[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Mark Felton: Can Russia Attack Britain? Notre Dame Apologizes After Telling Hockey Fans Not To Wear Green, Shamrocks, 'Fighting Irish' Dear Horse, which one of your posts has the Deep State so spun up that's causing 4um to run slow? Bomb Cyclone Pacific Northwest Death Certificates Reveal FBI 'Revised' Murder Stats Still Bogus A $110B bubble on $500M earnings. History warns: Bubbles always burst. Joy Behar says people like their show because they tell the truth, unlike "dragon believer" Joe Rogan. Male Passenger Disappointed After Another Flight Ends Without A Stewardess Frantically Asking If Anyone Can Land The Plane Could the Rapid Growth of AI Boost Gold Demand? LOOK AT MY ASS! Elon Musk Responds As British Government "Summons" Him To 'Disinformation' Hearing MSNBC Contributor Panics Over Trump Nominating Bondi For AG: Dangerous Because Shes Competent House passes dangerous bill that targets nonprofits, pro-Palestine groups Navy Will Sideline 17 Support Vessels to Ease Strain on Civilian Mariners Israel carries out field executions, massacres in north Gaza AOC votes to back Israel Lobby's bogus anti-Semitism definition Biden to launch ICE mobile app, further disrupting Trump's mass deportation plan: Report Panic at Mar-a-Lago: How the Fake Press Pool Fueled Global Fear Until X Set the Record Straight Donald Trumps Nominee for the FCC Will Remove DEI as a Priority of the Agency Stealing JFK's Body Trump plans to revive Keystone XL pipeline to solidify U.S. energy independence ASHEVILLE UPDATE: Bodies Being Stacked in Warehouses & Children Being Taken Away American news is mostly written by Israeli lobbyists pushing Zionist agenda Biden's Missile Crisis British Operation Kiss kill Instantly Skripals Has Failed to Kill But Succeeded at Covering Up, Almost NASA chooses SpaceX and Blue Origin to deliver rover, astronaut base to the moon The Female Fantasy Exposed: Why Women Love Toxic Love Stories United States will NOT comply with the ICC arrest warrant for Prime Minister Netanyahu: Mississippi’s GDP Beats France: A Shocking Look at Economic Policy Failures (Per Capita) White House Refuses to Recognize US Responsibility for Escalation of Conflict in Ukraine

9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: How 9/11 Was Done
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://physics911.net/how-911-was-done/
Published: Sep 3, 2012
Author: http://physics911.net/how-911-was-done/
Post Date: 2012-09-03 14:09:24 by tom007
Keywords: None
Views: 19350
Comments: 674

How 9/11 Was Done

For additional notes see the accompanying blog 911notes.blogspot.com. Prologue

Read the following two screens of text to learn what happened at 9/11.

9/11 was a master plot, concocted by a handfull of Israelis and dual passport Americans and carried out by the resources of the Mossad.

Larry Silverstein leases a nearly worthless dinosaur WTC building complex (worthless due to the asbestos the buildings were stuffed with and needed to be cleaned up, the cost of which may have rivaled the value of the buildings themselves) weeks before 9/11, makes sure it is over insured against terrorist acts and hires an Israeli security firm. From that moment on the coast is clear to let a team of demolition experts from the Israeli army led by Peer Segalovitz into the WTC buildings. These charges plus detonators had been prepared at the premises of the Urban Moving Systems company, a Mossad front. During the weeks before 9/11 these prepared charges were loaded into vans, driven into the basements of WTC Twin Towers next to the elevator shaft, unloaded into the elevator, and lifted onto the roof of the elevator through the opening in the elevator ceiling. Next the elevator moved from floor to floor while charges where being attached to the columns as displayed in this video from 0:22 onwards. The detonators of these charges were radiographic controlled and finally detonated from WTC7 on the day of 9/11.

Fast backward, Hamburg 54 Marienstrasse, july 2000, 22:40. Mohamed Atta, Al Shehhi and Jarrah (who were later blamed of being the pilots of flight 11, 175 and 93 respectively), who share the apartment hear the ringing of the door bell. Jarrah opens the door, 5 masked men make their way into the apartment with drawn pistols. The 3 Arabs are forced to lay on the ground. Their passports are confiscated, next the 3 men are made unconscious with some liquid and strangled to death afterwards. The bodies are carried out of the apartment into a van and driven off towards a desolate spot at the boarding of the Elbe river outside Hamburg, 1 kilometer north of Borstel and disposed of into the river with a bag filled with stones tied to their feet. The 3 passports are now in the possession of the agents of the Mossad, who carried out the raid on the apartment and 3 Arabs have vanished without anybody knowing that they are dead. Not long after the raid the 3 passports are given to 3 Israeli agents who were selected on having some resemblance with the 3 Arabs just killed. They make for America soon afterwards in the summer of 2000 and start laying a trail at flight schools, posing with the stolen identities from the 3 Arabs killed.

Years earlier the israeli Michael Goff working for PTech, an Arab owned software company that develops key enterprise software for many government institutions like NORAD and FAA, using his secure channel with another israeli Amit Yoran, somehow manages to give Israeli army computer programmers access to this critical computer code. It was due to this manipulation that the hijackings on 9/11 remained unnoticed by the flight controller of NORAD. Once this was in place the planes could be taken over by remote control and flown into the World Trade Center.

The hijacking of airliners by remote control had been tested as a dress rehearsal for 9/11 on the Egypt Air flight 990 that crashed into the Atlantic on October 31, 1999.

Now everything was in place to commit the crime of the century. On the day of 9/11 the Israeli stand-ins for the ‘Arab hijackers’ showed up at the predestined departure airports to make sure they were captured on surveillance camera’s. The crucial point here is that the security at both the departure airports was in hands of an Israeli firm Huntleigh-USA, a subsidiary of the Dutch based but Israeli owned ICTS led by a fellow named Menahem Atzmon. And this is crucial: Atzmon used to be a colleague of Olmert in 1998. So there you have the link between the 9/11 operative level (an airport security firm) and the highest level of Israeli politics. What happened on the morning of 9/11 was that after the Israeli stand-ins were captured on camera, they left the airport via a side entrance and the show could begin. Minutes after the planes became air born somebody somehow was able to send a signal to the planes, causing the control panels to be disabled and the flight destination altered. What happened was that an anti-hijack system was activated (code word ‘home run’) and the regular pilot was put out of control. This pilot will probably have tried frantically to regain control of his aircraft. It is not very likely he will have told his passengers about the new situation since that would only cause panic. The passengers probably suspected nothing and hence had no reason to make any phone calls to their relatives (which were not possible anyway). And while the 9/11 passengers unsuspecting travel towards their immanent deaths, on the ground from a war room Israeli agents carry out phone calls to relatives of the passengers that were still in the air, using voice morphing technology and caller-ID spoofing and thus planted the Arabs-did-it-deception in the public consciousness. The sound samples necessary to carry out the fake telephone calls had been obtained via the israeli infiltration of American telephone networks by Israeli firms like Amdocs and Verint. By the time that the passengers were puzzled as they discerned the New York sky line it was already too late.

Meanwhile on the other side of the Hudson river the members of the Israeli team that planted the demolition charges were waiting for things to happen. And while the rest of New York experienced in horror the events that were unfolding that day, the demolition experts were celebrating and high-fiving. The plot had worked out magnificently.

*** Please save this page to your local hard drive ***

This blog is the verbal expression of an adaptive learning process. Please come back regularly.

Core Argument

Ok, I admit. Some elements in this story are speculative. I do not know for instance if Atta was killed in Germany or in America. But the story is an coherent educated speculation. It is an attempt to reconstruct the events of 9/11. Myriads of web sites exist that expose the inconsistencies in the official story, that obviously is a fraud. This story offers an integral explanation of what could have happened and in all likelihood more or less did happen at 9/11 as there can be hardly any doubt about who was behind 9/11 if one rejects the official story. Some elements remain vague, like what happened exactly to WTC7, flight77, flight93 or Mohamed Atta. But these questions are of academic interest only. It’s clear who was behind 9/11 and what happened in detail with WTC-1/2 and the planes. That is enough. Here’s where most people got killed. The rest of the plot can be uncovered by a tribunal.

In order to prevent that you get swallowed up by yet another 10 meters of screen text here is the core of the argument. The story is based on 2 broadly accepted postulates:

1) WTC was brought down by controlled demolition 2) The ‘dancing Israelis’ on the morning of 9/11 had foreknowledge of things to come

These 2 premises are enough to put the Official Conspiracy Theory (Arabs did it) out of business.

