[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The life of the half-immortal who advised CCP (End of CCP in 2026?)

Millions Flee China’s Top Cities

Violence begets violence: IDF troops beaten, choked, rammed by Jewish settlers in West Bank

Netanyahu Says It's Antisemitic For Israeli Soldiers To Describe Their Own Atrocities

China's Economy Spirals With No End In Sight, Says Kyle Bass

American Bread Cannot Be Sold in Most Countries

Woman Spent Her Life To Prove 796 Babies were buried under Catholic Home

Japan Got Rich Without Getting Fat

US Spent $495.3 million to fire 39 THAAD Missiles

Private Mail Back Online

Senior Israeli officials tell Israeli media that they intend to attack Iran after ceasefire.

Palestinian Woman Nails Israeli

Tucker Carlson: Marjorie Taylor Greene:

Diverse Coney Island in New York looks unrecognizable after third world invasion

Corbett Report: Palantir at the Heart of Iran

Haifa, Israel Before and After

Nobody can hear you anymore.

Boattail Buick: The Bill Mitchell's Riviera Revival!

Pulitzer Winning Washington Post Journalist Busted For Child Porn

20 Big Restaurant Chains Are Closing Several Locations All Over America

Trump's Plans for Gaza and Palestine

You Won't Believe what NATO Just Promised Zelensky

Man Shatters Both Legs Jumping From 2nd Story Running from Cops

The Upside of NYC Potentially Electing the Socialist Mamdani

The grandfather of the brilliant new head of MI6 was a Nazi spy chief

Jeff Bezos's Venice Wedding Angered the Locals

GE Appliances to move washing machine production from China to Kentucky in $490M investment

Why Ukraine Cant Seriously Deplete Russia's S-400 Air Defence Arsenal: Massive Production Scale Allows For Rapid Replenishment

DOGE Sparks Biggest Plunge In Social Security Handouts Ever; Fed's Favorite Inflation Indicator Ticked Higher In May

U.S. House Bans WhatsApp Over Data Security Concerns


9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: NO PLANER COINTELPRO Operation Becoming Transparent
Source: Prison Planet Forum
URL Source: http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=945.50;wap2
Published: Aug 1, 2008
Author: Morgan Rose
Post Date: 2012-10-06 10:54:21 by FormerLurker
Ping List: *9-11*     Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 34916
Comments: 309

COINTELPRO, an acronym for Counter Intelligence Program, was a series of covert operations conducted by the FBI starting in the mid 50’s and continuing until 1976 when it was exposed by the investigations The Church Committee. One of the primary methods of COINTELPRO consisted of forging pseudo-movement groups as a means of conducting Psychological Warfare operations to spread disinformation, disrupt, and divide existing movements. These ‘psy-ops’ tended to foment suspicions among the targeted movements and try to dissuade sympathies from people outside the targeted movement.

Today, COINTELPRO has reared its ugly head again, with infiltrations popping up everywhere from Anti-War activism groups to peaceful gun owners and militias. Provocations have become more and more conspicuous to the public as the Seattle World Trade Organization protests and Ontario Security and Prosperity Partnership protests successfully exposed provocateur operations. Of course, something as dangerous to the establishment *body politic* as 9/11 has not been without its alleged incidents of COINTELPRO action. Allegations of government disinformation have been swirling around certain figures in the movement, such as former Bush Administration official Morgan Reynolds, who has recently proposed that “no planes hit the World Trade Center”, has alleged “TV Fakery”, and submitted that the towers were brought down by “Directed Energy Weapons” a.k.a. “Laser Beams”.

While the government has spent innumerable resources trying to contradict eyewitness statements regarding reported explosions in the towers, Morgan Reynolds and his “mockingbirds” expect the 9/11 truth movement to put their energy into further contradicting even more numerous eyewitness statements . See a problem here?

Typical of the above outlined methods, “No Planers” have become a pseudo-movement, adding lunacy, deception, and division to the legitimate questions emanating from 9/11 families, first responders, government officials, intelligence experts, scientists, engineers, architects, academics, entertainment personalities, and so many others.

Perhaps the more visible purveyors of this pseudo-movement are supported by Paula Gloria’s “Concordia Foundation”. The “Concordia Foundation” claims 501 (c) 3, or “nonprofit” status, However, recent investigations conducted by concerned donors have uncovered that her “foundation” does not retain “nonprofit” status with the IRS. In fact, more rigorous inquires have obtained that no records of the “Concordia Foundation” even exist in its home state of New York. Funding of Paula Gloria’s “foundation” originates solely from an information technology firm, Bit By Bit Computer Consultants. “Donations” to the “Concordia Foundation” are actually billed directly to Bit By Bit. The apparent fraud has appropriately prompted multiple complaints with the FTC and IRS.

Bit By Bit, and its subsidiary 3BDigital, admittedly list among their portfolio Bloomberg LLC, Chase Bank, The National Football League, Citigroup, and The National Security Council. 3BDigital boasts to have partnerships with Nokia, Cisco Systems, IBM, Compaq, Microsoft, Goldman Sachs, and Level (3) Communications. Level (3) Communications, a defense contractor doing business, primarily, with US and UK interests, is the developer of the WESCAM system said to be the delivery mechanism for the supposed “TV Fakery”. Of course this is nonsense, but it is fascinating that these harlequins would incorporate their partnerships into their own theories.

The “Concordia Foundation” numbers among its surrogates Nico Haupt,” a man who exhibits *prima facie *schizophrenic behavior. Allegations of COINTELPRO surrounding Haupt have, in the past, seemed to be justified. WeAreChange recently had two unprovoked incidents with Haupt, where he assaulted the groups members, only to be ignored by onlooking NYPD.

