See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Pilots Analyze the Government Provided Radar Data of the Planes of 9-11
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Sep 24, 2012
Author: http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/911-inter
Post Date: 2012-09-24 19:34:06 by tom007
Keywords: None
Views: 4711
Comments: 145
http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/911-intercepted/
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-73) not displayed.
.
.
.
#74. To: tom007 (#58)
I was taught civility, long ago. The first example drummed into my thick head was this: "Winston Churchill once said..."It costs me nothing to be civil to a man, even though I intend to hang him tomorrow". ON this forum, I am very often labeled as dumb, stupid, ignorant and those are the kind and generous ones. At times posters use language that describes what they really think. At the end of the day, I will have proven myself ignorant at best, but I did try to be civil doing it. Did not cost me a cent.
No knowledge of this. I do know years ago, people at the olde CAA had no protection from liability while doing their job as directed. Every word was taped, stamped, filed and stored. It finally took an act of Congress to relieve workers from liability. Anytime there was an event, lawyers descended like locusts, suing everyone in sight, the man at the bottom could end up penniless trying to protect himself. Once the government accepted the legal burden, the lawyers looked elsewhere for money.
Malarkey. What you tried to do here in your responses to me is exempt yourself from civility with an autocratic double standard equating any attempt to debate you as finger-pointing, rudeness, verbiage, gross verbiage, lack of self- enlightenment and intelligent discourse, negativity and so on. Edited for spelling. ------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
And most of us find it salutary to actually practice important lessons we were taught. I'm glad to see I'm not the only one who knows he's full of shit. He pulls out the "civility" canard when he's had his ass handed to him on a plate an can no longer defend his position. Then he runs away. Calling Ron Paul an isolationist is like calling your neighbor a hermit because he doesn't come over and break your window - unknown I WITHDRAW MY CONSENT! This tactic is well described in "Compromised" by Terry Reed (I think) detailing how drug shipments were dropped into the US by Barry Seal et al. I asked an AF fighter pilot, my neighbor, if it would work, and he answered affirmative. Yeh that's what I do with unimportant tapes that I know nobody will ever be interested and deal with unimportant issues. Perhaps my civility classes would be beneficial????? People that do not function well in open society find such very helpful.
People that do not function well in open society find such very helpful. Because...they're not functioning well or they'd know better than to take a class in civility from you, Mr. Double Standards Autocrat? ------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Fan would feel much better if he were a Fan of Salma Hayek. She has a calming effect on men that are troubled.
People that do not function well in open society find such very helpful. Cowards like to make see-through excuses and run away when they've been cornered instead of manning up and admitting they were wrong or admitting defeat or just outright saying that they no longer want to argue the issue. You fool no one. Calling Ron Paul an isolationist is like calling your neighbor a hermit because he doesn't come over and break your window - unknown I WITHDRAW MY CONSENT! The comments coming from so many on all the forums on the internet sure do lend insight to the whys and wherefores of this country's status. So many attack when opinions differ, yet few offer up anything worth considering for solving today's problems. Insults and name calling come fast and furious, but too few have, can or will hold rational discussions. There is so much to be learned from history as well as from the views and opinions of those we share space with on this earth. There is little to be gained from challenging the rights of others to differ. Rational and respectful discussion can bring not only enlightening knowledge, but acceptable compromise. Irrational and disrespectful communication not only encourages silence, but also limits ideas, views and suggestions that could well lead to excellent solutions, not just mediocre attempts at "putting out fires". I hope the day comes when the majority of people on this world show respect to others.
Fan... If you do not have affinity for Salma Hayek, we can never be friends. Of course, if you are female, I could understand a dislike for Salma.
How to phrase this question for Cynicom without rankling him by using the word "you"...I'm gonna venture going with this: Is Kissinger an alumni of the Cynicom Class of Civility? Henry Kissinger Says Luke Rudkowski Is A Sick Person for Questioning Him on NSM 200 ------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Henry... I recall in real time the appearance of this evil person. Henry like von Mises, Hayeks and others were the offspring of the Rockefeller money. Henry was a nobody,enlisted person in the military, suspected Russian spy with the code name of Bor. He was a nobody, going nowhere until Nelson Rockefeller bought and paid for him. When Henry was turned loose into the political arena, Rockefeller gave him $50,000 cash to tide him over until a "position" was found for him. Anyone that read his """best seller""""" Nuclear weapons and Foreign Policy"""" knew he was another Ayn Rand in the making.
