[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

A $110B bubble on $500M earnings. History warns: Bubbles always burst.

Joy Behar says people like their show because they tell the truth, unlike "dragon believer" Joe Rogan.

Male Passenger Disappointed After Another Flight Ends Without A Stewardess Frantically Asking If Anyone Can Land The Plane

Could the Rapid Growth of AI Boost Gold Demand?

LOOK AT MY ASS!

Elon Musk Responds As British Government "Summons" Him To 'Disinformation' Hearing

MSNBC Contributor Panics Over Trump Nominating Bondi For AG: Dangerous Because Shes Competent

House passes dangerous bill that targets nonprofits, pro-Palestine groups

Navy Will Sideline 17 Support Vessels to Ease Strain on Civilian Mariners

Israel carries out field executions, massacres in north Gaza

AOC votes to back Israel Lobby's bogus anti-Semitism definition

Biden to launch ICE mobile app, further disrupting Trump's mass deportation plan: Report

Panic at Mar-a-Lago: How the Fake Press Pool Fueled Global Fear Until X Set the Record Straight

Donald Trumps Nominee for the FCC Will Remove DEI as a Priority of the Agency

Stealing JFK's Body

Trump plans to revive Keystone XL pipeline to solidify U.S. energy independence

ASHEVILLE UPDATE: Bodies Being Stacked in Warehouses & Children Being Taken Away

American news is mostly written by Israeli lobbyists pushing Zionist agenda

Biden's Missile Crisis

British Operation Kiss kill Instantly Skripals Has Failed to Kill But Succeeded at Covering Up, Almost

NASA chooses SpaceX and Blue Origin to deliver rover, astronaut base to the moon

The Female Fantasy Exposed: Why Women Love Toxic Love Stories

United States will NOT comply with the ICC arrest warrant for Prime Minister Netanyahu:

Mississippi’s GDP Beats France: A Shocking Look at Economic Policy Failures (Per Capita)

White House Refuses to Recognize US Responsibility for Escalation of Conflict in Ukraine

MAKE EDUCATION GREAT AGAIN!!

They will burn it with a "Peresvet" or shoot it down with a "hypersound"

NY Times: Could Trumps Return Pose a Threat to Climate and Weather Data?

Apples new AI-powered Siri?

Pepe Escobar: The BRICS Spirit Is Alive And Well In South Africa


9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: NO PLANER COINTELPRO Operation Becoming Transparent
Source: Prison Planet Forum
URL Source: http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=945.50;wap2
Published: Aug 1, 2008
Author: Morgan Rose
Post Date: 2012-10-06 10:54:21 by FormerLurker
Ping List: *9-11*     Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 19891
Comments: 309

COINTELPRO, an acronym for Counter Intelligence Program, was a series of covert operations conducted by the FBI starting in the mid 50’s and continuing until 1976 when it was exposed by the investigations The Church Committee. One of the primary methods of COINTELPRO consisted of forging pseudo-movement groups as a means of conducting Psychological Warfare operations to spread disinformation, disrupt, and divide existing movements. These ‘psy-ops’ tended to foment suspicions among the targeted movements and try to dissuade sympathies from people outside the targeted movement.

Today, COINTELPRO has reared its ugly head again, with infiltrations popping up everywhere from Anti-War activism groups to peaceful gun owners and militias. Provocations have become more and more conspicuous to the public as the Seattle World Trade Organization protests and Ontario Security and Prosperity Partnership protests successfully exposed provocateur operations. Of course, something as dangerous to the establishment *body politic* as 9/11 has not been without its alleged incidents of COINTELPRO action. Allegations of government disinformation have been swirling around certain figures in the movement, such as former Bush Administration official Morgan Reynolds, who has recently proposed that “no planes hit the World Trade Center”, has alleged “TV Fakery”, and submitted that the towers were brought down by “Directed Energy Weapons” a.k.a. “Laser Beams”.

