See other 9/11 Articles
Title: The 11th Anniversary of 9/11--Paul Craig Roberts
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/
Published: Sep 11, 2012
Author: PCR
Post Date: 2012-09-11 10:52:14 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 641
Comments: 32
The article below was written for the Journal of 9/11 Studies for the eleventh anniversary of September 11, 2001, the day that terminated accountable government and American liberty. It is posted here with the agreement of the editors. In order to understand the improbability of the government’s explanation of 9/11, it is not necessary to know anything about what force or forces brought down the three World Trade Center buildings, what hit the Pentagon or caused the explosion, the flying skills or lack thereof of the alleged hijackers, whether the airliner crashed in Pennsylvania or was shot down, whether cell phone calls made at the altitudes could be received, or any other debated aspect of the controversy. You only have to know two things. One is that according to the official story, a handful of Arabs, mainly Saudi Arabians, operating independently of any government and competent intelligence service, men without James Bond and V for Vendetta capabilities, outwitted not only the CIA, FBI, and National Security Agency, but all 16 US intelligence agencies, along with all security agencies of America’s NATO allies and Israel’s Mossad. Not only did the entire intelligence forces of the Western world fail, but on the morning of the attack the entire apparatus of the National Security State simultaneously failed. Airport security failed four times in one hour. NORAD failed. Air Traffic Control failed. The US Air Force failed. The National Security Council failed. Dick Cheney failed. Absolutely nothing worked. The world’s only superpower was helpless at the humiliating mercy of a few undistinguished Arabs. It is hard to image a more far-fetched story--except for the second thing you need to know: The humiliating failure of US National Security did not result in immediate demands from the President of the United States, from Congress, from the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and from the media for an investigation of how such improbable total failure could have occurred. No one was held accountable for the greatest failure of national security in world history. Instead, the White House dragged its feet for a year resisting any investigation until the persistent demands from 9/11 families for accountability forced President George W. Bush to appoint a political commission, devoid of any experts, to hold a pretend investigation. On 9/11 Doubts Were Immediate On September 11, 2001, a neighbor telephoned and said, “turn on the TV.” I assumed that a hurricane, possibly a bad one from the sound of the neighbor’s voice, was headed our way, and turned on the TV to determine whether we needed to shutter the house and leave. What I saw was black smoke from upper floors of one of the World Trade Center towers. It didn’t seem to be much of a fire, and the reports were that the fire was under control. While I was trying to figure out why every TV network had its main news anchor covering an office fire, TV cameras showed an airplane hitting the other tower. It was then that I learned that both towers had been hit by airliners. Cameras showed people standing at the hole in the side of the tower looking out. This didn’t surprise me. The airliner was minute compared to the massive building. But what was going on? Two accidents, one on top of the other? The towers—the three-fourths or four-fifths of the buildings beneath the plane strikes--were standing, apparently largely undamaged. There were no signs of fire except in the vicinity of where the airliners had hit. Suddenly, one of the towers blew up, disintegrated, and disappeared in fine dust. Before one could make any sense of this, the same thing happened to the second tower, and it too disappeared into fine dust. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6alf9_xswA The TV news anchors compared the disintegration of the towers to controlled demolition. There were numerous reports of explosions throughout the towers from the base or sub-basements to the top. (Once the government put out the story of terrorist attack, references to controlled demolition and explosions disappeared from the print and TV media.) This made sense to me. Someone had blown up the buildings. It was completely obvious that the towers had not fallen down from asymmetrical structural damage. They had blown up. The images of the airliners hitting the towers and the towers blowing up were replayed time and again. Airliners hit the top portions of the towers, and not long afterward the towers blew up. I turned off the TV wondering how it was that cameras had been ready to catch such an unusual phenomenon as an airplane flying into a skyscraper. I don’t remember the time line, but it wasn’t long before the story was in place that Osama bin Laden and his al Qaeda gang had attacked the US. A passport had been found in the rubble. Another airliner had flown into the Pentagon, and a fourth airliner had crashed or been shot down. Four airliners had been hijacked, meaning airport security had failed four times on the same morning. Terrorists had successfully assaulted America. When I heard these reports, I wondered. How could a tiny undamaged passport be found in the rubble of two skyscrapers, each more than 100 stories tall, when bodies, office furniture and computers could not be found? How could airport security fail so totally that four airliners could be hijacked within the same hour? How could authorities know so conclusively and almost immediately the names of the perpetrators who pulled off such a successful attack on the world’s only superpower, when the authorities had no idea that such an attack was planned or even possible? These questions disturbed me, because as a former member of the congressional staff and as a presidential appointee to high office, I had high level security clearances. In addition to my duties as Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury, I had FEMA responsibilities in the event of nuclear attack. There was a mountain hideaway to which I was supposed to report in the event of a nuclear attack and from which I was supposed to take over the US government in the event no higher official survived the attack. The more the story of 9/11 was presented in the media, the more wondrous it became. It is not credible that not only the CIA and FBI failed to detect the plot, but also all 16 US intelligence agencies, including the National Security Agency, which spies on everyone on the planet, and the Defense Intelligence Agency, Israel’s Mossad, and the intelligence agencies of Washington’s NATO allies. There are simply too many watchmen and too much infiltration of terrorist groups for such a complex attack to be prepared undetected and carried out undeterred. Washington’s explanation of the attack implied a security failure too massive to be credible. Such a catastrophic failure of national security would mean that the US and Western Europe were never safe for one second during the Cold War, that the Soviet Union could have destroyed the entire West in one undetected fell swoop. As a person whose colleagues at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington were former secretaries of state, former national security advisors, former CIA directors, former chairmen of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, I was troubled by the story that a collection of individuals unsupported by a competent intelligence service had pulled off the events of 9/11. As a person with high level government service, I knew that any such successful operation as 9/11 would have resulted in immediate demands from the White House, Congress, and the media for accountability. There would have been an investigation of how every aspect of US security could totally fail simultaneously in one morning. Such a catastrophic and embarrassing failure of the national security state would not be left unexamined. NORAD failed. The US Air Force could not get jet fighters in the air. Air Traffic Control lost sight of the hijacked airliners. Yet, instead of launching an investigation, the White House resisted for one year the demands of the 9/11 families for an investigation. Neither the public, the media, nor Congress seemed to think an investigation was necessary. The focus was on revenge, which the Bush neocon regime said meant invading Afghanistan which was alleged to be sheltering the perpetrator, Osama bin Laden. Normally, terrorists are proud of their success and announce their responsibility. It is a way to build a movement. Often a number of terrorist groups will compete in claiming credit for a successful operation. But Osama bin Laden in the last video that is certified by independent experts said that he had no responsibility for 9/11, that he had nothing against the American people, that his opposition was limited to the US government’s colonial policies and control over Muslim governments. It makes no sense that the “mastermind” of the most humiliating blow in world history ever to have been delivered against a superpower would not claim credit for his accomplishment. By September 11, 2001, Osama bin Laden knew that he was deathly ill. According to news reports he underwent kidney dialysis the following month. The most reliable reports that we have are that he died in December 2001. It is simply not credible that bin Laden denied responsibility because he feared Washington. But Osama bin Laden was too useful a bogeyman, and Washington and the presstitute media kept him alive for another decade until Obama needed to kill the dead man in order to boost his sinking standings in the polls so that Democrats would not back a challenger for the Democratic presidential nomination. Numerous bin Laden videos, every one pronounced a fake by experts, were released whenever it was convenient for Washington. No one in the Western media or in the US Congress or European or UK parliaments was sufficiently intelligent to recognize that a bin Laden video always showed up on cue when Washington needed it. “Why would the ‘mastermind’ be so accommodating for Washington?” was the question that went through my mind every time one of the fake videos was released. The 9/11 “investigation” that finally took place was a political one run from the White House. One member of the commission resigned, declaring the investigation to be a farce, and both co-chairman and the legal counsel of the 9/11 