4um: Jane Harman and Israeli Spying (new CIA director?)

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Neocon Nuttery
See other Neocon Nuttery Articles
Title: Jane Harman and Israeli Spying (new CIA director?)
Source: CounterPunch
URL Source: http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/11 ... ane-harmon-and-israeli-spying/
Published: Nov 14, 2012
Author: ALISON WEIR
Post Date: 2012-11-14 14:04:41 by hondo68
Keywords: None
Views: 144
Comments: 3

It is astounding to find that one of the handful of prospects being floated to become CIA director following the fall of General David Petraeus is a person reportedly implicated in a 2005 Israeli spy scandal.
CNN, Politico, and others have all listed former Congresswoman Jane Harman as a potential new CIA head. Oddly, however, none have mentioned reports in 2006 and again in 2009 that an NSA wiretap in 2005 had picked up Harman promising a suspected Israeli agent that she would aid people indicted for espionage on behalf of Israel.
According to reports, Harman allegedly told the Israeli agent that she would lobby the Justice Department to reduce espionage-related charges against two top officials for the powerful Israel lobby organization, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC).
In return, the suspected Israeli agent (who may have been a dual-citizen American) reportedly pledged to help lobby for Harman to become chair of the House Intelligence Committee. Harman was already the ranking Democrat on the committee.
At the end of the conversation, Harman reportedly said: “This conversation doesn’t exist.”
The two AIPAC officials had been indicted for illegally obtaining classified documents about Iran and passing these on to Israel. They also gave them to prominent Washington Post journalist Glenn Kessler, whose speaker bio lists three topics: “Global Affairs, Jewish Interest, Middle East Issues.”
One of the indicted AIPAC officials has since defended himself by stating that his actions were routine for AIPAC – that AIPAC staffers regularly obtain and hand on classified U.S. information to Israel and others.
AIPAC, worried at public exposure caused by the indictments, fired the two men. Subsequent lawsuits over their firing provided considerable information, from sleazy details about AIPAC high officials to the fact that dozens of AIPAC donors had provided monetary assistance to the two men, despite evidence that they had leaked classified U.S. documents to a foreign country.
Among these donors were Slim-Fast billionaire Daniel Abraham, philanthropist Lynn Schusterman, and Haim Saban, an Israeli-American who is one of the major donors to Democratic candidates. Saban, who is close to Harman, says his “greatest concern is to protect Israel.” (His wife was recently nominated to be US ambassador to the UN.)
Harman, who frequently speaks at AIPAC events, is widely known for her strong advocacy for Israel and of Middle East wars on behalf of it.
She backed the attack on Iraq and now similarly maintains that Iran is a threat to Americans, despite the fact that Iraqquickly turned into a tragic, unnecessary, and disastrously costly debacle; that Iraq had none of the weapons of mass destruction that had been claimed; and that current claims against Iran are similarly tenuous.
The Jewish Forward calls her a “pro-Israel stalwart,” and the Jewish Telegraphic Agency (JTA) reports, “Harman is beloved by the pro-Israel lobby and is a sure-bet appearance at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee’s annual policy conference.”
According to Open Secrets, Harman was one of the top recipients of pro-Israel campaign donations.
JTA reported that her departure from Congress in 20011, “earned her an unusually effusive statement of regret from AIPAC director Howard Kohr.”
Like AIPAC, Harman currently pushes the alleged need, often promoted by flawed media reports, for the U.S. to address what she claims is Iran’s development of nuclear weapons, despite the fact that U.S. intelligence agencies continue to find that Iran is actually not developing them. (She also neglects to mentionthat Israel has a stockpile of nuclear weapons and has refused to sign the nonproliferation treaty).
In her nine terms in Congress, Harman focused on military and security affairs and served on all the major security committees: six years on Armed Services, eight years on Intelligence, and four on Homeland Security.
Harman, who was married to billionaire Sidney Harman, owner of Newsweek, until his death last year, was listed as the second-richest member in congress.
Harman resigned from Congress in 20011 to head up the Washington DC Woodrow Wilson Center, part of theSmithsonian. The Wilson Center is listed as the 16^th most powerful think tank in the world.
Like Harman, the longtime chair of the Wilson Center, Joseph B. Gildenhorn, is extremely close to Israel. He endowed theInstitute for Israel Studies at the University of Maryland and may at one point have been an AIPAC board member. Wilson Co-chair Sander R. Gerber has been an AIPAC board member for many years.
In explaining her decision to leave Congress in order to direct the Wilson Center, Harman said: “Serving at its helm provides unique opportunities to involve the House and Senate, top experts and world leaders in ‘great debates’ about the most pressing foreign and domestic policy matters.”
While Congressional Quarterly’s Roll Call contains an article in which Harman denies the espionage-related reports, the publication seems to have taken down the report to which Harman was responding and to which numerous other articleslink: “Sources: Wiretap Recorded Rep. Harman Promising to Intervene for AIPAC,” by Jeff Stein, Congressional Quarterly, April 19, 2009. (It’s unclear whether the removal of Stein’s article is related to the fact that three months after the story broke, Congressional Quarterly was bought by the Economist Group.)
In the report, investigative journalist Jeff Stein provided additional details about the incident and explained that whether or not Harman delivered on her promise (she did not attain her desired chairmanship), the making of the promise was sufficient to constitute, in legal terms, a “completed crime.”
Despite considerable outcry and calls for a Justice Department investigation, Harman eluded prosecution, the expected full investigation of the powerful southern California Democrat never happened, and Harman’s allegedly subversive actions seem to have dropped from sight.
Whileformer Petraeus deputy (and currently acting director) Michael J. Morell seems to be the current frontrunner for CIA head, Harman and others are reported to still be in the running. Also, Morell could prove to be a temporary choice to prevent a lapse in leadership while the long-term director is chosen.
If Harman does becomes CIA director, her appointment would no doubt be greeted with glee by the Israeli government. Whether or not Harman made treasonous promises to an Israeli agent, there is no doubt that she is a committed advocate for the Israeli regime.
Americans, on the other hand, might have less reason for joy.
Poster Comment:
Rabbi Obama's appointment of an Israeli spy for CIA chief will be eagerly approved by both wings of the D&R party congress.
(1 image)
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: hondo68 (#0)
If Bammy appts Harman CIA Director, war with Iran will follow soon after due to a Cia/Mossad false flag incident.
Even Arch Witch Pelosi had misgivings about giving Harman too much intel powers a while back. What does that tell us?
voices.washingtonpost.com...man_have_long _histor.html