Premise 2 leads to the preliminary conclusion that the Israelis had foreknowledge because they organized the attacks themselves. Since Israelis are not known to commit suicide attacks we have to assume that the airplanes that crashed into their destinations were remote controlled. If one accepts this as a working hypothesis than there is a lot, I mean really a lot, of material that supports this Israeli Conspiracy Theory that replaces the official Arab Conspiracy Theory. We have the dedicated Zionist Silverstein who leases the WTC complex and over insures it against terrorism (leading to a hansom profit); we know that security at all departure airports and ‘arrival airports’ (WTC) was in Israeli hands (Huntleigh-USA and Kroll Associates, resp.); we know that the owner of Huntleigh-USA, Menachem Atzmon, a convicted criminal, had strong ties to Ehud Olmert, that is the highest level of Israeli politics; we also know that the Israeli secret service can eavesdrop on virtually everybody in the USA via Israeli owned companies like Amdocs and Verint which gave the Mossad the possibility to obtain sound samples of future 9/11 passengers to apply voice morphing to in order to make the fake phone calls on 9/11. And of course there is Dov Zakheim, the real mastermind of 9/11 who was CEO of SPC for 4 years prior to 9/11, a company that produces systems for remote control of airplanes. The same Zakheim that was a member of the Zionist dominated PNAC group, that more or less plotted for a global American empire, and suggested that a ‘New Pearl Harbor‘ (page 51) could speed things up a bit; and finally the same Zakheim that 6 months before 9/11 became supervisor of a group of Pentagon comptrollers that had to sort out what had happened to the 2.3 trillion dollars that were missing from the Pentagon books; many of these comptrollers conveniently got killed on 9/11 and much of the financial data went with them. This is the core of the story.

Note: I am not claiming that 9/11 is solved. Of this however we can be certain: WTC controlled demolition, Israelis carried out the operation, no Arab hijackers, mastermind Zakheim, motive PNAC & Clean Break and remote control. I do not care about flight77 or 93, those are details to be solved by crime investigators. The most pressing question is that of remote control: how was that done? Were the original flights 11 and 175 remote controlled themselves or was there a plane swap as some have suggested, including Bollyn?

Disclaimer: nobody is guilty until convicted by a court of law. This blog’s intent is to stimulate thinking about 9/11 from a different angle than the official one. From day one the blame has been put at bin Laden and his people without real evidence. Today bin Laden is no longer persecuted for 9/11 according to the FBI website. The theory proposed here might be true or false or contain some truth. In the end it must be an official investigation that determines who is guilty and who is not. This blog is dedicated to Italian ex-president Cossiga who is the highest ranking statesman to date who has openly stated that it was the Mossad who has carried out the 9/11 attacks.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Hence, my query at #508 asking if you knew what you were talking about. This is the 3rd time now that you are being informed: the referenced video [9-11 TV Fakery Smoke & Mirrors (short version)] was altered by the media to promote War in Iraq.

Pure crap.

That video first showed up in 2004 (judging from the comments to that video on YouTube), and was more than likely created by a "no planer" to make his case.

Not even ONE of the live videos from 9/11 display any of the manipulation visible in that video, so it is quite obvious that whoever created that video did it with the intent of deceiving his audience into thinking it was an example of media manipulation of the live video, where in reality it is the person himself who doctored it, or fabricated it out of whole cloth since there IS no live video from that day which displays any similarities to that video.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-20   12:23:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

This is the 3rd time now that you are being informed: the referenced video [9-11 TV Fakery Smoke & Mirrors (short version)] was altered by the media to promote War in Iraq.

That video was released sometime in 2004. The Iraq War was launched in 2003.

So much for your cover story.

In terms of needing video to show an audience to beat the war drums, there was already plenty of it to show, they didn't need to create anything new, and they certainly didn't need to erase the smoke plume from original footage and reinsert it in an amateurish manner.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-20   12:32:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

In this post, titorite asked for help in posting the video analysis here of MSM newsclips with plane-trajectory anomalies at this link: www.youtube.com/watch? v=NnhDqOJh_28 -- YouTube title: WTC No Plane Truth (Part 17)

As far as your other BS videos, find me an ORIGINAL video which shows the same characteristics.

The panoramic collection I posted several times, the latest back in post 344, would be a good place to start. Care to point out anything odd about that collection of videos?

You rely on "analyzed" video to "prove" your case, while not considering the VERY strong possibility that it is the analyzer himself adding those video oddities.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-20   12:42:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Now GreyLmist and titorite, I want each of you to answer a VERY simple question with a YES or a NO answer, not with a five page collection of nonsense, but with a YES or a NO.

Was there a smoke plume on the morning of 9/11/2001 pouring out of the WTC North Tower?

