[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Mark Felton: Can Russia Attack Britain? Notre Dame Apologizes After Telling Hockey Fans Not To Wear Green, Shamrocks, 'Fighting Irish' Dear Horse, which one of your posts has the Deep State so spun up that's causing 4um to run slow? Bomb Cyclone Pacific Northwest Death Certificates Reveal FBI 'Revised' Murder Stats Still Bogus A $110B bubble on $500M earnings. History warns: Bubbles always burst. Joy Behar says people like their show because they tell the truth, unlike "dragon believer" Joe Rogan. Male Passenger Disappointed After Another Flight Ends Without A Stewardess Frantically Asking If Anyone Can Land The Plane Could the Rapid Growth of AI Boost Gold Demand? LOOK AT MY ASS! Elon Musk Responds As British Government "Summons" Him To 'Disinformation' Hearing MSNBC Contributor Panics Over Trump Nominating Bondi For AG: Dangerous Because Shes Competent House passes dangerous bill that targets nonprofits, pro-Palestine groups Navy Will Sideline 17 Support Vessels to Ease Strain on Civilian Mariners Israel carries out field executions, massacres in north Gaza AOC votes to back Israel Lobby's bogus anti-Semitism definition Biden to launch ICE mobile app, further disrupting Trump's mass deportation plan: Report Panic at Mar-a-Lago: How the Fake Press Pool Fueled Global Fear Until X Set the Record Straight Donald Trumps Nominee for the FCC Will Remove DEI as a Priority of the Agency Stealing JFK's Body Trump plans to revive Keystone XL pipeline to solidify U.S. energy independence ASHEVILLE UPDATE: Bodies Being Stacked in Warehouses & Children Being Taken Away American news is mostly written by Israeli lobbyists pushing Zionist agenda Biden's Missile Crisis British Operation Kiss kill Instantly Skripals Has Failed to Kill But Succeeded at Covering Up, Almost NASA chooses SpaceX and Blue Origin to deliver rover, astronaut base to the moon The Female Fantasy Exposed: Why Women Love Toxic Love Stories United States will NOT comply with the ICC arrest warrant for Prime Minister Netanyahu: Mississippi’s GDP Beats France: A Shocking Look at Economic Policy Failures (Per Capita) White House Refuses to Recognize US Responsibility for Escalation of Conflict in Ukraine

9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: How 9/11 Was Done
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://physics911.net/how-911-was-done/
Published: Sep 3, 2012
Author: http://physics911.net/how-911-was-done/
Post Date: 2012-09-03 14:09:24 by tom007
Keywords: None
Views: 19062
Comments: 674

How 9/11 Was Done

For additional notes see the accompanying blog 911notes.blogspot.com. Prologue

Read the following two screens of text to learn what happened at 9/11.

9/11 was a master plot, concocted by a handfull of Israelis and dual passport Americans and carried out by the resources of the Mossad.

Larry Silverstein leases a nearly worthless dinosaur WTC building complex (worthless due to the asbestos the buildings were stuffed with and needed to be cleaned up, the cost of which may have rivaled the value of the buildings themselves) weeks before 9/11, makes sure it is over insured against terrorist acts and hires an Israeli security firm. From that moment on the coast is clear to let a team of demolition experts from the Israeli army led by Peer Segalovitz into the WTC buildings. These charges plus detonators had been prepared at the premises of the Urban Moving Systems company, a Mossad front. During the weeks before 9/11 these prepared charges were loaded into vans, driven into the basements of WTC Twin Towers next to the elevator shaft, unloaded into the elevator, and lifted onto the roof of the elevator through the opening in the elevator ceiling. Next the elevator moved from floor to floor while charges where being attached to the columns as displayed in this video from 0:22 onwards. The detonators of these charges were radiographic controlled and finally detonated from WTC7 on the day of 9/11.

Fast backward, Hamburg 54 Marienstrasse, july 2000, 22:40. Mohamed Atta, Al Shehhi and Jarrah (who were later blamed of being the pilots of flight 11, 175 and 93 respectively), who share the apartment hear the ringing of the door bell. Jarrah opens the door, 5 masked men make their way into the apartment with drawn pistols. The 3 Arabs are forced to lay on the ground. Their passports are confiscated, next the 3 men are made unconscious with some liquid and strangled to death afterwards. The bodies are carried out of the apartment into a van and driven off towards a desolate spot at the boarding of the Elbe river outside Hamburg, 1 kilometer north of Borstel and disposed of into the river with a bag filled with stones tied to their feet. The 3 passports are now in the possession of the agents of the Mossad, who carried out the raid on the apartment and 3 Arabs have vanished without anybody knowing that they are dead. Not long after the raid the 3 passports are given to 3 Israeli agents who were selected on having some resemblance with the 3 Arabs just killed. They make for America soon afterwards in the summer of 2000 and start laying a trail at flight schools, posing with the stolen identities from the 3 Arabs killed.

Years earlier the israeli Michael Goff working for PTech, an Arab owned software company that develops key enterprise software for many government institutions like NORAD and FAA, using his secure channel with another israeli Amit Yoran, somehow manages to give Israeli army computer programmers access to this critical computer code. It was due to this manipulation that the hijackings on 9/11 remained unnoticed by the flight controller of NORAD. Once this was in place the planes could be taken over by remote control and flown into the World Trade Center.

The hijacking of airliners by remote control had been tested as a dress rehearsal for 9/11 on the Egypt Air flight 990 that crashed into the Atlantic on October 31, 1999.

Now everything was in place to commit the crime of the century. On the day of 9/11 the Israeli stand-ins for the ‘Arab hijackers’ showed up at the predestined departure airports to make sure they were captured on surveillance camera’s. The crucial point here is that the security at both the departure airports was in hands of an Israeli firm Huntleigh-USA, a subsidiary of the Dutch based but Israeli owned ICTS led by a fellow named Menahem Atzmon. And this is crucial: Atzmon used to be a colleague of Olmert in 1998. So there you have the link between the 9/11 operative level (an airport security firm) and the highest level of Israeli politics. What happened on the morning of 9/11 was that after the Israeli stand-ins were captured on camera, they left the airport via a side entrance and the show could begin. Minutes after the planes became air born somebody somehow was able to send a signal to the planes, causing the control panels to be disabled and the flight destination altered. What happened was that an anti-hijack system was activated (code word ‘home run’) and the regular pilot was put out of control. This pilot will probably have tried frantically to regain control of his aircraft. It is not very likely he will have told his passengers about the new situation since that would only cause panic. The passengers probably suspected nothing and hence had no reason to make any phone calls to their relatives (which were not possible anyway). And while the 9/11 passengers unsuspecting travel towards their immanent deaths, on the ground from a war room Israeli agents carry out phone calls to relatives of the passengers that were still in the air, using voice morphing technology and caller-ID spoofing and thus planted the Arabs-did-it-deception in the public consciousness. The sound samples necessary to carry out the fake telephone calls had been obtained via the israeli infiltration of American telephone networks by Israeli firms like Amdocs and Verint. By the time that the passengers were puzzled as they discerned the New York sky line it was already too late.

Meanwhile on the other side of the Hudson river the members of the Israeli team that planted the demolition charges were waiting for things to happen. And while the rest of New York experienced in horror the events that were unfolding that day, the demolition experts were celebrating and high-fiving. The plot had worked out magnificently.

*** Please save this page to your local hard drive ***

This blog is the verbal expression of an adaptive learning process. Please come back regularly.

Core Argument

Ok, I admit. Some elements in this story are speculative. I do not know for instance if Atta was killed in Germany or in America. But the story is an coherent educated speculation. It is an attempt to reconstruct the events of 9/11. Myriads of web sites exist that expose the inconsistencies in the official story, that obviously is a fraud. This story offers an integral explanation of what could have happened and in all likelihood more or less did happen at 9/11 as there can be hardly any doubt about who was behind 9/11 if one rejects the official story. Some elements remain vague, like what happened exactly to WTC7, flight77, flight93 or Mohamed Atta. But these questions are of academic interest only. It’s clear who was behind 9/11 and what happened in detail with WTC-1/2 and the planes. That is enough. Here’s where most people got killed. The rest of the plot can be uncovered by a tribunal.

In order to prevent that you get swallowed up by yet another 10 meters of screen text here is the core of the argument. The story is based on 2 broadly accepted postulates:

1) WTC was brought down by controlled demolition 2) The ‘dancing Israelis’ on the morning of 9/11 had foreknowledge of things to come

These 2 premises are enough to put the Official Conspiracy Theory (Arabs did it) out of business.

