See other 9/11 Articles
Title: How 9/11 Was Done
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://physics911.net/how-911-was-done/
Published: Sep 3, 2012
Author: http://physics911.net/how-911-was-done/
Post Date: 2012-09-03 14:09:24 by tom007
Keywords: None
Views: 14191
Comments: 674
How 9/11 Was Done For additional notes see the accompanying blog 911notes.blogspot.com. Prologue Read the following two screens of text to learn what happened at 9/11. 9/11 was a master plot, concocted by a handfull of Israelis and dual passport Americans and carried out by the resources of the Mossad. Larry Silverstein leases a nearly worthless dinosaur WTC building complex (worthless due to the asbestos the buildings were stuffed with and needed to be cleaned up, the cost of which may have rivaled the value of the buildings themselves) weeks before 9/11, makes sure it is over insured against terrorist acts and hires an Israeli security firm. From that moment on the coast is clear to let a team of demolition experts from the Israeli army led by Peer Segalovitz into the WTC buildings. These charges plus detonators had been prepared at the premises of the Urban Moving Systems company, a Mossad front. During the weeks before 9/11 these prepared charges were loaded into vans, driven into the basements of WTC Twin Towers next to the elevator shaft, unloaded into the elevator, and lifted onto the roof of the elevator through the opening in the elevator ceiling. Next the elevator moved from floor to floor while charges where being attached to the columns as displayed in this video from 0:22 onwards. The detonators of these charges were radiographic controlled and finally detonated from WTC7 on the day of 9/11. Fast backward, Hamburg 54 Marienstrasse, july 2000, 22:40. Mohamed Atta, Al Shehhi and Jarrah (who were later blamed of being the pilots of flight 11, 175 and 93 respectively), who share the apartment hear the ringing of the door bell. Jarrah opens the door, 5 masked men make their way into the apartment with drawn pistols. The 3 Arabs are forced to lay on the ground. Their passports are confiscated, next the 3 men are made unconscious with some liquid and strangled to death afterwards. The bodies are carried out of the apartment into a van and driven off towards a desolate spot at the boarding of the Elbe river outside Hamburg, 1 kilometer north of Borstel and disposed of into the river with a bag filled with stones tied to their feet. The 3 passports are now in the possession of the agents of the Mossad, who carried out the raid on the apartment and 3 Arabs have vanished without anybody knowing that they are dead. Not long after the raid the 3 passports are given to 3 Israeli agents who were selected on having some resemblance with the 3 Arabs just killed. They make for America soon afterwards in the summer of 2000 and start laying a trail at flight schools, posing with the stolen identities from the 3 Arabs killed. Years earlier the israeli Michael Goff working for PTech, an Arab owned software company that develops key enterprise software for many government institutions like NORAD and FAA, using his secure channel with another israeli Amit Yoran, somehow manages to give Israeli army computer programmers access to this critical computer code. It was due to this manipulation that the hijackings on 9/11 remained unnoticed by the flight controller of NORAD. Once this was in place the planes could be taken over by remote control and flown into the World Trade Center. The hijacking of airliners by remote control had been tested as a dress rehearsal for 9/11 on the Egypt Air flight 990 that crashed into the Atlantic on October 31, 1999. Now everything was in place to commit the crime of the century. On the day of 9/11 the Israeli stand-ins for the ‘Arab hijackers’ showed up at the predestined departure airports to make sure they were captured on surveillance camera’s. The crucial point here is that the security at both the departure airports was in hands of an Israeli firm Huntleigh-USA, a subsidiary of the Dutch based but Israeli owned ICTS led by a fellow named Menahem Atzmon. And this is crucial: Atzmon used to be a colleague of Olmert in 1998. So there you have the link between the 9/11 operative level (an airport security firm) and the highest level of Israeli politics. What happened on the morning of 9/11 was that after the Israeli stand-ins were captured on camera, they left the airport via a side entrance and the show could begin. Minutes after the planes became air born somebody somehow was able to send a signal to the planes, causing the control panels to be disabled and the flight destination altered. What happened was that an anti-hijack system was activated (code word ‘home run’) and the regular pilot was put out of control. This pilot will probably have tried frantically to regain control of his aircraft. It is not very likely he will have told his passengers about the new situation since that would only cause panic. The passengers probably suspected nothing and hence had no reason to make any phone calls to their relatives (which were not possible anyway). And while the 9/11 passengers unsuspecting travel towards their immanent deaths, on the ground from a war room Israeli agents carry out phone calls to relatives of the passengers that were still in the air, using voice morphing technology and caller-ID spoofing and