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-20   12:46:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Your argument is invalid

Really? Your videos simply reiterate what I've already said, and certainly don't disprove anything I've stated.

If you disagree, then cite the point in the video that you think proves differently.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-20   13:05:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Now GreyLmist and titorite, I want each of you to answer a VERY simple question with a YES or a NO answer, not with a five page collection of nonsense, but with a YES or a NO.

Was there a smoke plume on the morning of 9/11/2001 pouring out of the WTC North Tower?

Enough of your voluminous and redundant, bilious verbiage round and round and round. I've already answered your question at #437:

As you consider all such smoke formations as undisputable, prima facie evidence in itself of your 9/11 thesis, regardless of the contradictions, and consider technical Videography analysis a distractive and disruptive non- science, what's the point of your question [Edit to add: again]? To once again declare any response as interference and sprayed propaganda to dominate and derail the thread? I haven't decided yet exactly how much of the Acts of War against America which we saw that day may have been designed offstage by the perps.

What you think of that, the timeliness of the documentary in question, and whether that media manipulated propaganda was of any use in your opinion for beating the war drums means about nothing in their scheme of things. What your tedium ad nauseum does show is that nothing from us in these discussion gets through to you without being mangled. The next time you want to waste more time and space around here by repeating your quoted question like this is your personal Inquisition dungeon to torture "9/11 heretics" and readers, ask NIST and/or Internet Archive instead:

Click here: http://archive.org/details/PBS-Center07 -- 8.5 sec. clip with audio of the PBS documentary. Full version at Internet Archive. The video posted here was an analysis of footage in it manipulated by the media.

PBS-Center 07 (May 25, 2010) US Department of Commerce, NIST

View Direction: north
Duration: 8.475
File Size: 31,700,388 bytes
(30.23 MB)

This movie is part of the collection: NIST WTC Organized Video Repository Producer: US Department of Commerce, NIST

Edited 1st sentence of last paragraph + bracketed addition and punctuation in the quoted section re: #437.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-09-20   13:52:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

An excellent reprise of important transactions in this argument.

Note that the writer didn't see the need to call anyone a "punk" or an "asshole" in his summary.

The lines of patience are much longer in Grey.

____________________________________________________________ . . . The US government has declared civil war on itself. Its lust for war grew so great... Liberty before death. We run , we live, We fight again, till we win. We did not start this fight. We damn sure did not willingly pay our taxes to buy the bullets and drones that shall be used to kill us. We will correct the violations of this rogue nation....our rogue nation. We will fix this because nobody else can. You will work to help me help us all to fix this failure. After you're done educating yourself, Action!!!

titorite  posted on  2012-09-20   14:08:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Good job on posting videos, titorite.

Thank you much.... and yeah wow... I have to agree with others.. that was some awe inspireing jaw dropping well spoken words of debate on your part....

I should have such long lines of patience :)

____________________________________________________________ . . . The US government has declared civil war on itself. Its lust for war grew so great... Liberty before death. We run , we live, We fight again, till we win. We did not start this fight. We damn sure did not willingly pay our taxes to buy the bullets and drones that shall be used to kill us. We will correct the violations of this rogue nation....our rogue nation. We will fix this because nobody else can. You will work to help me help us all to fix this failure. After you're done educating yourself, Action!!!

titorite  posted on  2012-09-20   14:14:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

In this post, titorite asked for help in posting the video analysis here of MSM newsclips with plane-trajectory anomalies at this link: www.youtube.com/watch? v=NnhDqOJh_28 -- YouTube title: WTC No Plane Truth (Part 17)

As far as your other BS videos, find me an ORIGINAL video which shows the same characteristics.

The panoramic collection I posted several times, the latest back in post 344, would be a good place to start. Care to point out anything odd about that collection of videos?

You rely on "analyzed" video to "prove" your case, while not considering the VERY strong possibility that it is the analyzer himself adding those video oddities.

You were shown MSM newsclips of plane trajectory and smoke trajectory anomalies. From what I've seen of your "panoramic collection" video, it's largely not MSM stamped but what's your point as an analyzer of it? You made the smoke go in opposite directions in the first 2 1/2 minutes or whoever made the video did that or it's just being viewed wrong perspectivewise, according to you, if anyone thinks it anomalous or what? Btw, the profanely screeching woman in that video also said in the longer version words to the effect that they weren't under attack in their area, the WTC was. Odd thing to say, under the circumstances -- like foreknowledge of some sort.

Edited for spelling.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-09-20   14:33:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I was getting low on patience at #525 but am in the process of trudging back in that direction. Such thoughtful posts from friendlies here are rather energizing in that way.

Edited last sentence.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-09-20   14:48:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Enough of your voluminous and redundant, bilious verbiage round and round and round.

Again, you project your own faults onto others as ALL of your posts prove. You can NOT answer with a YES or a NO, you have to post page upon page of bullshit instead.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-20   15:31:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

You were shown MSM newsclips of plane trajectory and smoke trajectory anomalies.

You are posting videos doctored by "no planers", proving that the "no planers" doctored them.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-20   15:32:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

This movie is part of the collection: NIST WTC Organized Video Repository Producer: US Department of Commerce, NIST

Uh huh. EIGHT SECONDS of video, which does NOT show what your doctored video "shows".

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-20   15:33:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

This is an article from 2005 that I found today. Have just scanned through it quickly so far but it looks to be highly informative and corroborated with many linked references and pics:

Hollywood-like Fake Smoke Made 9-11

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-09-20   15:35:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

You made the smoke go in opposite directions in the first 2 1/2 minutes or whoever made the video did that

Uh huh. Are you just plain nuts, retarded, or blind? Which is it?

NONE of those video clips shows "smoke going in opposite directions". You are either a totaly inept idiot or a liar to the extreme.

If you had any sense of direction and had enough common sense to correlate the towers with the actual landscape and map orientation, the smoke travels southeast in EVERY FUCKING VIDEO you moron. There, I can cuss just like your little friend. Maybe it'll help you understand things better.

Did you ever gradudate elementary school?

If you're standing west of an object moving southeast, it moves left to right and into the distance

If you're standing north of that object, it moves right to left and into the distance.

If you're standing east of that moving object, it moves right to left and towards you.

If you're standing south of that moving object, it moves left to right and towards you.

You've impressed me with how ridiculous your argument is, especially considering you expect people to believe millions of people in NYC are either blind, stupid, or were not paying attention on the morning of 9/11 and didn't notice that there was NO SMOKE PLUME (according to you and titorite, although you've tap danced around that simple yes or no question as to whether there WAS a smoke plume or not).

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-20   15:46:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

You are currently incapable of overcoming your brainwashing FL

____________________________________________________________ . . . The US government has declared civil war on itself. Its lust for war grew so great... Liberty before death. We run , we live, We fight again, till we win. We did not start this fight. We damn sure did not willingly pay our taxes to buy the bullets and drones that shall be used to kill us. We will correct the violations of this rogue nation....our rogue nation. We will fix this because nobody else can. You will work to help me help us all to fix this failure. After you're done educating yourself, Action!!!

titorite  posted on  2012-09-20   16:02:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

This is an article from 2005 that I found today. Have just scanned through it quickly so far but it looks to be highly informative and corroborated with many linked references and pics:

Just as I thought, the usual mix of truth and fiction, leading naive, uneducated, and gullible people down the rabbit hole never to return.

No wonder the government gets away with this sort of thing, there are too many REALLY dumb people out there who fall for their gimmicks, hook, line, and sinker, who THEN turn around and claim verifiable evidence is fabricated, while their fantasies based on imaginary evidence which doesn't exist is the absolute "truth".

Good luck with your "journey" down that hole, and congrats again on muddying the waters so thoroughly, the truth may well NEVER be widely known and the culprits will continue to walk free without fear of justice ever catching up to them.

Hell, you've pissed me off to the point I really don't think I care anymore, and I'm sure that was your intent all along.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-20   16:09:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

You are currently incapable of overcoming your brainwashing FL

I guess in YOUR Orwellian mindset, lies are truth, truth is a lie, north is east, west is north, south is up and left is down.

Sure thing kid.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-20   16:10:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Hell, you've pissed me off to the point I really don't think I care anymore, and I'm sure that was your intent all along.

U mad bro?

Seriously though if you are mad you should ask yourself why do you hate the conclusion?

____________________________________________________________ . . . The US government has declared civil war on itself. Its lust for war grew so great... Liberty before death. We run , we live, We fight again, till we win. We did not start this fight. We damn sure did not willingly pay our taxes to buy the bullets and drones that shall be used to kill us. We will correct the violations of this rogue nation....our rogue nation. We will fix this because nobody else can. You will work to help me help us all to fix this failure. After you're done educating yourself, Action!!!

titorite  posted on  2012-09-20   16:21:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Seriously though if you are mad you should ask yourself why do you hate the conclusion?

