[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Scientists find toxic metals linked to autism in popular toothpaste

FRAGMENTS OF HIV-AIDS VIRUS INSIDE COVID VACCINES.

Harvard Hammered: Feds Yank An Additional $450 Million In Grants

TOTAL WAR: TRUMP SHUTS DOWN THE IRS 45,000 AGENTS FIRED!

Netanyahu: Israel Will Finish War in Gaza, Drive Out 50% of Palestinians

Something has to change with Big Pharma... NOW.

Your Mitochondria Need THIS to Be Healthy. A Conversation with Nicolas Verhoeven, PhD

Ben Shapiro MELTS DOWN Over Trump Deprioritizing Israel

Tulsi Gabbard FIRES the Top Two Deep State Officials from the National Intelligence Council

World Health Organization: 57 Children in Gaza Killed by Malnutrition Since March Amid Israeli Siege

Pop Star Ed Sheeran Admits "Every Area Of London" Is Dangerous Now

Dr. David Martin discusses a proposed bioweapons attack scheduled for July 2025.

MSNBC horribly suggests the genocide against the SA refugees is justified.

Cheap Tomatoes (And Immigration)

SOTT Earth Changes Summary - April 2025: Extreme Weather, Planetary Upheaval,

Turmeric Lowers Blood Pressure-How To Get the Most Out Of It

Magistrate Judge Issues Warning to US Attorney Alina Habba and ICE After Arrest of Newark Mayor

UK PM Starmer Slammed For Daring To Suggest Immigrants Should "Speak English"

How $21 TRILLION Went Missing From U.S. Tax Payers! -Catherine Austin Fitts

Diddy’s Collapse Was No Accident – Whitney Webb Connects the Dots!

CANADIAN Soldiers Spill Hard Truth about Russia Ukraine War

10 Russian weapons used in Ukraine that worry NATO

CAF It Looks Like Crypto Is Going to Be the Trigger for the Next Crisis—and Massive Plunder

Jimmy Dore NYC Mayor Race Just Got CRAZY! !

US Treasury Shocks With Second Biggest Budget Surplus In History

Democrats have reached peaked stupidity.

The Forgotten History of Neurological Vaccine Injuries

Israel to take full control of land registry in West Bank's Area C, cementing annexation

Trump discusses end to Gaza war with Saudi crown prince

ew numbers from the Bureau of Labor and Statistics show 800,000 jobs from last year never existed.


9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: NO PLANER COINTELPRO Operation Becoming Transparent
Source: Prison Planet Forum
URL Source: http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=945.50;wap2
Published: Aug 1, 2008
Author: Morgan Rose
Post Date: 2012-10-06 10:54:21 by FormerLurker
Ping List: *9-11*     Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 27035
Comments: 309

COINTELPRO, an acronym for Counter Intelligence Program, was a series of covert operations conducted by the FBI starting in the mid 50’s and continuing until 1976 when it was exposed by the investigations The Church Committee. One of the primary methods of COINTELPRO consisted of forging pseudo-movement groups as a means of conducting Psychological Warfare operations to spread disinformation, disrupt, and divide existing movements. These ‘psy-ops’ tended to foment suspicions among the targeted movements and try to dissuade sympathies from people outside the targeted movement.

Today, COINTELPRO has reared its ugly head again, with infiltrations popping up everywhere from Anti-War activism groups to peaceful gun owners and militias. Provocations have become more and more conspicuous to the public as the Seattle World Trade Organization protests and Ontario Security and Prosperity Partnership protests successfully exposed provocateur operations. Of course, something as dangerous to the establishment *body politic* as 9/11 has not been without its alleged incidents of COINTELPRO action. Allegations of government disinformation have been swirling around certain figures in the movement, such as former Bush Administration official Morgan Reynolds, who has recently proposed that “no planes hit the World Trade Center”, has alleged “TV Fakery”, and submitted that the towers were brought down by “Directed Energy Weapons” a.k.a. “Laser Beams”.

