See other Health Articles
Title: Why Cat Owners Should All Be Penalized
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/765972
Published: Jun 23, 2012
Author: Arthur L. Caplan, PhD
Post Date: 2012-06-23 02:23:31 by Tatarewicz
Keywords: None
Views: 270
Comments: 15
Hi. I'm Art Caplan, speaking to you from the Center for Bioethics at the University of Pennsylvania. Today I want to talk about a very serious healthcare problem: irresponsible behavior on the part of a lot of Americans that isn't getting much attention, and that means you if you own a cat. Many types of health costs are associated with cat ownership. We have allergies and asthma, people who wind up going to the hospital because they have allergic reactions either to the cat or the medicine they take, and there are all types of skin problems. The list goes on and on. It is pretty clear that these miserable mousers are a huge healthcare problem. I started thinking about this when I saw a recent poll that was published in Forbes magazine that said that most Americans believe that there ought to be a tax on people who are overweight. They make a lifestyle choice and wind up causing more healthcare costs for everybody else due to the diseases and ailments linked to obesity, so Americans think they should pay more. By the way, their employers are starting to think that as well, that they should start to levy penalties and fines on people who are overweight at the workplace. All of which takes me back to the issue of cats. If we are going to put a penalty on lifestyle choices, then shouldn't we penalize all lifestyle choices? If cats are really causing healthcare problems in the way that I think they do, then I think we need to be fair and tax cat owners. If you look at the situation, there are probably 60 million or more Americans who own a cat. A lot of you out there choose to own more than one. Many of you have a cat and you actually keep children in the house near this cat, so these are all horrible, terrible, inappropriate, and immoral decisions. Why? Well, we don't know exactly how much cat ownership costs, but it probably runs into billions of dollars every year in terms of allergy medicines that people take, hospitalizations that I mentioned earlier, and treating skin diseases. You are also exposing others who don't want to own a cat to cats because you can never get the cat dander and the cat allergen out of the rug, the furniture, and the carpet. Even if you move the cat, so to speak, the presence of the cat is left behind. This is a very burdensome thing, not just for people who live with cats but the rest of us who try to visit you or who want to move into a place where you have been. Therefore, it is pretty clear -- probably beyond any ethical dispute -- that cat ownership is an irresponsible choice. Let me add that none of this applies to dogs. I own a dog. I think they are wonderful. In fact, there probably should be a tax break for dog owners. But for cats, looking at the kinds of costs that are involved and the irresponsibility that cat owners exercise in choosing to have them, I think we need to start thinking more seriously about ways to extend penalties if we are going to make personal responsibility a part of healthcare. Cat owners, think hard about what I said. And those of you who are in favor of personal responsibility as a way to cut down healthcare costs, you know who I am talking about. This is Art Caplan at the Center for Bioethics at the University of Pennsylvania. I wish all of you a happy summer. Poster Comment: Wonder if these mousers, those not so lazy, might spread the Hanta virus?
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Tatarewicz (#0)
Ingenius. The taxes could go toward paying off the interest on the debt. Wonderful.
Apparently cats carry a virus or something that makes rats seek cats. It also makes male humans too paranoid and female humans not paranoid enough. This might explain coal burners. Our white sons are sent to war against non-whites who have done us no harm, and this is not called crime; Another insane socialist. I think we should tax holders of PhDs. They have destroyed our country meddling in other people's lives. Some of them can't even tie their own shoe laces but they are in positions of responsible, f---ing up the nation. They study abstract issues such as 'ethics' and think they should get to run everyone's life. Take your dog and stick it, Caplan. Meow
hahahaha
my sentiment exactly
I suspect that the piece is entirely tongue in cheek. Liberals are forever trying to penalize other people's behavior with which they disagree, but cats are a popular pet choice among them, or at least that is the perception.
My choice is no animals at all in the house. Dogs are actually worse than most cats when it comes to allergies and smell.
God is always good!
So was my response.
Not to mention that ear-splitting bow-wow-wowing/arf-arfing.
Yeh, me too. I am sticking with the XXXTrillion biotic cells in my body, not to mention the recent revelations that we all have 10 - 12 permanent and different colonies of Streapoccoci deeply rooted in out Tounges. OK for hummingbirds. Just doing the job they've been "trained" for to ward off burglars. You can preclude the barking when visiting a friend with a dog by bringing them a treat, then they never stop being affectionate.
Cat - haters sniff their fart bubbles in swimming pools and bath tubs. Ex-wives are far more disease ridden and rabid. Something definitely needs to be done about them. "The few who understand the [FEDERAL RESERVE] system will either be so interested in its profits or be so dependent upon its favours that there will be no opposition from that class, while on the other hand, the great body of people, mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous advantage that capital derives from the system, will bear its burdens without complaint, and perhaps without even suspecting that the system is inimical to their interests." The Rothschild brothers of London writing to associates in New York, 1863.
as coal burner I'd like to know what you mean. I'm not paranoid just very alert. I'm a cat lover so I could care less what somebody with some piled high and deep credential has to say about an animal they know nothing about. Some cat owners take better care of their cats than some dog owners I've known. That Caplan dude sounds like a real wussie. :(
"For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth, to know the worst, and to provide for it.” ~ Patrick Henry
#2. To: Tatarewicz (#0)
at home, non-white criminals prey upon our wives and daughters and this is not called war.
#3. To: Tatarewicz (#0)
#4. To: Prefrontal Vortex (#2)
#5. To: ratcat (#3)
Take your dog and stick it, Caplan.
#6. To: ratcat (#3)
#7. To: Tatarewicz (#0)
#8. To: Original_Intent (#6)
I suspect that the piece is entirely tongue in cheek.
#9. To: RickyJ (#7)
(Edited)
My choice is no animals at all in the house. Dogs are actually worse than most cats when it comes to allergies and smell.
#10. To: RickyJ (#7)
My choice is no animals at all in the house.
"Satan / Cheney in "08" 
#11. To: All (#10)
no animals at all in the house.
"Satan / Cheney in "08"
#12. To: ratcat (#9)
Not to mention that ear-splitting bow-wow-wowing/arf-arfing.
#13. To: Tatarewicz (#0)
(Edited)
#14. To: Prefrontal Vortex (#2)
This might explain coal burners.
If either Moromney or Mammyjammyobammy win the November (s)election peoples with common sense will pray that December 21 2012 will indeed be the end of the world!
#15. To: Tatarewicz (#0)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest