Title: 911 What Happened - Not How It Happened - Dr Judy Wood Source:
[None] URL Source:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gFW-sZrmSs Published:Nov 16, 2012 Author:Judy Wood Post Date:2012-11-16 10:10:44 by Horse Keywords:None Views:6597 Comments:115
That woman is a total nutcase that could have had a hand in the murder of one of her students. She is being used by disinfo agents to discredit 9/11 truth.
She is being used by disinfo agents to discredit 9/11 truth.
I'm getting REALLY sick and tired of this entire 9/11 thing, and I've been a vocal critic of the government lies since before I even signed up here on 4um half a decade ago.
The disinfo, and the effects it has on unsuspecting readers, has been amazing. They have more power over the general public than those who present facts and actual truth.
So why should I care, when apparently, many of those who proclaim themselves "truthers" don't?
So why should I care, when apparently, many of those who proclaim themselves "truthers" don't?
Real Truthers ALWAYS CARE. Always. We can not give up, we do not forget, we get to the bottom of things and we share what we learn and you can take it or leave it.
Getting to know the truth is about setting ourselves free.
We share the information that others maybe free as well.
Ah, but the problem is titorite doesn't care about the truth. He ignores strong facts and evidence that indicates what most likely happened on 9/11 and pushes the highly improbable that lacks facts and evidence when there no reason to do so.
You're wrong - he cares greatly about learning the truth.
I have to disagree with you on that. The truth isn't mystical or magical, it can be clearly seen from available evidence what most likely took place on the day of 9/11. There might be small details here and there that are different but I highly doubt anything major. Anyway, I have already stated why his theory of directed energy could not have been what caused the towers to collapse. He won't address that because he doesn't care about the truth.
He won't address that because he doesn't care about the truth.
If he cared about truth he wouldn't have just turned tail and ran. If he cared about truth, he would have either admitted he was wrong and apologized, or presented factual information which bolstered his view.
Thus far, he's called on me to disprove Judy Wood's work, where her OWN previous work demonstrates the opposite of what he is claiming.
Also thus far, he can't seem to find ANY sort of directed energy weapon which exists that could have accomplished what he claims.
Thus far, he's called on me to disprove Judy Wood's work, where her OWN previous work demonstrates the opposite of what he is claiming.
You've been called on to address the current issues, not her previous work. Lots pf people have had to readjust their earlier assessments regarding 9/11. Nothing unusual about that except with Christopher Bollyn, for example, who duplicitously and hostilely postures as if the subject of possible DEW/Beam weaponry originated with Judy Wood when it is traceable to him [as early as Feb 14, 2002].
You've been called on to address the current issues, not her previous work.
Name what it is about that interview which you feel needs to be addresed. I had presented her earlier work to show how she has already proven that a sequential failure had occured.
Now tell me, what is it about that work that you disagree with.
I had presented her earlier work to show how she has already proven that a sequential failure had occured.
I do not believe sequential failure occurred. For sequential failure to occur the buildings would have fallen at a much slower rate. What people saw on 9/11 was sequential timed explosions all the way down the building.