While the government has spent innumerable resources trying to contradict eyewitness statements regarding reported explosions in the towers, Morgan Reynolds and his “mockingbirds” expect the 9/11 truth movement to put their energy into further contradicting even more numerous eyewitness statements . See a problem here?

Typical of the above outlined methods, “No Planers” have become a pseudo-movement, adding lunacy, deception, and division to the legitimate questions emanating from 9/11 families, first responders, government officials, intelligence experts, scientists, engineers, architects, academics, entertainment personalities, and so many others.

Perhaps the more visible purveyors of this pseudo-movement are supported by Paula Gloria’s “Concordia Foundation”. The “Concordia Foundation” claims 501 (c) 3, or “nonprofit” status, However, recent investigations conducted by concerned donors have uncovered that her “foundation” does not retain “nonprofit” status with the IRS. In fact, more rigorous inquires have obtained that no records of the “Concordia Foundation” even exist in its home state of New York. Funding of Paula Gloria’s “foundation” originates solely from an information technology firm, Bit By Bit Computer Consultants. “Donations” to the “Concordia Foundation” are actually billed directly to Bit By Bit. The apparent fraud has appropriately prompted multiple complaints with the FTC and IRS.

Bit By Bit, and its subsidiary 3BDigital, admittedly list among their portfolio Bloomberg LLC, Chase Bank, The National Football League, Citigroup, and The National Security Council. 3BDigital boasts to have partnerships with Nokia, Cisco Systems, IBM, Compaq, Microsoft, Goldman Sachs, and Level (3) Communications. Level (3) Communications, a defense contractor doing business, primarily, with US and UK interests, is the developer of the WESCAM system said to be the delivery mechanism for the supposed “TV Fakery”. Of course this is nonsense, but it is fascinating that these harlequins would incorporate their partnerships into their own theories.

The “Concordia Foundation” numbers among its surrogates Nico Haupt,” a man who exhibits *prima facie *schizophrenic behavior. Allegations of COINTELPRO surrounding Haupt have, in the past, seemed to be justified. WeAreChange recently had two unprovoked incidents with Haupt, where he assaulted the groups members, only to be ignored by onlooking NYPD.

Haupt continuously spreads disinformation, even abject lies, surrounding the 9/11 truth movement. From calling legitimate 9/11 truthers “Plane Huggers”, to claiming “Alex Jones works for ABC” and is “covering up for the media”, Haupt’s tactics and behavior exhibit classic COINTELPRO methods. Haupt even advocates “waterboarding Plane Huggers”.

So a “foundation” with intimate ties to international defense contractors, major Wall Street banks, prominent telecommunications firms, and The National Security council is a driving force behind the “No Plane” pseudo-movement?

The information promulgated by Paula Gloria, Nico Haupt, Morgan Reynolds, and others is clearly suspect in light of these new revelations. Whereas, before, all of the speculation regarding “No Plane” theories were simply diffused by logic and common sense, now we see that something much more sinister is at play. The divide and conquer tactics employed by these clowns has warranted past allegations of COINTELPRO. Today, the charade has been fully exposed: the pyschological warfare, the subliminals, the allegations of ‘cover-up’ within the movement, the show on the Howard Stern Channel. Although these revelations should prompt further investigation, it certainly begs the question: does it get any more transparent? Subscribe to *9-11*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 23.

#2. To: FormerLurker (#0)

Thanks for the dogged defense of the positions that you have taken, FL.

Given the effect of ten years of debate on the internet, which has brought the debate out into the open and has now made discussion of these many questions acceptable in polite social conversation, a reaction on the part of the most dangerous parts of our establishment is to be expected.

We have to be extra vigilant these days when we examine evidence and theories as to causes and methods used in the attacks on that day. There is a lot of disinformation out there. COINTELPRO is not dead.

randge  posted on  2012-10-06   11:15:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: randge (#2) (Edited)

You're welcome randge. And it's quite obvious that COINTELPRO is not dead, it is thriving and kicking in full bloom.