There is a picture of Kissinger eating his own boogers. That's the least of his problems, the mass-murdering bastid. I sense a disturbance in the farce. Much gnashing will ensue.
I recall that also. A friend of mine referred to Henry as, "a dirty bag of money sitting in a chair". Like Rand, Henry could babble on for hours and say nothing. Another Rockefeller Jew lackey foisted upon the citizens of this country.
That says something treasonous about G.W. Bush's selection of Kissinger to commandeer the 9/11 Commission. 9-11 Commission - Wikipedia [sic] The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States was established on November 27, 2002, by President George W. Bush and the United States Congress, with former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger initially appointed to head the commission.[2] However, Kissinger resigned only weeks after being appointed, because he would have been obliged to disclose the clients of his private consulting business.[3] ------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Grey... If you have time to waste, read Kissingers book. I read it when very young and came away with one thought in mind. What did he say and what in hell is he talking about. Henry can babble on endlessly and say nothing. Turtle reminded us of one of his bad habits, I seem to recall from somewhere in the past that Henry also had body odor. I am gonna look up Salma Hayek and forget you and Fan even exist.
I can vouch for the truth of the Rockefeller/Kissinger relationship ... like "up close and personal"!!! Personal observation: Birds of a feather stick together ... and stink always follows stink!!!
Is that so? Well then, just don't go forgetting that in reality holograms do exist. John Lear - 9/11 & Strategic Perception Management Until we meet again here... ------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Lear mixes truth with fiction. Those impacts at the WTC most certainly weren't holograms, and to my knowledge, holograms appear transparent, not as solid objects. It would be especially difficult if not impossible for a hologram to be visible in bright daylight from miles away, and then there's the matter of the impact damage itself. CNN Shows Off Hologram Technology - Presidential Election 2008 Uploaded by ArchangelSandalphon on Nov 4, 2008 Jessica Yellin shows up on CNN New York from Chigago in a hologram ------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
What can be done in a darkened TV studio is not the same as what can be done in daylit skies over Manhatten, visible from tens of miles away. That and I doubt that CNN video was made without a bit of video enhancement, yet the image is still fuzzy on the edges and appears two dimensional. But the primary factor is that the image is stationary, it is not moving across miles of sky, and if anything, it appears fake. In other words, I question whether it was just a video superimposition rather than a bonafide hologram. IF it were real, the technology required to project a hologram in a stationary location within a darkened studio isn't super sophisticated compared to what would be required for a daylight projection in the skies of Manhatten moving at a speed identical to that of an airliner. One other thing GL, since when do you trust CNN to be giving you truthful information?
Since when don't you trust CNN/MSM video on 9/11 imagery issues? ------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
I know you dislike John Lear but give him a fair hearing through his History and Future of Television testimonial: John Lear - Vanishing Planes & Holographs Uploaded by graflok on May 29, 2008 ------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Thing is, it wasn't just CNN which had live video from 9/11, it was all the other networks airing simultaneously, including international networks such as the BBC. Besides, for the reasons mentioned it is pretty much impossible that the flight of the aircraft could be faked with a hologram. It borders on science fiction, whereas the remote controlled plane theory isn't within that realm, it is actually quite possible and plausible. Cross-referencing Post #59 at 4um Title: Let US start a thread on WHO Did 911 Excerpts: EXERCISES INCLUDED MOCK TV NEWS REPORTS It is known that simulated television news reports had been used in training exercises before 9/11. For example, a two-day exercise was held at Andrews Air Force Base, Maryland, in June 2001, called "Dark Winter," based on the scenario of a smallpox attack on the United States. This exercise, according to New York magazine, included "simulated news clips from an imaginary cable news network called NCN." ------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
And the Starship Enterprise could have just blasted away with its phasers. Thing is, a remote controlled missile (which the aircraft would have been) has a very damn good chance of hitting its target. For CGI to have faked EVERYTHING seen on network TV, ALL of the on scene reporters and camera crews would had to have been in on the grand conspiracy, ALL of the first responders who witnessed the 2nd impact would had to have been in on it, and ALL of the NYC inhabitants who witnessed the event would had to have been in on it. There is just WAY too much chance of something going wrong, where if people saw a blast without an aircraft striking the tower, it would have drawn INSTANT attention. Besides that, there would have been SOME video of that occuring, being that MANY people were recording the smoke coming from the North Tower by that point in time. That's besides the fact all of the news stations would have had to simultaneously blend CGI into live video, and had the explosives go off in the towers at the precise time to make it appear the CGI aircraft actually impacted the South Tower at the correct moment. Not only would thousands, if not tens of thousands of people been involved, the technical feasibilty of such a hoax is pretty farfetched. CGI is good these days, but not THAT good. There is no evidence of fakery in the live videos, although no planers HAVE faked their own later videos to "make their point". Why do you keep falling back with this science fantasy scenario GL? Aren't actual documented facts and scientific evidence enough to prove 9/11 was an inside job, carried out with the help of the Mossad? Besides GL, do you truly think that the news production teams, newscasters, reporters, and camera crews, along with firemen, police, and NYC inhabitants would have taken part in a false flag operation where thousands of people would have been killed?
