[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Let’s Talk About Grief | Death Anniversary Democrats Suddenly Change Slogan To 'Orange Man Good' America in SHOCK as New Footage of Jill Biden's 'ELDER ABUSE' Emerges | Dems FURIOUS: 'Jill is EVIL' Executions, reprisals and counter-executions - SS Polizei Regiment 19 versus the French Resistance Paratrooper kills german soldier and returns wedding photos to his family after 68 years AMeRiKaN GULaG... 'Christian Warrior Training' explodes as churches put faith in guns Major insurer gives brutal ultimatum to entire state: Let us put up prices by 50 percent or we will leave Biden Admin Issues Order Blocking Haitian Illegal Immigrants From Deportation Murder Rate in Socialist Venezuela Falls to 22-Year Low ISRAEL IS DESTROYING GAZA TO CONTROL THE WORLD'S MOST IMPORTANT SHIPPING LANE Denmark to tax livestock farts and burps starting in 2030 Woman to serve longer prison time for offending migrant men who gang-raped a minor IDF says murder is okay after statistics show that Israel killed 75% of all journalists who died in 2023 Boeing to be criminally INDICTED for fraud 0:35 / 10:02 Nigel Farage Embarrasses Rishi Sunak & Keir Starmer AGAIN in New Speech! Norway to stockpile 82,500 tons of grain to prepare for famine and war Almost 200 Pages of Epstein Grand Jury Documents Released UK To Install Defibrillators in EVERY School Due to Sudden Rise in Heart Problems Pfizer purchased companies that produce drugs to treat the same conditions caused by covid vaccines It Now Takes An Annual Income Of $186,000 A Year For Americans To Feel Financially Secure Houthis Unleash 'Attacks' On Israeli, U.S. And UK Ships; 'Trio Of Evil Hit' | Full Detail Gaza hospital chief says he was severely tortured in Israeli prisons I'd like to thank Congress for using my Tax money to buy Zelenskys wife a Bugatti. Cancer-causing radium detected in US city's groundwater due to landfill teeming with nuclear waste from WWII-era atomic bomb efforts Tennessee Law Allowing Death Penalty For Pedophiles Goes Into Effect - Only Democrats Oppose It Meet the NEW Joe Biden! 😂 Bovine Collagen Benefits Milk Thistle Benefits for the Liver, Gut & More Anthocyanin Benefits for Health

9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: Smoke and Mirrors videos-controversy topic
Source: various
URL Source: http://freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/reada ... gi?ArtNum=149329&Disp=671#C671
Published: Sep 29, 2012
Author: Me and various
Post Date: 2012-09-29 01:19:12 by GreyLmist
Keywords: 9/11, NIST, PBS, CBS
Views: 2041
Comments: 94

Relevant info on this topic is accessible through posts #586 and #671 linked below:

4um Title: How 9-11 Was Done

Post #586 -- videos, links, and details

Post #671 -- WETA/PBS addendum info

Poster Comment:

Tangential discussion starting point [#103] at 4um Title: Pilots Analyze the Government Provided Radar Data of the Planes of 9-11, if needed for referencing here.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 80.

#9. To: All, *9-11*, *No Planers* (#0) (Edited)

This is an addendum for references on an additional documentary circa 2003 (Ref. web.archive.org: 911conspiracy.tv - 2nd WTC Attack Videos - CBS3: "The Center of the World - New York: A Documentary Film" | PBS, Lisa Ades, Ric Burns, and David Ogden Stiers, narrator) that is said to be the origin of the now unavailable Detroit Public TV documentary footage (referenced at the start of the Smoke and Mirrors long- version video with the Detroit Public TV logo and also in the 8-sec. US Department of Commerce/NIST video with the WETA logo for Washington D.C. PBS; Ref. Posts #586 and #671).

