Title: The Framing of Joe Paterno Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Nov 14, 2012 Author:. Post Date:2012-11-14 21:50:29 by christine Keywords:None Views:2776 Comments:38
This "scandal" was engineered and financed to occur quickly and with maximum intensity. There is big money and power involved.
The campaign to blame the dead guy is so obviously a ploy to divert from reality that anyone with a modicum of intellect is still waiting for truth concerning this matter. Whoever designed this farce was confident that every moral degenerate on the planet would jump on the bandwagon of blaming some dead guy for their own disgusting disease.
You talk like one of those bandwagon jumper types.
Really???
My daughter graduated from there, daughter in law earned her masters from there, son did two years there, one long time friend retired professor from there, a few other friends alumnus from Penn State.
Sandusky, heir apparent to Paterno was eased out long ago for a reason, that reason was not lost on people that had an interest there.
When one follows a Pied Piper, it pays to pay attention to the actions of the Piper.
LOL! I love all my sons. All of them now have sons of their own whom I think they also love. Your silly manner of speech is indeed indicative of your own emotional disease that permits you to join any stupid lynch mob that comes along. Face it! You are emotionally compromised and wholly incapable of sitting in judgment of others.
LOL! I love all my sons. All of them now have sons of their own whom I think they also love. Your silly manner of speech is indeed indicative of your own emotional disease that permits you to join any stupid lynch mob that comes along. Face it! You are emotionally compromised and wholly incapable of sitting in judgment of others.
In Cynicom"s remark, "Men loving little boys is a disease." the context is one of unnatural and unlawful desire for and/or contact with boys who may be influenced and sexually exploited by male authority figures.
There's no reason to exploit a minor semantic point to attack him. Especially since all who read his remark understood what he meant except you. (your grasp of the comment seems intentionally misunderstood)
We must be honest with ourselves and "have clean hands" first and foremost before we attack others. Otherwise we will find ourselves isolated from the members, most of whom have a low tolerance for intellectual dishonesty.
Attention:
Ms. christine, another angry or confused person of interest may be wilding here now.
There's no reason to exploit a minor semantic point to attack him. Especially since all who read his remark understood what he meant except you. (your grasp of the comment seems intentionally misunderstood)
You are correct. It is like "didn't do enough at a given point in time" being intentionally confused with guilty of a heinous perversion of society.
Point made. Was just wondering if the random firing of silly innuendo mixed with a little emotional semantic smoke was becoming the new norm lately.