Because it is this sort of bullshit that obscures the truth, and prevents the majority of the population from ever nailing it down well enough to demand action.

Most people on the fence about it would just dismiss ALL further discussion of 9/11 contradictions and flat out impossibilities as whacked out fantasies, and would feel perhaps the government story IS true, and that is the end of it.

This sort of thing destroys any credibility thousands of people have worked long and hard for, and obscures any real facts and data they present.

It's just the sort of thing those complicit with the attacks themselves would do to cover their tracks.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-20   16:30:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Because it is this sort of bullshit that obscures the truth, and prevents the majority of the population from ever nailing it down well enough to demand action.

What obscures the truth is your own altered ego , manipulated by the propaganda of the day..... that or pig headed foolishness that can not admit when he is wrong.

As for the people taking action?... Yeah righht... Action begins with you bub, and I ain't talking about typing online.

____________________________________________________________ . . . The US government has declared civil war on itself. Its lust for war grew so great... Liberty before death. We run , we live, We fight again, till we win. We did not start this fight. We damn sure did not willingly pay our taxes to buy the bullets and drones that shall be used to kill us. We will correct the violations of this rogue nation....our rogue nation. We will fix this because nobody else can. You will work to help me help us all to fix this failure. After you're done educating yourself, Action!!!

titorite  posted on  2012-09-20   16:35:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

For one, you have ZERO proof of what you claim, and rely on fabricated evidence to make your point.

You also ignore the fact that effectively the ENTIRE POPULATION of NYC would have to be in on your alleged plot, where they all decided to lie about the fact what they were seeing with their eyes was NOT what they were seeing on live TV.

You in fact claim there weren't even any hijacked planes at all, so add American Airlines, United, Logan Airport, Dulles International, and Newark International to your list, as well as the FAA and its air traffic controllers.

And of course, don't forget to add EVERY network broadcasting out of NYC that morning, along with all camera crews, reporters, and production staff.

Yep, in YOUR world, that all makes sense.

Did you never contemplate the possibility that YOUR view of things was manufactured by those who WERE in on it, and who inserted that ridiculous theory into the mix in order to sow confusion in the minds of the less educated and easily misled?

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-20   16:43:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

As for the people taking action?... Yeah righht... Action begins with you bub, and I ain't talking about typing online

Go for it Rambo, go storm CNN and see where it gets you, since you think THEY were the ones who made 9/11 happen.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-20   16:44:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Go for it Rambo, go storm CNN and see where it gets you, since you think THEY were the ones who made 9/11 happen.

You shouldn't presume that I don't

That is a big part of your problem mister....

Too many damn presumptions..

You already know it all so whats the point Jack?

____________________________________________________________ . . . The US government has declared civil war on itself. Its lust for war grew so great... Liberty before death. We run , we live, We fight again, till we win. We did not start this fight. We damn sure did not willingly pay our taxes to buy the bullets and drones that shall be used to kill us. We will correct the violations of this rogue nation....our rogue nation. We will fix this because nobody else can. You will work to help me help us all to fix this failure. After you're done educating yourself, Action!!!

titorite  posted on  2012-09-20   16:48:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

So what's stopping you, go ahead and don some black SWAT outfit and do your thing at CNN, since you're a big bad brave internet tough guy, I'm sure it'll work out for you swell.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-20   17:08:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

If you want to believe little leprechauns dressed in drag wired the WTC towers and switched the live network feeds that morning with their own production, go ahead and believe that, but don't have the audacity to tell sane people that THEY'RE the ones with a problem.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-20   17:11:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

No, they weren't leprechauns.

wudidiz  posted on  2012-09-20   17:14:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

wudidiz  posted on  2012-09-20   17:16:44 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

No, they weren't leprechauns.

Well at least you got that one right wud.

But in your mind, do you think the entire population of NYC would lie about what they saw that day, or keep silent about it if it were in conflict with what they saw on TV?

Do YOU think the smoke plumes were faked?

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-20   17:18:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Me: You were shown MSM newsclips of plane trajectory and smoke trajectory anomalies.

You: You are posting videos doctored by "no planers", proving that the "no planers" doctored them.

