[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: How 9/11 Was Done
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://physics911.net/how-911-was-done/
Published: Sep 3, 2012
Author: http://physics911.net/how-911-was-done/
Post Date: 2012-09-03 14:09:24 by tom007
Keywords: None
Views: 13161
Comments: 674

How 9/11 Was Done

For additional notes see the accompanying blog 911notes.blogspot.com. Prologue

Read the following two screens of text to learn what happened at 9/11.

9/11 was a master plot, concocted by a handfull of Israelis and dual passport Americans and carried out by the resources of the Mossad.

Larry Silverstein leases a nearly worthless dinosaur WTC building complex (worthless due to the asbestos the buildings were stuffed with and needed to be cleaned up, the cost of which may have rivaled the value of the buildings themselves) weeks before 9/11, makes sure it is over insured against terrorist acts and hires an Israeli security firm. From that moment on the coast is clear to let a team of demolition experts from the Israeli army led by Peer Segalovitz into the WTC buildings. These charges plus detonators had been prepared at the premises of the Urban Moving Systems company, a Mossad front. During the weeks before 9/11 these prepared charges were loaded into vans, driven into the basements of WTC Twin Towers next to the elevator shaft, unloaded into the elevator, and lifted onto the roof of the elevator through the opening in the elevator ceiling. Next the elevator moved from floor to floor while charges where being attached to the columns as displayed in this video from 0:22 onwards. The detonators of these charges were radiographic controlled and finally detonated from WTC7 on the day of 9/11.

Fast backward, Hamburg 54 Marienstrasse, july 2000, 22:40. Mohamed Atta, Al Shehhi and Jarrah (who were later blamed of being the pilots of flight 11, 175 and 93 respectively), who share the apartment hear the ringing of the door bell. Jarrah opens the door, 5 masked men make their way into the apartment with drawn pistols. The 3 Arabs are forced to lay on the ground. Their passports are confiscated, next the 3 men are made unconscious with some liquid and strangled to death afterwards. The bodies are carried out of the apartment into a van and driven off towards a desolate spot at the boarding of the Elbe river outside Hamburg, 1 kilometer north of Borstel and disposed of into the river with a bag filled with stones tied to their feet. The 3 passports are now in the possession of the agents of the Mossad, who carried out the raid on the apartment and 3 Arabs have vanished without anybody knowing that they are dead. Not long after the raid the 3 passports are given to 3 Israeli agents who were selected on having some resemblance with the 3 Arabs just killed. They make for America soon afterwards in the summer of 2000 and start laying a trail at flight schools, posing with the stolen identities from the 3 Arabs killed.

Years earlier the israeli Michael Goff working for PTech, an Arab owned software company that develops key enterprise software for many government institutions like NORAD and FAA, using his secure channel with another israeli Amit Yoran, somehow manages to give Israeli army computer programmers access to this critical computer code. It was due to this manipulation that the hijackings on 9/11 remained unnoticed by the flight controller of NORAD. Once this was in place the planes could be taken over by remote control and flown into the World Trade Center.

The hijacking of airliners by remote control had been tested as a dress rehearsal for 9/11 on the Egypt Air flight 990 that crashed into the Atlantic on October 31, 1999.

Now everything was in place to commit the crime of the century. On the day of 9/11 the Israeli stand-ins for the ‘Arab hijackers’ showed up at the predestined departure airports to make sure they were captured on surveillance camera’s. The crucial point here is that the security at both the departure airports was in hands of an Israeli firm Huntleigh-USA, a subsidiary of the Dutch based but Israeli owned ICTS led by a fellow named Menahem Atzmon. And this is crucial: Atzmon used to be a colleague of Olmert in 1998. So there you have the link between the 9/11 operative level (an airport security firm) and the highest level of Israeli politics. What happened on the morning of 9/11 was that after the Israeli stand-ins were captured on camera, they left the airport via a side entrance and the show could begin. Minutes after the planes became air born somebody somehow was able to send a signal to the planes, causing the control panels to be disabled and the flight destination altered. What happened was that an anti-hijack system was activated (code word ‘home run’) and the regular pilot was put out of control. This pilot will probably have tried frantically to regain control of his aircraft. It is not very likely he will have told his passengers about the new situation since that would only cause panic. The passengers probably suspected nothing and hence had no reason to make any phone calls to their relatives (which were not possible anyway). And while the 9/11 passengers unsuspecting travel towards their immanent deaths, on the ground from a war room Israeli agents carry out phone calls to relatives of the passengers that were still in the air, using voice morphing technology and caller-ID spoofing and thus planted the Arabs-did-it-deception in the public consciousness. The sound samples necessary to carry out the fake telephone calls had been obtained via the israeli infiltration of American telephone networks by Israeli firms like Amdocs and Verint. By the time that the passengers were puzzled as they discerned the New York sky line it was already too late.

Meanwhile on the other side of the Hudson river the members of the Israeli team that planted the demolition charges were waiting for things to happen. And while the rest of New York experienced in horror the events that were unfolding that day, the demolition experts were celebrating and high-fiving. The plot had worked out magnificently.

*** Please save this page to your local hard drive ***

This blog is the verbal expression of an adaptive learning process. Please come back regularly.

Core Argument

Ok, I admit. Some elements in this story are speculative. I do not know for instance if Atta was killed in Germany or in America. But the story is an coherent educated speculation. It is an attempt to reconstruct the events of 9/11. Myriads of web sites exist that expose the inconsistencies in the official story, that obviously is a fraud. This story offers an integral explanation of what could have happened and in all likelihood more or less did happen at 9/11 as there can be hardly any doubt about who was behind 9/11 if one rejects the official story. Some elements remain vague, like what happened exactly to WTC7, flight77, flight93 or Mohamed Atta. But these questions are of academic interest only. It’s clear who was behind 9/11 and what happened in detail with WTC-1/2 and the planes. That is enough. Here’s where most people got killed. The rest of the plot can be uncovered by a tribunal.

In order to prevent that you get swallowed up by yet another 10 meters of screen text here is the core of the argument. The story is based on 2 broadly accepted postulates:

1) WTC was brought down by controlled demolition 2) The ‘dancing Israelis’ on the morning of 9/11 had foreknowledge of things to come

These 2 premises are enough to put the Official Conspiracy Theory (Arabs did it) out of business.

Premise 2 leads to the preliminary conclusion that the Israelis had foreknowledge because they organized the attacks themselves. Since Israelis are not known to commit suicide attacks we have to assume that the airplanes that crashed into their destinations were remote controlled. If one accepts this as a working hypothesis than there is a lot, I mean really a lot, of material that supports this Israeli Conspiracy Theory that replaces the official Arab Conspiracy Theory. We have the dedicated Zionist Silverstein who leases the WTC complex and over insures it against terrorism (leading to a hansom profit); we know that security at all departure airports and ‘arrival airports’ (WTC) was in Israeli hands (Huntleigh-USA and Kroll Associates, resp.); we know that the owner of Huntleigh-USA, Menachem Atzmon, a convicted criminal, had strong ties to Ehud Olmert, that is the highest level of Israeli politics; we also know that the Israeli secret service can eavesdrop on virtually everybody in the USA via Israeli owned companies like Amdocs and Verint which gave the Mossad the possibility to obtain sound samples of future 9/11 passengers to apply voice morphing to in order to make the fake phone calls on 9/11. And of course there is Dov Zakheim, the real mastermind of 9/11 who was CEO of SPC for 4 years prior to 9/11, a company that produces systems for remote control of airplanes. The same Zakheim that was a member of the Zionist dominated PNAC group, that more or less plotted for a global American empire, and suggested that a ‘New Pearl Harbor‘ (page 51) could speed things up a bit; and finally the same Zakheim that 6 months before 9/11 became supervisor of a group of Pentagon comptrollers that had to sort out what had happened to the 2.3 trillion dollars that were missing from the Pentagon books; many of these comptrollers conveniently got killed on 9/11 and much of the financial data went with them. This is the core of the story.

Note: I am not claiming that 9/11 is solved. Of this however we can be certain: WTC controlled demolition, Israelis carried out the operation, no Arab hijackers, mastermind Zakheim, motive PNAC & Clean Break and remote control. I do not care about flight77 or 93, those are details to be solved by crime investigators. The most pressing question is that of remote control: how was that done? Were the original flights 11 and 175 remote controlled themselves or was there a plane swap as some have suggested, including Bollyn?

Disclaimer: nobody is guilty until convicted by a court of law. This blog’s intent is to stimulate thinking about 9/11 from a different angle than the official one. From day one the blame has been put at bin Laden and his people without real evidence. Today bin Laden is no longer persecuted for 9/11 according to the FBI website. The theory proposed here might be true or false or contain some truth. In the end it must be an official investigation that determines who is guilty and who is not. This blog is dedicated to Italian ex-president Cossiga who is the highest ranking statesman to date who has openly stated that it was the Mossad who has carried out the 9/11 attacks.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 228.

#1. To: tom007 (#0)

Once this was in place the planes could be taken over by remote control and flown into the World Trade Center.

Uhhhh, nahhhhhhh.

Cynicom  posted on  2012-09-03   14:20:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Cynicom, *9-11* (#1)

Uhhhh, nahhhhhhh.

Uhhh, yeahhhh.

Have you never heard of drones or UAVs? The technology DOES in fact exist (and did prior to 9/11/2001) to fly an airliner remotely.

Here's a Boing 720 being flown remotely 17 years before 9/11/2001.

Here's a bit more on the Dov Zakheim connection...

My hypothesis is that the real planes were hijacked by remotely activated gas cannisters releasing knock out gas (or nerve gas) during flight, disabling or killing passengers and crew. Once the crew was disabled, the plane could be flown to wherever needed, possibily swapped in midair with those which would in fact fly into the towers and the Pentagon. In a swap scenario, a live pilot carrying a gas mask could have been a passenger on the original flight, putting the mask on a precise time. A gas mask may have been stashed under a seat by a ground crew member perhaps. Then the pilot could have flown the plane to a secure location, while the "terror" plane would have been flown to its target remotely.

That would explain how those planes acquired that "pod" shown in the above video.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-03   20:21:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: FormerLurker (#20)

Have you never heard of drones or UAVs?

9/11 was flown by human hands.

Cynicom  posted on  2012-09-03   20:40:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#64. To: Cynicom, randge (#22)

Have you never heard of drones or UAVs?

9/11 was flown by human hands.

And the proof of this assertion is?

Because the Nightly Nooze said so?

Because the White House Spokesliar said so?

The U.S. Government has never provided one iota of solid information tying the 19 magickal Ayerabs nor Osama Bin Dead since 2001 to the events of 9/11/2001. None, nada, zeeeeeeeero.

It has all been done by assertion and pronouncement repeated over and over and over. BUT, where's the beef?

Original_Intent  posted on  2012-09-04   16:22:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#65. To: Original_Intent, randge, Christine (#64)

9/11 was flown by human hands.

Point of interest...

In testimony by FAA radar controllers who were watching the aircraft on radar, they stated they considered the aircraft to being flown by someone of superior piloting skill because of the maneuvers executed.

(humor) Of course the aircraft could have been flown by the American Captain, who was not aboard but rather sitting in a casino in Las Vegas, with a remote joy stick.)

Hey, anything is possible, right????

Cynicom  posted on  2012-09-04   16:56:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#66. To: Cynicom (#65)

imagine

There was no plane.

wudidiz  posted on  2012-09-04   17:10:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#67. To: wudidiz (#66)

wud...

If someone offers expert proof that there was NO Pentagon involved, I will give up.

This is interesting as the government doles out disinformation to con the troops.

"Ever since this "no-plane" theory has been planted on the 9-11 truth movement, the corporate media inevitably seizes on it as a means to ridicule those who do not accept the official story of 9-11. One obvious example is the March 2005 issue of Popular Mechanics, which used the "no-plane" theory to summarily dismiss any and all doubters of the official story as a munch of nuts that all correct-thinking loyal Americans should ever listen to. Which is what the no-plane hoax is intended to do".

Cynicom  posted on  2012-09-04   17:38:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#68. To: Cynicom (#67)

That would all be true if....

There was a plane.

There was no plane.

wudidiz  posted on  2012-09-04   17:53:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#70. To: wudidiz (#68)

There was no plane.

There were planes wud, just not the ones they were claimed to have been.

In the case of the Pentagon, it more than likely was a cruise missile painted as an American Airlines 757.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-04   17:59:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#72. To: FormerLurker (#70)

freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/re...ArtNum=148199&Disp=64#C64

wudidiz  posted on  2012-09-04   18:04:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#73. To: All, *No Planers* (#72)

There were planes

I didn't see one.

wudidiz  posted on  2012-09-04   18:05:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#74. To: wudidiz (#73)

I didn't see one.

Did you ever personally see China wud? Just because YOU didn't see it doesn't mean it wasn't or isn't there.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-04   18:11:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#76. To: FormerLurker (#74)

Just because YOU didn't see it doesn't mean it wasn't or isn't there.

