See other Editorial Articles
Title: Is Benghazi a neocon reverse october surprise against Obama campaign
Source:
Truth Alliance
URL Source: http://beforeitsnews.com/alternativ ... st-obama-campaign-2489446.html
Published: Nov 2, 2012
Author: Jason Charles
Post Date: 2012-11-03 00:33:24 by RickyJ
Ping List: *9-11* Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: Flase, Flag
Views: 97
Comments: 1
By Jason Charles | Truth Alliance | Nov. 2, 2012 Are we witnessing a neocon take over of the Presidency…once again? Or, maybe they never really gave Barry any power at all, only time. Just enough time to take the heat off the Republicans for their own betraying of the Constitution for eight long years. This Benghazi incident has all of the hallmarks of a neocon false flag staged attack. Five quick points that don’t add up and could equate to a surprise inside attack on the Obama campaign, as more info breaks daily about this tragedy. CIA drones watching prior to the attack Unarmed drones are for surveillance and intelligence to watch a attack unfold, the damning thing here is they sent one drone unarmed then as a back up after the attack was unfolding they sent the 2nd without any type of munitions? Maybe they were only interested in watching? Disruption of standard operating procedure to scramble help Here we have military assets well in the range of this attack and were denied help from the chain of command that extended up to the President himself. “Reports indicate two drones and an AC-130 gunship were in the area when Benghazi was attacked, yet their resources were not used.- Brietbart “ Also Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer, famed 9/11 whistleblower noted on Rush Limbaughs show that there is no way that standard operating procedure would have failed to been enacted automatically in the presence of a threat. The use of al-Qaeda mercs to induce the riots No question that NATO and the internationalist forces are criminally negligent for utilizing “Al-Qaeda” mercenary forces in Syria and Libya. Both the Obama admin via Hilary Clinton and Romney and his team of neocons has access to the intelligent assets and handlers of these mercenary forces. “U.S. intelligence believes that assailants connected to al Qaeda in Iraq were among the core group that attacked the diplomatic mission in Benghazi, a U.S. government official told CNN. – CNN ” Denials of requests for more marine guards by none other than Hilary Clinton Interesting to note Sec. Hilary Clinton knew well in advance that this facility could not be protected. Is she the inside lady working with the internationalist take over alongside the neocon republicans here. It has to be asked because it is in the realm of possibility when dealing with the treacherous Clintons. Not only did she know that the embassy was vulnerable she also knew that militant thugs were training in the area. How nice. ” According to a review of the cable addressed to the Office of the Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the Emergency Action Committee was also briefed “on the location of approximately ten Islamist militias and AQ training camps within Benghazi … these groups ran the spectrum from Islamist militias, such as the QRF Brigade and Ansar al-Sharia, to ‘Takfirist thugs.’” Each U.S. mission has a so-called Emergency Action Committee that is responsible for security measures and emergency planning. – FOX “ Mitt Romney smiling during press release A creepy indicator that this reverse engineered October Surprise scandal against the Obama campaign was expected from the Romney camp was his smile. Romney himself telegraphed his glee across the airwaves at a Press event denouncing the attack as an Obama flub. Mitt Romney smirking just after press conference denouncing the Obama Benghazi response Romney Campaign being run by neo-cons An article in the CFR pointed out the 17-24 advisors in the Romney camp where neocons. The same that sold illegal war, torture, and security state war powers. “Out of Romney’s 24 special advisors on foreign policy, 17 served in the Bush-Cheney administration. If Romney were to win, it’s likely that many of these people would serve in his administration in some capacity — a frightening prospect given the legacy of this particular group. The last time they were in government, it was disastrous. For example, one of Romney’s top surrogates on the campaign trail is John Bolton, who served as President George W. Bush’s ambassador to the United Nations. Bolton embodies the reckless neoconservative thinking that was largely responsible for getting us into Iraq under false pretenses. Today, he openly roots for diplomacy with Iran to fail and is all-too-eager to send our men and women in uniform into war. Last year, for instance, Bolton said that, “It would be in our interest to overthrow this regime in Syria. – FP“ Romney and the GOP have the cheats in place ready to steal the election and seem to be benefiting quite a bit in the wake of all the scandals politically against Obama. Are we ready to say President Elect and Thief Mitt Romney after the election? If this is the case, that this is truly an election time October surprise scandal against Obama, then for neocons in Romney’s camp this would be their second 9/11 day false flag to create political capital. 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 1.
#1. To: All (#0)
(Edited)
Romney sucks so bad that he can't even legitimately beat a president that has resided over one of the worst economy the USA has ever had. Romney could easily finish this nation off while so-called "Christians" continue to beat their drums for him thinking he is their saviour. We are basically doomed as a nation with both the left and right being so easily misled.
There are no replies to Comment # 1. End Trace Mode for Comment # 1.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestRomney and the GOP have the cheats in place ready to steal the election and seem to be benefiting quite a bit in the wake of all the scandals politically against Obama. Are we ready to say President Elect and Thief Mitt Romney after the election?
Replies to Comment # 1.