Haupt continuously spreads disinformation, even abject lies, surrounding the 9/11 truth movement. From calling legitimate 9/11 truthers “Plane Huggers”, to claiming “Alex Jones works for ABC” and is “covering up for the media”, Haupt’s tactics and behavior exhibit classic COINTELPRO methods. Haupt even advocates “waterboarding Plane Huggers”.

So a “foundation” with intimate ties to international defense contractors, major Wall Street banks, prominent telecommunications firms, and The National Security council is a driving force behind the “No Plane” pseudo-movement?

The information promulgated by Paula Gloria, Nico Haupt, Morgan Reynolds, and others is clearly suspect in light of these new revelations. Whereas, before, all of the speculation regarding “No Plane” theories were simply diffused by logic and common sense, now we see that something much more sinister is at play. The divide and conquer tactics employed by these clowns has warranted past allegations of COINTELPRO. Today, the charade has been fully exposed: the pyschological warfare, the subliminals, the allegations of ‘cover-up’ within the movement, the show on the Howard Stern Channel. Although these revelations should prompt further investigation, it certainly begs the question: does it get any more transparent? Subscribe to *9-11*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 34.

#2. To: FormerLurker (#0)

Thanks for the dogged defense of the positions that you have taken, FL.

Given the effect of ten years of debate on the internet, which has brought the debate out into the open and has now made discussion of these many questions acceptable in polite social conversation, a reaction on the part of the most dangerous parts of our establishment is to be expected.

We have to be extra vigilant these days when we examine evidence and theories as to causes and methods used in the attacks on that day. There is a lot of disinformation out there. COINTELPRO is not dead.

randge  posted on  2012-10-06   11:15:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: randge (#2) (Edited)

You're welcome randge. And it's quite obvious that COINTELPRO is not dead, it is thriving and kicking in full bloom.

It's to be expected with something as huge as 9/11 that it would be used to divide and conquer the truth movement, while at the same time discrediting those who are the most vocal, such as Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Pilots for 9/11 Truth, etc.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-10-06   11:24:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: FormerLurker (#3)

i noticed that the clique of "mainstream" (kosher) truthers bombasted reynolds & fetzer yrs ago. Dr. Fetzer addresses the zionists & even the holhoax, which makes him trustworthy in my book.One may debate matters without necessarily being cointelpro.

Artisan  posted on  2012-10-06   20:09:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Artisan (#4)

Liking a guy because he claims to be "addressing the zionists" or pretends to do so, is like voting for Mitt Romney because he calls himself a conservative and pretends to be one.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-10-07   15:01:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: FormerLurker (#8)

he doesnt 'claim' to be discussing the forbidden topic of jews, It's just something i noticed after he was excluded from the kosher 'clique'. It has nothing to do with the no-plane stuff, a topic which i find irrelevent.

Artisan  posted on  2012-10-08   4:54:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Artisan (#14)

The "no plane" topic is a HUGE red flag for me, as it indicates the person peddling it has no grasp on reality at best, or is purposesly shelling out disinfo in earnest in order to discredit any actual evidence and research into the 9/11 attacks.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-10-08   12:23:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: FormerLurker (#15)

The "no plane" topic is a HUGE red flag for me, as it indicates the person peddling it has no grasp on reality at best, or is purposesly shelling out disinfo in earnest in order to discredit any actual evidence and research into the 9/11 attacks.

Oh, but it isn't a red flag at the Pentagon for you and others of your 25% No Planes faction, is it? Posts like yours show that your group is conditioned to react so against what you are fractionally yourselves, like compliant COINTEL- brainwashed subjects.

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-10-08   16:00:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: GreyLmist (#18)

Oh, but it isn't a red flag at the Pentagon for you and others of your 25% No Planes faction, is it? Posts like yours show that your group is conditioned to react so against what you are fractionally yourselves, like compliant COINTEL- brainwashed subjects.

Hey genius, HOW MANY TIMES do you need to be reminded of the fact that we are talking about the WTC attacks in terms of "no planes"? It's been acknowledged MANY times that a 757 not only DIDN'T strike the Pentagon, but COULDN'T have struck the Pentagon as described.

It is NOT part of the "no plane" theory which insists all live video of the WTC attacks were prerecorded in some super duper secret high tech news studio, and that ALL of the networks, their reporters, and camera men who were on the scene that day were in on the "faked attacks".

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-10-08   16:04:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: FormerLurker, *9-11* (#19) (Edited)

Hey genius, HOW MANY TIMES do you need to be reminded of the fact that we are talking about the WTC attacks in terms of "no planes"? It's been acknowledged MANY times that a 757 not only DIDN'T strike the Pentagon, but COULDN'T have struck the Pentagon as described.

It is NOT part of the "no plane" theory which insists all live video of the WTC attacks were prerecorded in some super duper secret high tech news studio, and that ALL of the networks, their reporters, and camera men who were on the scene that day were in on the "faked attacks".

You've inflated the numbers again and might think you're "the decider" on defining No Planes Theory but you're not. You're a gatekeeper against No Planes investigations at the WTC and, lo these many years, Mike Rivero over at whatreallyhappened.com has been gatekeeping especially against No Plane at the Pentagon investigations. That's just one example of someone influential who would likely disagree with your insistence that No Plane at the Pentagon folks are to be exempted from classification as No Planers.

Edited for spelling.

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-10-10   3:40:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: GreyLmist (#23)

BTW spinster, I never said there was NO PLANE at the Pentagon. I said that whatever it was that hit the Pentagon, it wasn't a Boeing 757. It was SOME sort of aircraft, and there MAY have been a decoy aircraft flying in the general vicinity which WAS an airliner, but I've never said the television networks faked the attacks, yet were involved with the murder of 3000 Americans, such as yourself and fellow travellers.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-10-10   11:25:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 34.

        There are no replies to Comment # 34.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 34.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]