thus planted the Arabs-did-it-deception in the public consciousness. The sound samples necessary to carry out the fake telephone calls had been obtained via the israeli infiltration of American telephone networks by Israeli firms like Amdocs and Verint. By the time that the passengers were puzzled as they discerned the New York sky line it was already too late. Meanwhile on the other side of the Hudson river the members of the Israeli team that planted the demolition charges were waiting for things to happen. And while the rest of New York experienced in horror the events that were unfolding that day, the demolition experts were celebrating and high-fiving. The plot had worked out magnificently. *** Please save this page to your local hard drive *** This blog is the verbal expression of an adaptive learning process. Please come back regularly. Core Argument Ok, I admit. Some elements in this story are speculative. I do not know for instance if Atta was killed in Germany or in America. But the story is an coherent educated speculation. It is an attempt to reconstruct the events of 9/11. Myriads of web sites exist that expose the inconsistencies in the official story, that obviously is a fraud. This story offers an integral explanation of what could have happened and in all likelihood more or less did happen at 9/11 as there can be hardly any doubt about who was behind 9/11 if one rejects the official story. Some elements remain vague, like what happened exactly to WTC7, flight77, flight93 or Mohamed Atta. But these questions are of academic interest only. It’s clear who was behind 9/11 and what happened in detail with WTC-1/2 and the planes. That is enough. Here’s where most people got killed. The rest of the plot can be uncovered by a tribunal. In order to prevent that you get swallowed up by yet another 10 meters of screen text here is the core of the argument. The story is based on 2 broadly accepted postulates: 1) WTC was brought down by controlled demolition 2) The ‘dancing Israelis’ on the morning of 9/11 had foreknowledge of things to come These 2 premises are enough to put the Official Conspiracy Theory (Arabs did it) out of business. Premise 2 leads to the preliminary conclusion that the Israelis had foreknowledge because they organized the attacks themselves. Since Israelis are not known to commit suicide attacks we have to assume that the airplanes that crashed into their destinations were remote controlled. If one accepts this as a working hypothesis than there is a lot, I mean really a lot, of material that supports this Israeli Conspiracy Theory that replaces the official Arab Conspiracy Theory. We have the dedicated Zionist Silverstein who leases the WTC complex and over insures it against terrorism (leading to a hansom profit); we know that security at all departure airports and ‘arrival airports’ (WTC) was in Israeli hands (Huntleigh-USA and Kroll Associates, resp.); we know that the owner of Huntleigh-USA, Menachem Atzmon, a convicted criminal, had strong ties to Ehud Olmert, that is the highest level of Israeli politics; we also know that the Israeli secret service can eavesdrop on virtually everybody in the USA via Israeli owned companies like Amdocs and Verint which gave the Mossad the possibility to obtain sound samples of future 9/11 passengers to apply voice morphing to in order to make the fake phone calls on 9/11. And of course there is Dov Zakheim, the real mastermind of 9/11 who was CEO of SPC for 4 years prior to 9/11, a company that produces systems for remote control of airplanes. The same Zakheim that was a member of the Zionist dominated PNAC group, that more or less plotted for a global American empire, and suggested that a ‘New Pearl Harbor‘ (page 51) could speed things up a bit; and finally the same Zakheim that 6 months before 9/11 became supervisor of a group of Pentagon comptrollers that had to sort out what had happened to the 2.3 trillion dollars that were missing from the Pentagon books; many of these comptrollers conveniently got killed on 9/11 and much of the financial data went with them. This is the core of the story. Note: I am not claiming that 9/11 is solved. Of this however we can be certain: WTC controlled demolition, Israelis carried out the operation, no Arab hijackers, mastermind Zakheim, motive PNAC & Clean Break and remote control. I do not care about flight77 or 93, those are details to be solved by crime investigators. The most pressing question is that of remote control: how was that done? Were the original flights 11 and 175 remote controlled themselves or was there a plane swap as some have suggested, including Bollyn? Disclaimer: nobody is guilty until convicted by a court of law. This blog’s intent is to stimulate thinking about 9/11 from a different angle than the official one. From day one the blame has been put at bin Laden and his people without real evidence. Today bin Laden is no longer persecuted for 9/11 according to the FBI website. The theory proposed here might be true or false or contain some truth. In the end it must be an official investigation that determines who is guilty and who is not. This blog is dedicated to Italian ex-president Cossiga who is the highest ranking statesman to date who has openly stated that it was the Mossad who has carried out the 9/11 attacks.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-570) not displayed.
.
.
.
#571. To: FormerLurker (#568)
(Edited)
Lean to the left, smoke. Lean to the right. Stand up. Sit down. Fight, fight, fight with FL -- cuz, obviously, that's what they want you to do and seems they don't have anything better to do than spend their time on this for kicks. lol I'm aware that it all makes sense to you but, like I said before, you are no longer eligible to assist in deciding the matter for me. Your view makes about as much sense to me as this possibility for the destruction of the WTC -- which is slightly more plausible than your remote control non-evidence in the scenario, although I'll admit not by much /S: The Day The Earth Stood Still - Truck Destruction Sequence Edited paragraph 1. ------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
I knew that. lol Not really. Since I'm here, though, do you realize that the example you cited a couple of times at 1:16 in the MSM newsclips video isn't really comparable to the Internet Archived NIST video because the NIST video shows a plane approach and the MSM newsclip video doesn't? This longer, 10-min. version of the video you've been rampaging about for so long has comparable examples of the archived NIST documentary in question (at the start) and the alleged plane impact too: 9/11 TV Fakery: Smoke & Mirrors I'm posting it because I like this question and answer session in the Comments section there: "that's the point, they didn't contain a plan like this. They messed up big time and everyone knows about it now. Anhd anyway this was a production set up by the media you follow without question, not your temporary government figureheads." These are the soundtrack lyrics, since they are annoyingly hard to hear there: Circuits buzzing, visions passing The floating seeds of timeless travel I've seen the past, Not sure what's the meaning of that so, Edited a typo + punctuation and am moving on... ------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
I have been following this debate on and off for the past couple of days and haven't had time to keep up with the minutiae of the discussion, but I'd like to know how you'd respond to this question. Indeed there seem to be a number of anomalies that I see in this video (posted in #570), as there are in the "As it happened" collection of videos that you posted in #549. How do I know what I am seeing here is a video as it was released or copied from Detroit Public TV and hasn't been doctored to show something other than what the original producer had broadcast? I am focused on just the opening video in the opening of the "Smoke & Mirrors" - the one with the plane that appears out of nowhere for clarity's sake, so we don't get lost in what we are talking about (which can happen rather quickly when folks are discussing these sorts of topics.) I specified not only the short segment at 1:16 of the video you posted, but the time frame between 4:35 to 4:59. That original footage IS what your "Smoke and Mirrors" derived from, although that part of the original footage does not show the approach of the plane, just the resulting fireball and smoke. It is possible that the NIST archive contains the entire feed from that camera, whereas the original was only the live footage being broadcast in real time. It is VERY CLEAR however that the "smoke and mirrors" video was amatuerishly doctored to make it LOOK doctored, ie. the erasure of the original smoke plume and the step graduated copy overlayed where the smoke used to be in the video, along with a different sized impact fireball that hardly expands and doesn't result in a billow of smoke. In ALL of the original video that can be found, the fireball, resulting smoke, and smoke plume from the North Tower match. So yes, the "smoke and mirrors" video is exactly that, a cheap trick pulled off by a no planer to support his case, where he is guilty of the very thing he is accusing all of the news networks of perpetrating on 9/11, and that is fabricating evidence to support his cause. Out of curiousity, do you have a link to the NIST documentary you cite, or are you just repeating what you've heard in the "Smoke and Mirrors" video? Here's another clip of the live CBS footage aired live on the morning of 9/11. It does NOT show the approach of the aircraft. The "Smoke and Mirrors" video claims to have obtained its footage from Detroit Public TV, which in turn, oddly enough, obtained ITS footage from some defunct website named terrorize.dk, which was a domain out of Denmark. It is claimed to be a crop of the CBS footage, yet the CBS footage doesn't show the approach. It's obvious disinfo, which you either fell for, or are actively a participant in. [Edit] Oddly enough, Detroit Public TV has pulled its "documentary" off its website... Please, some of us are really trying to get to the bottom of this. I am a participant in nothing. I am merely trying to get a handle on this stuff. WTF is this, BTW? Yet another version? Ah hah. Here's a clip of footage aired later by CBS, which does show the approach of the aircraft, yet starts with the aircraft already halfway from the right edge of the screen to the right side of the Empire State Building. It would be quite easy to start the clip generated by that terrorize.dk website by taking video with the aircraft out of the frame (ie. when the plane was hidden by the Empire State Building) and then inserting video with the aircraft on its approach, to make it look like the plane appeared out of nowhere. Being the smoke plume WAS doctored by terroize.dk, it is HIGHLY likely that is exactly what was done. In fact, you can see from the Detroit Public TV video at the 0:02 mark that the smoke plume gets fuzzy and appears to jump. That is exactly where the splice was made, and that is exactly where the aircraft "appears out of nowhere". [Edit] Please refer to post Post 582 for further analysis. This is OBVIOUS and BLATENT fabrication of false evidence on the part of terrorize.dk, and then further propagated by the author of the "Smoke and Mirrors" video. Please, some of us are really trying to get to the bottom of this. I am a participant in nothing. I am merely trying to get a handle on this stuff. I wasn't saying you were a participant randge, I was speaking to GreyLmist, but pinging you to what I was saying. Sorry for the misunderstanding. WTF is this, BTW? Yet another version? ' Yes, it's part of the original footage which showed the last part of the approach, and then the resulting impact. See my last post for further clarification as to exactly what is going on with "terrorize.dk", Detroit Public TV, and the "Smoke and Mirrors" video, and how it relates to the actual footage. It's extremely difficult to know whose collection of pixels is the genuine article here and what has been tampered with. I don't have the expertise myself and must rely on the interpretations of others. If they'd had cell phone cameras in Jesus' day, we'd be treated to vids of Jesus walking on water and yet others that show him wading in the surf. "See, they cropped his image and set him on top on the waves!" Then we'd be treated to a hot argument over the physics of waves and the prevalent air currents over the Sea of Galilee. I'm afraid that this is one area of the 911 investigation that suffers from the fact that the evidence is too easily tainted or suffers from a lack of clear provenance. The evidence of tampering on the part of terrorize.dk, the source for the Detroit Public TV and the extended "Smoke and Mirrors" video is blatent, where that video which is used to "prove" TV stations fabricated the aircraft and resulting impacts out of nothing, shows a splice at the 0:02 mark where the smoke appears to jump and go backwards. That is where the footage was modified to make it appear that the "plane came out of thin air". As far as the short version of the "Smoke and Mirrors" video, it is SUPER blatent that the smoke plume has been tampered with, if you compare it to not only the CBS footage, but ANY of the live footage from that day. It's quite ironic that the author of the video, who is claiming himself to be an expert apparently, wasn't bright enough to compare the terrorize.dk video with any of the original footage. Of course this causes confusion among some as to what is real and what isn't, and that is the clear intent of the "no plane theorist". After more analysis, the terrorize.dk video of the aircraft approach was created as follows; The true beginning of the clip is looped, but with the aircraft edited out for the first pass, then restarted several tenths of seconds after the actual start point, this time with the aircraft in frame. Thus, it appears that the aircraft comes out of nowhere. In the original CBS footage, the video was freeze framed with the aircraft circled, then ran up to the end of the clip. The fake footage from terrorize.dk simply added a fake beginning using the original clip with the aircraft erased out of the frame, starting from where the CBS video actually begins to show motion, and then inserted the actual footage to slightly after (tenths of a second) the point of where the first segment was cut from, more than likely to make the splice less noticable in terms of positioning of the smoke plume. If you look though, it is STILL quite noticable, as the smoke jumps backwards right at the same time the aircraft "appears out of nowhere". One more thing about this extended "Smoke and Mirrors" video. At 00:39 into the video it asks, "Why was the camera aimed slightly to the right of the Empire State Building instead of at the burning WTC?". It adds the comment, "A perfect position to catch the arrival of the 2nd plane". Thing is, terrorize.dk CROPPED the original CBS video to make it LOOK that way, whereas the original footage is a wide view of Lower Manhatten taken from north of the Empire State Building, with the WTC centered in the frame. Just one more thing that the "Smoke and Mirrors" video lies about. Continuing the analysis of the "Smoke and Mirrors" extended video, it states at 1:29 that, "This is about the impact that was not shown". The original footage sure DID show that impact, but of course the author of "Smoke and Mirrors" would have his audience believe that his statement is beyond reproach. And of course, at 1:41 into the video, he shows his doctored version of the impact and the smoke plume from the North Tower, which he obviously edited from the original CBS footage to make it look as it does. He did this by erasing the smoke plume, copying a part of it, then cutting and pasting it in expanding sequences to recreate a fake plume. He then makes the claim that's what the original footage really shows, where in fact HE is the one who made it look that way. He goes on to show at 7:38 the actual CBS footage, which apparently he remembered DID exist, and claims it is a different clip of what he just spent minute upon minute "analyzing". He's disingenious enough to claim that the CBS newscaster is unaware of the plane in the video, whereas the live feed was NOT showing the aircraft approach, it only caught the actual fireball after the impact. It was only by replaying the feed from that particular camera AFTER the impact that the approach was visible. [Edit] Upon reexamining the live CBS footage, it's apparent that the newscaster didn't catch the plane on the first replay (2:33 into the video), but DID see it on the 2nd replay at 3:24 into the video, which is posted below. Has ANYONE besides me paid any attention to these rather critical inconsistencies and obvious deception? It's quite obvious to me what the "no plane" movement is all about, and that is to deceive, mislead, and trick casual observers of the 9/11 Truth movement using fabricated evidence, false claims, and outright lies. What is obnoxious and sickening to me is the fact there are some who would ridicule those who disbelieve such nonsense, and accuse THOSE people of "disinfo", where it is blatently apparent it is the "no plane" movement that is pure disinformation being used to discredit or at minimum obscure any valid scientific data concerning 9/11, and to dismiss crucial analysis and discussion contrary to their agenda. 1. Post #525 | PBS-Center 07 : US Department of Commerce, NIST : Free Download & Streaming : Internet Archive Click here: http://archive.org/details/PBS-Center07 -- 8.5 sec. clip with audio of the PBS documentary. Full version at Internet Archive. PBS-Center 07 (May 25, 2010) US Department of Commerce, NIST This movie is part of the collection: NIST WTC Organized Video Repository Producer: US Department of Commerce, NIST 2. Post #572 | 9/11 TV Fakery: Smoke & Mirrors -- long version, 10 min. Description: The particular clip analyzed in this video was found on the 9/11 website terrorize.dk (now gone) back in early 2004 and has not been altered by the video-maker in any way. [My note: Contains the NIST PBS clip listed above at beginning of the video.] 3. Post #373 | 9-11 TV Fakery Smoke & Mirrors (short version) -- 4 min. Description: The particular clip analyzed in this video was found on the 9/11 website terrorize.dk (now gone) back in early 2004 and has not been altered by the video-maker in any way. 4. Post #549 | September 11, 2001 - As It Happened - The South Tower Attack -- 8.5 min. Description: This segment is comprised of a succession of newscasts that feature the impact of Flight 175 into the South Tower as it happened LIVE at 9:03 AM. This segment documents and preserves how just about each and every network covered the moment the South Tower was struck on live television. Included are clips from ABC News, CBS News, WNYW-TV (Channel 5, New York), WNBC- TV (Channel 4, New York), NY1 (New York One, All News), Fox News Channel, WCBS- TV (Channel 2, New York), WPIX-TV (Channel 11, New York)... Also included in this segment are four NON-BRAOADCAST angles of the impact of Flight 175 into the South Tower. They are included here for completeness and utilize audio from NPR Radio from the morning. This is an exerpt from the DVD - "September 11, 2001 - As It Happened - A Composite." 5. randge's newsclip video at Post #577 | Second plane hit, CBS, 9/11, 09:04 -- 0:18 seconds Description: Second plane hit, CBS, 9/11, 09:04 [My note: plane comes from behind Empire State building] 6. FL's newsclip video at Post #578 | 2nd hit CBS 9:17 am -- 0:38 seconds Description: 2nd plane impact 7. FL's newsclip video at Post #576 | 2nd hit - WCBS-TV (CBS2) **LIVE** -- 0:50 seconds Description: Live news footage of United Airlines Flight 175 hitting the south tower of the World Trade Center. You DO NOT actually see the plane in this video, the camera zooms out only after the plane crashed. Taken from local CBS affiliate CBS-2 in New York. [My note: no plane but smoke and explosion examples for comparisons to other videos] 8. FL's YouTube version of PBS-Center 07 documentary clip [Refs. NIST + Smoke and Mirrors videos] at Post #578 | 2nd hit Detroit Public TV (CBS 9:05 crop from terrorize.dk) -- 0:09 seconds Description: 2nd plane impact 9. הוכחה לזיוף טלוויזיוני ב 9/11 העשן מוכפל ! -- Hebrew version at YouTube of the Smoke and Mirrors long version video, posted June of this year. Published on Jun 25, 2012 by tuvalo2 Noted at 911conspiracy.tv (currently offline) re: Smoke & Mirrors YouTube video posted by Elpiper. Link to Internet Archive Wayback Machine page-copy for terrorize.dk: Second Hit - North of the Empire State Building [Translate from Danish to English] Edited to add 3 more videos + formatting + 911conspiracy.tv info and terrorize.dk link + spelling + Notation below at Post #576 by FormerLurker [FL]: ------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Did you happen to miss my last series of posts which thoroughly proves that the "Smoke & Mirrors" videos is actually a fraudulent succession of edits to the original CBS source video? PBS-Center 07 (May 25, 2010) US Department of Commerce, NIST View Direction: north Duration: 8.475 File Size: 31,700,388 bytes (30.23 MB) This movie is part of the collection: NIST WTC Organized Video Repository Producer: US Department of Commerce, NIST The apparent producer of the video, judging from the watermark in the video is WETA, a Washington DC based public broadcasting station. I have no idea why NIST would associate itself to the video, then again, perhaps with the deception they've already perpetrated it isn't hard to imagine they'd be the ones behind this one as well. Here's a bit about WETA It's clear as day they (either WETA or NIST itself) manipulated the CBS video to create that video of the approach, where the plane appears out of nowhere. I posted the NIST video clip for the PBS documentary referenced in the Smoke and Mirrors videos at Post #525 and again at Post #586 in a collection of related videos for comparisons as an access convenience. ------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Out of curiousity, are you ever going to tell me which way YOU think the smoke is travelling in each clip in regards to compass direction? Uh yeah, I just responded to that post. Now why do you think a WETA produced video would be claimed by NIST? Was it NIST who doctored the CBS video, or was it WETA? Oh yes, I guess I missed that one. I had earlier asked you for a simple yes or no as to whether you were saying there wasn't a smoke plume coming from the North Tower, and in your response in post 525 you said something about me posting "voluminous and redundant, bilious verbiage round and round and round". Like wow, just a bit of projection there on your part, don't you think? You still tap danced and dodged the question, so I didn't bother reading that post any further. Apparently that's where you decided to post a video of the "airplane out of nowhere", ignoring the very simple question as to whether or not you think there was a smoke plume or not. Watcha think of this? I think video compression causes a loss of resolution, especially that of a repetitive linear pattern such as the outside of the WTC. Have you ever used a digital camera to take a picture of an object with closely spaced lines in it? You'll notice there is distortion where the lines appear to blend together. The same is true of compressed video. It is digitized, and pixel data which the compression algorithm deems redundant is discarded. The only way to see what the actual video showed in terms of the entry hole damage at that instant in time is to view the non compressed version, which may or not be digital, since in 2001 I think a lot of high end cameras were using digital recording rather than analog. The thing is about the whole "no planes" theory is that nobody appears to be in agreement as to what is real and what is not, even between no planers themselves. Nobody wants to say yes I think this is true, or no I think that is untrue. Add to that the fraudulent evidence, along with the rather implausible idea that the entire international news media conspired to produce false events in real time using videos prepared ahead of time in a highly sophisticated studio, and that nobody out of the millions of people in NYC stated that what was broadcast on live television was NOT what they were seeing with their own eyes, well, I think it's a rather impossible concept. Indeed there seem to be a number of anomalies that I see in this video (posted in #570), as there are in the "As it happened" collection of videos that you posted in #549. I think you meant #572 because #570 doesn't have a video posted there. The sprawl of vids and info is confusing and posts have been problematic to go to specifically on my computer when doing searches in Full Thread mode (probably because it's vast), so I consolidated the posts and their videos (at Post #586) which I thought to be most relevant to the current issues about the Smoke and Mirrors controversy, as well as the anomalies about smoke and plane trajectories, etc. Below are the two videos which are listed there that I think you've noted for various anomalies observed: 2. Post #572 | 9/11 TV Fakery: Smoke & Mirrors -- long version, 10 min. 4. Post #549 | September 11, 2001 - As It Happened - The South Tower Attack -- 8.5 min. I am focused on just the opening video in the opening of the "Smoke & Mirrors" - the one with the plane that appears out of nowhere for clarity's sake, so we don't get lost in what we are talking about (which can happen rather quickly when folks are discussing these sorts of topics.) Also at Post #586 linked above is a NIST clip (Producer: US Department of Commerce, NIST) at Internet Archive of the PBS-Center 07 documentary referenced in both of the Smoke and Mirrors videos. This is the link for the documentary clip at Internet Archive: http://archive.org/details/PBS-Center07. An Individual Files section is listed at the bottom of the page that you might be able to reference for further comparisons. ------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Actually, the source of the "Smoke and Mirrors" video is from Detroit Public TV, which got ITS version of the clip from either terrorize.dk or WETA. I don't see where NIST comes in to the picture except for the fact they have archived the video. So either terrorize.dk, WETA, or NIST (if they are the actual source), are the ones who doctored the CBS video to give the illusion of a plane appearing out of nowhere. Have you ever used a digital camera to take a picture of an object with closely spaced lines in it? You'll notice there is distortion where the lines appear to blend together. The same is true of compressed video. It is digitized, and pixel data which the compression algorithm deems redundant is discarded. The only way to see what the actual video showed in terms of the entry hole damage at that instant in time is to view the non compressed version, which may or not be digital, since in 2001 I think a lot of high end cameras were using digital recording rather than analog. The thing is about the whole "no planes" theory is that nobody appears to be in agreement as to what is real and what is not, even between no planers themselves. Nobody wants to say yes I think this is true, or no I think that is untrue. Add to that the fraudulent evidence, along with the rather implausible idea that the entire international news media conspired to produce false events in real time using videos prepared ahead of time in a highly sophisticated studio, and that nobody out of the millions of people in NYC stated that what was broadcast on live television was NOT what they were seeing with their own eyes, well, I think it's a rather impossible concept. You have failed to address any of the anomalies in the picture. You talk about video compression, but the images are taken from a video shown on the news. One of the ones used as "evidence" of a plane hit. Wud, ALL videos found on the Internet are compressed, thus obscuring fine details in the sort of patterns I described. You asked me what I thought, I gave you my thoughts, so what's the beef? killtown.911review.org/2nd- hit.html There are hundreds of images and animated gifs there, but not much in the way of video that's still available. So what exactly are you talking about? You didn't post a video, just somebody's tiny video capture images which may or not even be "untouched". You have to be more specific than "Watcha think of this", especially when there is nothing being said or asked. You want to talk about THIS video? It's an actual video of what I think you're trying to show. Notice the blockiness though, that is because it is not only compressed, but it's a digital enlargement of a compressed video that's THEN been recompressed and uploaded to YouTube which runs the video through an Adobe Flash video converter which ALSO performs its own compression. Nope. In case you didn't get the memos about that earlier: I took you off my Assistance List on that matter. ------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
If you want to watch something which might answer some of your questions and open your eyes to things, here's this... Deleted a duplicate post here. Edit to add: So that this post is not just a waste of space, am noting here that additional info was added to Post #586 since the time this one and #603 (with the memo on reference material copies sent) were pinged. ------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Pinging copies of reference materials at Post #586. May have to try accessing the post more than once if it goes to the opening post in this thread first, as my computer does likely due to thread-length. If so, go to the end of the path for Post #586 in the browser and click Enter.
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
So let's see. You are refusing to state WHAT direction you think the smoke is going, HAVE refused to state which direction the smoke is going, yet CLAIM that the smoke is going in the wrong direction. Thing is, you don't seem to KNOW WHICH DIRECTION the smoke SHOULD be travelling to begin with, and can't seem to determine the orientation for the view in each clip you specified, ie. 0:14 and 1:44. The first view is from the northwest of the North Tower, with the South Tower obscured since it was directly southeast of the North Tower. The second view is from due west of the towers from a further distance, with the North Tower to the left and the South Tower to the right. The smoke moves to the southeast in both clips. So what part of any of the above are you unable to understand, and/or what part of it do you disagree with? You're not helping prove your sincerity in this by ducking and evading the question. For anyone who wants to see how the NIST/WETA/Detroit Public TV/terrorize.dk/Smoke and Mirrors "plane out of nowhere" video clip was created, click on the link below to post 578. Subsequent posts 582, 583, and 584 analyze the deception behind the "Smoke and Mirrors" video in detail.
