[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Cash Jordan: ICE Raids Home Depot... as California Collapses

Silver Is Finally Soaring: Here's Why

New 4um Interface Coming Soon

Attack of the Dead-2025.

Canada strips Jewish National Fund of charitable status

Minnesota State Rep. Vang just admitted that she is an ILLEGAL ALIEN.

1100% increase in neurological events since the roll-out of Covid mRNA

16 Things That Everyone Needs To Know About Violent Far-Left Revolution In Los Angeles

Undercover video in Arizona alleges ongoing consumer fraud by Fairlife

Dozens arrested after San Francisco protest turns violent Sunday

Looking for the toughest badasses in the city (Los Angeles)

Democrat Civil War Explodes: DNC Chair Threatens to Quit Over David Hogg

Invaders waving Mexican flags, pour onto the 101 Freeway in Los Angeles

Australian Fake News Journo Hit By Rubber Bullet In L.A. Riot

22-year-old dies after being unable to afford asthma inhaler

North Korean Bulsae-4 Long-Range ATGM Spotted Again In Russian Operation Zone

Alexander Dugin: A real Maidan has begun in Los Angeles

State Department Weighing $500 Million Grant to Controversial Gaza Aid Group: Report

LA Mayor Karen Bass ordered LAPD to stand down, blocked aid to federal officers during riots.

Russia Has a Titanium Submarine That Can ‘Deep Dive’ 19,700 Feet

Shocking scene as DC preps for Tr*mp's military birthday parade.

Earth is being Pulled Apart by Crazy Space Weather! Volcanoes go NUTS as Plasma RUNS OUT

Gavin, feel free to use this as a campaign ad in 2028.

US To Formalize Military Presence in Syria in Deal With al-Qaeda-Linked Govt

GOP Rep Introduces Resolution Labeling Free Palestine Slogan as Anti-Semitism

Two-thirds of troops who left the military in 2023 were at risk for mental health conditions

UK and France abandon plans to recognise Palestinian state at conference

Kamala Backs LA Protests After Rioters Attack Federal Officers

Netanyahu's ultra-Orthodox partners move ahead with Knesset dissolution plan

Former Prime Minister of Ukraine: Zelensky will leave the country


9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: Lucky Larry Sues for 2.8Billion More!
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.bostonherald.com/news/re ... ?articleid=1061159482&srvc=rss
Published: Sep 11, 2012
Author: .
Post Date: 2012-09-11 18:52:35 by Lod
Keywords: None
Views: 496
Comments: 9

www.bostonherald.com/news...cleid=1061159482&srvc=rss


Poster Comment:

Full story and videos at link. (We need a Jew!Jew!Jew! category here)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Lod (#0)

That jew is going to get one hell of a lot richer, just watch.

... If a man has nothing that he is willing to die for, then he has nothing worth living for....

Give Me Liberty  posted on  2012-09-11   19:12:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Give Me Liberty (#1)

That jew is going to get one hell of a lot richer, just watch.

Yep just like the other "judgements" from the WTC insurance claims this too will be decided a jew judge.

Stealing from the Goy is just fine according to jewish teachings.

"Satan / Cheney in "08" Just Foreign Policy Iraqi Death Estimator

tom007  posted on  2012-09-11   19:22:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Lod (#0)

(1) Larry Silverstein is not the sole owner of the WTC. He is merely the CEO of an enormous consortium of investors.

(2) So far the WTC has been an enormous LOSS to this consortium because its lease requires it to make very large payments to the Port Authority (the actual owner) - even though the consortium has been unable to collect a penny in rent since Sept 11th.

(3) If any of those nasty rumors trying to connect Silverstein with the attack were true, you'd think they'd be advanced during the very pricey lawsuits that the consortium has had to bring. First there was an enormous lawsuit against, primarily, the Lloyds of London insurance consortium, which had tried to argue that it could pay off only for one mishap for the entire loss of the whole WTC, on the pretext that the collisions into two towers were part of only one conspiracy and therefore only a single mishap. You'd think if Silverstein knew what was going to happen, he'd have had the insurance policy written a lot more clearly on that issue. Now his consortium is suing airlines for millions - if there were anything to those nasty rumors, you can be sure the airlines will mention them rather than have to pay millions of dollars.