I do think that some would willingly participate in such a flase flag op, that some might have believed they were participating in a Military excercise and could have been sworn to secrecy about it as a national security necessity, and that most were probably swept into the operation believing it was actually happening, similar to the War of the Worlds broadcast. You've probably seen CNN's staged newscast with Charles Jaco of the first war in Iraq. Syria is currently being similarly propagandized with fakery only worse. ------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
But in the post I replied to, you said remote control planes -- not missiles. The issue isn't about whether remote control missiles can hit their target. Surely they can with a high degree of accuracy but with more risk of error and discovery than CGI. I don't know which videos you're referring to as being faked by No Planers. Initially, there were about 40 videos that were in evidence and what's unusual is that there weren't many more if many people in the area were recording. I've spent a lot of time addressing your concerns and would like to hear your explanation for why there was little to no smoke damage at the WTC [Towers and Bldg. 7 too] as well as how WTC 1 was insignificantly impacted by flying projectiles when WTC 2 was demolished. No Planes research doesn't threaten investigations of 9/11 as an inside job carried out with the help of the Mossad, or controlled demolition determination. Edited for grammar and bracketed insert. ------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
P.S. As a flase flag op, the perps would likely want a certain amount of visual evidence backed by the MSM to sell their war objectives, etc. What they wouldn't want is for it to be closely examined for flaws that point to them rather than their designated target of "Al Qaeda".
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
A HANDFUL might be plausible, if we were talking about some remote site out in North Dakota or something. BUT, we are not talking about North Dakota, we are talking about the World Trade Center in NYC, where not only were there hundreds if not thousands of first responders already on the scene when the 2nd plane hit, there were news crews with cameras rolling all over Manhatten, along with many private individuals. So no, nobody could convince all those people to "go along", especially with the deaths of 3000 Americans that day. Anyone who would have been approached to do so would have spilled the beans, and the police would have arrested anyone canvassing them to "join the conspiracy". But in the post I replied to, you said remote control planes -- not missiles. I explicity said aircraft that were USED as missiles. We DO have drone technology in case you've somehow been asleep for the past decade or so. Surely they can with a high degree of accuracy but with more risk of error and discovery than CGI. And I'm sure if Captain Kirk was in on this conspiracy, he could have fired phasers at the towers to make them collapse. That'd be a sure fire way to do it wouldn't it. Thing is, not only would it have been impossible to hide such an blatent fabrication in real time in front of millions of people, it would be technically infeasible if not impossible to coordinate a real time explosion that would perfectly mimic an aircraft impact, and superimpose an imaginary aircraft into the video in sync across ALL television networks, from different viewpoints, distances, elevations, and with helicopters flying in the vicinity recording the live events. The debris ejected from the tower is ALSO consistant with an aircraft impact, so what do you think they did, had explosives with debris installed inside the building around the perimeter walls where people were sitting and working? Demolition charges between floors or in the elevator shafts is one thing, but placing them on the outside or inside the perimeter in order to mimic an aircraft impact is something altogether different. Yeah OK GL. We had discussed the "Smoke and Mirrors" video in length on the last 9/11 thread. It was blatently obvious that the video was a collection of fraudulent clips which were actually doctored from the original CBS live video. THAT is what I mean by faked video, and you should know that. It doesn't sit well with me that you pretend not to know what I'm talking about here. It's quite obvious that "no planers" view it as their "smoking gun" where in reality it's an obvious fake designed to propel their theory into the limelight. Are you high? "Little to no smoke damage"? Are you trying to say there were no fires at all, and THAT was faked too? Do you truly believe what you write? As far as WTC 1, WTF are you talking about in terms of "insignificantly impacted by flying projectiles"? Are you trying to say neither building really collapsed now, that was fake too? In your mind, did the WTC towers ever exist at all? Just so that we can all grasp exactly what it is you DO believe in, care to tell me what part of the WTC attacks you believe did NOT happen?
FL: I explicity said aircraft that were USED as missiles. We DO have drone technology in case you've somehow been asleep for the past decade or so. FL at Post #101: It borders on science fiction, whereas the remote controlled plane theory isn't within that realm, it is actually quite possible and plausible. Me at Post #102: Remote control could not ensure that a plane (civilian, military, or drone) wouldn't break apart outside of the buildings on impact (endangering people on the street, leaving contradictory evidence behind, and messing up the cover story for the destruction of the Towers) but CGI could. FL at Post #103: Thing is, a remote controlled missile (which the aircraft would have been) has a very damn good chance of hitting its target. Me at Post #106: But in the post I replied to [note: #101], you said remote control planes -- not missiles. The issue isn't about whether remote control missiles can hit their target. Surely they can with a high degree of accuracy but with more risk of error and discovery than CGI. FL at Post #109: I explicity said aircraft that were USED as missiles. We DO have drone technology in case you've somehow been asleep for the past decade or so. ---------- I already addressed the issue of drones in Post #102, as well as civilian and military aircraft: Edited for spelling. ------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
FL: Yeah OK GL. We had discussed the "Smoke and Mirrors" video in length on the last 9/11 thread. It was blatently obvious that the video was a collection of fraudulent clips which were actually doctored from the original CBS live video. THAT is what I mean by faked video, and you should know that. It doesn't sit well with me that you pretend not to know what I'm talking about here. It's quite obvious that "no planers" view it as their "smoking gun" where in reality it's an obvious fake designed to propel their theory into the limelight. It doesn't sit well with me that you pretend not to know that video was a Media alteration. I thought you finally understood that the last time we discussed it. ------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Comments (115 - 145) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestBut that post was marvelous nonsense.
#75. To: FormerLurker (#70)
#76. To: Cynicom (#74)
(Edited)
I did try to be civil doing it.
#77. To: Cynicom (#74)
(Edited)
I was taught civility, long ago.
#78. To: GreyLmist, Cynicom (#76)
What you tried to do here in your responses to me is exempt yourself from civility with an autocratic double standard equating any attempt to debate you as finger-pointing, rudeness, verbiage, gross verbiage, lack of self- enlightenment and intelligent discourse, negativity and so on.
Any perceived compliance with unconstitutional “laws” or orders put forth by government employees is NOT recognition of their authority; it is simply the result of carefully calculated submission to an entity exhibiting superior firepower.
#79. To: FormerLurker (#69)
In terms of primary radar, blips can be merged tranparently by a lower altitude plane climbing from below radar altitude, while maintaining the same geographical position as the other aircraft. A swap could be made by both aircraft flying side by side momentarily, then the original aircraft descends at such a rate and airspeed to match the position of the upper aircraft, till it is below radar altitude.
"Satan / Cheney in "08" 
#80. To: FormerLurker (#70)
But officials at the center never told higher-ups of the tape's existence, and it was later destroyed by an F.A.A. official described in the report as a quality-assurance manager there. That manager crushed the cassette in his hand, shredded the tape and dropped the pieces into different trash cans around the building, according to a report made public today by the inspector general of the Transportation Department
"Satan / Cheney in "08"
#81. To: F.A. Hayek Fan (#78)
I'm glad to see I'm not the only one who knows he's full of shit. He pulls out the "civility" canard when he's had his ass handed to him on a plate an can no longer defend his position. Then he runs away.
#82. To: Cynicom, F.A. Hayek Fan (#81)
Perhaps my civility classes would be beneficial?????
#83. To: GreyLmist (#82)
Because...they're not functioning well or they'd know better than to take a class in civility from you, Mr. Double Standards Autocrat?
#84. To: Cynicom (#81)
Perhaps my civility classes would be beneficial?????
Any perceived compliance with unconstitutional “laws” or orders put forth by government employees is NOT recognition of their authority; it is simply the result of carefully calculated submission to an entity exhibiting superior firepower.
#85. To: Cynicom (#83)
#86. To: F.A. Hayek Fan, All (#84)
#87. To: Phant2000, Cynicom (#85)
I hope the day comes when the majority of people on this world show respect to others.
#88. To: GreyLmist, Phant2000 (#87)
#89. To: Cynicom (#88)
#90. To: Turtle (#89)
There is a picture of Kissinger eating his own boogers.
#91. To: Cynicom (#88)
suspected Russian spy with the code name of Bor.
The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, also known as the 9/11 Commission, was set up on November 27, 2002, "to prepare a full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11 attacks", including preparedness for and the immediate response to the attacks.
#92. To: GreyLmist (#91)
#93. To: Cynicom, All (#88)
... Nelson Rockefeller bought and paid for him.
#94. To: Cynicom (#92)
and forget you and Fan even exist.
#95. To: GreyLmist (#94)
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#96. To: FormerLurker, *9-11*, *No Planers* (#95)
to my knowledge, holograms appear transparent, not as solid objects.
#97. To: GreyLmist (#96)
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#98. To: GreyLmist (#96)
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#99. To: FormerLurker (#98)
One other thing GL, since when do you trust CNN to be giving you truthful information?
#100. To: FormerLurker (#97)
#101. To: GreyLmist (#99)
Since when don't you trust CNN/MSM video on 9/11 imagery issues?
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#102. To: FormerLurker (#101)
Remote control could not ensure that a plane (civilian, military, or drone) wouldn't break apart outside of the buildings on impact (endangering people on the street, leaving contradictory evidence behind, and messing up the cover story for the destruction of the Towers) but CGI could.
#103. To: GreyLmist (#102)
(Edited)
Remote control could not ensure that a plane (civilian, military, or drone) wouldn't break apart outside of the buildings on impact (endangering people on the street, leaving contradictory evidence behind, and messing up the cover story for the destruction of the Towers) but CGI could.
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#104. To: GreyLmist (#102)
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#105. To: FormerLurker (#104)
Besides GL, do you truly think that the news production teams, newscasters, reporters, and camera crews, along with firemen, police, and NYC inhabitants would have taken part in a false flag operation where thousands of people would have been killed?
#106. To: FormerLurker (#103)
(Edited)
Thing is, a remote controlled missile (which the aircraft would have been) has a very damn good chance of hitting its target.
#107. To: All (#106)
#108. To: GreyLmist (#105)
I do think that some would willingly participate in such a flase flag op, that some might have believed they were participating in a Military excercise and could have been sworn to secrecy about it as a national security necessity, and that most were probably swept into the operation believing it was actually happening, similar to the War of the Worlds broadcast.
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#109. To: GreyLmist (#106)
(Edited)
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#110. To: GreyLmist (#106)
I don't know which videos you're referring to as being faked by No Planers.
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#111. To: GreyLmist (#106)
(Edited)
I've spent a lot of time addressing your concerns and would like to hear your explanation for why there was little to no smoke damage at the WTC [Towers and Bldg. 7 too] as well as how WTC 1 was insignificantly impacted by flying projectiles when WTC 2 was demolished.
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#112. To: GreyLmist (#106)
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#113. To: FormerLurker (#109)
(Edited)
Me: But in the post I replied to, you said remote control planes -- not missiles.
Remote control could not ensure that a plane (civilian, military, or drone) wouldn't break apart outside of the buildings on impact (endangering people on the street, leaving contradictory evidence behind, and messing up the cover story for the destruction of the Towers) but CGI could.
#114. To: FormerLurker (#110)
Me: I don't know which videos you're referring to as being faked by No Planers.
.
.
.
