See other 9/11 Articles
Title: 9/11 Illusions, Special Effects, and Other Magic Tricks
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/1 ... ects-and-other-magic-tricks-2/
Published: Oct 13, 2012
Author: Jack White (with Jim Fetzer)
Post Date: 2012-10-13 15:44:20 by wudidiz
Ping List: *9-11* Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 1531
Comments: 24
9/11 Illusions, Special Effects, and Other Magic Tricks
9/11 Illusions, Special Effects, and Other Magic Tricks
by Jack White (with Jim Fetzer)
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 14.
#1. To: wudidiz (#0)
This article lost all credibility when it went with the "no plane" propaganda" put out by the govt. Thierry Meyssan has admitted he was paid by the US govt to publish the no plane garbage. To make it appear legal, the govt paid for the publication and purchased $3 million worth of his bogus propaganda 9/11: The Big Lie books. This is why Rumsfeld conveniently accidentally said something about a missile hitting the Pentagon then quickly corrected himself. This disinformation has been used by the govt to help discredit any investigation into obvious discrepancies with the govt's 9/11 version and findings.
Again, as I said on the other thread, what did you expect that plane to do, bounce off the WTC South Tower as if it were made of rubber, or shatter as if it were made of glass? It was a large high velocity mass of about 250,000 pounds, hitting a mesh of relatively thin steel columns spaced far enough apart where the majority of the plane encountered no exterior resistance upon penetration. It carried a huge amount of momentum and exerted a massive amount of force upon the exterior columns of the WTC tower. That, and it all happened in a split second. So what you show in your collection of screen shots is NOT evidence that there was no plane there. Besides, it was captured on MANY different cameras, both from private individuals AND news agencies. So unless all of the news crews, camera crews, production staff, and witnesses on the scene, including the survivors, were in on this huge conspiracy to produce fraudulent video, air it in real time in relation to real world events, and plotted to kill 3000 Americans, including themselves in some cases, all to benefit PNAC and the news moguls, well, I think fairies wearing boots kicking down the towers have about as much of a chance as your story of being true.
It carried a huge amount of momentum and exerted a massive amount of force upon the exterior columns of the WTC tower. That, and it all happened in a split second. Mass X velocity = Kinetic Energy /time = Power With the plane going 500 mph, or whatever, the time element of the energy transfer to the building would have been a second or less, that's a lot of Power.
By the time the nose was done crushing against the building some of it should of blown back... after all ducks break those nose cones. After the steel engines (Almost all the steel their is in a plane) went in we should of seen some serious blow back and impact scatter.... action reaction happens in nanoseconds, not whole seconds. By the time the tail is starting to melt in we should see all kinds of debries flying... lord knows I've seen what an F1 racer crash looks like... I've seen lots and lots of crashes in fact... (Hazard of the research) And yeah every single crash of almost every kind has all kinds of reaction before the entire plane sank HELL One would of thought those engines would of crunched out some office furniture and glass.... I mean the engines sank in with the tail still following and yet... the photos and film speak to the inconsistencies.
No. Conservation of energy. The energy vector was in one direction only - no matter would be "blown back".
No. Conservation of energy. The energy vector was in one direction only - no matter would be "blown back". That is not how Newtonian physics works. The energy was not in one direction. LOOK If you were to punch me in the face an equal amount of force exerted into my face would also be exerted into your fist. This is why people break knuckle and bone one faces. The force applies both ways. I know you know how to use a drill or an Ice Pick. That is what is was in a sort of sense no? The plane plowing into matter burrowing in... where is the ripples from the burrowing? A hollow aluminium straw on half a tank of gas. Thats all it was. just an alleged typicical plane. ....................... Aluminium NOT does destroy steel.... It should not of happened under those alleged circumstances... not even with everything in its favor! meh I have digressed badly. SO when the plane was pileing into the building the matter had no where else to go. It does not get "hyper compacted" it does not go into "N" space. As the plane smashed in it would of had to dislodge it's own matter and the buildings matter as it entered into the building.... moment by moment. Point being By the time half the plane is in the building, by that time the other half of building and plane matter is blowing back...especially around the entrance hole ALL YOU GUN SHOOTERS THAT HAVE WATCHED YOUR BULLETS IMPACT TARGETS KNOW THIS!!!! As the bullet enters , shit gets dislodged and blown back and out and so one and so forth. ...... If you fail to see it then maybe it's fake!@!#$(%%^&9!~!!~! Still.. who knows. I could always be completely wrong.
Uh huh. One that weighed roughly 250,000 pounds traveling at 500 mph, and which contained magnesium and steel alloys, as well as anodized aluminum as hard or harder than that used in guns. Hollow aluminum straw my ass.
There are no replies to Comment # 14. End Trace Mode for Comment # 14.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#2. To: bush_is_a_moonie, *No Planers* (#1)
#4. To: wudidiz (#2)
#6. To: FormerLurker (#4)
It was a large high velocity mass of about 250,000 pounds, hitting a mesh of relatively thin steel columns spaced far enough apart where the majority of the plane encountered no exterior resistance upon penetration.
#7. To: tom007 (#6)
#8. To: titorite (#7)
By the time the nose was done crushing against the building some of it should of blown back
#12. To: tom007 (#8)
(Edited)
By the time the nose was done crushing against the building some of it should of blown back
>>>>>>>>>I would love to see a 911 youtube series , Aluminium vrs steel...it would prove the point<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<,,
#14. To: titorite (#12)
A hollow aluminium straw on half a tank of gas. Thats all it was. just an alleged typicical plane.
Replies to Comment # 14.