Bizarre. Why won't you find something more constructive to do, FL, like free your mind some? I daresay, I'm probably not the only one getting the imagery that your loose-cannon routine is not in your best interest or your faction's. You had no problem earlier re-posting (at #344) and then debating in better form the very same video of MSM clips that I posted twice before at #297 and #323 (noting in the second posting the timestamps 0:14 and 1:44 for comparison of smoke and plane trajectories):

September 11, 2001 - As It Happened - The South Tower Attack

There are certainly other MSM video examples on the net that you could compare those clips with if your objective was to determine the truth rather than obfuscate and worse. I gave your commentary and info serious consideration in further studies of the trajectory matter -- far more, I'd say, than you've shown to No Planers throughout these discussions. I'm aware that you don't agree with me on the trajectories and, since your posts are amounting (imo) to heckling and static, I'm confident that most others here can well assess the trajectories for themselves in the above video and more without having to be repetitiously run through your guantlet and mazes about it. If they'd like to offer their opinions on the subject, I'd be quite interested in hearing them. Would like to be able to say the same about yours but no can do at this juncture.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-09-20   17:56:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

You had no problem earlier re-posting (at #344) and then debating in better form the very same video of MSM clips that I posted twice before at #297 and #323 (noting in the second posting the timestamps 0:14 and 1:44 for comparison of smoke and plane trajectories):

Do you have ADD or dyslexia? Which tower do you think is closest to you at 0:14 in the video? Since you're probably not going to answer, it's the NORTH tower viewed from the northeast, and smoke is blowing directly away from the observer (southeast), then expanding out from right to left in the distance.

At 1:14, it's from the same angle and the smoke is blowing the same direction.

But wait, at 1:16 THERE is the original footage of the aptly named [Smoke and Mirrors] video you've been using as "evidence" of tampering, where in the original, here at 1:16, such tampering does not exist, and the smoke is STILL travelling southeast. Since you've proven your inability to judge direction, the view is from the north, and the North Tower is to the right of the South Tower (look at the f'in map if you don't believe me), and the smoke is travelling right to left and away, ie. to the southeast.

And BTW, the newscaster says "it went into the east tower". There WAS no "east tower", he obviously meant South Tower, but he may have made the mistake due to the fact the South Tower was actually southeast of the North Tower.

All you're doing is proving how inept you are at analyzing video footage.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-20   18:32:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I'm confident that most others here can well assess the trajectories for themselves in the above video and more

And they would see for themselves what sort of shit you've been shoveling here.

without having to be repetitiously run through your guantlet and mazes about it.

The mazes are set up by you, where you absolutely refuse to acknowledge compass orientation, act as if there is no such thing as direction, and refuse to answer yes or no questions with a yes or a no.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-20   18:34:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

0:14 and 1:44 of the video "September 11, 2001 - As It Happened - The South Tower Attack" at Post #297:

Here in post 323 you said 0:14 and 1:44. So in case you're going to claim I'm avoiding the issue, 0:14 was recorded from the northeast of the North Tower, and the smoke is travelling southeast as explained previously. The footage at 1:44 was recorded from the west of both towers, resulting in a left to right and outwards direction of the smoke, and a right to left approach of the aircraft into the South Tower.

Are you really that blind, dumb, or confused?

Are you ever going to admit you're mistaken, or are you going to keep on posting this dung every 50 posts or so, pretending that you've never been proven wrong on this topic?

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-20   18:46:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

and consider technical Videography analysis a distractive and disruptive non- science

I consider those who FABRICATE "video oddities" where none existed before to be liars, swindlers, and worse.

What you've posted as "evidence" is NOT "technical Videography", it is nothing more than amaturish attempts to distort and doctor the original footage while claiming that's what they "found" in that original footage, where those distortions and "oddities" did not exist till they got their hands on it, edited it, then published their "findings".

Again, the very video you posted just now, showing the raw footage (timestamp 1:16), proves that the person who "found" the manipulation in the smoke plume is the person who ADDED that manipulated smoke plume, since the original footage does NOT contain such manipulation.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-20   18:56:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

In terms of proof that "no planers" are themselves manipulating and fabricating evidence to "prove" the videos are fabricated, here's a prime example of their "work".

Observe the original footage in the following video from 4:35 to 4:59. It's obvious the smoke plume in that original footage is not manipulated.

Now look at their "evidence", where someone has produced a video aptly named [9/11 TV Fakery: Smoke & Mirrors]. It is obvious the smoke plume has been erased and overlayed with a copy, progressing to an enlarged copy from right to left.

The author has even indicated with yellow lines where he doctored the video.

Now how's that for being dumb and believing everything you see on YouTube?

