[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Editorial See other Editorial Articles Title: Glaxo's 'Massive' Fines Just Cost of Doing Business Glaxo's 'Massive' Fines Just Cost of Doing Business By Marek Fuchs 07/03/12 - 08:31 AM EDT Add Comment Stock quotes in this article:GSK Tweet NEW YORK (TheStreet) -- What's $3 billion: a ruinous amount or simply a few bucks between friends, the mere cost of doing business? More on GSK GlaxoSmithKline PLC (GSK): Today's Featured Health Care Winner GMO's Cautious Founder Finds Some Stocks to buy Real Money Previews Another Screen for Safe, Cheap Stocks This simple stock screen turns up names that will please a deep value investor. Kass: A Brief Bounce Today's rapid rally most likely will be short-lived. Two Basic-Materials Stocks on Sale Fund managers are shedding shares, and insiders are buying. That's the operative question when Glaxo(GSK_), or any other company -- think Johnson & Johnson(JNJ_), Merck(MRK_), Pfizer(PFE_) -- is fined for malpractices. In what The New York Times(NYT_) termed "the largest settlement involving a pharmaceutical company" (all those others have had to pay settlements in the last couple of years too, though this edges the previous fines out) Glaxo pleaded guilty to promoting a number of drugs, including antidepressants, for unapproved uses and failing to report safety data. As a trader, here's what you need to know: How much of a fix will this put Glaxo in, and will it impact the way drug companies do business? But the only way to answer this central question is to put Glaxo's fine into perspective. Too many media outlets don't even attempt it. NBC News, for example, ran a segment calling the fine "massive," but offering no sense of proportion. This makes the $3 billion (a lot to you and me) sounds onerous. The New York Times gave you the perspective you need: "Despite the large amount," The Times wrote, "$3 billion represents only a portion of what Glaxo made on the drugs. Avandia, for example, racked up $10.4 billion in sales, Paxil brought in $11.6 billion, and Wellbutrin sales were $5.9 billion during the years covered by the settlement." Put like that, it is clear: the fine will be rationalized as the cost of doing business and change little. >To order reprints of this article, click here: Reprints Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 1.
#1. To: tom007 (#0)
Anything less than 100% of net profit is 'just a cost of doing business.'
There are no replies to Comment # 1. End Trace Mode for Comment # 1.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||