Commission distanced themselves from their report with statements that the 9/11 Commission was “set up to fail,” that resources were withheld from the commission, that representatives of the US military lied to the commission and that the commission considered referring the false testimony for criminal prosecution. One would think that these revelations would cause a sensation, but the news media, Congress, the White House, and the public were silent. All of this bothered me a great deal. The US had invaded two Muslim countries based on unsubstantiated allegations linking the two countries to 9/11, which itself remained uninvestigated. The neoconservatives who staffed the George W. Bush regime were advocating more invasions of more Muslim countries. Paul O’Neill, President Bush’s first Treasury Secretary, stated publicly that the Bush regime was planning to invade Iraq prior to 9/11. O’Neill said that no one at a National Security Council meeting even asked the question, why invade Iraq? “It was all about finding a way to do it.” http://articles.cnn.com/2004-01-10/politics/oneill.bush_1_roomful-of-deaf-people-education-of-paul-o-neill-national-security-council-meeting?_s=PM:ALLPOLITICS The leaked top secret Downing Street Memo written by the head of British intelligence (MI6) confirms Paul O’Neill’s testimony. The memo, known as the “smoking gun memo” whose authenticity has been confirmed, states that “President George W. Bush wants to remove Saddam Hussein, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy.” In other words, the US invasion of Iraq was based on nothing but a made up lie. As an engineering student I had witnessed a controlled demolition. When films of the collapse of WTC building 7 emerged, it was obvious that building 7 had been brought down by controlled demolition. When physics instructor David Chandler measured the descent of the building and established that it took place at free fall acceleration, the case was closed. Buildings cannot enter free fall unless controlled demolition has removed all resistance to the collapsing floors. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lESol88wOi0 If airliners brought down two skyscrapers, why was controlled demolition used to bring down a third building? I assumed that structural architects, structural engineers, and physicists would blow the whistle on the obviously false story. If I could see that something was amiss, certainly more highly trained people would. The first physicist to make an effective and compelling argument was Steven Jones at BYU. Jones said that explosives brought down the twin towers. He made a good case. For his efforts, he was pressured to resign his tenured position. I wondered whether the federal government had threatened BYU’s research grants or whether patriotic trustees and alumni were the driving force behind Jones’ expulsion. Regardless, the message was clear to other university based experts: “Shut up or we’ll get you.” Steven Jones was vindicated when chemist Niels Harrit of the University of Copenhagen In Denmark reported unequivocally that the scientific team in which he participated found nano-thermite in the residue of the twin towers. This sensational finding was not mentioned in the US print and TV media to my knowledge. Several years after 9/11 architect Richard Gage formed Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth, an organization that has grown to include 1,700 experts. The plans of the towers have been studied. They were formidable structures. They were constructed to withstand airliner hits and fires. There is no credible explanation of their failure except intentional demolition. I also found disturbing the gullibility of the public, media, and Congress in the unquestioning acceptance of the official stories of the shoe-bomber, shampoo and bottled water bomber, and underwear bomber plots to blow up airliners in transit. These schemes are farcical. How can we believe that al Qaeda, capable of pulling off the most fantastic terrorist attack in history and capable of devising improvised explosive devices (IEDs) that kill and maim US troops and destroy US military vehicles would rely on something that had to be lighted with a match? The shoe and underwear bombers would simply have pushed a button on their cell phones or laptops, and the liquid bomb would not have required extended time in a lavatory to be mixed (all to no effect). None of this makes any sense. Moreover, experts disputed many of the government’s claims, which were never backed by anything but the government’s story line. There is no independent evidence that anything was involved other than firecracker powders. The case of the underwear bomber is especially difficult to accept. According to witnesses, the underwear bomber was not allowed on the airliner, because he had no passport. So an official appears who walks him onto the airliner bound for Detroit on Christmas day. What kind of official has the authority to override established rules, and what did the official think would happen to the passenger when he presented himself to US Customs without a passport? Any official with the power to override standard operating practices would know that it was pointless to send a passenger to a country where his entry would be rejected. The circumstantial evidence is that these were orchestrated events designed to keep fear alive, to create new intrusive powers for a new over-arching federal policy agency, to accustom US citizens to intrusive searches and a police force to conducting them, and to sell expensive porno-scanners and now more advanced devices to the Transportation Safety Administration. Apparently, this expensive collection of high-tech gadgetry is insufficient to protect us from terrorists, and in August 2012 the Department of Homeland Security put in an order for 750 million rounds of ammunition, enough to shoot every person in the US 2.5 times. Naive and gullible Americans claim that if some part of the US government had been involved in 9/11, “someone would have talked by now.” A comforting thought, perhaps, but nothing more. Consider, for example, the cover-up by the US government of the 1967 Israeli attack on the USS Liberty that killed or wounded most of the crew but failed to sink the ship. As the survivors have testified, they were ordered in a threatening way not to speak about the event. It was twelve years later before one of the USS Liberty’s officers, James Ennes, told the story of the attack in his book, Assault on the Liberty. I continue to wonder how the professionals at the National Institute of Standards and Technology feel about being maneuvered by the federal government into the unscientific position NIST took concerning the destruction of the WTC towers. What will be the outcome of the doubts about the official story raised by experts? I worry that most Americans are too mentally and emotionally weak to be able to come to grips with the truth. They are far more comfortable with the story that enemies attacked America successfully despite the massive national security state in place. The American public has proved itself to be so cowardly that it willingly, without a peep, sacrificed its civil liberty and the protections of law guaranteed by the Constitution in order to be “safe.” Congress is not about to expose itself for having squandered trillions of dollars on pointless wars based on an orchestrated “new Pearl Harbor.” When the neoconservatives said that a “new Pearl Harbor” was a requirement for their wars for American/Israeli hegemony, they set the stage for the 21st century wars that Washington has launched. If Syria falls, there is only Iran, and then Washington stands in direct confrontation with Russia and China. Unless Russia and China can be overthrown with “color revolutions,” these two nuclear powers are unlikely to submit to Washington’s hegemony. The world as we know it might be drawing to a close. If enough Americans or even other peoples in the world had the intelligence to realize that massive steel structures do not disintegrate into fine dust because a flimsy airliner hits them and limited short-lived fires burn on a few floors, Washington would be faced with the suspicion it deserves. If 9/11 was actually the result of the failure of the national security state to deter an attack, the government’s refusal to conduct a real investigation is an even greater failure. It has fallen to concerned and qualified individuals to perform the investigative role abandoned by government. The presentations at the Toronto Hearings, along with the evaluations of the Panel, are now available, as is the documentary film, “Explosive Evidence--Experts Speak Out,” provided by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. The government’s agents and apologists try to deflect attention from disturbing facts by redefining factual evidence revealed by experts as the product of “a conspiracy culture.” If people despite their brainwashing and lack of scientific education are able to absorb the information made available to them, perhaps both the US Constitution and peace could be restored. Only informed people can restrain Washington and avert the crazed hegemonic US government from destroying the world in war.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: christine (#0)
That is the most sane, most intelligent statement I have read about 9/11 IN YEARS.
Thanks for the excellent article. Police officers & detectives investigate "conspiracies" on a regular basis. They're called tips. These tips often uncover facts which can lead to an arrest. The tips that surround the 9-11 catastrophe are piled higher than a stack of Manhattan phone books, but ignored by a compliant corporate media and some 15-20% of the American populace. Thank god for PCR and others who are still pounding out the Truth. Their efforts have won the day, with now more than 80% of the American population in some state of disbelief regarding the official government lie. Happy 9-11 anniversary, America. Your government has lied to you once again.
Yep, that's what happened according to our ever vigilant journalists, like Popular Mechanics, basically an cheerleader for any military action. This seems to be unworthy of notice by the US press. Paul beat me to it. I agree, Cyni.
great comment*
Knocks my flying telephone poles theory to hell, does it not?
PINGO Roberts has come a long way. His doubts may have been immediate but i remember when he finally bit the bullet re 911 on alex jones show round 2006. Maybe its the MSG & HFCS, but i cant read the article. Its 2012.Folks either know,or theyre a lost cause.
"Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28
not much to say on this 11th anniversary, other than, thank you to all of you for your courage to speak the truth & oppose the evil that envelops this world. Youve taught & inspired me for a long time & I love you all. :-)
"Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28
9/11 Propaganda Machine on Overdrive: Mike Rivero (9-10-12)
Sniff, sniff.......no love for heart broken Ab who didn't make the love ping list. Derb nub it! " If you cannot govern yourself, you will be governed by assholes. " Randge, Poet de Forum, 1/11/11 "Life's tough, and even tougher if you're stupid." --John Wayne
its because i never remember how to spell yer name. (smooch) :-)
"Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28
Yesterday was an anniversary of shame and deception unprecendented in this nation's history. In order to understand the improbability of the government’s explanation of 9/11, it is not necessary to know anything about what force or forces brought down the three World Trade Center buildings, what hit the Pentagon or caused the explosion, the flying skills or lack thereof of the alleged hijackers, whether the airliner crashed in Pennsylvania or was shot down, whether cell phone calls made at the altitudes could be received, or any other debated aspect of the controversy.
#2. To: christine, 4um (#0)
#3. To: christine (#0)
One is that according to the official story, a handful of Arabs, mainly Saudi Arabians, operating independently of any government and competent intelligence service, men without James Bond and V for Vendetta capabilities, outwitted not only the CIA, FBI, and National Security Agency, but all 16 US intelligence agencies, along with all security agencies of America’s NATO allies and Israel’s Mossad. Not only did the entire intelligence forces of the Western world fail, but on the morning of the attack the entire apparatus of the National Security State simultaneously failed. Airport security failed four times in one hour. NORAD failed. Air Traffic Control failed. The US Air Force failed. The National Security Council failed. Dick Cheney failed. Absolutely nothing worked. The world’s only superpower was helpless at the humiliating mercy of a few undistinguished Arabs.
"Satan / Cheney in "08" 
#4. To: christine (#0)
The 9/11 “investigation” that finally took place was a political one run from the White House. One member of the commission resigned, declaring the investigation to be a farce, and both co-chairman and the legal counsel of the 9/11 Commission distanced themselves from their report with statements that the 9/11 Commission was “set up to fail,” that resources were withheld from the commission, that representatives of the US military lied to the commission and that the commission considered referring the false testimony for criminal prosecution.
"Satan / Cheney in "08"
#5. To: All (#4)
One would think that these revelations would cause a sensation, but the news media, Congress, the White House, and the public were silent.
"Satan / Cheney in "08"
#6. To: Cynicom (#1)
#7. To: Jethro Tull (#2)
#8. To: christine (#6)
I agree, Cyni.
#9. To: christine (#0)
If 9/11 was actually the result of the failure of the national security state to deter an attack, the government’s refusal to conduct a real investigation is an even greater failure
"Satan / Cheney in "08"
#10. To: Jethro Tull (#2)
#11. To: christine, lod, jethro tull, wudidiz, original_intent, randge, farmfriend, formerlurker, twentytwelve, hounddawg, tom007, greylmist, x-15, rickyj, noone222, psusa2, itistoolate, *9-11* (#6)
#12. To: Artisan (#11)
#13. To: Artisan (#11)
I love you all.
#14. To: abraxas (#13)
#15. To: Artisan (#11)
-Alex Kurtagic
#16. To: Artisan, All, *Music Club* (#14)
Group hug, anyone?: From America: This is for all the lonely people... 
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
#17. To: Artisan (#11) (Edited)
That's really nice chris, but, are you sure you meant to include mee? I mean, the new and improved US Government, Inc., is a great bunch of guys and I don't want aaaaany trouble! These are the creatures who murdered nearly three thousand people, some in the most horrific ways (the falling bodies from 100 stories reached terminal velocity and the noise exceeded 100 decibels as they exploded the concrete and/or asphalt on impact-thanks guys, for 11 years of sweaty nightmares and irregular heartbeats) in order to manipulate the chess pieces in The Middle East Real Estate Acquisition Tournament and to enrich the contractors who have suffered in silence from the unrealized peace dividend since the Evil Empire defaulted in the face of Star Wars. The powerful forces who murder kids in their beds as their primary targets then label them collateral damage should raise the suspicions of even the most trusting American. And even those with the least book learnin' should know enough about human nature to ask, "What would such leaders do if it wasn't going to be reported in The SAC BEE or the LITTLETON WASP?" But TV is the cure for such rational thought. Folks, take it from a guy who was once a curly haired kid with glasses who wanted nothing more than universal love to sprout like mushrooms in cow flop; The murdering, soulless bastards did indeed engineer 9/11 using state of the art explosives, illusions and the dirtiest of tricks ever inspired by the Tavistock Reptilian Slither & Swim Club. And, after murdering a beloved US President in a crossfire and eliminating 200 witnesses as every powerful politico and media mogul lined up to help us forget the details that didn't fit, why would anyone question the evil ones' confidence in their ability to execute another plan so diabolical that most could not accept it without succumbing to the terror? Educating unsuspecting people to believe the worst about 9/11 and our government means telling people that a diabolically evil agenda more terrifying than Linda Blair's film portrayal of Mr. Scratch Goes To Washington is a regular topic of discussion amongst the hairy-backed conspirators, and mass murders will happen as often as needed to consolidate world power and control over our hearts, minds, morals, gold, guns and ammo caches. To suddenly inject this unimaginable horror into the cognitive dissonance-quiet desperation lives of folks who live for their two weeks of boating on Lake Mead to decompress and avoid pummeling their co-workers is just too ghastly to metabolize in a single lesson. not much to say on this 11th anniversary, other than, thank you to all of you for your courage to speak the truth & oppose the evil that envelops this world. Youve taught & inspired me for a long time & I love you all. :-
#18. To: HOUNDDAWG (#17)
haha. excellent summation dawg! 911 is a lot like jfk in that many folks acknowledge funny-business but nothing is ever done about it. ('what can we do?') I mean, the new and improved US Government, Inc., is a great bunch of guys and I don't want aaaaany trouble!
"Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28
#19. To: Artisan (#18)
I suppose if Americans saw an immediate result of a power grab, such as the local militia raping and machete-chopping their way into the hearts of the villages' tweens and teens, we'd be more concerned. But, we don't and therefore we aren't. 911 is a lot like jfk in that many folks acknowledge funny-business but nothing is ever done about it. ('what can we do?')
#20. To: Artisan, abraxas, christine, lod, jethro tull, wudidiz, original_intent, randge, farmfriend, formerlurker, twentytwelve, hounddawg, titorite, tom007, greylmist, x-15, rickyj, noone222, psusa2, itistoolate, *9-11* (#11)
Did I miss anyone?? Heartfelt best wishes to you all, and thanks for your labors. What you every day fills me with satisfaction in seeing the sour and sclerotic class of pestilential liars that run things in this rat's maze we call a civilization get a daily spit in the eye. NOW, QUIT BEATING THE SHIT OUT OF ONE ANOTHER AND GET BACK TO WORK!
#21. To: randge, 4 (#20)
Good point. While there is disagreement on the minutiae of the crime, there in unanimity in the knowledge that fedgov's story is a complete lie from top to bottom. NOW, QUIT BEATING THE SHIT OUT OF ONE ANOTHER AND GET BACK TO WORK!
“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken
#22. To: randge, All, *Music Club* (#20)
Thunderclap Newman "Something in the air" 1969 Patriot version because yesterday, September 17th, was Constitution Day: Something in the Air: The American Revolution - By Tom Petty Call out the instigator And you know it's right Run through the fields and houses And you know it's right Call out the instigator And you know it's right :)
Because there's something in the air
We've got to get together sooner or later
Because the revolution's here
And you know that it's right
We have got to get it together
We have got to get it together now
Because there's something in the air
We've got to get together sooner or later
Because the revolution's here
And you know that it's right
We have got to get it together
We have got to get it together now
Because there's something in the air
We've got to get together sooner or later
Because the revolution's here
And you know that it's right
We have got to get it together
We have got to get it together now
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
#23. To: GreyLmist (#22)
Thanks, GreyLmist. I enjoyed both covers. ; )
#24. To: christine (#0)
What a frikking commie nutcase. Why does he hate America so?? Numerous bin Laden videos, every one pronounced a fake by experts, were released whenever it was convenient for Washington. No one in the Western media or in the US Congress or European or UK parliaments was sufficiently intelligent to recognize that a bin Laden video always showed up on cue when Washington needed it. “Why would the ‘mastermind’ be so accommodating for Washington?” was the question that went through my mind every time one of the fake videos was released.
"Satan / Cheney in "08"
#25. To: randge (#20)
Like ;)
#26. To: Artisan (#11)
very nice ;)
#27. To: HOUNDDAWG (#17)
A++ (it deserves its own thread!)
#28. To: randge (#20)
What you every day fills me with satisfaction in seeing the sour and sclerotic class of pestilential liars that run things in this rat's maze we call a civilization get a daily spit in the eye. NOW, QUIT BEATING THE SHIT OUT OF ONE ANOTHER AND GET BACK TO WORK! Right on, randge. You are a scholar and a gentleman in every sense. Thank you. Heartfelt best wishes to you all, and thanks for your labors.
"For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth, to know the worst, and to provide for it.” ~ Patrick Henry
#29. To: Artisan (#11)
Thank you too, Martin :-) not much to say on this 11th anniversary, other than, thank you to all of you for your courage to speak the truth & oppose the evil that envelops this world. Youve taught & inspired me for a long time & I love you all. :-)
"For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth, to know the worst, and to provide for it.” ~ Patrick Henry
#30. To: HOUNDDAWG, *9-11*, *Post Of The Day* (#17)
I mean, the new and improved US Government, Inc., is a great bunch of guys and I don't want aaaaany trouble! These are the creatures who murdered nearly three thousand people, some in the most horrific ways (the falling bodies from 100 stories reached terminal velocity and the noise exceeded 100 decibels as they exploded the concrete and/or asphalt on impact-thanks guys, for 11 years of sweaty nightmares and irregular heartbeats) in order to manipulate the chess pieces in The Middle East Real Estate Acquisition Tournament and to enrich the contractors who have suffered in silence from the unrealized peace dividend since the Evil Empire defaulted in the face of Star Wars. The powerful forces who murder kids in their beds as their primary targets then label them collateral damage should raise the suspicions of even the most trusting American. And even those with the least book learnin' should know enough about human nature to ask, "What would such leaders do if it wasn't going to be reported in The SAC BEE or the LITTLETON WASP?" But TV is the cure for such rational thought. Folks, take it from a guy who was once a curly haired kid with glasses who wanted nothing more than universal love to sprout like mushrooms in cow flop; The murdering, soulless bastards did indeed engineer 9/11 using state of the art explosives, illusions and the dirtiest of tricks ever inspired by the Tavistock Reptilian Slither & Swim Club. And, after murdering a beloved US President in a crossfire and eliminating 200 witnesses as every powerful politico and media mogul lined up to help us forget the details that didn't fit, why would anyone question the evil ones' confidence in their ability to execute another plan so diabolical that most could not accept it without succumbing to the terror? Educating unsuspecting people to believe the worst about 9/11 and our government means telling people that a diabolically evil agenda more terrifying than Linda Blair's film portrayal of Mr. Scratch Goes To Washington is a regular topic of discussion amongst the hairy-backed conspirators, and mass murders will happen as often as needed to consolidate world power and control over our hearts, minds, morals, gold, guns and ammo caches. To suddenly inject this unimaginable horror into the cognitive dissonance-quiet desperation lives of folks who live for their two weeks of boating on Lake Mead to decompress and avoid pummeling their co-workers is just too ghastly to metabolize in a single lesson. Awesome writing, Dawg.
"For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth, to know the worst, and to provide for it.” ~ Patrick Henry
#31. To: christine (#0)
This is what stood out to me. I keep asking why people oppose questioning the official fairy tale ? The answer is they are afraid. Americans, even the most ignorant, stupid and useless are afraid of their own government, at a visceral level, they are in fear of an utterance of questioning their so-called authority. Personally, I find most Americans pathetic, and repulsive. The first physicist to make an effective and compelling argument was Steven Jones at BYU. Jones said that explosives brought down the twin towers. He made a good case. For his efforts, he was pressured to resign his tenured position. I wondered whether the federal government had threatened BYU’s research grants or whether patriotic trustees and alumni were the driving force behind Jones’ expulsion. Regardless, the message was clear to other university based experts: “Shut up or we’ll get you.”
#32. To: randge (#23)
:) P.S. Constitution Day is Every Day. For us here at the Tenth Amendment Center, Constitution day isn’t a once-a-year celebration. It’s not just a day to review historical trivia. It’s not a day to grandstand and pretend to support what the founding generation left us. Constitution Day is our way of life – every single day of the year.
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest