[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

"Gestapo" Müller - Hunting Hitler's Secret Police Chief

How Michelle Obama Could Become Democrats' Nominee after Biden's Terrible Debate, with Steve Bannon

Was This Lethal Spitfire Ace Killed by His Own Tactics?

Welsh Police Pay Home Visit To Man For Displaying Reform UK Political Sign

Liz Harrington Drops a BOMBSHELL on How Georgia Was Stolen

Trudeau govt to make all bathrooms in Parliament buildings GENDER NEUTRAL

French official admits censorship is needed for government to control public opinion

Bill Maher Predicts Trump Victory: The Left Is Aggressively Anti-Common Sense

Google is suppressing Blaze Media. Heres how you can help.

Large-scale prisons being secretly erected in all 50 states will they be used to house illegals or force Americans into concentration camps?

Hezbollah is ready to confront Israels military, with Jon Elmer

Balloons Land in Southern Lebanon, Warning Locals the Land Belongs to Jews

German Politician Hit With Hate Crime Investigation For Demanding Migrant Criminals Be Deported

DNC Caught Funneling Millions to Law Firms Involved in Unprecedented Lawfare Campaign Against Trump

Here Are The 20 Biggest Whoppers Biden Told During His Debate With Trump

NYC to ban cellphones in public schools.

New York Times Columnists Turn On Biden After Disastrous Debate Performance

8 Armed Men With Venezuelan Accents Violently Rob Denver Jewelry Store

Uvalde Police School Chief Indicted, Arrested Over Response To 2022 Shooting

Greetings from the Horse

Tonight confirmed every Democrats worst fear.

Five Women Soon To Die In 1928

How Trump Can Lose The Debate

Tucker Carlson Savagely Dismantles ‘Dumb’ and ‘Stupid’ Far-Left Reporter at Australian Freedom Conference

James Clapper, Mr. October Surprise: How Obama's Intel Czar Rigged 2016 And 2020 Debates Against Trump

Biden Campaign Balks Wont Commit to Drug Test

S-500 Prometheus: Designed To Kill Stealth Jets, ICBMs

The US military chases shiny new things and the ranks suffer

USS Dwight D. Eisenhower Now in the Med, USS Theodore Roosevelt Heads to the Middle East

Lefties losing it: Rita Panahi mocks Democrat judge acting like a ‘confused simpleton’


9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: A Brief Summary: WTC Destruction & High Temperature Aftermath: ONLY Nuclear Bombs and the China Syndrome Fit All the Evidence
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Oct 23, 2012
Author: The Anonymous Physicist
Post Date: 2012-11-03 10:28:04 by wudidiz
Ping List: *9-11*     Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 1421
Comments: 68

Thursday, October 23, 2008

A Brief Summary: WTC Destruction & High Temperature Aftermath: ONLY Nuclear Bombs and the China Syndrome Fit All the Evidence

NOTE: PLEASE DISSEMINATE THIS DEFINITIVE SUMMARY ON THE NUKING OF THE WTC AS WIDELY AS POSSIBLE!

by The Anonymous Physicist

In attempting to ascertain what caused the destruction of the WTC on 9/11/01, and the great heat and molten metal observed for up to six months afterward, one must account for ALL the phenomena involved in WTC destruction, and the aftermath-- and not just one or two factors. Only nuclear bombs and the resulting China Syndrome can account for ALL phenomena observed. The overview and numerous supporting articles on the nuclear destruction of the WTC are here: wtcdemolition.blogspot.com But, at the outset, we should realize that there is an abundance of evidence that the O.C.T. (Official Conspiracy Theory) is quite bogus. For example, sworn testimony from firemen/responders contains their witnessing of loud explosions from the onset of tower destruction. This alone destroys the OCT of gravity-driven, progressive collapse.

A brief summary of the nuclear aspects now follows.