Noone saw it. Except on tv.

wudidiz  posted on  2012-09-04   18:17:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#77. To: wudidiz (#76)

Noone saw it. Except on tv.

You are in denial wud. It wasn't just captured on video by MANY news agencies, people in New York actually saw it happen live.

That, and the witnesses in Washington saw SOME type of aircraft approaching the Pentagon.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-04   18:20:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#114. To: FormerLurker (#77)

It wasn't just captured on video by MANY news agencies, people in New York actually saw it happen live.

You have what evidence that they "actually" saw it live?

I guess a missle might have hit the pentagon, but there's little, if any, evidence of it.

wudidiz  posted on  2012-09-05   18:05:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#120. To: wudidiz (#114)

You have what evidence that they "actually" saw it live?

I guess a missle might have hit the pentagon, but there's little, if any, evidence of it.

Wud, I know you mean well. Please don't take it as an insult, but if you bothered doing any sort of research into 9/11 you'd know that it's 99.8% likely that planes hit the WTC towers, and some sort of cruise missile hit the Pentagon.

If you contemplate the fact that those who are involved with the actual events of that day are actively covering up this information that we are talking about here with false paths, you'd consider the strong possibililty that the "no planes" idea is flat out improbable, unlikely, and more than likely one of those false leads.

There is enough 100% pure scientific data to crucify the perps without jumping to questionable theories with little or no collaborating evidence.

Sure, IF there were no planes well that'd be one hell of an exercise in deceipt on the part of hundreds of witnesses and news crews. But there is enough tangible evidence to demonstrate that the events of that day were in no way related to 19 Arab "terrorists", but were in fact part of a large scale military/espionage operation played out by the Israeli Mossad, Pakistani ISI, and the highest levels of the US government.

There is no need to follow bizarre stories which do not follow logic or probability, and which have no basis in scientific reality.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-05   20:15:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#141. To: FormerLurker (#120)

it's 99.8% likely that planes hit the WTC towers,

100% likely that planes hit the towers. A Global Hawk flew those planes into the towers. It is made by Boeing. Look it up online.

BTW, it was NORAD that controlled the Global Hawk. 9-11 was a training exercise that went live. The pilots of those planes had no control over the them. The Global Hawk over-rides the controls and flies the planes where they want them to go.

Very likely that it was a cruise missile that hit the Pentagon. No evidence that it was a plane.

BTP Holdings  posted on  2012-09-06   17:22:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#142. To: BTP Holdings (#141)

A Global Hawk flew those planes into the towers.

Er, no. The Global Hawk is a drone, and it MIGHT be what hit the Pentagon. Then again it might have been something else, such as a cruise missile painted like an AA 757.

Those planes that hit the towers were more than likely converted 767's, as per the Dov Zakheim sale to the Air Force.

Remote control of any of those aircraft could be and more than likely would be achieved by direct satellite link.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-06   17:31:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#194. To: FormerLurker, *9-11*, *No Planers* (#142) (Edited)

BTP Holdings: A Global Hawk flew those planes into the towers.

FormerLurker: Er, no. The Global Hawk is a drone, and it MIGHT be what hit the Pentagon. Then again it might have been something else, such as a cruise missile painted like an AA 757.

Those planes that hit the towers were more than likely converted 767's, as per the Dov Zakheim sale to the Air Force.

Remote control of any of those aircraft could be and more than likely would be achieved by direct satellite link.

Are you claiming that the Military couldn't or wouldn't disconnect a satelite link to over-ride a remote control hijacking from the ground? Fast forward to the second right arrow in the mp3 interview below. A satellite system is discussed there, as well as mere turbulence disconnecting autopilot. To disconnect external autopilot/remote control and keep it disconnected, simply shut off all electrical power and standby battery to the plane.

Click here for audio: pilotsfor 911truth.org/p4t/RemoteControlWhistleblower.mp3

CB_Brooklyn at checktheevidence.co.uk/:

[Additions after Oct 2007 by Andrew Johnson]

There are three basic versions of the 9/11 events. Although differences and/or overlapping may occur, the following three versions generally describe what most people believe:

1. OGCT. This is known as the “Official Government Conspiracy Theory”. This version states that a guy from a cave in Afghanistan conspired with 19 boxcutter-wielding Muslims to hijack airplanes, outwit the USA’s entire multi- trillion dollar defense system, and cause the Twin Towers to collapse. This is the version pushed by the government and media as being the truth of 9/11.

