See other (s)Elections Articles
Title: Veep Pick Paul Ryan Is No Conservative
Source:
The New American Magazine
URL Source: http://thenewamerican.com/usnews/po ... k-paul-ryan-is-no-conservative
Published: Aug 12, 2012
Author: Jack Kenny
Post Date: 2012-08-12 15:11:38 by hondo68
Keywords: backed "Government Motors", Omnibus Appropriations 2012, NDAA, TARP, Patriot Act, support of big-spending
Views: 929
Comments: 47
No sooner had Mitt Romney's choice of Paul Ryan as his running mate become known than the world of punditry was abuzz with talk of "Ryanmania." Since mania is by definition an excessive or unreasonable enthusiasm, the label may be regarded as an understatement.For while the seven-term Republican congressman from Wisconsin and chairman of the House Budget Committee is not yet a household name across America, he does generate excitement within the "conservative movement," an excitement and enthusiasm that suggests the talking heads at Fox News and the dot.com warriors at The Weekly Standard have no more sense of conservative, constitutional government than the cheering chanting crowd of Republican partisans who greeted the vice presidential hopeful in Norfolk, Virginia, Saturday morning. Like him or not, the one thing politically aware Americans are supposed to know about Paul Ryan is that he is a fiscal conservative, a bold budget hawk. He is, after all, the prime author of the House budget plan (titled "the Path to Prosperity") to repeal the Obama health insurance program ("ObamaCare"), turn the Medicaid program for low-income Americans over to the states and create a private insurance option for Medicare beneficiaries starting in 2023. The plan would also turn food stamps and other federal programs for the poor into block grants to the states, with limits on the growth of those programs. If Republican voters have any doubts about Ryan's commitment to budget austerity, they need only hear the Democrats' outcry that Ryan's "Path to Prosperity" will be a road to the poorhouse for elderly and low-income Americans. But on the other side of the ledger, Ryan's voting record shows a robust support of big-spending programs to enlarge the role of the federal government, especially when they are promoted by a Republican in the White House. Ryan voted for all of the big-ticket, budget-busting items of the administration of President George W. Bush, including the No Child Left Behind Act and the prescription drug benefit known as Medicare Part D, often described as the largest expansion of the welfare state since Lyndon Johnson's Great Society. Ryan voted to create the new Department of Homeland Security, including the Transportation Security Administration that has harassed air travelers, while making aircraft safe from shoes, belt buckles and grandma's knitting needles. He voted for the PATRIOT Act, giving government enhanced powers for warrantless snooping into the lives of American citizens as well as foreign nationals. Ryan voted for the Troubled Assets Relief Program that bailed out the "too big to fail" financial institutions and inspired the Tea Party rebellion against big government and "crony capitalism." He backed the auto bailout that turned GM into "Government Motors." And while conservatives generally like to leave wars and military spending off the list of costly "big government" programs, Ryan's record on that front is also troubling. Like Romney, Ryan has no foreign policy credentials and no record of military service to point to in the election campaign. And like Romney, Ryan swallowed whole the Bush-Cheney line on Iraq and supported the decision to invade and occupy that country in a needless war that cost more than 4,000 American and hundreds of thousands Iraqi lives and has added roughly a trillion dollars to our soaring national debt. Ryan's budget calls for no reduction in military spending, despite the continued presence of U.S. troops in some 130 countries around the world, most of which have no bearing on our own national security. Even more troubling is Ryan's vote last December in favor of the National Defense Authorization Act. The legislation included a provision authorizing the President to use the military to arrest suspected terrorists, including American citizens apprehended in the United States, and hold them indefinitely, without charges and without trial, in clear violation of due process rights guaranteed by the Constitution. This year Ryan voted against an amendment to remove that provision from the law. Ryan did vote against reauthorization of the Export-Import Bank, which grants loans and loan guarantees to foreign governments and businesses for the purchase of U.S. products. But his vote last year for the $915 billion Omnibus Appropriations Bill for 2012 went to support further spending on housing, education, foreign aid, and other programs for which there is no constitutional role for the federal government. On The New American magazine's latest Freedom Index, matching congressional votes with the strictures of the Constitution, Ryan's rating for the 112th Congress to date was an anemic 67 percent. Paul Ryan is, in short, a typical Bush-era Republican, whose selection as a vice presidential candidate is being trumpeted as a triumph by many of the same Republicans who are doing their best to flush the administration of George W. Bush down the memory hole. Republican candidates almost never invoke the Bush name and the most recent Republican President will not be attending the party's convention in Tampa, where Romney and Ryan are expected to be officially nominated. Chances the name of the 43rd President will be mentioned in rare fleeting reference, if at all. Yet in his choice of running mate, Romney has chosen a loyal Bush Republican and reliable supporter of the programs and policies that made the Bush administration an anathema to genuine conservatives and an embarrassment to the nation. Finally, the Ryan budget, while including a number of unspecified cuts in entitlement programs, would push overall spending higher than current levels. Despite its optimistic revenue projections, the Congressional Budget Office projects the Ryan plan will lead to a balanced budget by 2040.That suggests a rousing slogan for the Romney-Ryan ticket: "Slightly Less Socialism And A Balanced Budget in 28 Years." Poster Comment: Just another big gov progressive like Obama and W. Mitt. 