Premise 2 leads to the preliminary conclusion that the Israelis had foreknowledge because they organized the attacks themselves. Since Israelis are not known to commit suicide attacks we have to assume that the airplanes that crashed into their destinations were remote controlled. If one accepts this as a working hypothesis than there is a lot, I mean really a lot, of material that supports this Israeli Conspiracy Theory that replaces the official Arab Conspiracy Theory. We have the dedicated Zionist Silverstein who leases the WTC complex and over insures it against terrorism (leading to a hansom profit); we know that security at all departure airports and ‘arrival airports’ (WTC) was in Israeli hands (Huntleigh-USA and Kroll Associates, resp.); we know that the owner of Huntleigh-USA, Menachem Atzmon, a convicted criminal, had strong ties to Ehud Olmert, that is the highest level of Israeli politics; we also know that the Israeli secret service can eavesdrop on virtually everybody in the USA via Israeli owned companies like Amdocs and Verint which gave the Mossad the possibility to obtain sound samples of future 9/11 passengers to apply voice morphing to in order to make the fake phone calls on 9/11. And of course there is Dov Zakheim, the real mastermind of 9/11 who was CEO of SPC for 4 years prior to 9/11, a company that produces systems for remote control of airplanes. The same Zakheim that was a member of the Zionist dominated PNAC group, that more or less plotted for a global American empire, and suggested that a ‘New Pearl Harbor‘ (page 51) could speed things up a bit; and finally the same Zakheim that 6 months before 9/11 became supervisor of a group of Pentagon comptrollers that had to sort out what had happened to the 2.3 trillion dollars that were missing from the Pentagon books; many of these comptrollers conveniently got killed on 9/11 and much of the financial data went with them. This is the core of the story.

Note: I am not claiming that 9/11 is solved. Of this however we can be certain: WTC controlled demolition, Israelis carried out the operation, no Arab hijackers, mastermind Zakheim, motive PNAC & Clean Break and remote control. I do not care about flight77 or 93, those are details to be solved by crime investigators. The most pressing question is that of remote control: how was that done? Were the original flights 11 and 175 remote controlled themselves or was there a plane swap as some have suggested, including Bollyn?

Disclaimer: nobody is guilty until convicted by a court of law. This blog’s intent is to stimulate thinking about 9/11 from a different angle than the official one. From day one the blame has been put at bin Laden and his people without real evidence. Today bin Laden is no longer persecuted for 9/11 according to the FBI website. The theory proposed here might be true or false or contain some truth. In the end it must be an official investigation that determines who is guilty and who is not. This blog is dedicated to Italian ex-president Cossiga who is the highest ranking statesman to date who has openly stated that it was the Mossad who has carried out the 9/11 attacks.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

USA Today reporter Mike Walter was driving on Washington Boulevard when he witnessed the crash, which he recounted, "I looked out my window and I saw this plane, this jet, an American Airlines jet, coming. And I thought, 'This doesn't add up, it's really low.' And I saw it. I mean it was like a cruise missile with wings. It went right there and slammed right into the Pentagon"

What this gentleman saw, was witnessed by hundreds of other people from all walks of life.

I forgot to mention that the "pilot" of this rogue aircraft had been licensed as a commercial pilot by the FAA since 1999. Not an amatuer.

Cynicom  posted on  2012-09-04   14:45:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

. Pretty damn good for a pilot who "couldn't fly at all", eh?

Again, check the FAA records, the pilot had been a professional commercial pilot since 1999.

Cynicom  posted on  2012-09-04   14:48:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

And I saw it. I mean it was like a cruise missile with wings.

Exactly.

I forgot to mention that the "pilot" of this rogue aircraft had been licensed as a commercial pilot by the FAA since 1999. Not an amatuer.

Thing is, his flight instructors called the FAA to find out if his license was real, since he was not qualified to possess it. Besides the fact he couldn't fly an airplane, he could barely speak or understand English, and speaking English is a prerequisite for an FAA license.

From How the FBI and 9/11 Commission Suppressed Key Evidence about Hani Hanjour

Later, Hanjour’s horrible English prompted one flight school, Jet Tech, to question the authenticity of his FAA-approved pilot’s license. Jet Tech was another school in the Phoenix area where Hanjour sought continuing instruction. Peggy Chevrette, operation manager at Jet Tech, later told FOX News: “I couldn’t believe that he had a license of any kind with the skills that he had.”[8] She explained that Hanjour’s English was so bad it took him five hours to complete an oral exam that normally should have taken about two.

But it wasn’t just his poor English that failed to impress. In his evaluation the Jet Tech flight instructor wrote that the “student [Hanjour] made numerous errors during his performance and displayed a lack of understanding of some basic concepts. The same was true during review of systems knowledge….I doubt his ability to pass an FAA [Boeing 737] oral at this time or in the near future.” The 737 instructor concluded his evaluation with a final entry: “He [Hanjour] will need much more experience flying smaller A/C [aircraft] before he is ready to master large jets.”[9] The 9/11 Commission Report fails to discuss or even mention this negative written evaluation, even while presenting Hanjour’s substandard performance in a Boeing 737 simulator as sufficient evidence that Hanjour could fly a Boeing 757, an even larger plane![10] The wording of the final report succeeds in giving this impression, however dubious, even while obscuring the facts: an amazing achievement of propaganda.

Early in 2001, Peggy Chevrette, the operation manager at Jet Tech, repeatedly conveyed her concerns about Hanjour to the FAA. Eventually John Anthony, a federal inspector, showed up at the school and examined Hanjour’s credentials. But Anthony found them in order and took no further action. The inspector even suggested that Jet Tech provide Hanjour with an interpreter. This surprised Chevrette because it was a violation of FAA rules. “The thing that really concerned me,” she later told FOX News, “Was that John had a conversation in the hallway with Hani and realized what his skills were at that point and his ability to speak English.”[11] Evidently, the inspector also sat in on a class with Hanjour.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-04   14:53:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Again, check the FAA records, the pilot had been a professional commercial pilot since 1999.

Show me some documented proof of his flight experience.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-04   14:55:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Again, check the FAA records, the pilot had been a professional commercial pilot since 1999.

You will find NO "professional experience", since the man couldn't even fly a single engine plane. Apparently he was handed this "license" as part of the "Legend".

From Wiki

In larger networks the organization can be complex with many methods to avoid detection, including clandestine cell systems. Often the players have never met. Case officers are stationed in foreign countries to recruit and to supervise intelligence agents, who in turn spy on targets in their countries where they are assigned. A spy need not be a citizen of the target country - hence does not automatically commit treason when operating within it. While the more common practice is to recruit a person already trusted with access to sensitive information, sometimes a person with a well-prepared synthetic identity, called a Legend in tradecraft, may attempt to infiltrate a target organization.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-04   15:04:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Show me some documented proof of his flight experience.

No, you need to do your own homework, it is sadly lacking.

If you desire to have the information, call or write to FAA HQ in Washington, they will be happy to provide you with the proper office for such information.

That information will give you the names of his instructors, the name of the flight school and the FAA examiners that certified him for a commercial license.

Of course all of those people nearly fifteen years ago were probaly in on the event??? Right?? eh????

Cynicom  posted on  2012-09-04   15:08:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

What it comes down to Cyni is that you're saying Hanjour, who couldn't fly at all, pulled off a physically impossible feat with a large multi-engine aircraft.

Besides, there were no Arabs onboard Flight 77...

Autopsy: No Arabs on Flight 77 [Edited: provided more detailed info at updated link]

Perhaps Allah did it for him by him praying from his apartment that morning, eh?

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-04   15:11:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

No, you need to do your own homework, it is sadly lacking.

You are projecting Cyni. You have ZERO proof that Hanjour could fly, yet you attribute him with superhuman abilities to pull off the impossible.

If you bothered to look at all, the comments of his flight instructors are there for the world to see. The man COULD NOT FLY AT ALL.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-04   15:12:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

That information will give you the names of his instructors, the name of the flight school and the FAA examiners that certified him for a commercial license.

If I were an investigator with the power to pry into official government records, I'd more than likely hit a brick wall when delving into the identity of the person who handed Hanjour his "commerical license".

The identity would more than likely turn out to be fake, or that of a person who "recently passed away".

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-04   15:25:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

If you desire to have the information, call or write to FAA HQ in Washington, they will be happy to provide you with the proper office for such information.

It is YOU who claims to have first hand knowledge of the fact this dolt who couldn't fly at all had "professional experience" as a commerical pilot.

So go ahead, name the companies he flew for as a commercial pilot.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-04   15:28:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Have you never heard of drones or UAVs?

9/11 was flown by human hands.

And the proof of this assertion is?

Because the Nightly Nooze said so?

Because the White House Spokesliar said so?

The U.S. Government has never provided one iota of solid information tying the 19 magickal Ayerabs nor Osama Bin Dead since 2001 to the events of 9/11/2001. None, nada, zeeeeeeeero.

It has all been done by assertion and pronouncement repeated over and over and over. BUT, where's the beef?

Original_Intent  posted on  2012-09-04   16:22:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

9/11 was flown by human hands.

Point of interest...

In testimony by FAA radar controllers who were watching the aircraft on radar, they stated they considered the aircraft to being flown by someone of superior piloting skill because of the maneuvers executed.

(humor) Of course the aircraft could have been flown by the American Captain, who was not aboard but rather sitting in a casino in Las Vegas, with a remote joy stick.)

Hey, anything is possible, right????

Cynicom  posted on  2012-09-04   16:56:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

imagine

There was no plane.

wudidiz  posted on  2012-09-04   17:10:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

wud...

If someone offers expert proof that there was NO Pentagon involved, I will give up.

This is interesting as the government doles out disinformation to con the troops.

"Ever since this "no-plane" theory has been planted on the 9-11 truth movement, the corporate media inevitably seizes on it as a means to ridicule those who do not accept the official story of 9-11. One obvious example is the March 2005 issue of Popular Mechanics, which used the "no-plane" theory to summarily dismiss any and all doubters of the official story as a munch of nuts that all correct-thinking loyal Americans should ever listen to. Which is what the no-plane hoax is intended to do".

Cynicom  posted on  2012-09-04   17:38:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

That would all be true if....

There was a plane.

There was no plane.

wudidiz  posted on  2012-09-04   17:53:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

In testimony by FAA radar controllers who were watching the aircraft on radar, they stated they considered the aircraft to being flown by someone of superior piloting skill because of the maneuvers executed.

They were talking about the descent from 7000 feet to 2000 feet in a spiraling 330 degree turn.

There was no way for them to see on radar what the plane did when it was flying at tree top level.

Flight 77

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-04   17:56:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

There was no plane.

There were planes wud, just not the ones they were claimed to have been.

In the case of the Pentagon, it more than likely was a cruise missile painted as an American Airlines 757.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-04   17:59:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I don't think so.

wudidiz  posted on  2012-09-04   18:01:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/re...ArtNum=148199&Disp=64#C64

wudidiz  posted on  2012-09-04   18:04:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

There were planes

I didn't see one.

wudidiz  posted on  2012-09-04   18:05:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I didn't see one.

Did you ever personally see China wud? Just because YOU didn't see it doesn't mean it wasn't or isn't there.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-04   18:11:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

In testimony by FAA radar controllers who were watching the aircraft on radar, they stated they considered the aircraft to being flown by someone of superior piloting skill because of the maneuvers executed.

And oh yeah, forgot to mention that the "pilot" was the same Hani Hanjour who couldn't fly a Cessna.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-04   18:13:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Just because YOU didn't see it doesn't mean it wasn't or isn't there.

Noone saw it. Except on tv.

wudidiz  posted on  2012-09-04   18:17:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Noone saw it. Except on tv.

You are in denial wud. It wasn't just captured on video by MANY news agencies, people in New York actually saw it happen live.

That, and the witnesses in Washington saw SOME type of aircraft approaching the Pentagon.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-04   18:20:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I just love watching the mental contortions of the conspiracists.

I tell all of them I'll give them 10,000 years and they'll never prove ONE of their hallucinations.

I sense a disturbance in the farce. Much gnashing will ensue.

Turtle  posted on  2012-09-04   18:29:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

That would all be true if....

There was a plane.

There was no plane.

That may be it, W.

First hit a Global Hawk, the second hit is more interesting.

A British investigator seems to have a recording from the news helio that was up by that point as it was transmitted real time from the aircraft.

What I saw on that video feed was a LOT different than what I saw on CNN, but certainly was from the same camera.

Dwell on that.

So he is saying this evidence is absolute proof that a photoshopped feed was fed to us that fate filled day.

He postulates that a missile was fired from another helio that did the damage, and that is pretty much what you see on what he is claiming to be the real feed, not the shopped one we saw.

Nearly ANYTHING makes more sense than the Official Conspiracy.

"Satan / Cheney in "08"

tom007  posted on  2012-09-04   18:41:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

atching the aircraft on radar, they stated they considered the aircraft to being flown by someone of superior piloting skill because of the maneuvers executed.

Yes, they assumed they were mil jets, not people movers.

