Title: 911 What Happened - Not How It Happened - Dr Judy Wood Source:
[None] URL Source:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gFW-sZrmSs Published:Nov 16, 2012 Author:Judy Wood Post Date:2012-11-16 10:10:44 by Horse Keywords:None Views:8622 Comments:115
That woman is a total nutcase that could have had a hand in the murder of one of her students. She is being used by disinfo agents to discredit 9/11 truth.
She is being used by disinfo agents to discredit 9/11 truth.
I'm getting REALLY sick and tired of this entire 9/11 thing, and I've been a vocal critic of the government lies since before I even signed up here on 4um half a decade ago.
The disinfo, and the effects it has on unsuspecting readers, has been amazing. They have more power over the general public than those who present facts and actual truth.
So why should I care, when apparently, many of those who proclaim themselves "truthers" don't?
So why should I care, when apparently, many of those who proclaim themselves "truthers" don't?
Real Truthers ALWAYS CARE. Always. We can not give up, we do not forget, we get to the bottom of things and we share what we learn and you can take it or leave it.
Getting to know the truth is about setting ourselves free.
We share the information that others maybe free as well.
Real Truthers ALWAYS CARE. Always. We can not give up, we do not forget, we get to the bottom of things and we share what we learn and you can take it or leave it.
Each and every time I have attempted to present facts when conversing with you in regards to the 9/11 attacks, you have attacked me with a barrage of profantities and insults, along with wild claims with no basis in fact.
Seems to me if you actually cared about what the TRUTH was, you wouldn't behave in that manner.
Since you must have guessed by now I had bozo'd you, apparently you thought you'd play the nice guy in speaking to my handle, trying to score some "points". You're just the gift that keeps on giving.
#36. To: FormerLurker, lod, GreyLmist, wudidiz, RickyJ, horse, itistoolate, christine, all, Ping, pang walla walla bing bang. (#30)
Each and every time I have attempted to present facts when conversing with you in regards to the 9/11 attacks, you have attacked me with a barrage of profantities and insults, along with wild claims with no basis in fact.
Seems to me if you actually cared about what the TRUTH was, you wouldn't behave in that manner.
Since you must have guessed by now I had bozo'd you, apparently you thought you'd play the nice guy in speaking to my handle, trying to score some "points". You're just the gift that keeps on giving.
FormerLurker,
That is the weirdest.... weakest... lamest attempt at a conversation twist and guilt redirection.
I have no clue nor interest in what you do with your settings.
In fact I am tired of addressing you because when ever we converse the subject always seems to stray from 911 and into personal nit pickings. And While I can quote where I have said I was mistaken and what not...whats the point?
Instead of making this about me and you or you vrs the world or any other nonesense thing, instead , how about we talk about what we know.... and what this thread is about.
We know we have all kinds of DEW weapons. D.A.P.A.R. doesn't make wicker baskets. It makes military advancements. It is completely possible DEW weapons were used. They existed at that time... nothing being put forward in this interview was fringe. Ms, Woods even stressed avoiding speculation and grounding our conclusions in what can be proven by peer reviewed... PEER REVIEWED.
Peer Review Definition Dec 26, 2005 ... Peer review is the evaluation of creative work or performance by other people in the same field in order to maintain or enhance the quality
So we can see she is not afraid of having her worked double checked and debunked.
To do that though FIRST you must know exactly what it is we are talking about...what the fruits of her labour has been, in said peer review paper.
If you have issue with her findings the point out her work exactly and speak up on what your exact boggle is with her work. And I stress "her" here because I am not wanting to know about the work of others by comparisons. I am familer(sp) with other peoples research. Specifically , if you find flaw in Woods work , I would like to keep it about her work and where you find any issue in it...
#38. To: titorite, christine, tom007, RickyJ, *9-11* (#36)
D.A.P.A.R. doesn't make wicker baskets
You don't even know how to spell it. It's called DARPA.
BTW, there IS no reason why any exotic device would have been necessary to bring down the towers as witnessed.
A controlled sequence of detonations using C4 cutting charges, enhanced perhaps with the addition of nano-thermite, would easily have collapsed floors below the point of collapse, causing the upper structure to pulverize the weakened floors below it as it fell, resulting in a near free fall collapse.
Precision timing achieved by computer control would have been all that was necessary to accomplish the task.
Something pulverized the concrete, in sequence, and it wasn't a pancaking building from ten stories above.
It was free fall pancaking, indicating the underlying floor below the collapsing structure had lost ALL structural integrity prior to the upper structure crashing into it.
The increased speed of the upper structure caused a much higher release of kinetic energy than would otherwise have occured, enabling the pulverization of the area of impact.
If the lower floors had NOT been wired for demolition, then the collapse would NOT have been symmetrical nor would if have occured at near free fall speed.
In fact, IF the upper structure had impacted INTACT floors, the collapse would have drastically slowed down and stopped after perhaps 10 or so floors, and the upper structure would have slid off the remaining tower, crashing down into the streets of New York.
We are total FOOLS for going along with this shit. There I said it.
Why does not the government open an investigation into this.......
O yeh.
In the interview she went over a very valid point...
We the people , are looking into this. We need to know. Given the circumstances of the event and all that was involved in every level, we need to know everything we can about this ESPECIALLY the complete existence of the exact types of weapons they used, down to the serial numbers and manufacturer(s).
The more we all know about this kind of technology the better off we will all be. The more understanding we have , the less likely it will be that such power will be able to be used in such a manner again...the better off we will all be.