1. First, low yield nukes (mini-nukes or micro-nukes) are a proven fact that the U.S Govt has admitted to since the 1950’s with their Davey Crocket rifle, and more recently with a physicist’s testimony to Congress. It is also documented fact that since the 1960’s, and Project Plowshare, low radiation nukes-- and later neutron bombs-- have been available, and were planned for excavation projects and such. My “many small nukes” WTC hypothesis indicates that numerous low yield nukes went off INSIDE (near the center of) the towers. They vaporized anything near them (via million degree temperatures and/or high neutron flux), but the yield of these micro-nukes was deliberately small enough not to vaporize the outer structure. This also ensured that any radiation was contained during detonation. And Plowshare, and neutron bombs, prove low radiation nukes have been available for decades.

2. MASSIVE EVIDENCE of ELECTROMAGNETIC PULSES (EMP) FROM NUKES. This includes the eyewitness, sworn testimony of EMT responder, Patricia Ondrovic (and others). She reported that as WTC1 was beginning to be destroyed, she saw flickering lights in WTC6 lobby where she tried to enter, but was stopped. And just outside at that time, cars caught fire without any visible reason, and one then had its car door explode off of it; and the door hit and injured her as she began to flee the area. Exactly how EMP from nukes did all this is explained here, along with other evidence of EMP during tower destruction from nuclear bombs.

3. DUST PARTICLE SIZE WAS LESS THAN 2.5 MICRONS-- & LIED ABOUT by the Gov’t’s main OCT (Official “Collapse” Theory) engineer/author. You can think of a mortar and pestle, and grinding something large into smaller and smaller pieces. It takes more and more energy input to yield smaller and smaller pieces. A nuclear bomb is known to yield particle sizes down to 10 nanometers. (1 nanometer is 1 billionth of a meter). And Govt scientists had equipment to analyze the WTC dust down to 10-nanometer size, if they wanted to, and should have. Unless they did, and have refused to release this. What they (the U.S. Geological Survey scientists) did was lump together all dust sizes less than 2.5 microns and released this data. (A micron is 1 millionth of a meter, and a thousand times larger than 1 nanometer). Nonetheless, the Govt’s main engineer/author, Z.P. Bazant, numerous times wrote papers that claimed that 10 microns was the smallest sized particles created during WTC destruction, and later collected by USGS scientists. For years he did not cite the work that showed, this. Last year he did cite a reference, and it led back to the 2.5 micron study, NOT to the 10 microns he claimed as the smallest dust particle size! So he flat out committed fraud here. He had to do this as his bogus papers claim that the gravitational potential energy (height times weight) of the towers accounted for the energy needed to create the smallest dust particle size. And there isn’t enough energy from his theory to account for 2.5 micron size dust, let alone the much smaller dust sizes that the USGS did not ascertain or release! The bogus physics and math from Bazant and others is here.

4. MELTED, HANGING SKIN WITHOUT FIRE was reported by at least 4 known WTC survivors. This includes WTC worker Felipe David, whose own words state this occurred without fire, but his story when told by another, has “fire” added. There are also two women who reported (on the “Larry King Show”) that a similar thing happened to them, and they don’t know why, because they too were not in any fire. And there is also a security guard with a similar report. The security guard and Felipe David had this happen to them in the lobby and the sub-basement area of WTC1 respectively. Outside the towers, firemen/responders also felt great heat on their skin without being near any fire DURING TOWER DESTRUCTION. Only the thermal rays of a nuclear bomb can account for this. They go out the farthest when a nuke goes off. And hanging skin was a common occurrence in Hiroshima survivors. Note that the outside firemen feeling heat on their skin (without fire near them) also disproves “DEW”, as they are NOT in the towers nor right under them either, and thus if “directed energy beams did it”, and these must be coherent, they would not diverge and cause heat far from their target! So no “DEW” was involved.

5. SUB-BASEMENT LEVEL, 50-TON STEEL PRESS & HEAVY DOOR VAPORIZED. At the same time as Felipe David’s nightmare was unfolding, and also in the sub-basement, WTC engineer Mike Pecoraro reports going up a level and seeing that a sub-basement level was in shambles and was “just gone.” Also he states a 50-ton press has also been apparently vaporized, and a 300 pound steel/concrete door has just been left shriveled up like foil. The only things that could do this are the multi-million degree temperatures, and neutron bombardment, from a nuclear bomb. Coupling this with the four survivors who had melted, hanging skin at this same time, we have evidence of blast, high temperatures, neutron bombardment and thermal rays-- all virtual proof of nuclear bomb use.

6. HEAT GENERATION AT THE WTC FOR UP TO 6 MONTHS AFTER 9/11- -THE CHINA SYNDROME AFTERMATH (CSA) (see http://wtc-chinasyndrome.blogspot.com) No heat “lingers” for weeks and months, not alleged jet fuel, not alleged thermite (which would have been used up either in minutes or hours--or during its use as an explosive). We have the documented, witnessed, and well photographed and videotaped great heat and molten metal for weeks, and indeed for up to six months underground at the WTC-- until all radioactive fission fragments were carted away. No heat lingers for that long; this could only have been heat GENERATION. The evidence of great heat throughout much of the rubble pile and even higher temperatures underneath the two towers and WTC7 is massive. It included melted firemen’s boots, even dogs had to wear special boots, a mass of congealed bullets in WTC6 going off weeks later from heat, and many photos of steam emanation from the continual water hosing of the “hotspots” all around the WTC. The China Syndrome HAD TO ARISE because each of the numerous small nukes used up only 1-6% of its fissile material-- which is standard for nukes. The remainder was then available as radioactive fragments, releasing great heat for a long time (until removed), as the half-life of Uranium 235 is 700 million years. And it is likely that there were numerous, redundant nukes employed, and the phenomena of "fratricided" and fizzled nukes may also have occurred as these are common with nuclear detonations. These effects likely further exacerbated the China Syndrome. The radioactive fragments were somewhat dispersed throughout the rubble pile, and in greatest concentration underneath the towers and WTC7-- where water and sand treatments could not readily be employed. Note that the alleged Tritium finding that the Govt released, may be a red herring to fool people to look for top-secret unknown types of nukes, which couldn’t have led to the CSA, which is what clearly occurred. The ludicrous lying (“there never was any heat during or after WTC destruction”) or the poor attempts to create new laws of chemistry and physics by alleged 9/11truthers (“super nanocomposite thermite burns forever”) only shows how desperate the Govt is to hide the China Syndrome Aftermath.

7. THE MISSING PEOPLE, FURNITURE, steel & other contents of the towers. Destruction of the towers vaporized many of the nearly 3,000 people who died, as well as much furniture, steel and other building contents. The medical examiner was unable to find or utilize any strands of DNA for over 1100 people. The rubble pile from the two towers was only a couple of stories high when it should have been several times higher from a “collapse,” or even a conventional demolition. There is much missing mass from the “extraordinarily high temperatures” as fire engineering Professor Barnett declared after examining vaporized steel, that occurred during tower/WTC7 destruction. Nukes vaporize matter near their hypocenter. Thermite, thermobarics, etc. DO NOT. Contrary to what some claim, neither thermite nor thermobarics could vaporize the missing people, furniture, steel and other contents, as detailed here.

8. CLASSICAL GOV’T DISINFO METHODS ENSUED whereby their agents put out supposedly “alternative theories” involving alleged “secret, new technologies” that are either evidence-free and/or impossible. Space Beams/DEW (Directed Energy Weapons), or ludicrous “super nanocomposite thermite burns forever” theories were created by the intel agencies to cover up the nuking of the WTC, and the China Syndrome Aftermath. (Thermite cools off in minutes or hours.) These “theories” desperately try to claim new phenomena or new laws of physics and chemistry--as does the 9/11 Commission’s ludicrous “findings.”

