Title: 911 What Happened - Not How It Happened - Dr Judy Wood Source:
[None] URL Source:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gFW-sZrmSs Published:Nov 16, 2012 Author:Judy Wood Post Date:2012-11-16 10:10:44 by Horse Keywords:None Views:8547 Comments:115
That woman is a total nutcase that could have had a hand in the murder of one of her students. She is being used by disinfo agents to discredit 9/11 truth.
She is being used by disinfo agents to discredit 9/11 truth.
I'm getting REALLY sick and tired of this entire 9/11 thing, and I've been a vocal critic of the government lies since before I even signed up here on 4um half a decade ago.
The disinfo, and the effects it has on unsuspecting readers, has been amazing. They have more power over the general public than those who present facts and actual truth.
So why should I care, when apparently, many of those who proclaim themselves "truthers" don't?
So why should I care, when apparently, many of those who proclaim themselves "truthers" don't?
Real Truthers ALWAYS CARE. Always. We can not give up, we do not forget, we get to the bottom of things and we share what we learn and you can take it or leave it.
Getting to know the truth is about setting ourselves free.
We share the information that others maybe free as well.
Ah, but the problem is titorite doesn't care about the truth. He ignores strong facts and evidence that indicates what most likely happened on 9/11 and pushes the highly improbable that lacks facts and evidence when there no reason to do so.
You're wrong - he cares greatly about learning the truth.
I have to disagree with you on that. The truth isn't mystical or magical, it can be clearly seen from available evidence what most likely took place on the day of 9/11. There might be small details here and there that are different but I highly doubt anything major. Anyway, I have already stated why his theory of directed energy could not have been what caused the towers to collapse. He won't address that because he doesn't care about the truth.
Fuck it , I tried to get yall talking about her work specificly , since this topic was about her and her research. ..but it seems yall can not point out any flaw or are unwilling to attempt it.
At least I think we all know now where you two stand in the line and what loyalties yall perfer serve.
I'll see yall never. It's been real and it's been fun but it aint been real fun, know what mean?
At least I think we all know now where you two stand in the line and what loyalties yall perfer serve.
Uh huh. Back to the personal stuff against me know, right titorite, since you've lost the argument and can't back up your claims.
If you noticed, I HAVE posted some of Judy Wood's earlier work. She made the case for EXACTLY what I AM saying, in that it was a sequential failure which caused the upper mass to accelerate at near free fall speed.
Neither you nor her have been able to say exactly why C4 or other conventional explosive devices could not have been used to cause that sequential failure from occuring exactly as it did.