scrapper2 posted on 2012-11-14 14:25:53 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#2. To: scrapper2 (#1)
A lot.
"Satan / Cheney in "08"
tom007 posted on 2012-12-26 21:09:50 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#3. To: hondo68 (#0)
Rabbi Obama's appointment of an Israeli spy for CIA chief will be eagerly approved by both wings of the D&R party congress.

Yes, they'll fall all over themselves trying to get in front of a camera to blabber about what a fine public servant this treasonous trollop is and what an asset she'll be in the war on . . . blah, blah, blah.
We may just miss the bullet on this one. This guys seems to be that front runner from what all the mainstream rags are putting out. God help us.

CIA Reaching for Mediocrity? [UPDATED]
By Larry Johnson

on April 19, 2010 at 7:00 AM in Current Affairs

I presume some of you caught the Washington Post “blow job” about the new number two guy at CIA, Michael Morrell. I was particularly struck by the following:

Michael J. Morell, 51, will take over the No. 2 position at a time when the CIA is battering the al-Qaeda terrorist network with an escalating campaign of drone strikes in Pakistan but also enduring severe setbacks, including a suicide bombing that killed seven agency employees and contractors near the Afghan city of Khost in December. . . .
The son of an autoworker from Akron, Ohio, Morell joined the agency in 1980 and went on to become a top analyst on Asia and Latin America.
Top analyst? What a frigging joke that is. I worked for the CIA from 1985-1989 and worked as an analyst covering the wars in Nicaragua and Honduras from 1986- 1989. This was one of the hottest accounts, easily one of the top three in the entire Directorate of Intelligence, and the name, Michael Morrell never surfaced. After 6 years at the CIA Morrell should have been a senior analyst and, by virtue of his time on the job, certainly could have found his way to a hot account. What defined a “hot account back then?”
Regularly writing for the Presidential Daily Brief and/or the National Intelligence Daily. Regularly breifing members of Congress and other folks in the Executive Branch. I asked a friend, who genuinely was one of the top analysts on Asia and Latin America for a reaction to the Washington Post report. My friend described Morrell as a “mediocre cubicle-resident producing assessments of no particular value” who spent his career eager clawing for access to power, but never produced a single piece of cutting edge analysis.
Great! Just what the CIA needs in the number two position–a lifetime mediocre analyst with no experience recruiting or managing human sources. I think some hard questions are in order. For example, when he was the Director of Intelligence under George W. Bush what role, if any, did he play in overseeing CIA analysis on Iran and its nuclear threat. Why is that an issue? The CIA analysis on this issue has been all over the board. Sloppy analysis is not a vote of confidence in my book.
Also, has he taken any principled stands against efforts to politicize intelligence (which is directly related to the issue of Iran)? It is important to understand that every Administration, Republican and Democrat, has tried to play politics with intelligence. It is what politicians do. Asking a politician to accept intelligence without complaint is like asking a male dog to not lick its balls–you can ask but it won’t stop either for doing what they do naturally.
With that in mind it is important to have leadership at the Agency that knows how to stand up to political pressure and tell the truth without worrying about how the politicians downtown will react. I don’t know Morrell, but people who do say he is not the kind of guy with spine to stand up to that kind of pressure. If they are right the CIA then the CIA faces dark days ahead.
UPDATE–After soliciting views of other former colleagues about Mr. Morrell and very disturbing and troubling picture is emerging. Morrell is a protege of George “Slam Dunk” Tenet and has been championed by John Brennan. This is no longer about merit. It is a member of the “good old boys” network butt snorkeling his way to the top. I’ve solicited views from more than twenty former intelligence officers. These include folks who served at the highest levels in both the DO and the DI. Not one, I repeat one, has come back extolling the praises of Morrell. Several have replied with troubling anecdotes that point to Morrell as the quintessential Dilbert of the CIA. He knows how to avoid a flap but does not know the first thing about leadership. Lack of strong, visionary leadership has been the bane of the CIA and the outlook for a turn around on this front is dismal.

Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin to slit throats. - H. L. Mencken
randge posted on 2012-12-27 0:00:36 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

Freedom4um