Paul Ryan's first choice for a running mate?
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 44.
#17. To: hondo68, Turtle, F.A. Hayek Fan, X-15, scrapper2, Itistoolate, noone222, Prefrontal Vortex (#0)
Ryan only scores 60% on the Freedom Index. He voted to continue paying UN dues. Extended the Patriot Act. Voted against withdrawal from Libya and voted to keep funding action there. Voted to raise the debt limit. voted in another NAFTA like trade agreement with Korea. voted in favor of the Omnibus Appropriations bill. voted in favor of the line item veto which violates the separation of powers. Voted in favor of the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA). and voted in favor of indefinite detention in the NDAA.
Hey, you don't need to convince me of Ryan's warts. But do you think he's as bad or worse than Obama? I firmly believe there is NOTHING as bad or worse than 4 more years of the CommunistInChief. But we are all free to make that choice in November. I am voting against Obama. Staying home is not an option for me, because that's a vote for Obama and the Alinsky crowd. As I recall you are/were a state employee. Maybe a pro-union Obama is better for you and your family. I pass no judgement. We all do what we need to do.
that's what the global elites want you to think so you will keep voting lesser of two evils and voting for their puppets "that can win" like that is more important than the policies they push. stop and think about it. who was better or worse for this country? Nixon who gave us the EPA and affirmative action or Carter who gave us the energy dept. If your didn't already know, could you tell from that who had the D and who had the R? who was worse? Bush for giving us the Patriot Act or Obama who gave us Obama care based on Romney care? who has the Ds and who has the Rs. They are all puppets pushing an agenda that does not favor the American public or constitutional freedoms.
What you're telling me is not news to me. I know everything there is to know about puppets and global elites etc etc. I used to post here long before you started. I am not voting against Obama because I don't know the drill. ok? So please don't lecture me as tho I'm a dummy and you're an enlightened genius. Previously I wrote in Ron Paul. But after 4 hellish years of Obama in the WH, I am voting against Obama. This is the way I want to go. You vote whatever you want. I've said before. I don't agree with how you will vote. I don't think voting Libertarian is any better an answer than what I'm planning to do. Even Ron Paul doesn't run as a Libertarian because he knows that America is a 2 party system. And he has chosen to stay with the party that he thinks is closer to what he believes in. He has said he is trying to save the GOP from itself. Ron Paul has made a choice of lesser evil rather than trying to run with a party, the Libertarians, that is not viable. We do what we need to do.
not what I was doing. sorry you took it that way.
#45. To: farmfriend (#44)
OK. Sorry for misunderstanding your remarks.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#18. To: farmfriend (#17)
#35. To: scrapper2 (#18)
I firmly believe there is NOTHING as bad or worse than 4 more years of the CommunistInChief.
#37. To: farmfriend (#35)
(Edited)
They are all puppets pushing an agenda that does not favor the American public or constitutional freedoms.
#44. To: scrapper2 (#37)
So please don't lecture me as tho I'm a dummy and you're an enlightened genius.
Replies to Comment # 44.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 44.