[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Cash Jordan: Angry Voters Go “Shelter To Shelter”... EMPTYING 13 Migrant Hotels In 2 Hours

Israel targets Hamas leadership in attack on Qatar’s Doha, group says no members killed

Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said on Monday that villages in the Israeli-occupied West Bank should look like cities in Gaza

FBI Arrests 22 Chinese, 4 Pharma Companies, Preventing Disaster That Could Kill 70 Million Americans

911 Make Believe

New CLARITY Act Draft Could Shield Crypto Developers From Past Liability

Chicago Builds a Wall To Protect Illegal ALiens From Ice

Sens. Scott, Johnson Launch Investigation into Palisades Fire; Demand Newsom's Cooperation

"Go Talk To Bill Gates About Me": How JP Morgan Enabled Jeffrey Epstein's Crimes, Snagged Netanyahu Meeting

Cash Jordan: Looters EMPTY Chicago Mall... as Mayor's 'No Arrests' Policy BACKFIRES

Caitlin Johnstone: They Just Bombed Greta Thunberg's Boat

Democrats MELTDOWN Over RFK Jr.

Bill Gates, Truth About Vaccines, & Big Pharma’s Plot to Destroy Doctors Who Question ”The Science”

Supreme Court upholds 'roving patrols' for immigration stops in Los Angeles

MN Gunman’s Pot Use Is Further Evidence Against Rescheduling Marijuana

Intense Exercise is Best

New Cars Are George Orwell 1984 Compliant

PEGASUS EVENT 201

Over Half Of Berlin's New Police Recruits Can't Speak Basic German, Officials Admit

Thomas Massie NAMES Epstein as a CIA and Israeli Asset

How Chickens See the World (Its CRAZIER Than You Think)

You remember TommyTheMadArtist?

Joe Rogan on the Belgian Malinois

Democrat New Mexico Governor Admits National Guard Making Progress In High-Crime Albuquerque

Florida banning vaccine mandates

To Prevent Strokes, Take Potassium.

Lawyer for Epstein VICTIMS Shares Details Trump FEARED THE MOST

WW3? French Hospitals Told To Prepare For A "Major Military Engagement" Within Six Months

The Zionist Experiment Is Over

Sen. Tim Kaine: ‘Extremely Troubling’ to Say Natural Rights Are from God


Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: An Unserious Man
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/20/o ... man-an-unserious-man.html?_r=1
Published: Aug 20, 2012
Author: By PAUL KRUGMAN
Post Date: 2012-08-20 13:34:49 by tom007
Keywords: None
Views: 235
Comments: 3

An Unserious Man By PAUL KRUGMAN Published: August 19, 2012 832 Comments

Mitt Romney’s choice of Paul Ryan as his running mate led to a wave of pundit accolades. Now, declared writer after writer, we’re going to have a real debate about the nation’s fiscal future. This was predictable: never mind the Tea Party, Mr. Ryan’s true constituency is the commentariat, which years ago decided that he was the Honest, Serious Conservative, whose proposals deserve respect even if you don’t like him. Fred R. Conrad/The New York Times

Paul Krugman Go to Columnist Page » Blog: The Conscience of a Liberal Related

Both Campaigns Seize Role of Medicare Defender (August 19, 2012)

Related in Opinion

Editorial: Truth and Lies About Medicare (August 19, 2012) Op-Ed Columnist: Dark Road to the White House (August 18, 2012) Op-Ed Contributor: Paul Ryan’s Fairy-Tale Budget Plan (August 14, 2012) More on United States Elections »

Opinion Twitter Logo. Connect With Us on Twitter

For Op-Ed, follow @nytopinion and to hear from the editorial page editor, Andrew Rosenthal, follow @andyrNYT. Readers’ Comments

Readers shared their thoughts on this article.

Read All Comments (832) »

But he isn’t and they don’t. Ryanomics is and always has been a con game, although to be fair, it has become even more of a con since Mr. Ryan joined the ticket.

Let’s talk about what’s actually in the Ryan plan, and let’s distinguish in particular between actual, specific policy proposals and unsupported assertions. To focus things a bit more, let’s talk — as most budget discussions do — about what’s supposed to happen over the next 10 years.

On the tax side, Mr. Ryan proposes big cuts in tax rates on top income brackets and corporations. He has tried to dodge the normal process in which tax proposals are “scored” by independent auditors, but the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center has done the math, and the revenue loss from these cuts comes to $4.3 trillion over the next decade.

On the spending side, Mr. Ryan proposes huge cuts in Medicaid, turning it over to the states while sharply reducing funding relative to projections under current policy. That saves around $800 billion. He proposes similar harsh cuts in food stamps, saving a further $130 billion or so, plus a grab-bag of other cuts, such as reduced aid to college students. Let’s be generous and say that all these cuts would save $1 trillion.

On top of this, Mr. Ryan includes the $716 billion in Medicare savings that are part of Obamacare, even though he wants to scrap everything else in that act. Despite this, Mr. Ryan has now joined Mr. Romney in denouncing President Obama for “cutting Medicare”; more on that in a minute.

So if we add up Mr. Ryan’s specific proposals, we have $4.3 trillion in tax cuts, partially offset by around $1.7 trillion in spending cuts — with the tax cuts, surprise, disproportionately benefiting the top 1 percent, while the spending cuts would primarily come at the expense of low-income families. Over all, the effect would be to increase the deficit by around two and a half trillion dollars.

Yet Mr. Ryan claims to be a deficit hawk. What’s the basis for that claim?

Well, he says that he would offset his tax cuts by “base broadening,” eliminating enough tax deductions to make up the lost revenue. Which deductions would he eliminate? He refuses to say — and realistically, revenue gain on the scale he claims would be virtually impossible.

At the same time, he asserts that he would make huge further cuts in spending. What would he cut? He refuses to say.

What Mr. Ryan actually offers, then, are specific proposals that would sharply increase the deficit, plus an assertion that he has secret tax and spending plans that he refuses to share with us, but which will turn his overall plan into deficit reduction.

If this sounds like a joke, that’s because it is. Yet Mr. Ryan’s “plan” has been treated with great respect in Washington. He even received an award for fiscal responsibility from three of the leading deficit-scold pressure groups. What’s going on?

The answer, basically, is a triumph of style over substance. Over the longer term, the Ryan plan would end Medicare as we know it — and in Washington, “fiscal responsibility” is often equated with willingness to slash Medicare and Social Security, even if the purported savings would be used to cut taxes on the rich rather than to reduce deficits. Also, self-proclaimed centrists are always looking for conservatives they can praise to showcase their centrism, and Mr. Ryan has skillfully played into that weakness, talking a good game even if his numbers don’t add up.

The question now is whether Mr. Ryan’s undeserved reputation for honesty and fiscal responsibility can survive his participation in a deeply dishonest and irresponsible presidential campaign.

The first sign of trouble has already surfaced over the issue of Medicare. Mr. Romney, in an attempt to repeat the G.O.P.’s successful “death panels” strategy of the 2010 midterms, has been busily attacking the president for the same Medicare savings that are part of the Ryan plan. And Mr. Ryan’s response when this was pointed out was incredibly lame: he only included those cuts, he says, because the president put them “in the baseline,” whatever that means. Of course, whatever Mr. Ryan’s excuse, the fact is that without those savings his budget becomes even more of a plan to increase, not reduce, the deficit.

So will the choice of Mr. Ryan mean a serious campaign? No, because Mr. Ryan isn’t a serious man — he just plays one on TV.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: tom007 (#0)

Krugman is a WaffenCrank and should be permanently banned from economics.

I sense a disturbance in the farce. Much gnashing will ensue.

Turtle  posted on  2012-08-21   9:53:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Turtle (#1)

Krugman is a WaffenCrank and should be permanently banned from economics.

Are you crazy or do you do this for fun?

"Satan / Cheney in "08" Just Foreign Policy Iraqi Death Estimator

tom007  posted on  2012-08-21   21:34:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: tom007 (#2)

Are you crazy or do you do this for fun?

I am totally serious. Krugman does not understand economics.

I sense a disturbance in the farce. Much gnashing will ensue.

Turtle  posted on  2012-08-21   23:17:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]