Title: 911 What Happened - Not How It Happened - Dr Judy Wood Source:
[None] URL Source:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gFW-sZrmSs Published:Nov 16, 2012 Author:Judy Wood Post Date:2012-11-16 10:10:44 by Horse Keywords:None Views:8051 Comments:115
That woman is a total nutcase that could have had a hand in the murder of one of her students. She is being used by disinfo agents to discredit 9/11 truth.
Ask 911 Truthers how one million tons of concrete, steel and office equipment was turned into dust. When you get an answer, then you have a right to criticize her.
Ask 911 Truthers how one million tons of concrete, steel and office equipment was turned into dust. When you get an answer, then you have a right to criticize her.
C4 combined with nanothermite had a LOT to do with the end result. Thousands of tons of concrete accelerating at free fall speed, due to demolished underlying support structures, can pick up a LOT of kinetic energy, enough to pulverize anything in it's way.
I had read Judy Wood's "billard ball" analysis about a decade or so ago, and pretty much agreed with it. Thing is, she's gone on the exotic weaponry tangent and can't seem to comprehend the very real dynamics of what was involved in what happened that day. Since she insists there could not POSSIBLY be a more conventional explanation, and guides the reader into thinking the same, I can see no other reason for that than she is actively diverting attention away from the ACTUAL facts of that day, tricking MANY people into a cesspool of unfounded and unsupporatable assertions and speculation.
Realistically, there IS no actual evidence of any exotic weaponry, everything witnessed, recorded, and documented could have been accomplished with what I mentioned, C4 and nanothermite.
That Kinetic energy would not pulverize a million tons before it hit the ground. Nanothermite and C4 do not have enough energy to do what they did on mid-air.
That Kinetic energy would not pulverize a million tons before it hit the ground. Nanothermite and C4 do not have enough energy to do what they did on mid-air.
Not to be facetious Horse, but how do you KNOW this to be fact? Did you calculate all the necessary factors, and arrive at your determination through science, or is this just a "hunch"?
How many OTHER 110 story skyscrapers have been demolished in this way in order to compare the effects? Have you ever actually SEEN a "regular" controlled demolition?
Look at the following video and then come back and tell my they used "directed energy beams" to accomplish what you saw.