In comparison to the Smoke and Mirrors (long version) PBS footage: All of the original CBS news footage that I've viewed up to this point of the Empire State Building angle likewise shows the plane image as if it appears out of nowhere to the right of the Empire State Building or from behind it, depending on which broadcast segments are being reported/discussed. Also, in all of the available PBS video-clip examples that I've noted above, the screen jumps as if spliced like the Smoke and Mirrors segment does. Neither of these issues (the appearance of the plane image as if out of nowhere and the screen jump as if spliced) should be attributed to tampering by whomever authored the Smoke and Mirrors analysis videos at the terrorize.dk site or to Elpiper who posted them at YouTube in May and June of 2008 because they are evidenced in MSM CBS and PBS film of 9/11. The color darkening seen more in the Smoke and Mirrors short-version is similar to an MSM Chopper view that I'll try to relocate and post as an example. The copied smoke alteration is debateable as to how and from what source that happened and there could be some interpretive problems with the wording of the comments in the video analyses. It is still my impression as of now, though, from what I can recall of much earlier discussions about this video topic, that the coloration and smoke copying was for dramatic effect by the Media to promote the Iraq war.

At watchdocumentary.com: The biggest source of free documentaries to watch online

Segment 4 at 1:17

New York: A Documentary Film - Episode 08: The Center of the World (1946–2003)

YouTube Playlist by me of the documentary: PBS, New York - 8 Center Of The World -- 7 videos, duration 1:30:50, go to 1:17 of video #4 for comparisons with the other footage in question.

Description excerpts:

New York: A Documentary Film is an eight-part, 17½ hour, American documentary film on the history of New York City. It was directed by Ric Burns and originally aired in the U.S. on PBS. The film was a co-production of Thirteen New York and WGBH Boston.

The documentary is divided into eight parts: * Episode One: The Country and the City (1609--1825) * Episode Two: Order and Disorder (1825--1865) * Episode Three: Sunshine and Shadow (1865--1898) * Episode Four: The Power and the People (1898--1918) * Episode Five: Cosmopolis (1919--1931) * Episode Six: City of Tomorrow (1929--1941) * Episode Seven: The City and the World (1945--2000) * Episode Eight: The Center of the World (1946--2003)

Additional References:

Film Credits . New York The Center of the World . WGBH American Experience - PBS

freerepublic.com: PBS TV -- The Center of the World (a WTC history)

Edit to insert a PBS notation in paragraph 2.

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-10-01   5:48:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

One more thing GL. Being that apparently the "Smoke and Mirrors" video is the "best" evidence you can drag off the net in terms of supporting your theory, it should be clear that your theory doesn't hold water.

It's obvious to me that this video is quite important to you, since if it wasn't you'd move on to better things to research and investigate. Being that at least I know that this video is a complete fraud, you're never going to convince me of what you're peddling, although I'm sure you'll be tap dancing all over the forum trying to convince others that it's bonafide evidence.

Yep, it's bonafide evidence alright. Evidence that someone released a doctored video to PBS stations for broadcast, and then others either out of malice or ignorance decided that it's "evidence" of the "no planes" theory.

Since the author of the "Smoke and Mirrors" video claims expertise, and he even includes the source CBS footage in his extended video, it's apparent that he's not doing it out of ignorance.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-10-01   11:08:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

It's obvious to me that this video is quite important to you, since if it wasn't you'd move on to better things to research and investigate.

I would like to move on now to better things to research and investigate. This is a link set for 10:24 of video #3 in the Playlist linked above for the PBS documentary: PBS, New York - 8 Center Of The World (3/7). Set the video below to that mark too. Any comment on the very oddly shaped plane image shown in that PBS doc clip at 10:24?

Edited sentence 1.

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-10-04   14:42:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

It's obvious to me that this video is quite important to you, since if it wasn't you'd move on to better things to research and investigate.

