[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Editorial See other Editorial Articles Title: Mitt’s Gray Areas Mitts Gray Areas By PAUL KRUGMAN Published: July 8, 2012 455 Comments Facebook Twitter Google+ Email Share Print Reprints Once upon a time a rich man named Romney ran for president. He could claim, with considerable justice, that his wealth was well-earned, that he had in fact done a lot to create good jobs for American workers. Nonetheless, the public understandably wanted to know both how he had grown so rich and what he had done with his wealth; he obliged by releasing extensive information about his financial history. Fred R. Conrad/The New York Times Paul Krugman Go to Columnist Page » Blog: The Conscience of a Liberal Related News Romney Mines the Hamptons for Campaign Cash (July 9, 2012) Times Topic: Mitt Romney Related in Opinion More on United States Elections » Opinion Twitter Logo. Connect With Us on Twitter For Op-Ed, follow @nytopinion and to hear from the editorial page editor, Andrew Rosenthal, follow @andyrNYT. Readers Comments Readers shared their thoughts on this article. Read All Comments (455) » But that was 44 years ago. And the contrast between George Romney and his son Mitt a contrast both in their business careers and in their willingness to come clean about their financial affairs dramatically illustrates how America has changed. Right now theres a lot of buzz about an investigative report in the magazine Vanity Fair highlighting the gray areas in the younger Romneys finances. More about that in a minute. First, however, lets talk about what it meant to get rich in George Romneys America, and how it compares with the situation today. What did George Romney do for a living? The answer was straightforward: he ran an auto company, American Motors. And he ran it very well indeed: at a time when the Big Three were still fixated on big cars and ignoring the rising tide of imports, Romney shifted to a highly successful focus on compacts that restored the companys fortunes, not to mention that it saved the jobs of many American workers. It also made him personally rich. We know this because during his run for president, he released not one, not two, but 12 years worth of tax returns, explaining that any one year might just be a fluke. From those returns we learn that in his best year, 1960, he made more than $660,000 the equivalent, adjusted for inflation, of around $5 million today. Those returns also reveal that he paid a lot of taxes 36 percent of his income in 1960, 37 percent over the whole period. This was in part because, as one report at the time put it, he seldom took advantage of loopholes to escape his tax obligations. But it was also because taxes on the rich were much higher in the 50s and 60s than they are now. In fact, once you include the indirect effects of taxes on corporate profits, taxes on the very rich were about twice current levels. Now fast-forward to Romney the Younger, who made even more money during his business career at Bain Capital. Unlike his father, however, Mr. Romney didnt get rich by producing things people wanted to buy; he made his fortune through financial engineering that seems in many cases to have left workers worse off, and in some cases driven companies into bankruptcy. And theres another contrast: George Romney was open and forthcoming about what he did with his wealth, but Mitt Romney has largely kept his finances secret. He did, grudgingly, release one years tax return plus an estimate for the next year, showing that he paid a startlingly low tax rate. But as the Vanity Fair report points out, were still very much in the dark about his investments, some of which seem very mysterious. Put it this way: Has there ever before been a major presidential candidate who had a multimillion-dollar Swiss bank account, plus tens of millions invested in the Cayman Islands, famed as a tax haven? And then theres his Individual Retirement Account. I.R.A.s are supposed to be a tax-advantaged vehicle for middle-class savers, with annual contributions limited to a few thousand dollars a year. Yet somehow Mr. Romney ended up with an account worth between $20 million and $101 million. There are legitimate ways that could have happened, just as there are potentially legitimate reasons for parking large sums of money in overseas tax havens. But we dont know which if any of those legitimate reasons apply in Mr. Romneys case because he has refused to release any details about his finances. This refusal to come clean suggests that he and his advisers believe that voters would be less likely to support him if they knew the truth about his investments. And that is precisely why voters have a right to know that truth. Elections are, after all, in part about the perceived character of the candidates and what a man does with his money is surely a major clue to his character. One more thing: To the extent that Mr. Romney has a coherent policy agenda, it involves cutting tax rates on the very rich which are already, as I said, down by about half since his fathers time. Surely a man advocating such policies has a special obligation to level with voters about the extent to which he would personally benefit from the policies he advocates. Yet obviously thats something Mr. Romney doesnt want to do. And unless he does reveal the truth about his investments, we can only assume that hes hiding something seriously damaging. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
#1. To: All (#0)
Free market capitalism, if ya don't like it move to red China and live with the rest of the commies. I remember this. AMC was based in Kenosha, Wisconsin. ;) "When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke
|
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|