See other Resistance Articles
Title: The US Military Industrial Complex Is More Dangerous Than Ever
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.businessinsider.com/the- ... tary-industrial-complex-2012-7
Published: Jul 6, 2012
Author: Bill Bonner, The Daily Reckoning
Post Date: 2012-07-06 09:46:34 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 138
Comments: 5
“Hey Bill,” writes a Dear Reader. “You are a sad excuse for a military analyst. You can criticize the military all you want, especially from your leftist headquarters in Paris. But when trouble comes, you’re going [to] wish you had US military forces to protect your sorry ass.” Hey Dear Reader, your editor replies, go f**… Never mind. You may be right. Maybe history doesn’t work now the way it used to. Our beat here is economics. But the US ‘security’ industry currently eats up about $1 trillion per year — which is a big part of the economy and an even bigger part of the federal budget. When we talk about an upsurge in manufacturing, for example, we are talking about an industry that is making 40% of its output for the Pentagon. And when we talk about an increase in the use of energy, we could mention the world’s biggest energy user — also the Pentagon. And when we calculate the US federal deficit we could remind ourselves that every penny of it is about what America’s ‘security’ agenda costs. Dear Readers will also recall that we are not the kind of economist you see on TV…the kind that wins a Nobel Prize with some elaborate mathematical proof of a proposition which is, on its face, preposterous. No, we are an old fashioned ‘literary’ economist…the kind that can barely do binomial equations, let alone calculus. What we are interested in is how the world works. And we notice that the world of military spending works just like the rest of the world. That is, it obeys the law of declining marginal utility. You can put more in…but you don’t necessarily get more out. But first, our dear reader above missed the point. First, we’re not criticizing the military. We’re not criticizing the uniform, that is; we’re criticizing the man in it. He will always do what comes naturally — when he can get away with it; he will aggrandize his own position at others’ expense. He is a lazy, foul, half-witted, opportunist…always trying to do the least work for the most reward possible. That is to say, he is just like the rest of us. Second, when the next real shooting war breaks out, we’re not likely to thank the Pentagon; we’re more likely to curse it. We’ll be sorry we spent so much money to produce such a fat, coddled and incompetent military industry. Why incompetent? Strategically, the proper job of a defense department is to defend the country… not to waste its resources stirring up trouble all over the world. It is meant to protect the nation against enemies, not create them. It is also incompetent in a tactical sense. So much money, time and effort is spent fighting make-believe enemies — ‘terrorists’ or ‘insurgents’ — that it will most likely lack the equipment and the know-how to fight a real one. We don’t have to know in detail how the US military will fail. Instead, we know that power and money corrupt…and enfeeble. You see, military power — like almost everything else you can mention in a family publication — is subject to the law of declining marginal utility…aka the law of diminishing returns. At some point, you can spend more…and get less. And when the real test comes, we predict, the US military will fail…it will be too corpulent, too slow, and too out-of-date to meet the challenge. Military preparedness probably reaches the point of declining marginal utility when the armed forces are able to mount a credible defense of the nation and its borders — and no more. Thereafter, “the military-industrial complex,” as Eisenhower called it, becomes too inwardly-focused…on promotions, on procedures, on procurement…too self-serving. In a real war, it is usually humbled by a faster, cheaper, more modern enemy. But it gets worse. A large, well-funded military is a tempting weapon. Keep it lying around, loaded…and someone is bound to get killed. After a while, the temptation to use a big army is irresistible. A large military is typically captured by the militarists, who want to use it for their own glory. At that point, the army is no longer an asset to the country it is meant to serve; it is a danger. It will enter into ruinous wars…turn against its own citizens…or both But why does the US security industry focus on phony enemies…and insignificant threats? Because it is looking out for Number One. It is being human. It is taking resources from the productive part of the economy and redistributing them to itself…with no benefit, other than the aforementioned aggrandizement of the military itself, along with its contractors, suppliers, and its pet politicians. The US military has more power and more money than any institution in the world. It has now been taken over by neo-con ideologues with their own crackpot agendas. It has the support of the American people and their government. We can imagine how this will turn out…badly! Read more: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/dailyreckoning/~3/vmF4i8q- 3YU/#ixzz1zqkDrRy3
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Ada (#0)
Since Ike was here, there has been one added ingredient. ...GMIC... GOVERNMENT, military, industrial complex.
Yes, at least a Trill. 1.2 T is my personal guess. Includes DOE etc. Hey C, it is said that Ike was going to say the political military industrial complex in the famous farewell address, but at the last moment a political aide got him to drop the political word out of his warnings.
Dont recall it at the time but would not doubt it. For myself, his biggest misstep was in piling on Joe McCarthy. That came after intense pressure by the Jews. Ike paid for his transgression in that his Son never went anywhere in the military.
MIC is dangerous only because government keeps ordering military hardware. Things would be different if instead of weaponry the same kind of money was spent on high-speed rail equipment.
Thereafter, “the military-industrial complex,” as Eisenhower called it
#2. To: Ada (#0)
But the US ‘security’ industry currently eats up about $1 trillion per year
"Satan / Cheney in "08" 
#3. To: Cynicom (#1)
"Satan / Cheney in "08"
#4. To: tom007 (#3)
Hey C, it is said that Ike was going to say the political military industrial complex
#5. To: Ada (#0)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest