See other War, War, War Articles
Title: Chinese General: Prepare for Combat Top Chinese general in unusual move tells troops to ready for combat with Japan
Source:
http://freebeacon.com/
URL Source: http://freebeacon.com/chinese-general-prepare-for-combat/
Published: Sep 18, 2012
Author: Bill Gertz
Post Date: 2012-09-18 13:35:54 by freepatriot32
Keywords: Chinese General, Combat, Japan
Views: 220
Comments: 15
China’s most powerful military leader, in an unusual public statement, last week ordered military forces to prepare for combat, as Chinese warships deployed to waters near disputed islands and anti-Japan protests throughout the country turned violent. Protests against the Japanese government’s purchase of three privately held islands in the Senkakus chain led to mass street protests, the burning of Japanese flags, and attacks on Japanese businesses and cars in several cities. Some carried signs that read “Kill all Japanese,” and “Fight to the Death” over disputed islands. One sign urged China to threaten a nuclear strike against Japan. Gen. Xu Caihou, vice chairman of the Central Military Commission, considered the most senior military political commissar, said Friday that military forces should be “prepared for any possible military combat,” state run Xinhua news agency reported. Heightened tensions over the Senkakus come as Defense Secretary Leon Panetta arrived in China Monday. Panetta, in comments made in Japan shortly before traveling to China, said, “We are concerned by the demonstrations, and we are concerned by the conflict that is taking place over the Senkaku islands.” “The message I have tried to convey is we have to urge calm and restraint on all sides,” he said, noting any “provocation” could produce a “blow up.” Panetta repeated the U.S. position that it is neutral in the dispute over Japan’s Senkaku islands, a small chain of islets located south of Okinawa and north of Taiwan. But he also reaffirmed the U.S. defense commitment to Japan, a treaty ally. “We stand by our treaty obligations,” Panetta said, echoing a similar commitment made during a 2010 standoff between Beijing and Tokyo over the Senkakus. ”They’re longstanding, and that has not changed.” China claims the islands as its territory and calls them the Diaoyu islands. Last week, following the Japanese government’s purchase of three of the Senkakus from private Japanese owners, six Chinese maritime security ships were deployed near the Senkaku islands, further heightening tensions. Xu’s unusual comments followed reports in state-controlled Chinese media that opposed the Japanese government’s purchase of the three islands. Xu said during a visit to military units near Taiyuan, in the northern province of Shanxi, “efforts should be made to ensure that the military is capable of resolutely performing its duty to safeguard the country’s national sovereignty, security, and territorial integrity whenever it is needed by the Party and the people.” A U.S. official said the PLA’s most senior political general rarely makes such direct appeals to troops to prepare for combat. Panetta told reporters en route to Japan, the first stop on a three-nation visit to Asia, “The United States does not take a position with regards to territorial disputes.” In 2010, then-Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates invoked the U.S.-Japan defense treaty when tensions between China and Japan increased over Tokyo’s arrest of a Chinese fishing captain who rammed his boat against a Japanese coast guard vessel in waters near the Senkakus. Gates said the United States would “fulfill our alliance responsibilities” toward Japan. Japan’s Coast Guard announced on Sept. 14 that six Chinese maritime patrol vessels sailed into Japanese-controlled waters near the Senkakus and the vessels ignored Japanese warnings for the ships to leave the area. Other reports from China on Monday showed a convoy of hundreds of Chinese fishing vessels sailing toward the disputed islands. The six Chinese ships entered Japanese waters near the island on Friday, and ignored Japanese coast guard orders for them to vacate what it said was its territorial waters. The Chinese Foreign Ministry confirmed that six of its surveillance ships had entered the waters near the islands. China’s aggressiveness in maritime disputes has garnered little attention in the presidential election campaign. On Monday, President Obama criticized GOP nominee Mitt Romney for his attack on the administration for being soft on China through its weak response to China’s trade and currency policies. The Chinese maritime warships near the Senkakus were reported last week by Xinhua as “routine patrols” near the islands to “assert the country’s sovereignty and protect fishermen.” “The Diaoyou Islands and their affiliated islets have been China’s inherent territory since ancient times, and their surrounding waters are China’s traditional fishing ground,” the report said. A classified Chinese government map from 1969 that was obtained by Japan’s government shows Beijing had labeled the islands as “Senkaku,” their Japanese name, and thus confirmed their control by Tokyo. The map, which was viewed by the Free Beacon, also had a dividing line south of the islands showing that they fall within Japanese territory. Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R., Fla.), chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said during a hearing last week that China’s behavior toward regional states was tantamount to bullying. “While the world’s attention was turned to other crises, including Iran’s nuclear program and concerns over the faltering Euro, China has upped the ante, playing the role of a schoolyard bully towards its maritime neighbors,” Ros- Lehtinen said. “From one end to the other of the South China Sea, Beijing has increased both in belligerence and bellicosity.” Ros-Lehtinen said the United States, through the Navy, will stand by friends and allies in the region. The Florida Republican said China is seeking to control the South China Sea and other coastal waters and sealanes because they are “central to the Chinese communist mandarins’ aspirations to re-establish the Middle Kingdom as the dominant power in Asia.” “Whoever controls these sea lanes can dominate Asia—and beyond—by choking off that commerce and oil shipments to the major stakeholders in the Asian economic miracle,” she said. Chinese efforts to dominate the western Pacific are increasing the possibility of naval clashes, Ros-Lehtinen said. “Other global crises must not distract from our vital national interests in the South China Sea and the western Pacific,” she said during a hearing.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: freepatriot32 (#0)
The rape of Nanking has not been forgotten.
Why would the general run out this stuff? He knows that the days of set-piece conflict have been over for eighty years, or more, now... And the japs have plenty enough radiation as is without dumping more on'em. “The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken
She should know: she's a Sephardic Jew who recognizes the communist ideology that her race begat.
#2. To: freepatriot32 (#0)
#3. To: freepatriot32 (#0)
Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R., Fla.), chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said during a hearing last week that China’s behavior toward regional states was tantamount to bullying.
-Alex Kurtagic
#4. To: freepatriot32 (#0)
Since when?? It'd be better if we didn't routinely stick our noses into other folk's disputes, but we do, and this is extraordinarily mealy-mouth, soft-shoe bullshit even for a flunky like Panetta. BTW: 17 March 2006: Kyodo News reported the U.S. Ambassador to Japan, Thomas Schieffer, presented that he considered "the Islands as territory of Japan" in his talk in Tokyo.[Wiki - Senkaku Islands dispute] Panetta told reporters en route to Japan, the first stop on a three-nation visit to Asia, “The United States does not take a position with regards to territorial disputes.”
#5. To: freepatriot32 (#0)
SENKAKU ISLANDS 
#6. To: freepatriot32 (#0)
Mike Flaherty: Yeah, it's been there a long time. I wish I knew which corner.
My Man Godfrey (1936)
#7. To: X-15 (#3)
I thought it was astounding that any US government person would decry bullying when we do it worldwide. Suddenly when it appears another country might do it, it's terrible? Of more pressing interest, what happens when the US's largest creditor embarks upon war with an ally we're pledged to protect? Without Chinese money buying bonds, how do we finance our gigantic government?
Rivers of blood were spilled out over land that, in normal times, not even the poorest Arab would have worried his head over." Field Marshal Erwin Rommel
#8. To: freepatriot32 (#0)
The Chinese may think they can get away with this - threatening a nuclear war over three unimportant islands - because WE owe so much money to the Chinese and anticipate borrowing even more from them, that we would not intervene to save our ally, Japan.
#9. To: historian1944 (#7)
Without Chinese money buying bonds, how do we finance our gigantic government?
-Alex Kurtagic
#10. To: X-15 (#9)
Funny! Sort of like "I've got checks left, how can I be out of money?!?"
Rivers of blood were spilled out over land that, in normal times, not even the poorest Arab would have worried his head over." Field Marshal Erwin Rommel
#11. To: freepatriot32 (#0)
Since our war in Vietnam, China has fought two wars with Vietnam and gotten their asses kicked both times. If the Chinese want to fight the Japanese they'll be slaughtered.
I sense a disturbance in the farce. Much gnashing will ensue.
#12. To: Turtle (#11)
1973 -- Hanoi announces to Beijing its intentions to negotiate contracts with foreign firms for the exploration of oil in the Gulf of Tonkin, part of the South China Sea. The disputed islands in the South China Sea assume importance only after it is disclosed that they are near the potential sites of substantial offshore oil deposits. January 1974 -- Chinese military units seize islands in the Paracels occupied by South Vietnamese armed forces, and Beijing claims sovereignty over the Spratlys. Spring 1975 -- South Vietnam occupies part of the Spratly Islands. 1976 -- North and South Vietnam unify. 1978 -- Vietnam's treatment of the Hoa people - an ethnic Chinese group - becomes an issue when Hanoi institutes a crackdown on the Chinese community because of its pervasive role in domestic commerce in the South and its alleged subversive activities in the North. Vietnam's actions force an unprecedented exodus of thousands of Hoa across the border into China. November 1978 -- Sino-Vietnam relations worsen when the Soviet Union and Vietnam sign a Treaty of Friendship and Cooperation that calls for mutual assistance and consultation in the event of a security threat to either country. February to March 1979 -- In the Sino-Vietnamese Border War, China launches the offensive in response to Vietnam's invasion and occupation of Cambodia, which ends the reign of the China-backed Khmer Rouge. This becomes China's largest military operation since the Korean War. 1985 -- Throughout most of 1985 and into the early months of 1986, Vietnam's border provinces are subject to intense artillery and mortar shelling. China issues vague threats to Vietnam of a "second lesson" over the stalemate with Cambodia. 1988 -- China and Vietnam fight a naval battle just off the Spratly Islands. 70 Vietnamese sailors are killed. November 1991 -- China and Vietnam normalize relations after more than a decade of hostility. I had to look this up - thanks -
“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken
#13. To: Shoonra (#8)
Do you read the newspaper much?? threatening a nuclear war over three unimportant islands
#14. To: freepatriot32 (#0)
I tend to agree with China over this issue. If you look at a map, these islands are right off the coast of China and a long way from Japan. According to Wikipedia, the Chinese have records of these islands going back to the 15th century. The Japanese annexed these islands in the 19th century, at the beginning of their empire when they were much stronger militarily than China was. They obviously belong to China. Japan is in the same sort of conflict with Korea over a small island chain that is much close to Korea than Japan and which has historically been a part of Korea and which Japan annexed when they invaded and occupied Korea in 1905. They should have lost these islands when their empire was destroyed.
Calling Ron Paul an isolationist is like calling your neighbor a hermit because he doesn't come over and break your window - unknown
I WITHDRAW MY CONSENT!
Any perceived compliance with unconstitutional “laws” or orders put forth by government employees is NOT recognition of their authority; it is simply the result of carefully calculated submission to an entity exhibiting superior firepower.
#15. To: Shoonra (#8)
I agree with you, you make a salient point.
-Alex Kurtagic
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest