[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Dead Constitution See other Dead Constitution Articles Title: What Does Liberty Really Mean to You? Part II [As I mentioned yesterday], freedom to come and go is the core principle of my personal liberty. What else? Well, part of that freedom has to do with personal finances. Namely, you can have all the liberty in the world, but if you don’t have the money necessary to actually travel, you probably aren’t going to get very far... at least not in a fashion you might enjoy. While there are countries such as North Korea where the government makes accumulating any wealth almost impossible (unless you are part of the dictator’s inner circle), in most of the world, this aspect of life — call it “financial freedom” — has far more to do with a person’s willingness to work hard than anything else. That said, I readily acknowledge that governments everywhere are a constant weight on the entrepreneur’s back. Yet, simply looking at the facts as they are, I personally know dozens of people, here in the US — and in places like Argentina, where the government makes doing business an order of magnitude more difficult — who, through their own creativity and exertions, are fabulously successful. Despite the government’s meddling, financial freedom is imminently attainable for individuals who focus on their work and who put in steady efforts at increasing their personal knowledge (including learning how to handle your money, once you have some). Of course, succeeding may not be easy... it rarely is, though it can be. While I’m sure there are additional nuances to my personal definition of liberty that I could mention, the big point is that as long as I am free to come and go as I please and have the capability to build the wealth I need to do so, then I have pretty much all the liberty I need to enjoy my limited lifetime on this planet. After all, with those two conditions in place, if one place becomes too unfree for my taste, I can move on. “Wait a second!” some of you may find yourselves thinking indignantly. What about the wholesale trampling of the US Constitution in recent decades? What about the militarization of the domestic police force here in the US? What about the loss of freedom in the Land of the Free? I might respond with a sad shake of the head and by mouthing words such as “tragic,” or “damn shame,” or even “it’s outrageous, criminal even.” And there’s no question it’s all of those things and more. The idea of America in its youth was amazing, especially considering the era in which it was birthed. But that idea has been so diluted at this point to be almost meaningless... here in the United States. And therein lies the importance of being able to travel freely. You see, unlike many, I refuse to define myself by the artificial borders that were determined solely by an accident of birth. Why should I? Do I relate to the idea of America? Of course; what thinking person wouldn’t? But during these philosophical Dark Ages for freedom in the United States, what practical purpose does clinging onto that idea serve? To use an overused comparison, what practical purpose would it have served for the head of a Jewish family during Hitler’s Germany to stand on a street corner handing out anti-Nazi pamphlets? The obvious answer is “none.” It would have just resulted in the ultimate loss of liberty — his death and likely that of everyone he loved. Personally, I look at the Americans and I see a people who have been very effectively brainwashed, or who simply have given in to the entirely human tendency to shuffle unquestioningly onto the path of least resistance and let themselves go. I see a people who, on a wholesale basis, have consciously or unconsciously decided to trade the idea of America for the false security of a totalitarian state. While there are voices in the woods, such as Ron Paul, that warn of the consequences, I’m trying to focus today on hard realities. And the hard reality is that if you were to assemble all 300 million US citizens in an auditorium to listen to well-presented arguments for less vs. more government and then ask for a show of hands, the vast majority would raise their hands in favor of the current system that has the state deeply involved in pretty much every aspect of the economy and society at large. Skeptical? Then ask yourself what percentage of the audience would raise their hands in favor if asked the following: “How many of you want Social Security to remain intact?” “How many think the government should subsidize health care?” “How many think the rich should pay more taxes?” Or ask your questions in the negative, and watch how few hands stick in the air. “How many of you think the Food and Drug Administration should be abolished?” “How many of you think recreational drugs, including cocaine and heroin, should be legalized?” “How many of you think the Department of Education should be shuttered?” “How many of you think that the tax credit for mortgages should be canceled?” At the end of the exercise, the level of support for the very same tangled body of state-controlled handouts, regulations and central economic planning now choking the last gasps of life out of the body politic would be obvious and overwhelming. The practical point I am trying to make here is that the champions of liberty (COL) are fighting against a very entrenched and increasingly dangerous public mindset. Some like to hearken back to the days of the revolution when prominent men in the community risked it all to overthrow the British. I would contend that the situation today is totally different. Then it was a foreign enemy daily adding salt to the open wound of what was essentially an occupation by marching troops around and passing highly unpopular and often arbitrarily punitive laws. Today the enemy (of true freedom) is within. In fact, the nation is overrun by them... they dominate in most every community, in most businesses and even in most families. And your fellow citizens don’t want what the COL are selling. Sure, there are a fair number — for instance, members of the Tea Party — who might be sympathetic on a largely abstract level, but drill down into the specifics by asking questions such as those above and you’ll quickly find just how far off the grid you are. So what’s the point? 1. Face the facts — free no more. Contrary to popular delusions, the United States is no longer the Land of the Free — either in terms of its judicial system or its market structure. Rather, it is the land of the paranoid, the state-dependent, supporters of Guantanamo and permawar... with the highest incarceration rates in the world, militarized police and... and... and... That said, it’s also the land of the convenient shopping, relatively inexpensive food and housing and trains that run on time. Provided you pay attention not to trip over the big legal no-nos, you can enjoy a very high standard of living (though, in fairness, that’s true of most of the world). If, on the other hand, you don’t think you can stay out of trouble here or in any country whose government is becoming a danger to residents, then go somewhere else. Or, to quote my friend and partner Doug Casey, “Stop thinking like a serf.” 2. Define what it is you want from your life. And I am speaking about this life, not some promised afterlife. Do you really want to put yourself on the front line of a battle that the vast majority of the populace wouldn’t support you in? If the answer is “yes,” that you are willing to lose your liberty — the ability to travel freely — in support of the cause, then I can only wish you well. I hope at the end of your life, which in the US could come quicker than you’d like, you’ll have found satisfaction and purpose in the struggle. Just be sure you are clear on your objectives and are willing to accept the consequences. Of course, I’ll continue to support the champions of liberty here in the US, even though I think they are tilting against windmills for the most part. And I will almost certainly find occasion to speak against the totalitarian tide myself, albeit in terms sufficiently tame to avoid leading to a loss of my liberty. Far more important, as it relates to my personal liberty, I’ll continue the process of diversifying my life between political jurisdictions so that if and when things in my native country become unbearably oppressive — and therefore an active risk to my ability to freely go about my business — I can bid it goodbye. Call me a coward, but in my view it’s far better to switch than to fight, especially when the vast majority of my fellow citizens wouldn’t know the true meaning of freedom if you served it to them on a silver plate. Regards, David Galland Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Tatarewicz (#0)
(Edited)
The right to keep AND bear arms, with no interference from outside authorities. According to Obummer, he wantrs the U.N. to control our guns. That will never happen. Too many guys and gals with hunting rifles and camoflage. ;) "When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke
|
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||