[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Man Identifies as Cat to Cop his video made her stop consuming sugar. Shot And Bothered - Restored Classic Coyote & Road Runner Looney Tunes Cartoon 1966 How to Prove the Holocaust is a Hoax in Under 2 Minutes ..And The Legacy Media Wonders Why Nobody Trusts Them "The Time For Real Change Is Now!" - Conor McGregor Urges Irish To Lobby Councillors For Presidential Bid Daniela Cambone: Danger Not Seen in 40+ Years Tucker Carlson: Whistleblower Exposes the Real Puppet Masters Controlling the State Department Democrat nominee for NJ Governor, says that she will push an LGBTQ agenda in schools and WILL NOT allow parents to opt out. Holy SH*T, America's blood supply is tainted with mRNA Thomas Massie's America First : A Documentary by Tom Woods & Dan Smotz Kenvue Craters On Report RFK Jr To Link Autism To Tylenol Use In Pregnancy All 76 weapons at China 2025 military parade explained. 47 are brand new. Chef: Strategy for Salting Steaks 'Dangerous' Chagas disease confirmed in California, raising concerns for Bay Area MICROPLASTICS ARE LINKED TO HEART DISEASE; HERE'S HOW TO LOWER YOUR RISK This Scholar PREDICTED the COLLAPSE of America 700 years ago I Got ChatGPT To Admit Its Antichrist Purpose "The CIA is inside Venezuela right now" Col Macgregor says regime change is coming Caroline Kennedy’s son, Jack Schlossberg, mulling a run. Florida Surgeon General Nukes ALL School Vaxx Mandates, Likens Them to Slavery Doc on High Protein Diet. Try for more plant based protein. ICE EMPTIES Amazon Warehouse… Prime Orders HALTED as ‘Migrant Workforce’ REMOVED Trump to ask SCOTUS to reverse E. Jean Carroll sex-abuse verdict Wary Of Gasoline Shortage, California Pauses Price-Gouging Penalty On Oil Companies Jewish activist Barbara Lerner Spectre calls for the destruction of European The Democrats Are Literally Making Stuff Up! Turn Dead Dirt Into Living Soil With IMO 4 Michael Knowles: Trump & Israel, Candace Owens, and Why Christianity Is Booming Despite the Attacks Save Canada's Ostrich Farms! Protests Erupt Over Government Tyranny in Canada

Ron Paul
See other Ron Paul Articles

Title: Ron Paul: I ‘Have Not’ Decided If I'll Vote for Romney
Source: .
URL Source: http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politic ... ecided-if-ill-vote-for-romney/
Published: Jul 20, 2012
Author: .
Post Date: 2012-07-20 16:09:20 by Artisan
Keywords: None
Views: 1180
Comments: 49

Ron Paul, who is still technically running for the Republican nomination, says he has not decided whether or not he’ll vote for Mitt Romney.

“I have not made a decision,” Paul told Fox Business Network’s Liz Claman and David Asman.

When asked what he thinks about Romney as a candidate for president, Paul responded, “Compared to whom? He certainly offers different things than the current president. But the current conditions make it rough for anyone. They are going to have a very though job.”

Paul and Romney reportedly struck up a friendly rapport on the campaign trail, The New York Times noted in February.

Continue reading at ABC News

Poster Comment:

bwahahahaha!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 48.

#1. To: Artisan (#0)

It's becoming apparent that RP isn't the man many people thought he was.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-07-20   16:17:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

It's becoming apparent that RP isn't the man many people thought he was.

He has proven to be the man I knew him to be.

Ron Paul for President.

carenotus  posted on  2012-07-22   12:21:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

He has proven to be the man I knew him to be.

Lot of people wish they knew more about him, sooner, saved a lot of money from going down a black hole.

Cynicom  posted on  2012-07-22   18:25:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Lot of people wish they knew more about him, sooner, saved a lot of money from going down a black hole.

You shouldn't donate to any candidates.

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-07-23   0:40:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

You shouldn't donate to any candidates.

Any particular reason why "you" should not donate????

Cynicom  posted on  2012-07-23   3:13:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

You shouldn't donate to any candidates.

Any particular reason why "you" should not donate????

I wasn't talking about "you" meaning people in general, even though I don't think our Founders intended for any of our elections to be bought as they are. I meant you -- Cynicom -- shouldn't donate to any candidates. Ron Paul did nothing in his 2008 run or now to warrant your Shylockian/Merchant of Venice impersonation as if you were owed a "pound of flesh" from him and his support base for whatever the amount was of your supposed "contribution". Surely he wouldn't even have wanted it under those conditions.