2. APCT. I call this the “Alternate Propaganda Conspiracy Theory”. This version states that, more or less, there were hijackings on 9/11, but the planes might have been taken under remote control to ensure they crashed as planned. Airplanes most likely crashed at the Pentagon and Shanksville, but planes definitely did crash into the Twin Towers. The Twin Towers and WTC 7 collapsed from conventional explosives and thermite, and molten metal was found in the rubble. This is the version pushed by the government and media as being the “wacko conspiracy theory” that the “truth movement” believes.

3. REAL. This, simply, is the REAL version, backed by actual evidence, Laws of Physics, and common sense: There were no hijackings, no plane crashes, the corporate media broadcasted cartoons of an airplane impacting the South Tower, and the WTC complex (not just the Towers and WTC 7) was destroyed with Directed Energy Weapons (DEW). The government and media steer clear of these.

Edited for link title correction.

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-09-11   17:54:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#195. To: GreyLmist (#194)

Are you claiming that the Military couldn't or wouldn't disconnect a satelite link to over-ride a remote control hijacking from the ground?

Are you saying the military/NORAD/(name the appropriate alphabet soup agency) would disconnect its own link controlling the aircraft?

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-11   17:58:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#200. To: FormerLurker (#195) (Edited)

Are you saying the military/NORAD/(name the appropriate alphabet soup agency) would disconnect its own link controlling the aircraft?

So you're claiming a mass Military conspiracy as if none of them would move so but a civilian, mass-media conspiracy is "a bridge too far" for you? What's your explanation for the only thing hit by alleged Flt. 93 being the ground in Pennsylvania?

Edited for spelling.

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-09-11   19:04:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#202. To: GreyLmist (#200) (Edited)

So you're claiming a mass Military conspiracy as if none of them would move so but a civilian, mass-media conspiracy is "a bridge too far" for you? What's your explanation for the only thing hit by alleged Flt. 93 being the ground in Pennsylvania?

NBC/CNN/Fox didn't plan the 9/11 wargames. NORAD (along with certain key civilian and military planners) did.

As far as Flight 93, if my hypothesis that a chemical agent such as nerve gas was used to incapacitate the crews of the other "hijacked" aircraft, perhaps the gas failed to release properly and didn't reach the cabin, thus requiring some "intervention" on the part of Cheney to order a shoot down so as to hide any evidence of what had actually gone on.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-11   20:36:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#209. To: FormerLurker, *9-11* (#202)

NBC/CNN/Fox didn't plan the 9/11 wargames. NORAD (along with certain key civilian and military planners) did.

So? The Military conducts wargames often. Red Team, Blue Team and what have you -- with or without civilian participation.

As far as Flight 93, if my hypothesis that a chemical agent such as nerve gas was used to incapacitate the crews of the other "hijacked" aircraft, perhaps the gas failed to release properly and didn't reach the cabin, thus requiring some "intervention" on the part of Cheney to order a shoot down so as to hide any evidence of what had actually gone on.

The Military doesn't take their orders from Vice Presidents and alleged Flt. 93 had already nosedived into the ground in that part of the scenario, before the supposed "shootdown order" by Cheney. If you think the Military wouldn't have known at the time that alleged Flt. 93 wasn't still flying, think again. They don't really need the FAA to tell them stuff like that.

Timeline for the day of the September 11 attacks - Wikipedia

10:10 to 10:15 (approximately): Vice President Cheney, unaware that Flight 93 has crashed, authorizes fighter aircraft to engage the inbound plane, reported to be 80 miles (129 km) from Washington, based not on radar (from which it has disappeared) but speed and trajectory projections.

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-09-12   0:57:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#228. To: GreyLmist (#209)

Timeline for the day of the September 11 attacks - Wikipedia

10:10 to 10:15 (approximately): Vice President Cheney, unaware that Flight 93 has crashed, authorizes fighter aircraft to engage the inbound plane, reported to be 80 miles (129 km) from Washington, based not on radar (from which it has disappeared) but speed and trajectory projections.

Now you're relying on Wikipedia for your timeline? So you're claiming that Flight 93 WASN'T shot down, and that they did the "Let's Roll" thing and fought those damn Arabs flying the plane, causing it to crash?

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-12   11:18:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 228.

        There are no replies to Comment # 228.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 228.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]