"Satan / Cheney in "08"

tom007  posted on  2012-09-04   18:43:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

There was no plane.

There were planes wud, just not the ones they were claimed to have been.

In the case of the Pentagon, it more than likely was a cruise missile painted as an American Airlines 757.

Something along those lines.

"Satan / Cheney in "08"

tom007  posted on  2012-09-04   18:44:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

An Honest Commission or if we had an FBI worth the name we would have gotten to the bottom of this in one week.

But that is the LAST THING the gov within a gov wants.

"Satan / Cheney in "08"

tom007  posted on  2012-09-04   19:10:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I tell all of them I'll give them 10,000 years and they'll never prove ONE of their hallucinations.

You have never proven ONE thing here Turtle, yet claim to know everything. You feel yourself smarter than everyone else, yet know nothing at all about what you're talking about.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-04   19:55:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

There was no plane.

wud..

Wheres de plane boss, wheres de plane?????

hehehehehehehehehe

Cynicom  posted on  2012-09-04   20:23:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

tom...

All airlines have parameters concerning aircraft maneuvers allowed by their pilots.

Rate of climb or descent and degree of bank.

Infrequent fliers get scared as hell when they look out the window and they are looking down. Anything outside those limits are noticed.

I remember years ago, when was with olde CAA, there was a Pan Am 707 that went on its back at altitude. The pilot was out of his seat, managed to get back in his seat and with first officer, they brought it out of a dive. They landed at Gander, no major injuries.

The aircraft had to be junked, never flew again. The auto pilot had malfunctioned.

You will appreciate this, it will escape most. At Gander, during the investigation, for some unknown reason, someone did a random check of the aircraft for radiation and it was way above normal expectations and allowances.

Alarm bells went off as this was during cold war. Where had the aircraft been to become radioactive. It had flown thru the airborne debris from an unannounced Russian A test.

The government is mostly bad but not all bad, mostly stupid but not all stupid.

Cynicom  posted on  2012-09-04   20:58:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

9/11 - Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out, Full-length tinyurl.com/blf8t32

Itistoolate  posted on  2012-09-04   21:01:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

that is a saver, thanks. Amazing at how fast 11 years passes.

"Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28

Artisan  posted on  2012-09-05   1:30:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Yes, they assumed they were mil jets, not people movers.

They knew he was NOT a military jet.

The AA jet had TURNED OFF HIS TRANSPONDER.

With transponder off, it was much more difficult to follow him, he then becomes an unknown, his maneuvers were beyond normal airline aircraft, which prompted the controllers later to testify that his flying had been very good.

The DNA for every person involved was obtained with exception of one small boy. One person actually made it alive to the hospital alive, died later. I do not recall if was on aircraft or Pentagon employee.

Cynicom  posted on  2012-09-05   2:00:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

And oh yeah, forgot to mention that the "pilot" was the same Hani Hanjour who couldn't fly a Cessna.

Have you ever considered the possibility that what you believe is exactly what someone wants you to believe?????

Cynicom  posted on  2012-09-05   2:04:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

But here is the critical question: what is the government's (not Silverstein's) official explanation for how and why Building 7 came down. I

Burning furniture.

Seriously, that is what a NSIT suit said on record. Burning furniture - dwell on that for a moment to see what liars are all about.

May have been the same NSIT guy who said, straight faced, that there were NO REPORTS OF EXPLOSIONS REPORTED BY ANY SOURCE.

And I don't think openly burning jet fuel will reach much more than 700 F.

Snoora seems an expert. Ask her - She knows the godless Arabs did it.

And we should get a donation jar going for poor Larry Silverstien who took a huge loss from all that gold from WTC 7.

Israel did this to the United States People.

First, it's NIST National Institute of Standards and Technology not NSIT.

And the 9/11 commission report said that they could not determine the cause of Bldg 7's collapse.

Quote: "Snoora seems an expert. Ask her - She knows the godless Arabs did it."

The screen name is Shoonra and he's a man. And Shoonra is the name of The Israeli Cat Site.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2012-09-05   3:12:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Have you ever considered the possibility that what you believe is exactly what someone wants you to believe?????

I'm just looking at the facts Cyni. It's not a matter of belief, it's a matter of knowing what the facts are, and what is possible and what isn't.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-05   4:02:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

The DNA for every person involved was obtained with exception of one small boy

And not one "hijacker's" DNA was found at the Pentagon.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-09-05   4:04:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Comments (93 - 674) not displayed.

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]