My apologies to terrorize.dk as I've checked the archived page you linked, and using the Google Translate function, found that the author of THAT site was apparently saying the same things I just said about how the "airplane appears out of nowhere" was faked, ie. by splicing in a modified version of the beginning which has the plane erased, picked up at the 0:02 mark where the smoke jumps backwards. The person was refering to the Detroit Public TV video, so obviously DPTV didn't get the video from terrorize.dk, rather it was the other way around. So then apparently both Detroit Public TV and WETA got their video from the same source, one or the other produced it. Is that source actually NIST? Did NIST fake the "plane out of nowhere" to instigate the "no plane" theory? You're not helping prove your sincerity in this by ducking and evading the question. You're like a Looney Tunes duck, honestly, "daffy-1". This is an example of why it's unproductive to converse seriously with you lately, FL, and why the length of this thread (over unwarranted redundancies) is causing manueverability issues to wade through it for more important matters. I have not refused to state which direction the smoke is going and don't recall at the moment having used the particular phrase "wrong direction", although I might have. I've told you multiple times already that the smoke is going in opposite directions. Also, that the plane is moving from right to left in both examples I cited (0:14 and 1:44) but the smoke is moving to the left and away from the plane flying through a clear sky in the first example (at 0:14) and in the second example (at 1:44) the smoke is moving towards the plane and over it as it flows from left to right. Capiche now? Probably not but it's not a priority to me if you still don't get it. Ref: Post #586 ------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Also, that the plane is moving from right to left in both examples I cited (0:14 and 1:44) So what? The plane was moving northwards, so viewing from the northwest or from the west will show a right to left motion. but the smoke is moving to the left and away from the plane flying through a clear sky in the first example (at 0:14) No. It is moving away from the observer, and the view is from the northwest, thus the direction of the smoke is southeast. The easterly component will give the appearance of a leftwards motion, but THAT part of the plume is well past the WTC and out in the distance after having expanded. It is quite clear that the smoke pouring out of the North Tower is heading directly towards the South Tower, which is southeast of the North Tower. and in the second example (at 1:44) the smoke is moving towards the plane and over it as it flows from left to right. You're wrong. In the second clip, viewed from roughly due west of the WTC, the smoke is not just moving left to right (southwards), but also outwards (eastwards). The plane itself was west of the smoke and does not fly through it. Capiche now? Do you? The person was refering to the Detroit Public TV video, so obviously DPTV didn't get the video from terrorize.dk, rather it was the other way around. So then apparently both Detroit Public TV and WETA got their video from the same source, one or the other produced it. Is that source actually NIST? Did NIST fake the "plane out of nowhere" to instigate the "no plane" theory? afaik, the source is NIST. The Producer is listed as US Department of Commerce, NIST. Doubtful that the video was created for any NoPlanesTheory reason. As I said before (I think more than once), to my recollection, the video was Media manipulated for Iraq War propaganda purposes. For whatever reason it was done, that is likely where the graduated smoke copy was inserted, although there are smoke anomalies and smoke-shape issues between similar scenes in the videos listed for comparison. Other MSM video clips of 9/11 do show the plane image appearing out of nowhere. As far as the plane being shown on only one side or the other of the Empire State building and not a full approach path in some places, I doubt that is meant to be intentionally misleading as to where the plane image first appears in its approach. Rather, it's likely due to particular disscussion points about the scene. The video states that the smoke is the main focus of the analysis and not so much the plane, etc. Nice talking to ya this time, FL. Appreciated reading your thoughtful note. ------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Things is GL, the Smoke and Mirrors author implies that this is actual footage from the day of 9/11, and uses it to "prove" his "no planes" theory. He even has the blatent audacity to say that the NIST video is taken from a different camera than the CBS video which he later includes in his presentation, while making dishonest remarks about how the "camera was aimed slightly to the right of the Empire State Building instead of at the burning WTC", where in reality the shot is a cropped and doctored version of the CBS video he later includes in his own video. He goes on to draw attention, repeatedly I might add, to how it "comes out of nowhere". And yes, he then shows the wider angle version of the CBS clip with a doctored smoke plume, going into detail about how it was fake. Sure it's fake, but it's ALSO doctored video based upon the original CBS video, which does NOT contain a fake smoke plume, it contains the real one. Do you? I think so. You seem to be saying, basically, that it's just an optical illusion but the shift in the buildings from one view to the next isn't significant enough for me to see it your way at this time. Didn't appreaciate this note as much as the last one, though, but nice try anyway. Edited for spelling. ------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Comments (612 - 674) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestThere is no smoke "blowing in opposite directions" except from out of your own head.
#572. To: FormerLurker (#570)
(Edited)
Correction. With all these idiotic back and forth posts I misspoke and said the first shot was from the northeast. I meant northwest, and had said northwest hundreds of posts ago.
"Do people really believe the US governement could contain a plan like this from anyone."
I locked myself inside the capsule
And watched the planet slowly turning blue
The lights before me flashed and sparkled
Holding keys to lives I've wandered through
Mysterious and cold upon the screen
Glowing, flowing with the currents
Yet never knowing where I've really been
Come to rest in planes that don't exist
Visiting worlds of crystal beauty
Offering dreams so very hard to resist
I've seen the future
Beyond dimension and into empty space
Finding questions, never answers
Living time behind another face
#573. To: GreyLmist (#572)
#574. To: GreyLmist, randge, All (#572)
(Edited)
Since I'm here, though, do you realize that the example you cited a couple of times at 1:16 in the MSM newsclips video isn't really comparable to the Internet Archived NIST video because the NIST video shows a plane approach and the MSM newsclip video doesn't? This longer, 10-min. version of the video you've been rampaging about for so long has comparable examples of the archived NIST documentary in question (at the start) and the alleged plane impact too:
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#575. To: GreyLmist (#572)
the archived NIST documentary in question
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#576. To: GreyLmist, randge, All (#572)
(Edited)
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#577. To: FormerLurker (#576)
It's obvious disinfo, which you either fell for, or are actively a participant in.
#578. To: GreyLmist, randge, titorite, RickyJ, tom007, wudidiz, abraxas, All, *9-11* (#572)
(Edited)
In fact if you compare the smoke plume at the end of that clip, where the plane disappears behind the Empire State Building, that is EXACTLY where the video STARTS, The video is looped from the true start of the motion in the CBS video, with the plane edited out of the frame, then restarted slightly after the beginning of motion in the CBS video, giving the illusion that it was all one continuous clip with a plane appearing out of nowhere.
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#579. To: randge (#577)
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#580. To: FormerLurker (#579)
#581. To: randge (#580)
It's extremely difficult to know whose collection of pixels is the genuine article here and what has been tampered with. I don't have the expertise myself and must rely on the interpretations of others.
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#582. To: All (#578)
(Edited)
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#583. To: GreyLmist, All (#572)
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#584. To: GreyLmist, *9-11* (#572)
(Edited)
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#585. To: All (#584)
(Edited)
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#586. To: randge (#573)
(Edited)
View Direction: north
Duration: 8.475
File Size: 31,700,388 bytes
(30.23 MB)
Me: 0:14 and 1:44 timestamps for comparison of smoke trajectories
FL: 1:16 smoke issue and 4:35-4:59 plane and smoke issues; comparison to Smoke and Mirrors videosThe camera location: General Motors Building, aka FAO Schwartz, E 58th St at Madison Ave... 215 meters tall on ground elevated at 48 feet above sea level Lat 40.763595 Lon -73.972781 (Thanks, YougeneDebs)
Oddly enough, Detroit Public TV has pulled its "documentary" off its website...
#587. To: GreyLmist (#586)
(Edited)
2. Post #572 | 9/11 TV Fakery: Smoke & Mirrors -- long version, 10 min.
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#588. To: GreyLmist (#586)
(Edited)
Click here: http://archive.org/details/PBS-Center07 -- 8.5 sec. clip with audio of the PBS documentary. Full version at Internet Archive.
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#589. To: FormerLurker (#575)
Out of curiousity, do you have a link to the NIST documentary you cite, or are you just repeating what you've heard in the "Smoke and Mirrors" video?
#590. To: GreyLmist (#586)
Me: 0:14 and 1:44 timestamps for comparison of smoke trajectories
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#591. To: GreyLmist (#589)
(Edited)
I posted the NIST video clip for the PBS documentary referenced in the Smoke and Mirrors videos at Post #525 and again at Post #586 in a collection of related videos for comparisons as an access convenience.
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#592. To: GreyLmist (#589)
I posted the NIST video clip for the PBS documentary referenced in the Smoke and Mirrors videos at Post #525
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#593. To: FormerLurker (#578)
"For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth, to know the worst, and to provide for it.” ~ Patrick Henry
#594. To: wudidiz (#593)
Watcha think of this?
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#595. To: randge (#573)
I have been following this debate on and off for the past couple of days and haven't had time to keep up with the minutiae of the discussion, but I'd like to know how you'd respond to this question.
How do I know what I am seeing here is a video as it was released or copied from Detroit Public TV and hasn't been doctored to show something other than what the original producer had broadcast?
#596. To: GreyLmist, randge, *9-11* (#595)
(Edited)
Also at Post #586 linked above is a NIST clip (Producer: US Department of Commerce, NIST) at Internet Archive of the PBS-Center 07 documentary referenced in both of the Smoke and Mirrors videos. This is the link for the documentary clip at Internet Archive: http://archive.org/details/PBS-Center07.
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#597. To: FormerLurker, *9-11* (#594)
I think video compression causes a loss of resolution, especially that of a repetitive linear pattern such as the outside of the WTC.
"For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth, to know the worst, and to provide for it.” ~ Patrick Henry
#598. To: wudidiz (#597)
(Edited)
You have failed to address any of the anomalies in the picture. You talk about video compression, but the images are taken from a video shown on the news. One of the ones used as "evidence" of a plane hit.
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#599. To: wudidiz (#597)
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#600. To: FormerLurker (#590)
Out of curiousity, are you ever going to tell me which way YOU think the smoke is travelling in each clip in regards to compass direction?
#601. To: wudidiz, *9-11* (#597)
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#602. To: , *No Planers* (#586)
(Edited)
#603. To: *No Planers* (#586)
#604. To: GreyLmist, *9-11* (#600)
Nope. In case you didn't get the memos about that earlier: I took you off my Assistance List on that matter.
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#605. To: All, *9-11* (#578)
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#606. To: GreyLmist, randge, All, *9-11* (#586)
Link to Internet Archive Wayback Machine page-copy for terrorize.dk: Second Hit - North of the Empire State Building [Translate from Danish to English]
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#607. To: FormerLurker (#604)
So let's see. You are refusing to state WHAT direction you think the smoke is going, HAVE refused to state which direction the smoke is going, yet CLAIM that the smoke is going in the wrong direction.
4. Post #549 | September 11, 2001 - As It Happened - The South Tower Attack -- 8.5 min.
#608. To: GreyLmist (#607)
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#609. To: FormerLurker (#606)
My apologies to terrorize.dk as I've checked the archived page you linked, and using the Google Translate function, found that the author of THAT site was apparently saying the same things I just said about how the "airplane appears out of nowhere" was faked, ie. by splicing in a modified version of the beginning which has the plane erased, picked up at the 0:02 mark where the smoke jumps backwards.
#610. To: GreyLmist (#609)
I doubt that is meant to be intentionally misleading as to where the plane image first appears in its approach. Rather, it's likely due to particular disscussion points about the scene. The video states that the smoke is the main focus of the analysis and not so much the plane, etc.
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#611. To: FormerLurker (#608)
(Edited)
Capiche now?
.
.
.