I would like to move on now to better things to research and investigate. This is a link set for 10:24 of video #3 in the Playlist linked above for the PBS documentary: PBS, New York - 8 Center Of The World (3/7). Set the video below to that mark too. Any comment on the very oddly shaped plane image shown in that PBS doc clip at 10:24?

Edited sentence 1.

THAT WAS FREAKING EPIC!!!

The devil of the details... It took me a moment but I saw what you pointed out...

People you all see it right? In his PBS doc vid he linked... The plane engines.... Where should they be? On the wings or on the tail?

Look again at the video.

And ask yourself why they are using images of fake planes? and How much of the footage was fake planes.

titorite  posted on  2012-10-04   21:31:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

THAT WAS FREAKING EPIC!!!

..... tap dancing ......

People you all see it right? In his PBS doc vid he linked... The plane engines.... Where should they be? On the wings or on the tail?

As far as that PBS video, just as I thought. You're going to use that as "no planes" evidence. For one, not only is that NOT a clip from 9/11, it is either a dramatized image or a doctored one, PBS has ALREADY aired doctored footage from SOMEONE, who exactly isn't quite clear yet.

I find it an odd coincidence that you're bringing this stuff up on the net right about the same time PBS is airing the Architects for 9/11 Truth video. A guilt by association sort of thing, isn't it tit.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-10-04   21:39:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I find it revealing that your logic does not apply to yourself.

I mean you are being shown the inconsistent images... The images from the mainstream images you can get from their websites in their caches with the same flaws of the conspirators still left in ....

And yet you refuse to accept the truth in front of your eyes.

STOP LETTING ANTIQUE PROPAGANDA CONTROL YOUR THOUGHTS!

WTF is PBS in on the no plane theory too?!?! They made that vid just to get to you? is that it? Is that what you think?! That everything in the world revolves around you and your internet pronouncements of what is fact and what is not? Get real man.

titorite  posted on  2012-10-04   22:11:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

If you WON'T answer the simple yes or no question, then I have to assume that you ARE a shill here on the forum, specifically to target and attack those who are a bit too close in terms of what REALLY happened on the morning of 9/11/2001.

Let me ask you this ONE more time.

Do you think the "Smoke and Mirrors" video is actual proof of the "no planes" theory?

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-10-05   2:49:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

If you WON'T answer the simple yes or no question, then I have to assume that you ARE a shill here on the forum, specifically to target and attack those who are a bit too close in terms of what REALLY happened on the morning of 9/11/2001.

Let me ask you this ONE more time.

Do you think the "Smoke and Mirrors" video is actual proof of the "no planes" theory?

No , you are just acting like a dick head.

Your questions have been answered , fuck you for dragging my friends into this you piece of shit. They have no reference here. They have not been following the conversation of your trolling fucking antics.

I hope you get a virus today you fuck stain.

I mean bother me all you want but leave others that have nothing to do with this OUT OF THIS .... fucking jack boot thug

titorite  posted on  2012-10-05   7:19:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

So I guess it's official, you ARE a shill. It's quite apparent that you have no intent of having a civil discussion concerning this, you're only here to harrass and disrupt the forum with your antics.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-10-05   10:40:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Shill? Fuck your shill bullshit

Former Lurker you have entered full on scum bag territory when you attempted to drag my friends into this fuck you lying scum bag piece of shit.

What on gods green earth makes you think you are any better then any other scum bag? You attempt to drag innocent people into a conflict they have nothing to do with.

You attempt to use them as an intellectual weapon against me.

Trully you do no service to any truth movement.....

You're worthless lying punk ass is in no better place than pasted to that chair you filth.

titorite  posted on  2012-10-05   16:09:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

All you've done here is spew accusations and profanities, while at the same time putting on a tap dance routine, ducking and dodging the very simple question I asked of you.

Again, just one last try here.

Do you feel that the Smoke and Mirrors video is a fraud, or do you think it's real footage which proves the "no plane" theory?

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-10-05   16:28:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

All you've done here is spew accusations and profanities, while at the same time putting on a tap dance routine, ducking and dodging the very simple question I asked of you.

