In a Fox Business interview Wednesday, Rep. Ron Paul refused to say who he was planning on voting for but ruled out voting for Mitt Romney or President Obama, leaving only one plausible option.
"I obviously haven't announced in support for Romney, so that means that's very unlikely," Paul said. "And I don't think anybody think's I'm going to vote for Obama. So it's back to that frustration level in not seeing a dramatic choice in how the system works."
"Tonight there's a debate going on," Paul said. "And if you come to the conclusion that the candidates aren't all that different, why do we have to just listen to two of them?"
"There are other people who are technically capable of winning because they're on a lot of ballots," Paul said, to which his interviewer said "Like Gary Johnson, for example."
"Yeah," Paul said. But he wouldn't confirm that he was definitely voting for Johnson.
With the exception of Whites, the rule among the peoples of the world, whether residing in their homelands or settled in Western democracies, is ethnocentrism and moral particularism: they stick together and good means what is good for their ethnic group." -Alex Kurtagic
GaryJohnson20212.com is the only way, if you want to vote for potus, not that he'll win; but he's not evil.
The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable. ~ H. L. Mencken
He can vote for him, I will not vote for Gary Johnson. I will write in Ron Paul since there is no one else running that I would even think of voting for even as a lesser of evils. Nope, this year there really is no choice, and I will be feel good about voting for Ron Paul even though I know he has no chance.
he wouldn't confirm that he was definitely voting for Johnson.
Ron Paul should vote for himself, imo. I'm planning to vote for him. Gary Johnson isn't as Pro-Life and supports "humanitarian war" interventions of the AFRICOM variety, especially.
youre correct. johnson isnt as pure on foreign policy as many might assume, plus the fact that he's for killing babes excludes any legitimacy he may have had as a "non-evil" protest vote
"Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you".Sirach 4:28
abortion has always served as a litmust test for the character of a candidate. Granted that even those who rant against abortion have no intent on stopping it, any politician who openly supports it clearly conveys a wicked soul on the face of it..
"Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you".Sirach 4:28
A politician can say he's against abortion all he wants, but the fact of the matter is that there is NOTHING he can personally do which will repeal the US Supreme Court decision which gave the green light to abortion on demand.
So it's a win-win sitution for them. The REAL test comes from whether or not they'd launch unprovoked and immoral wars resulting in the murder of thousands or even millions of innocent people, men, women, AND children.
"The real deal is this: the royalty controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
i agree 100%, which is why, although i still wouldnt support a pro-aborrtionists for the reasons given above, the just war doctrine must be brought into the public discourse & highlighted especiallly to religious voters of good conscience.
"Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you".Sirach 4:28