While the government has spent innumerable resources trying to contradict eyewitness statements regarding reported explosions in the towers, Morgan Reynolds and his “mockingbirds” expect the 9/11 truth movement to put their energy into further contradicting even more numerous eyewitness statements . See a problem here?

Typical of the above outlined methods, “No Planers” have become a pseudo-movement, adding lunacy, deception, and division to the legitimate questions emanating from 9/11 families, first responders, government officials, intelligence experts, scientists, engineers, architects, academics, entertainment personalities, and so many others.

Perhaps the more visible purveyors of this pseudo-movement are supported by Paula Gloria’s “Concordia Foundation”. The “Concordia Foundation” claims 501 (c) 3, or “nonprofit” status, However, recent investigations conducted by concerned donors have uncovered that her “foundation” does not retain “nonprofit” status with the IRS. In fact, more rigorous inquires have obtained that no records of the “Concordia Foundation” even exist in its home state of New York. Funding of Paula Gloria’s “foundation” originates solely from an information technology firm, Bit By Bit Computer Consultants. “Donations” to the “Concordia Foundation” are actually billed directly to Bit By Bit. The apparent fraud has appropriately prompted multiple complaints with the FTC and IRS.

Bit By Bit, and its subsidiary 3BDigital, admittedly list among their portfolio Bloomberg LLC, Chase Bank, The National Football League, Citigroup, and The National Security Council. 3BDigital boasts to have partnerships with Nokia, Cisco Systems, IBM, Compaq, Microsoft, Goldman Sachs, and Level (3) Communications. Level (3) Communications, a defense contractor doing business, primarily, with US and UK interests, is the developer of the WESCAM system said to be the delivery mechanism for the supposed “TV Fakery”. Of course this is nonsense, but it is fascinating that these harlequins would incorporate their partnerships into their own theories.

The “Concordia Foundation” numbers among its surrogates Nico Haupt,” a man who exhibits *prima facie *schizophrenic behavior. Allegations of COINTELPRO surrounding Haupt have, in the past, seemed to be justified. WeAreChange recently had two unprovoked incidents with Haupt, where he assaulted the groups members, only to be ignored by onlooking NYPD.

Haupt continuously spreads disinformation, even abject lies, surrounding the 9/11 truth movement. From calling legitimate 9/11 truthers “Plane Huggers”, to claiming “Alex Jones works for ABC” and is “covering up for the media”, Haupt’s tactics and behavior exhibit classic COINTELPRO methods. Haupt even advocates “waterboarding Plane Huggers”.

So a “foundation” with intimate ties to international defense contractors, major Wall Street banks, prominent telecommunications firms, and The National Security council is a driving force behind the “No Plane” pseudo-movement?

The information promulgated by Paula Gloria, Nico Haupt, Morgan Reynolds, and others is clearly suspect in light of these new revelations. Whereas, before, all of the speculation regarding “No Plane” theories were simply diffused by logic and common sense, now we see that something much more sinister is at play. The divide and conquer tactics employed by these clowns has warranted past allegations of COINTELPRO. Today, the charade has been fully exposed: the pyschological warfare, the subliminals, the allegations of ‘cover-up’ within the movement, the show on the Howard Stern Channel. Although these revelations should prompt further investigation, it certainly begs the question: does it get any more transparent? Subscribe to *9-11*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 102.

#2. To: FormerLurker (#0)

Thanks for the dogged defense of the positions that you have taken, FL.

Given the effect of ten years of debate on the internet, which has brought the debate out into the open and has now made discussion of these many questions acceptable in polite social conversation, a reaction on the part of the most dangerous parts of our establishment is to be expected.

We have to be extra vigilant these days when we examine evidence and theories as to causes and methods used in the attacks on that day. There is a lot of disinformation out there. COINTELPRO is not dead.

randge  posted on  2012-10-06   11:15:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: randge (#2) (Edited)

You're welcome randge. And it's quite obvious that COINTELPRO is not dead, it is thriving and kicking in full bloom.

It's to be expected with something as huge as 9/11 that it would be used to divide and conquer the truth movement, while at the same time discrediting those who are the most vocal, such as Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Pilots for 9/11 Truth, etc.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-10-06   11:24:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: FormerLurker (#3)

i noticed that the clique of "mainstream" (kosher) truthers bombasted reynolds & fetzer yrs ago. Dr. Fetzer addresses the zionists & even the holhoax, which makes him trustworthy in my book.One may debate matters without necessarily being cointelpro.

Artisan  posted on  2012-10-06   20:09:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Artisan (#4)

Liking a guy because he claims to be "addressing the zionists" or pretends to do so, is like voting for Mitt Romney because he calls himself a conservative and pretends to be one.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-10-07   15:01:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: FormerLurker (#8)

he doesnt 'claim' to be discussing the forbidden topic of jews, It's just something i noticed after he was excluded from the kosher 'clique'. It has nothing to do with the no-plane stuff, a topic which i find irrelevent.

Artisan  posted on  2012-10-08   4:54:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Artisan (#14)

The "no-plane" nonsense seems pretty clearly to be disinformation planted to disinform, discredit 911 Truth, and mislead.

I don't pretend to have the final data set but I think it is safe to say that the "Official Conspiracy Theory" involving a "Magic Arab" with his "Charmed Cellphone" in a cave in Tora Bora makes about as much sense as "no planes". In other words both are disinfo.

I do think focusing on the likely Mossad connection is a bit of a Red Herring as well. It is not that I do not think that there were Israelis involved, but that they were not in charge of the Op but just one of the players.

Original_Intent  posted on  2012-10-08   14:26:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Original_Intent (#17)

The "no-plane" nonsense seems pretty clearly to be disinformation planted to disinform, discredit 911 Truth, and mislead.

And why do you say that?

Have you looked into it as deep as you could have?

I know I did not become a no planer over night.

But their remain problems... big glaring huge ,"drive a mack truck through the hole in the plot" problems...

Problems I can not turn a blind eye away from.

Inconsistencies I refuse to ignore.

One plane can not be caught on camera flying on different flight paths.

.......

I am not attempting to mislead anyone. I may not have the fine debate skills of GreyLmist but at least I don't resort to using disinformation tactics strait from the disinformation hand book.... it is very hard to deal with that kind of shit Original-Intent... god knows FormerLurker is just getting his jollies off on it all... thats part of the problem with utilising the tactics of disinformation.... Amateur enthusiasts forget the tactics are a weapon and then that becomes their default style of internet posting.... In my view he discredited himself..... especially when he crossed that line of using innocent bystanders to get at me. One should never use another friends against them... only scum do that. ......

This topic has exhausted me.

I don't get paid for this shit... I damn sure earned nothing for my tens of thousands of hours of investigation. ..... I am no shill. I am not discrediting anything.... I may not know the whole truth of all.. in fact if I did I would probably need to stand trial.. as for the planes though...

NO plane at the pentagon.

No plane at shanksville.

No planes.

titorite  posted on  2012-10-08   16:41:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: titorite (#20)

One plane can not be caught on camera flying on different flight paths.

Isn't it amazing what can be done with Photoshop these days?

The "no-planes" does not pass the smell test. There is too much independent footage, too many witnesses, and it would simply be technologically more advanced and complicated than I credit the gooburmunt with.

No, the planes did not bring down the buildings, but the combination of internal demolition charges (nano-thermites and possibly a micro-nuke or two) along with some type of microwave or particle beam better accounts for the observed phenomena - particularly in terms of the microfine concrete dust.

No, the "no planes" is planted disinformation - of that I am pretty well convinced just in terms of logic and known, or even extrapolated, available technology.

Original_Intent  posted on  2012-10-10   18:41:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#59. To: Original_Intent (#37) (Edited)

Isn't it amazing what can be done with Photoshop these days?

The "no-planes" does not pass the smell test. There is too much independent footage, too many witnesses, and it would simply be technologically more advanced and complicated than I credit the gooburmunt with.