Again, just one last try here.

Do you feel that the Smoke and Mirrors video is a fraud, or do you think it's real footage which proves the "no plane" theory?

9-11 jump-ping to video issue highlighted below.

I'm guessing, FL, that you think you're on some sort of entrapment enforcement mission with your false dichotomy/false dilemma/either-or fallacy hammerings when those aren't even the real choices, much less the only options realistically. You should already know by now that "Neither" would be the actual answer in truth to your Inquisitions about it. Once again, they are a Media Fakery issue with focus on the smoke and explosion anomalies in a Detroit PBS program depicting 9/11, not a No Planes Theory "powerpoint" demo. Being mistaken about when the footage was originally broadcast does not equate to fraud.

As I've already told you, it is the original MSM CBS-footage itself that shows the plane image appearing out of nowhere from the Empire State Building angle and you've also posted video showing the same thing yourself. If you can find original CBS footage from that Empire State Building angle which doesn't show the plane as if appearing out of nowhere, post it here for us but I couldn't find any. It is the PBS film that shows a splice jump and an example of that can be seen in the 2003 PBS "Center of the World" documentary that I posted above, which was aired several years before the Smoke and Mirrors analysis videos were posted at YouTube in 2008.

As for your 1st paragraph of spurious aspersions, this was your response to titorite after he posted a Smoke and Mirrors link for you to consider in the anomalous smoke discussion. Ref. 4um Title: How 9/11 Was Done; titorite at Post #350. FL at Post #355: "I dare say if you looked beyond your ass, you'd see that you've been wrong in EVERYTHING you've said,"

This is an example of titorite editing a post to you in an effort of civility:

Ref. Post #123 of 4um Title: Pilots Analyze the Government Provided Radar Data of the Planes of 9-11

Edited for civility.

Haven't seen any such example from you, FL, but this was your uncivil response to dodge what I'd asked of you more than once:

Post #111 of 4um Title: Pilots Analyze the Government Provided Radar Data of the Planes of 9-11

Me: I've spent a lot of time addressing your concerns and would like to hear your explanation for why there was little to no smoke damage at the WTC [Towers and Bldg. 7 too] as well as how WTC 1 was insignificantly impacted by flying projectiles when WTC 2 was demolished.

FL: Are you high? "Little to no smoke damage"? Are you trying to say there were no fires at all, and THAT was faked too?

Do you truly believe what you write?

As far as WTC 1, WTF are you talking about in terms of "insignificantly impacted by flying projectiles"?

I posted an example in that very thread at #137 as to what I mean by WTC 1 being insignificantly impacted by flying projectiles when WTC 2 was demolished. Here it is again, FL, in case you missed it and would care to explain the phenomenon this time:

WCBS 9-11 9:50 - 10:00 -- at the 1:27 and 6:30 marks

Edited sentence 1 for readability formatting.

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-10-05   23:47:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

This is what I've observed from the both of you. Neither one of you will pin down exactly what it is you're claiming, although titorite has previously stated that NO planes existed which were identified as hijacked aircraft that morning, and that the entire thing was fabricated.

He will not say one way or the other if he feels that the "Smoke and Mirrors" video is a fraud, but WILL get violently upset if I ask him about it.

You have posted repetitive posts stating the same thing for the past several weeks now, between this thread and the previous thread concerning Israeli Mossad involvement with the attacks, fluctuating between the authenticity of the "Smoke and Mirrors" video (proven to be using fake video, although presented as if it were an analysis of original footage), your claims that the smoke plumes were travelling in different directions (proven to be untrue), and some nebulous comment about "no damage from the collapse of the WTC 2 tower".

And of course, you have also used occasional ad hominem attacks against myself, acting all butt hurt over my responses to you and your pal, who has hurled more profanities and obscenities at not just me but others who disagreed with him, than anyone else I've seen post on this forum.

But between trying to convince people that the smoke plumes were fake, that the planes were fake, that the collapses were fake, all the while overlooking the actual evidence which proves differently, you haven't really stated what YOU think happened.

So what part of the attacks do you think were real, and those parts which were "faked" in your opinion, HOW were they "faked"?

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-10-06   10:07:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

This is what I've observed from the both of you. Neither one of you will pin down exactly what it is you're claiming, although titorite has previously stated that NO planes existed which were identified as hijacked aircraft that morning, and that the entire thing was fabricated.

He will not say one way or the other if he feels that the "Smoke and Mirrors" video is a fraud, but WILL get violently upset if I ask him about it.

You have posted repetitive posts stating the same thing for the past several weeks now, between this thread and the previous thread concerning Israeli Mossad involvement with the attacks, fluctuating between the authenticity of the "Smoke and Mirrors" video (proven to be using fake video, although presented as if it were an analysis of original footage), your claims that the smoke plumes were travelling in different directions (proven to be untrue), and some nebulous comment about "no damage from the collapse of the WTC 2 tower".

And of course, you have also used occasional ad hominem attacks against myself, acting all butt hurt over my responses to you and your pal, who has hurled more profanities and obscenities at not just me but others who disagreed with him, than anyone else I've seen post on this forum.

You're going to have to post some example of an ad hominem attack against you by me because the only comment which comes close to such that I can recall is when I compared the way you were acting to a gila monster -- the legend being that, when they bite, they won't let go until sundown or until it thunders. I apologize if that offended you but do find it funny, if so, after all of your ad hominem inundations.

I don't know what you mean by "fluctuating between the authenticity of the Smoke and Mirrors video." I've always said that it was a Media Fakery for Iraq War propaganda purposes. The footage analyzed was anomalous. In my opinion, afaik, the poster/analyzer naively underestimated the duplicity of the documentary producers. The commission of fraud was on their part, not the poster/analyzer's. I told you how to contact Elpiper with your charges of dishonesty. My comment about insignificant damage to WTC 1 from projectiles flying from the fall of WTC 2 was not nebulous and I posted video so you could see for yourself that the Tower was not severely impacted by debris as other WTC buildings farther away were said to have been from such. You dismissed it. The smoke plume does lean to the left and also to the right in various footage, not just the examples debated, and there are different plane trajectories too. No amount of evidence is ever going to be admissable to you as viable, apparently, if it goes against your remote control belief system or whatever other narratives you're promoting -- kind of like all the courts that don't care about Article II, Section I Constitutionality regarding eligibility for Presidential office or not, just popular opinion.

But between trying to convince people that the smoke plumes were fake, that the planes were fake, that the collapses were fake, all the while overlooking the actual evidence which proves differently, you haven't really stated what YOU think happened.

So what part of the attacks do you think were real, and those parts which were "faked" in your opinion, HOW were they "faked"?

I'm a No Planes researcher and don't think that there were any real plane strikes at the WTC, at the Pentagon or in Pennsylvania. I've already told you that I don't claim to have all the answers about how the 9/11 illusion was faked. As I've also said before, there is evidence of film fakery and false witnesses and there is evidence that alleged Flights 11 and 77 didn't even fly that day, none of which makes any difference to you, I'm sure. Seems to me that nothing much is being accomplished in our debates except constant chaos, confusion, and misconstruances so I'm going to post some evidence in this thread on the witnesses, as I said I would, then we might as well just agree to disagree about 9/11 and be done with this mess.

Edited for spelling and paragraph 2 for clarity.

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-10-07   12:28:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

nothing much is being accomplished in our debates except constant chaos, confusion

Which seems to be your ultimate goal. Disrupt and bring chaos to 9/11 threads which touch upon a bit too much truth, such as those which provide details on Israeli Mossad involvement.

Are you an Israeli citizen GL?