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-20   19:30:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Because it is this sort of bullshit that obscures the truth, and prevents the majority of the population from ever nailing it down well enough to demand action.

Most people on the fence about it would just dismiss ALL further discussion of 9/11 contradictions and flat out impossibilities as whacked out fantasies, and would feel perhaps the government story IS true, and that is the end of it.

This sort of thing destroys any credibility thousands of people have worked long and hard for, and obscures any real facts and data they present.

It's just the sort of thing those complicit with the attacks themselves would do to cover their tracks.

Don't be silly. No Planers haven't stood in the way of Planers demanding action. On the contrary, I've asked since long before arriving here why your side hasn't moved to prosecute if they have it all figured out. Stop using us as the excuse for Planer inactions. As far as I know, a majority of the population being agreeable isn't required to proceed prosecutorially in Criminal cases. Lynch mobs are maybe what you're imagining in the way of demanding action. Even the American Revolution probably didn't have a majority of the population concurring -- at least at first.

As for the people on the fence you spoke of, 9/11 shouldn't be a contest for most popular and marketable narrative, imo. My guess is that some aren't much interested in the truth or discussions or researching for themselves -- Planes or no Planes. Perhaps it's condescending, intelligence-insulting attitudes like yours and the implausibility of remote control mantras that are hindering your group from convincing others.

You've all along been peddling "9/11 contradictions and flat out impossibilities as whacked out fantasies" by the pretense that 9/11 should strangely be handled as some kind of "exceptional" case where it's considered crazy, etc., to scrutinize available videos for veracity. Even an unarmed theft at a convenience store with cameras gets more serious investigation of the film and its accuracy or lack thereof than you and yours are willing to accept as routine procedure in 9/11 evidence gathering. Like you said, that's just the sort of thing those complicit with the attacks themselves would do to cover their tracks. Let me tell you that, by my reckonings, those dumbed-down and ludicrous strategies, illogical denials and suppressive prohibitions against evidence you don't like doesn't sway as many people to your arrogant, muddying and demeaning way of thinking as much as you seemingly suppose.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-09-20   19:50:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Ping to post 554 with clear evidence of tampering by no planers to make video footage appear to be tampered with. Well no shit, THEY are the ones doing the tampering.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-20   19:54:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Hey genius, check your ping to post 554. So will you now admit that you have been trying to pass off videos doctored by no planers as actual evidence of a huge conspiracy by all news networks and the people of NYC on the morning of 9/11?

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-20   19:57:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

You've all along been peddling "9/11 contradictions and flat out impossibilities as whacked out fantasies" by the pretense that 9/11 should strangely be handled as some kind of "exceptional" case where it's considered crazy, etc., to scrutinize available videos for veracity.

As I've said all along, fabricating evidence is not called scrutiny, it's called falsification of evidence and quackery.

In terms of what I post regarding 9/11, I post known scientific principles and how they relate to the events of 9/11, such as the impossibility of the towers falling at near free fall speed into themselves as if the lower floors didn't exist, as well as the obvious free fall speed of WTC7 as if it were falling through thin air.

I post the fact that at least some of the hijackers are still alive.

I post the fact that it is physically impossible for a 757 to fly several feet over the Pentagon lawn at over 500 mph while not even scraping the lawn, and flying nose level into the Pentagon ground floor, especially when piloted by a inept fool who couldn't even fly a single engine propeller driven plane..

I post reports concerning foreign assets found with tons of explosives on the George Washington Bridge that day, and the involvement of their brethren jumping with joy and dancing to the sight of the WTC towers collapsing, and how they were picked up by law enforcement and detained, then released.

I post the plausibility of remote controled aircraft being the aircraft that actually took part in the attacks of that day, and historical data backing up that hypothesis.

I have posted many other things concerning that day, but not once have I posted as factual and definitive any hair brained scenario which would require huge leaps of faith to accept, especially if it defies all logic and would require millions of co-conspirators to pull off.

So no, I don't post "9/11 contradictions and flat out impossibilities as whacked out fantasies", I identify how the official story is impossible, and how scientific fact contradicts the official legend.

By you peddling whacked out fantastical stories as 9/11 "truth", you discredit those who ARE honestly researching the facts concerning 9/11, and their work, since the masses of ignorant Americans who believe bin Laden was behind 9/11 will group what YOU say along with what Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth and other such experts have to say, and dismiss BOTH of you without any thought thinking you are both saying similar things.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-20   20:13:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Comments (559 - 674) not displayed.

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]