Ron Paul was not a Congressman when he resigned from the Republican Party in 1987 to run for President the first time as a Libertarian. In his 2008 run, his constituents had elected him to office as a Republican and he had a responsibility to represent them as the Republican they voted for, despite all the other politicians who care nothing of that responsibility to their voters and switch parties for their own benefit after gaining office party-pretentiously. Apparently, his representation responsibility to his district and their opportunity to send him to Congress again should have been discarded, in your opinion, to give you your "money's worth" with a third party Presidential run in '08 but, in order to gain ballot access in certain states, he had agreed then not to run Third Party. I'm not sure but that might not be the case this time [Edit to add: and he doesn't have to run for Congress again, so maybe he will consider a 2012 Third Party]. He only had 14 pledged delegates and 34 estimated delegates at the end of the '08 GOP race but stayed in it until it was over and I was still able to vote for him in my State to be President. I don't consider it a wasted vote. I think everybody who didn't vote for him wasted their vote for more corruption.

Is America, its misused Military, the Constitution and Liberty Revolution, and even this forum's atmosphere better for your Shylockian campaign against Ron Paul? I don't think so and don't understand it but you seem to delight in it. Says more about you, though, than it does about Ron Paul.

Edited for spelling, spacing, bracketed insert in paragraph two and to reword a sentence there after it.

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-07-23   13:24:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I meant you -- Cynicom -- shouldn't donate to any candidates.

Now that is personal.

After Ron Paul took us to the cleaners in 2008, I stopped donating until 2010 when I donated to Art Robinson, from Oregon.

At that time I took up helping deserving kids with college tuition. a lot more rewarding than giving to false pied pipers.

Cynicom  posted on  2012-07-23   14:26:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I meant you -- Cynicom -- shouldn't donate to any candidates.

Now that is personal.

Yes, it is personal. If I wanted to talk to the wall, I don't have to come here to do it. Am I the only one you expect to not address you personally about your personal Anti-Ron Paul campaign? -- or just anyone and everyone who is critical of it, as if you have some special dispensation from unfavorable commentary on your actions? What does that remind me of? A four letter word that begins with a "J" and ends with an "s".

After Ron Paul took us to the cleaners in 2008,

He didn't and he wasn't running a horse race, either, on orders that he be sent to a glue-factory if he didn't win for you and your investment. Your Ron Paul hostility is unfounded. iirc, it began when a media outlet refused to run a campaign ad for him that you and this 4um tried to arrange and was slow to refund the money for it. That wasn't Ron Paul's fault and it wasn't his fault that the nomination went to McCain -- undoubtedly due to the same sort of Party and media riggings that we and the world have seen run against Ron Paul this time. As I said before, he agreed for '08 to not run Third Party in order to gain ballot access in certain States. He also had a responsibility to continue representing his constituents as a Republican. Evidently, that means nothing to you. Why not?

Edited last sentence of paragraph 1.

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-07-23   15:51:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Does the possibility ever enter your mind that just perhaps Ron Paul was not serious about running for president?

After the Trotski memo, there were many Paul supporters that dropped their support and accepted what Paul wrote as the gospel.

Pauls actions have been consistent for years now, it is past time to accept him at his word and find someone else to support or withdraw from the system.

Cynicom  posted on  2012-07-23   16:04:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#49. To: Cynicom (#48)

After the Trotski memo, there were many Paul supporters that dropped their support and accepted what Paul wrote as the gospel.

We've discussed the so-called "Trotsky memo" before.

Ron Paul 2008: Message from Ron

Quote what your complaint is about. He said, "this Revolution is permanent." He noted that Trosky had also said that about the Russian Revolution, so as not to plagiarize the statement. So what? He then said of his own Revolution and ours: "It will not end at the Republican convention. It will not end in November. It will not end until we have won the great battle on which we have embarked. Not because of me, but because of you. Millions of Americans -- and friends in many other countries -- have dedicated themselves to the principles of liberty:" He talked of his own "determination to fight on, in every caucus and primary remaining, and at the convention for our ideas, with just as many delegates as I can get." He said, "with so many primaries and caucuses now over, we do not now need so big a national campaign staff, and so I am making it leaner and tighter." He explained that he was "committed to fighting for our ideas within the Republican party, so there will be no third party run." I've explained that he had agreed not to run third party to get ballot access in certain states. He explained, too, that he had "another priority": "I have constituents in my home district that I must serve. I cannot and will not let them down. And I have another battle I must face here as well. If I were to lose the primary for my congressional seat, all our opponents would react with glee, and pretend it was a rejection of our ideas. I cannot and will not let that happen." I also have explained that he had a responsibility to his constituents to represent them as the Republican they voted for and to continue representing the Constitution for them and all of us, if he could, which would have been jeopardized by switching parties then. The situation is somewhat different now if he chooses to run third party, since he doesn't have to run for Congressional re-election, but he still has a responsibility to represent his constituents in his district as a Republican for the remainder of his term.

Anyone who dropped their support over any of that wasn't seriously a supporter, imo.

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-07-27 04:24:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]