No, the planes did not bring down the buildings, but the combination of internal demolition charges (nano-thermites and possibly a micro-nuke or two) along with some type of microwave or particle beam better accounts for the observed phenomena - particularly in terms of the microfine concrete dust.

No, the "no planes" is planted disinformation - of that I am pretty well convinced just in terms of logic and known, or even extrapolated, available technology.

NO.... what was amazing is what graphic technologies were available back on September tenth 2001... the day before.

....Man....

You should not just say "Disinfo" and dismiss me outta hand.

THis is not dis-info.... this is an unhappy realization. Years of observation and ...unwanted conclusion... yet it is what it is.

LIke the microwave thing you refer too... are you really gonna acknowledge that fucked up spire and disavow the possiblity of CGI effects and planted charicter acotrs? ... The producers of the news media play a big role in 911... from fox to NBC and on and on.. many of the on the ground reporter, interviewers, and interviees were " Major News Media Producers" ....... BIG FREAKING COINCIEDENCE THAT!!!!

Ever seen wag the dog?

It is a propaganda war man... To fight it they need as much diversion as possible. With us truth seekers the wilder the truth the better,,,,

It was controlled demolition...WTC 7 was totally conventional..... wtc 1 and 2 and the surrounding buildings were not conventional... those were a combination of DEW weapons and conventionals... I think the conventionals were used to make the plane holes and destroy the tops.........

From all that I read and know of WTC 1 and 2... they were built like all modern sky scrapers with a destroy plan ( a forethought plan of building removal for when it became outdated) .. it was so huge and new (I love the tube within a tube concept) built in three sections ... to eventually be destroyed in three sections starting from the top down....

And if you follow the squibs and blow outs that is pretty much what it looks like. Top section first, then mid section, then bottom and spire ......freaky,,,

As you learn about areodynamics, and wake vortex and videographic alteration ......man.... things become apparent.

in 93 the plan failed because an untrusted asset was used.

in 2001 their were no untrusted assets , no way for anyone uncommited to fuck ip the evil plan twice.

The pentagon plane couldn't bank and survive those alleged angles of desent... the WTC plans can not have multple flight paths leading into the impact points,... those cell phone calls are BS, WTF is up with the atomization of it all... AHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!

NO!!!!

Discount nothing until you can prove it wrong....

Their was no WIFI connections for those remote connections. Not Atop WTC1 september elvenenth two thousand and one. ..... Remote planes.... I wanted to believe that at one point... I went about to prove it as I looked for the evidence... Truth lead me to the sad strange truth instead.

THE PATH OF "THE LEAST AMOUNT OF EFFORT USED TO OVERCOME THE MOST RESISTANCE" IS, WHAT WAS ENACTED!

Deadly Shadow puppet games used to distract a people from ever getting to the truth.

titorite  posted on  2012-10-11   9:12:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#64. To: titorite (#59)

NO.... what was amazing is what graphic technologies were available back on September tenth 2001... the day before.

However, NO ONE has produced, AT ANY TIME, evidence for the existence of holographic technology of the requisite level, nor any evidence that equipment capable of producing such an illusion was in place on September 11th 2001.

It was controlled demolition...WTC 7 was totally conventional..... wtc 1 and 2 and the surrounding buildings were not conventional... those were a combination of DEW weapons and conventionals... I think the conventionals were used to make the plane holes and destroy the tops.........

Here we are almost on the same page. I do believe multiple technologies were used both to initiate and control the building's collapses. It is the only hypothesis which accounts for ALL of the observed phenomena. As I pointed out above the "No Planes" hypothesis is at very best a distraction. Having spent a lot of time studying disinformation and how it is planted and used the "No Planes" hypothesis carries a lot of the hallmarks of disinformation used to discredit and divert into profitless lines of inquiry and on down the "Rabbit Hole".

As for the fallacious argument that I must "prove it wrong" to discredit the "hypothesis" that is in and of itself a logical fallacy. From the point of view of sound reasoning and logic the burden is simply to show that there is no evidence of the technology of the requisite scale to produce the observed phenomena. Can you cite even one example of holographic technology which can be verified and crosschecked which would support that technology being available on September 11th 2001?