It's to be expected with something as huge as 9/11 that it would be used to divide and conquer the truth movement, while at the same time discrediting those who are the most vocal, such as Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Pilots for 9/11 Truth, etc.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-10-06   11:24:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: FormerLurker (#3)

i noticed that the clique of "mainstream" (kosher) truthers bombasted reynolds & fetzer yrs ago. Dr. Fetzer addresses the zionists & even the holhoax, which makes him trustworthy in my book.One may debate matters without necessarily being cointelpro.

Artisan  posted on  2012-10-06   20:09:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Artisan (#4)

Liking a guy because he claims to be "addressing the zionists" or pretends to do so, is like voting for Mitt Romney because he calls himself a conservative and pretends to be one.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-10-07   15:01:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: FormerLurker (#8)

he doesnt 'claim' to be discussing the forbidden topic of jews, It's just something i noticed after he was excluded from the kosher 'clique'. It has nothing to do with the no-plane stuff, a topic which i find irrelevent.

Artisan  posted on  2012-10-08   4:54:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Artisan (#14)

The "no plane" topic is a HUGE red flag for me, as it indicates the person peddling it has no grasp on reality at best, or is purposesly shelling out disinfo in earnest in order to discredit any actual evidence and research into the 9/11 attacks.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-10-08   12:23:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: FormerLurker (#15)

The "no plane" topic is a HUGE red flag for me, as it indicates the person peddling it has no grasp on reality at best, or is purposesly shelling out disinfo in earnest in order to discredit any actual evidence and research into the 9/11 attacks.

Oh, but it isn't a red flag at the Pentagon for you and others of your 25% No Planes faction, is it? Posts like yours show that your group is conditioned to react so against what you are fractionally yourselves, like compliant COINTEL- brainwashed subjects.

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-10-08   16:00:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: GreyLmist (#18)

Oh, but it isn't a red flag at the Pentagon for you and others of your 25% No Planes faction, is it? Posts like yours show that your group is conditioned to react so against what you are fractionally yourselves, like compliant COINTEL- brainwashed subjects.

Hey genius, HOW MANY TIMES do you need to be reminded of the fact that we are talking about the WTC attacks in terms of "no planes"? It's been acknowledged MANY times that a 757 not only DIDN'T strike the Pentagon, but COULDN'T have struck the Pentagon as described.

It is NOT part of the "no plane" theory which insists all live video of the WTC attacks were prerecorded in some super duper secret high tech news studio, and that ALL of the networks, their reporters, and camera men who were on the scene that day were in on the "faked attacks".

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-10-08   16:04:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: FormerLurker, *9-11* (#19) (Edited)

Hey genius, HOW MANY TIMES do you need to be reminded of the fact that we are talking about the WTC attacks in terms of "no planes"? It's been acknowledged MANY times that a 757 not only DIDN'T strike the Pentagon, but COULDN'T have struck the Pentagon as described.

It is NOT part of the "no plane" theory which insists all live video of the WTC attacks were prerecorded in some super duper secret high tech news studio, and that ALL of the networks, their reporters, and camera men who were on the scene that day were in on the "faked attacks".

You've inflated the numbers again and might think you're "the decider" on defining No Planes Theory but you're not. You're a gatekeeper against No Planes investigations at the WTC and, lo these many years, Mike Rivero over at whatreallyhappened.com has been gatekeeping especially against No Plane at the Pentagon investigations. That's just one example of someone influential who would likely disagree with your insistence that No Plane at the Pentagon folks are to be exempted from classification as No Planers.

Edited for spelling.

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-10-10   3:40:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 23.

#34. To: GreyLmist (#23)

BTW spinster, I never said there was NO PLANE at the Pentagon. I said that whatever it was that hit the Pentagon, it wasn't a Boeing 757. It was SOME sort of aircraft, and there MAY have been a decoy aircraft flying in the general vicinity which WAS an airliner, but I've never said the television networks faked the attacks, yet were involved with the murder of 3000 Americans, such as yourself and fellow travellers.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-10-10 11:25:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 23.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]