[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Editorial See other Editorial Articles Title: Extremely Rich Wall Street CEO Wants Americans To Work Longer Extremely Rich Wall Street CEO Wants Americans To Work Longer By Pat Garofalo posted from ThinkProgress Economy on Nov 20, 2012 at 10:40 am Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein Lloyd Blankfein evidently taking a break from doing gods work as the CEO of Wall Street behemoth Goldman Sachs told CBS News Scott Pelley that he believes the retirement age needs to be raised because in general, entitlements have to be slowed down and contained: BLANKFEIN: Youre going to have to undoubtedly do something to lower peoples expectations the entitlements and what people think that theyre going to get, because its not going to theyre not going to get it. PELLEY: Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid? BLANKFEIN: You can look at history of these things, and Social Security wasnt devised to be a system that supported you for a 30-year retirement after a 25-year career.
So there will be things that, you know, the retirement age has to be changed, maybe some of the benefits have to be affected, maybe some of the inflation adjustments have to be revised. But in general, entitlements have to be slowed down and contained. PELLEY: Because we cant afford them going forward? BLANKFEIN: Because we cant afford them. Maybe working until a later age is fine for a Wall Street CEO whose net worth is $450 million. But its simply nonsense to assert that the retirement age needs to go up because Social Security is no longer affordable. For starters, Social Security can pay full benefits for decades without any changes at all. (Imagine the accolades that would received if any other federal program had guaranteed funding for that stretch of time.) One simple change, raising the cap on the payroll tax, can guarantee that the program will pay nearly full benefits for three-quarters of a century. In the meantime, Social Security is statutorily barred from adding one dime to the federal deficit, so cutting it doesnt change the nations deficit or debt picture. Raising the retirement age, meanwhile, adversely impacts those workers most in need of a robust social safety net. While a year or two of extra work may not seem like much to a Wall Street CEO with his cushy corner office, for a factory worker or janitor, it can mean real problems. Life expectancy is only increasing for wealthier workers in non-physical jobs. Poorer workers doing physical labor have not seen the same gains. Overall, raising the retirement age to 70 would cut benefits for the average retiree by 19 percent. Email Icon Sharing Icon Security Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
#1. To: All (#0)
Turn off the internet, you welfare scum, and get to work. They hate us because were free. The wonderful amazing demi-god FDR made the retirement age 65 because the average age of death in those days was 64. People weren't supposed to get an SS at all. They were supposed to die before they got it.
There are actually govt agents who spread conspiracy theories among the gullible to help promote the illusion that the govt is all powerful.
I am pretty sure that is true.
|
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|