9. More now on the issue of Radiation: The #1 item above showed that the Govt has had mini-nukes, and micro-nukes for decades, and that low-radiation yielding nukes have also been around for decades as well. On the other hand, the great heat and molten metal at, and under, the WTC for up to six months after 9/11, indicates the existence of the China Syndrome Aftermath at the WTC; whereby many responders and Metro New York residents may have been exposed to some radiation from radioactive fission fragments that resulted from the use of the many micro-nukes. We have much indirect evidence of the effects of radiation poisoning among the 40,000 responders who were at “Ground Zero” in the weeks and months afterwards. There have been hundreds of reported cases of blood, lymph and thyroid cancers among responders. These types of cancers frequently arise from radiation exposure, and are much less likely (unlike lung diseases) to arise from inhalation of toxins. Also, the teeth and hair falling out reported by several responders are also standard illnesses from radiation poisoning. These responders’ doctors and lawyers are not telling these people that radiation may have caused their illnesses, because the China Syndrome Aftermath remains one of the Govt’s most closely guarded secrets. However, we can see that the Govt itself was well aware of what it had caused! Standard radiation-lowering methods were employed beginning the very next morning-- 9/12/01! These included water dilution/hosing down and sand/earth covering (and subsequent removal of this sand/earth) of the rubble pile. These procedures continued for weeks and months precisely because the rubble pile, and undergound areas, were replete with radioactive fission fragments.

There is some general information on radiation sources that needs elucidation. Due to absorption and other factors, radiation levels can go down quickly-- unless radioactive fragments (radionuclides) are released to the environment. Unless one is close (like Felipe David, who appears to have received thermal radiation, and not ionizing radiation)-- or the radiation is very intense-- enough distance/air or most materials, will stop most forms of radiation. This assumes one does not inhale or ingest radioactive particles or radionuclides. The underground WTC areas-- which likely had the highest radiation yields (and also heat)-- were off limits to all but a few responders. Also, as Hiroshima studies indicated, it took decades for many cancers and other illnesses to manifest. Note that a Gov’t agency, FEMA, was/is in charge of any radiation data for Ground Zero, and could easily have blocked release of any data that found radiation. The U.S. Gov’t has a long, sordid record of lying about radiation exposure to soldiers and citizens, as noted here when they nuked their own soldiers during “atomic tests”.

Honest people, not in DENIAL, must see the analogy to the Reichstag fire set by the German Nazis, in 1933, in Berlin. This was their seat of almost their entire federal gov’t. And this fire/destruction was used as an excuse to destroy their Constitution, and as an excuse for War on “terrorists,” and then all of Europe. There was one difference with the Nazis, however. They waited till the middle of the night, when there were no inhabitants in the Reichstag building! Of course, that German Gov’t did not admit they did it themselves, but that came out after they lost WWII. If U.S. Govt agencies have certain types of proof that they nuked the WTC, and thus its largest city; does any honest person think these Govt agencies would ever release this data--unless a new Gov’t came about? There is reason to believe that other crucial data such as WTC rubble pile temperature (AVIRIS, 2nd set), and WTC destruction seismic recordings were altered. This physicist hypothesizes that WTC responders AND nearby Metro New York residents and workers, that were exposed either the longest or to certain areas with the “hottest”spots face the risk of getting cancer and other immune disorders from radiation exposure in the years and decades to come. Sadly this will prove the China Syndrome Aftermath in the worst possible way. Private persons and institutions are urged to get and keep statistics on this, as the Gov’t will likely cover this up.

posted by spooked @ 9:30 AM

Bookmark and Share

(2 images)

Subscribe to *9-11*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 58.

#6. To: wudidiz (#0) (Edited)

"China Syndrome" has nothing to do with WTC. It refers to the (theoretical) possibility that a runaway nuclear reactor will generate such incredible heat that it will burn its way through the center of the earth.

A nuclear explosion in NYC - whatever its size or technical details - would be measurable in terms of radiation. There'd also be an Electro-Magnetic Pulse that, in theory, would damage or disrupt electronic equipment. No such thing was detected with Sept 11th - and believe me, a lot of people in NYC have geiger counters and undoubtedly checked them that day.

A few years earlier, some twit tried to argue that the Murrah Building bombing in Oklahoma City must have involved some mini-nuke .... just because normal explosives wouldn't fit his nutty theories, he figured that by stipulating a nuclear explosion he would be able to ignore all the usual laws of physics or plausibility, and claim whatever nonsense he wanted to.

Shoonra  posted on  2012-11-03   19:06:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Shoonra, all (#6) (Edited)

Trust the shill to put every logical coffin nail into an incorrect theory.