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-10-07   15:16:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Which seems to be your ultimate goal. Disrupt and bring chaos to 9/11 threads which touch upon a bit too much truth, such as those which provide details on Israeli Mossad involvement.

Are you an Israeli citizen GL?

This is my 9/11 thread and it is you who are being chaotic and disruptive, apparently to obscure the Media Fakery issues that have been established despite your bombast, twistings, and inattentiveness. I was even going to thank you for all that I've learned about this topic because of your interest in it until I saw your latest batch of barbs. I'm not an Israeli citizen. Are you, FL? Have to wonder since you didn't want to discuss any of the details I've provided about Israeli/Mossad involvement -- just fitdance about No Planers.

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-10-08   6:13:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

This is my 9/11 thread and it is you who are being chaotic and disruptive

A) This is an extension of the "discussion" of the Israeli Mossad involvement thread, where instead of discussing who exactly was involved, and what evidence there was to that effect, you and your sidekick decided to plaster the thread with "no planer" nonsense.

B) This thread was meant to stir controversy, as the title of the thread indicates. It was SUPPOSED to be a discussion of the "Smoke and Mirrors" video.

C) My first comment on this thread was a simple question, which was, "do the both of you admit that the Smoke and Mirrors video is a fraud?", directed to the both of you, ie. yourself and titorite. Your sidekick decided to launch a barrage of obscenities and accusations.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-10-08   11:13:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

A) This is an extension of the "discussion" of the Israeli Mossad involvement thread, where instead of discussing who exactly was involved, and what evidence there was to that effect, you and your sidekick decided to plaster the thread with "no planer" nonsense.

Either your memory is faulty, you're going completely berserk, or you're a bald faced liar. Which is it FL?; because I posted statistics showing that I am the poster in that thread who mentioned Israel and the Mossad most often. [Ref.: Post #392 of 4um Title: How 9-11 Was Done]

B) This thread was meant to stir controversy, as the title of the thread indicates. It was SUPPOSED to be a discussion of the "Smoke and Mirrors" video.

This thread was because of the controversy that you stirred up over the Smoke and Mirrors videos. In your post that I replied to, which you are commenting on here, you mentioned other 9/11 threads, Israel and the Mossad, and asked me if I was an Israeli citizen. Seems you think it's SUPPOSED to be about the Smoke and Mirrors videos when you want it to be about that and not when you don't.

C) My first comment on this thread was a simple question, which was, "do the both of you admit that the Smoke and Mirrors video is a fraud?", directed to the both of you, ie. yourself and titorite. Your sidekick decided to launch a barrage of obscenities and accusations.

He's not my sidekick and you set the tone of obscenities with him in your first response on his polite linking for you to a Smoke and Mirrors video, simply as a noticed smoke-direction anomaly example. He might use more such language and accusations in a post but he makes a lot less posts than you do, so I think you are still way ahead in the barrage launch count. He didn't know the details of the video but I already told you multiple times before this thread what I thought of the issue -- that it was a Media-fakery as Iraq War propaganda. Do you now admit that it is a proven Media fraud and not proven as malintent by the analyzer/poster, Elpiper?

Edited for spelling and last sentence + bracketed Reference insert for Post #392 linked at paragraph 1.

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-10-08   11:48:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Either your memory is faulty, you're going completely berserk, or you're a bald faced liar. Which is it FL?; because I posted statistics showing that I am the poster in that thread who mentioned Israel and the Mossad most often.

Statistics, eh? You cherry picked a few things to make yourself look snow white.

Here, I'll post a link to the How 9/11 Was Done thread.

If anyone still hasn't seen that thread, it's there for all to examine. It becomes apparent who is posting what.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-10-08   12:07:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Statistics, eh? You cherry picked a few things to make yourself look snow white.

Here, I'll post a link to the How 9/11 Was Done thread.

If anyone still hasn't seen that thread, it's there for all to examine. It becomes apparent who is posting what.