Original_Intent  posted on  2012-10-11   18:43:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#68. To: Original_Intent, titorite, *9-11* (#64) (Edited)

titorite: NO.... what was amazing is what graphic technologies were available back on September tenth 2001... the day before.

original_Intent: However, NO ONE has produced, AT ANY TIME, evidence for the existence of holographic technology of the requisite level, nor any evidence that equipment capable of producing such an illusion was in place on September 11th 2001.

Graphic thechnology isn't a synonym for holographic technology -- or did you intend to sneak that obscuration through as a distractive red herring to make a strawman pincushion of ridicule about No Planes research? Other than the opening garbage-article posted at the top of this thread and authored by a probable COINTELPRO stooge, you were the only one at all in this thread talking about holograms, O_I.

As I pointed out above the "No Planes" hypothesis is at very best a distraction. Having spent a lot of time studying disinformation and how it is planted and used the "No Planes" hypothesis carries a lot of the hallmarks of disinformation used to discredit and divert into profitless lines of inquiry and on down the "Rabbit Hole".

As for the fallacious argument that I must "prove it wrong" to discredit the "hypothesis" that is in and of itself a logical fallacy. From the point of view of sound reasoning and logic the burden is simply to show that there is no evidence of the technology of the requisite scale to produce the observed phenomena. Can you cite even one example of holographic technology which can be verified and crosschecked which would support that technology being available on September 11th 2001?

Wow. Just wow. Fallacious argument? No one has even asked you to prove it wrong. You inserted holograms into the discussion and the logical fallacy of your doing that is what is the actual disinformative distraction. Classic strawman argument, O_I. I'm fairly certain you know that with all of the times you've discussed such tactics. The question of motive is: Why? Were you really simply mistaken about what titorite meant as media graphic technology?

Edited for grammar, spelling, to abbreviate last sentence of paragraph 1 and sentence 3 insert in 2nd paragraph.

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-10-12   0:10:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#99. To: GreyLmist (#68)

Graphic thechnology isn't a synonym for holographic technology

True, but a certain unknown percentage of "No Planes" people assert that the planes and associated fireworks were all holograms. As well, as I pointed out above, evidence that the broadcast images were manipulated proves nothing more than that the broadcast images were manipulated. It does not tell us WHY and to what end they were manipulated, and it cuts both ways as I have read that some video experts who have looked at the "No Planes" videos have in turn pronounced them to have been manipulated.

However, my basic point stands - it is irrelevant and therefore a Red Herring. The evidence of Nano-thermites and the video of the buildings visibly being eroded by some unknown agency are much more compelling as evidence. Therefore I infer that the "No Planes" is a planted disinformational diversion to keep people chasing their tails over irrelevencies.

As for my motivations it is simple - I dislike disinformation and Red Herrings as they are both diversions and alterations of the truth.

As far as I'm concerned you might as well assert that the impacts were "Flying Trains" or "Pink Elephants". So far as getting at the truth of matters it is largely a moot point that inspires endless haggling over irrelevant points. You can believe in the fuzz in your Belly Button if you want. However, that also is not relevant to establishing the "Best Evidence". Nano-Thermite residue is solid quantifiable, replicable evidence. The observed phenomena of a pancake collapse accompanied by squibs (and first hand testimony to explosions preceding the plane impacts) IS hard evidence.

Original_Intent  posted on  2012-10-12   14:11:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#102. To: Original_Intent, GreyLmist, *9-11* (#99)

As well, as I pointed out above, evidence that the broadcast images were manipulated proves nothing more than that the broadcast images were manipulated.

I also like to make the distinction between original live footage from the day of 9/11/2001, to that which had been broadcast years after the event.

The PBS documentaries contain doctored footage, whereas original live footage from that morning does not show any signs of doctoring whatsoever.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-10-12   14:18:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 102.

        There are no replies to Comment # 102.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 102.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]