Shoonra  posted on  2012-09-11   20:26:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Shoonra (#3)

Once the structures were destroyed, the rent became a moot point; (you can't collect rent on a structure that no longer exists) you need to read and understand contract law. Towers 1 and 2 were paid for by the insurers as 2 separate incidents. Silverstein is sitting on more than $2 billion in cash payouts thus far. He is now hoping for another 2.8 billion, and he will get it. Additionally, he and his daughter were missing from the tower where they normally worked on 9-11, maybe that was a coincidence, but I doubt it. I wonder who is paying you to spew this drivel, because it doesn't pass the smell test.

... If a man has nothing that he is willing to die for, then he has nothing worth living for....

Give Me Liberty  posted on  2012-09-11   23:10:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Give Me Liberty (#4)

It took prolonged litigation to make the insurers pay for the two separate incidents. And it's you who needs to read contract law; the consortium headed by Silverstein was contractually required to pay the Port Authority a fixed annual rental on the WTC ... regardless of how much rent Silverstein was collecting from tenants. Silverstein had a small office at the WTC but his regular real estate & law office was in midtown. Considering that the first plane hit at 8:46 AM, on a primary election day, a LOT of people were not yet inside the towers.

Even in the multi-million dollar insurance litigation, the defense did not attempt to suggest that Silverstein had any complicity with the attack or the collapse of the towers.

Shoonra  posted on  2012-09-12   0:31:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Shoonra (#3)

(1) Larry Silverstein is not the sole owner of the WTC. He is merely the CEO of an enormous consortium of [Jewish] investors.

Fixed.

"Mr. Prime Minister, there is only one important question facing us, and that is the question whether the white race will survive." -- Leonid Brezhnev to James Callahan

Prefrontal Vortex  posted on  2012-09-12   0:58:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Lod (#0)

After a certain level of display of avarice, you gotta laugh.

"Mr. Prime Minister, there is only one important question facing us, and that is the question whether the white race will survive." -- Leonid Brezhnev to James Callahan

Prefrontal Vortex  posted on  2012-09-12   1:12:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Shoonra (#3)

2) So far the WTC has been an enormous LOSS to this consortium because its lease requires it to make very large payments to the Port Authority (the actual owner) - even though the consortium has been unable to collect a penny in rent since Sept 11th.

The "loss" is lost rent.

They leased the towers for $2.8 billion, not coincidentally the amount the judge has said they can sue for.

They've collected $4 billion from insurance.

+$1.2 billion.

"Mr. Prime Minister, there is only one important question facing us, and that is the question whether the white race will survive." -- Leonid Brezhnev to James Callahan

Prefrontal Vortex  posted on  2012-09-12   1:28:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Shoonra (#5)

the consortium headed by Silverstein was contractually required to pay the Port Authority a fixed annual rental on the WTC

Your first post suggested that silverstein would have to pay rent on the nonexistent structures, which is not true. Building gone, no rent. period. Secondly, I never implied that silverstein had any complicity in the event, just that neither he nor his daughter were in their normal offices when the event occurred, make of it what you want. The buildings had to go as they were loaded with asbestos. They couldn't get a permit to do a controlled demolition because of the asbestos in the structures. The costs involved in manually re-mediating the structures was prohibitive. Towers 1 and 2 also had a problem with dissimilar metal corrosion related to the stainless exterior attached to the iron structure, which would all have to be removed and replaced by something. With all of what needed to be done to the buildings (asbestos & stainless exterior), it would have been far less expensive to implode the buildings than manually make the necessary repairs, except for the asbestos problem. The city of New York would not issue a demolition permit with asbestos present in the structure. How convenient that the buildings were hit by an aircraft and collapsed when the buildings were designed to handle just such a impact. I don't know how the buildings were brought down (explosives or electromagnetic force etc.), but they should not have fallen. All one has to do is look at the buildings in excess of 45 stories that burned for days in Spain and China that did not fall or collapse. Those buildings burned very hot, not the black smoky fires of the WTC towers.

... If a man has nothing that he is willing to die for, then he has nothing worth living for....

Give Me Liberty  posted on  2012-09-12   1:30:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]