I added a link at Post #73 above for the statistics I posted in that thread at #392. Here's a printout-excerpt on the relevant info:

You: Congratulations to the three of you. After 11 days and 381 posts, you've managed to sidetrack the topic of this thread, which is Israeli involvement in the 9/11 attacks and the arrest of Mossad agents that day found with tons of explosives near the George Washington Bridge, as well as how the buildings were wired with explosives and detonated. You've turned it into a ridiculous array of wild unprovable allegations concerning a massive conspiracy involving the television networks, camera crews, on-scene reporters, firemen, police, WTC survivors, bystanders, airlines, airports, air traffic controllers, and the FAA, where they all decided to fake plane crashes into the WTC and produce videos of fake planes, fake smoke, and fake fireballs. Do you guys get paid for this favor you did Israel?

Me: Out of nearly 400 posts in this thread, the vast majority of them -- well over 300 -- are not by me, wudidiz, or titorite; but most of those by us were in answer to your barrage of demands, misconstruances, and derision.

The opening post contains the word "Mossad" a total of 5 times and, with all the posters in this thread, it is only mentioned a total of 5 more times -- all by you and only you, FL, and not until over the 20th post. The George Washington Bridge was never mentioned by anyone except you until now and I am the only other person to have used the word bridge in a posting.

The words Israel/Israeli/Israelis appear in responses on this thread less than 30 times after the opening post and 8 of those 30 times (approx. 25% to 30%+) are in a post by me on Zim Shipping linking that company directly to the Israeli government as a major shareholder -- which you cared not at all to discuss as evidence, nor did any other planers. I mentioned extensive research on Art Students in-residence at the WTC leading up to 9/11. Again, neither you nor any planers cared at all to discuss that evidence with regard to explosives and the spy network of Israeli Art Students concerning 9/11. A bigger priority for you, apparently (besides targeting no-planers), was insisting that the ABC "Butter Plane" was like "Kosher" Physics. Ergo, I should be the one asking you how much you got paid for the sidetracking distraction-favors you did for Israel.

After reviewing the post again, I see that you did mention outright the word Mossad 4 more times than me at that point. However, if I count the Art Student network individually, how many Mossad suspects would that be for my count-total? Maybe hundreds or more, I'm guessing.

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-10-08   12:46:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

You can play word games all you like GL. The proof is in the pudding, which is available at the thread I linked earlier. The thread starts off discussing the possibility of remote controlled aircraft as the article was concerning that topic, and Israeli involvement of such.

I didn't begin talking to you, wududiz, or titorite till the three of you started with your "no planes" nonsense.

You may as well have been saying that fairies hit the towers and made them fall, there's about as much evidence of that as there is in terms of the "no planes" theory.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-10-08   12:52:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

You can play word games all you like GL. The proof is in the pudding, which is available at the thread I linked earlier. The thread starts off discussing the possibility of remote controlled aircraft as the article was concerning that topic, and Israeli involvement of such.

I didn't begin talking to you, wududiz, or titorite till the three of you started with your "no planes" nonsense.

You may as well have been saying that fairies hit the towers and made them fall, there's about as much evidence of that as there is in terms of the "no planes" theory.

The proof is there of your games. The No Planes assaults by you and your pals were already in swing before I came to that thread when ATKHWDI pinged me to the topic on an issue that had nothing to do with No Planes. My first post was a link regarding the Hebrew relevance of the date September 11 at Post #126. I didn't comment on the No Planes bashing until Post #140. As you know, I did discuss the remote control issue in that topic, with particular attention to a latency issue and the fact that alleged Flt. 93 indicates that it wasn't used or could be over-ridden. My opinion is that you have no actual evidence of remote controlled aircraft that day.

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-10-08   14:04:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#82. To: GreyLmist (#80)

The proof is there of your games.

The thread didn't turn to shit until you and titorite started shitting all over it. It's there for the world to see.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-10-08 16:00:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]