If you are not a shill shoonra I apologise..... but I still think your a paid for agent posting to steer us and as always monitoring the conversations.

Good Points though. Color me surprised . Now see here RickyJ shoonra is an agent. You are just inappropriately acting like a but head.

titorite  posted on  2012-11-03   19:43:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Shoonra, RickyJ, tom007 (#8)

I see our 9/11 shillster, titorite, is at it again, accusing his victims of the very thing he is actively up to.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-11-03   20:51:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: FormerLurker (#9)

I see our 9/11 shillster, titorite, is at it again, accusing his victims of the very thing he is actively up to.

No asshole, I mean she is a real bona-fide air force cyber command government poster.

She is getting a check and doing a job.

You are acting like a prick for free.

titorite  posted on  2012-11-03   20:55:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: titorite (#10)

You are acting like a prick for free.

Like I said, you accuse others of the very thing you are actively up to.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-11-03   21:08:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: FormerLurker (#11)

Like I said, you accuse others of the very thing you are actively up to.

Whatever man. You're all about the last word and suppressing what is not truth to you.

Maybe you were to busy playing captain hero and judging who is a truther and who is to notice the moot in your own eye.

Sigh......

titorite  posted on  2012-11-03   23:49:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: titorite (#12)

Again, you project yourself well. I wonder if you're even aware of it, or if you have some sort of deep rooted issue.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-11-04   0:06:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: FormerLurker (#13) (Edited)

Again, you project yourself well. I wonder if you're even aware of it, or if you have some sort of deep rooted issue.

It is such a joy to conversate with you about 911. I always love the contributions you make and the new perspectives regarding the event that you offer. I hope you only grow in your education.

titorite  posted on  2012-11-04   1:29:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: titorite (#15) (Edited)

It is such a joy to conversate with you about 911. I always love the contributions you make and the new perspectives you offer. I hope you only grow in your education.

What contributions are you making other than pushing 9/11 disinfo and of course calling people names?

RickyJ  posted on  2012-11-04   1:30:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: RickyJ, titorite (#16)

What contributions are you making other than pushing 9/11 disinfo and of course calling people names?

You've seen the photos of the blackened, FDNY apparatus with melted tires and the cars in the same condition.

Do you believe that the FDNY parked too close to open flame, failed to recognize the danger and then allowed their equipment to burn up?

I'd be interested in any explanation for these melted vehicles. The govt has never offered any.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2012-11-04   4:56:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: HOUNDDAWG (#19)

I'd be interested in any explanation for these melted vehicles. The govt has never offered any.

Since a nuclear weapon did NOT detonate at the WTC towers, I'd say all available evidence points to the pyroclastic flow of debris that filled the streets after the collapse of each tower.

A pyroclastic flow is a debris cloud that behaves as a fluid, where it flows like water and can reach extremely hot temperatures.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-11-04   12:28:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: FormerLurker (#20)

A pyroclastic flow is a debris cloud that behaves as a fluid, where it flows like water and can reach extremely hot temperatures.

Right, without equivalent energy to propel it?

You didn't simply neglect to site an example because there aren't any.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2012-11-04   13:25:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: HOUNDDAWG (#21)

Right, without equivalent energy to propel it?

You didn't simply neglect to site an example because there aren't any.

The energy was derived from several sources;

A) The mass of the WTC towers being pulverized created heat. This occured from the potential energy of the mass being converted to kinetic energy, and then to heat energy.

B) Heat from the explosives in the structure which demolished the supports.

C) Nano-thermite in the structure, apparently placed there in order to facilitate the collapse. Such nano-thermite would have released huge amounts of heat.

There IS no example of a structure the size of the WTC towers ever collapsing before, so it's hard to come up with a previous example since there IS none which exists.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-11-04   13:30:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: FormerLurker, 4 (#22)

what melted cars at wtc? rense weighs in -

rense.com/general75/melt.htm

Lod  posted on  2012-11-04   15:19:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: Lod, *9-11* (#23)

what melted cars at wtc? rense weighs in -

rense.com/general75/melt.htm

Regarding the toasted vehicles and the destruction of the Towers, after it's been determined that they aren't fully explainable by jet fuel and office fires, conventional demolitions, or even thermite/thermate (nano or otherwise), the remaining options are apparently few: Media fakery to some extent, nuclear weaponry, or some other high-tech WMD.

Referencing your link + related info for research on the issues of the WTC's aluminum cladding, advanced weaponry, etc.:

Rense, 3-22-7: What Melted Cop Cars 7 Blocks From WTC On 911? - Pic and map

Ted Twietmeyer, 3-24-7: What May Have Melted The WTC Vehicles

To come up with a theory to explain "toasted vehicles" at the WTC we need to have a solution that explains the cause of the damage found with these vehicles. It clearly appears that the damage is the result of a weapon, and not the result of an ordinary fire or ignition source.

[sic]

What does an electromagnetic pulse do? First, we need to look at the effects and uses of eddy currents induced by a strong magnetic field. [sic] The stronger the eddy currents, the more heat which will be generated. Although magnetic fields are being created, they are temporary in aluminum because it is not magnetic, but paramagnetic. This means aluminum will be affected by magnetism, but it cannot be magnetized. Water is paramagnetic as well. Almost anything that conducts electricity but will not be attracted to a permanent magnet can be considered paramagnetic. [sic] steel is magnetic and not paramagnetic [sic]

We must answer another question - why would certain vehicles have damage and not others? Why would only certain parts of them be damaged, and other areas remain pristine? The answer lies in magnetic SHIELDING. Magnetic pulses are like other electromagnetic energy, which radiates out from a source in a straight line unless they wrap around back to their source (such as a bar magnet does.) [sic] Evidence is overwhelming that either a nuclear device or advanced weapon technology was used at the WTC. [sic] There may have been a blast wave that hit some of these vehicles in conjunction with a magnetic pulse. A powerful magnetic pulse(s) appears to have taken place, and the source clearly was not at ground level but much higher.

Ted Twietmeyer Update, 3-25-7, at Rense link above: What Melted Cop Cars 7 Blocks From WTC On 911?

It is not currently known whether an EMP was present in conjunction with a magnetic pulse. [sic] My apologies for the typo about the definition of a Giga-watt that passed by me. 1 Giga-watt = 1,000 million watts.

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-11-06   18:21:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#58. To: All, *9-11* (#52) (Edited)

Regarding the toasted vehicles and the destruction of the Towers, after it's been determined that they aren't fully explainable by jet fuel and office fires, conventional demolitions, or even thermite/thermate (nano or otherwise), the remaining options are apparently few: Media fakery to some extent, nuclear weaponry, or some other high-tech WMD.

This ponderance of the WTC-destruction evidence does not explain anything about the toasted cars and pulverization of the Towers but does address the possibility of a fakery stunt to perhaps hide something covert during demolition:

The Dust Cloud Trick: we had basically come to the conclusion that they took huge amounts of cement dust and simply loaded the top floors of the towers with as much cement dust as they felt necessary to to do the job of masking the demolition with the dust cloud

Info at that link related topically somewhat to other contractor-research in this thread on renovations at the Pentagon by AMEC (which also was involved in 9/11 clean-ups there, as well WTC 7 renovations and 9/11 clean-ups at the WTC):

http://www.911blogger.com/node/19889

Turner Construction, who supervised the 2000 demolition of the Seattle Kingdome, participated in the post-9/11 Ground Zero clean-up and performed extensive renovations within the World Trade Center towers just prior to 9/11, was in fact performing unspecified renovation work throughout the WTC complex until the very morning of September 11, 2001. The Port Authority of NY/NJ now claims that records describing such work or other projects were destroyed on September 11, 2001. A December 2000 WTC property assessment described required renovation work to be completed within one year, upon steel columns within elevator shafts of both WTC towers that was immediately pending or already underway.

12 employees of Turner Construction were located in an office in the third subbasement of Tower 1, the north tower. Turner had been performing renovation work in various parts of the center and had occupied various office spaces.

Edited to expand AMEC info in parenthesis at paragraph 3.

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-11-06   21:40:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 58.

        There are no replies to Comment # 58.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 58.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]