[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Dear Horse, which one of your posts has the Deep State so spun up that's causing 4um to run slow? Bomb Cyclone Pacific Northwest Death Certificates Reveal FBI 'Revised' Murder Stats Still Bogus A $110B bubble on $500M earnings. History warns: Bubbles always burst. Joy Behar says people like their show because they tell the truth, unlike "dragon believer" Joe Rogan. Male Passenger Disappointed After Another Flight Ends Without A Stewardess Frantically Asking If Anyone Can Land The Plane Could the Rapid Growth of AI Boost Gold Demand? LOOK AT MY ASS! Elon Musk Responds As British Government "Summons" Him To 'Disinformation' Hearing MSNBC Contributor Panics Over Trump Nominating Bondi For AG: Dangerous Because Shes Competent House passes dangerous bill that targets nonprofits, pro-Palestine groups Navy Will Sideline 17 Support Vessels to Ease Strain on Civilian Mariners Israel carries out field executions, massacres in north Gaza AOC votes to back Israel Lobby's bogus anti-Semitism definition Biden to launch ICE mobile app, further disrupting Trump's mass deportation plan: Report Panic at Mar-a-Lago: How the Fake Press Pool Fueled Global Fear Until X Set the Record Straight Donald Trumps Nominee for the FCC Will Remove DEI as a Priority of the Agency Stealing JFK's Body Trump plans to revive Keystone XL pipeline to solidify U.S. energy independence ASHEVILLE UPDATE: Bodies Being Stacked in Warehouses & Children Being Taken Away American news is mostly written by Israeli lobbyists pushing Zionist agenda Biden's Missile Crisis British Operation Kiss kill Instantly Skripals Has Failed to Kill But Succeeded at Covering Up, Almost NASA chooses SpaceX and Blue Origin to deliver rover, astronaut base to the moon The Female Fantasy Exposed: Why Women Love Toxic Love Stories United States will NOT comply with the ICC arrest warrant for Prime Minister Netanyahu: Mississippi’s GDP Beats France: A Shocking Look at Economic Policy Failures (Per Capita) White House Refuses to Recognize US Responsibility for Escalation of Conflict in Ukraine MAKE EDUCATION GREAT AGAIN!! They will burn it with a "Peresvet" or shoot it down with a "hypersound"

9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: Alex Jones Compars Judy Wood 911 Analysis to "Space Beams"
Source: you tube
URL Source: http://youtu.be/3p5VibTaUeQ
Published: Dec 1, 2012
Author: Santilli Covering AJ/Bermas Idiocy
Post Date: 2012-12-01 09:57:34 by abraxas
Keywords: None
Views: 3421
Comments: 142

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

The answer is AJ knows that the planes were remote controlled. Judy Woods says there were no planes. It was just a figment of our imaginations, a product of lasers.

I am not sure what AJ knows or doesn't know, but Judy Woods is not a reliable source of info for really anything, yet certain people keep pushing her 9/11 stories. The 9/11 truth movement is trying to be made into a laughing stock by these jokers to make sure the general population does not investigate the events of 9/11 and realize they have been lied to by the media and government for years.

If widespread knowledge of the truth of 9/11 came out then Israel would be history just like Alan Saborsky said they would be. It is the state of Israel, Mossad and CIA agents, as well as those in the government and military that cooperated with this false flag event that are using every means available to discredit the 9/11 truth movement with wackos like Judy Wood.

God is always good!

RickyJ  posted on  2012-12-04   19:26:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

It doesn't matter how many times you keep making false claims about me getting paid to post what you disagree with, you're still wrong each and every time. Be advised that bilious jibes don't amount to a counterargument.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-12-04   19:30:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Low opinions of Judy Wood are irrelevant to the facts that planes don't explain the devastation at the WTC, nor does thermitics. The same devastation can be seen in newsclips. The question of exotic weaponry didn't originate with her anyway. That's traceable to Christopher Bollyn, all the way back to February 2002 -- long before she arrived in the 9/11 research community whether you like it or not. What you think of her or the WMD aspect of 9/11 investigations changes nothing of the issues that can't be chalked up to conventional controlled demolitions.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-12-04   19:51:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

bilious jibes don't amount to a counterargument

Not in the real world.

wudidiz  posted on  2012-12-05   1:04:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

What you think of her or the WMD aspect of 9/11 investigations changes nothing of the issues that can't be chalked up to conventional controlled demolitions.

There is not ONE thing which can't be "chaulked up" to conventional EXPLOSIVES, let alone that which could be "chaulked up" to explosives based on nano-thermite.

Nano-thermite would be the way to go if they didn't want evidence of conventional explosives found in the debris. Now they can have people post on forums saying that no traces of explosives have been found.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-12-05   1:34:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

There is not ONE thing which can't be "chaulked up" to conventional EXPLOSIVES, let alone that which could be "chaulked up" to explosives based on nano-thermite.

Nano-thermite would be the way to go if they didn't want evidence of conventional explosives found in the debris.

I disagree with both of those statements. For someone who claimed in this post not to have looked into nano-thermite in any depth until less than two weeks ago, you seem to have like a religious fervor for the stuff. The magnitude of powers you've attributed to it are way over-estimated.

Now they can have people post on forums saying that no traces of explosives have been found.

Jones' alleged samples are rubbish. He and his crew didn't even try to find traces of conventional explosives. Those are plain facts and have nothing to do with your misdirected imagineerings about people like me. It's ok to realize that he's been misleading people -- kind of like "Mr. Thermite Sandman". Just shake it off and leave his deceptive snare.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-12-05   4:00:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

P.S. I'll be addressing your demolition claims further when I get back to the thread where I notified you that I'd be doing that, eventually.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-12-05   6:53:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

NORAD commander, Gen. Arnold, states at 4:58 that no one would have known the intent of the hijackers and, without that, [paraphrasing] a shoot down order would have been unjustifiable: 9/11 Military Response

The good General is wrong. Those jets werre off course and had every right to be shot down.

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke

BTP Holdings  posted on  2012-12-05   16:28:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I disagree with both of those statements. For someone who claimed in this post not to have looked into nano-thermite in any depth until less than two weeks ago, you seem to have like a religious fervor for the stuff. The magnitude of powers you've attributed to it are way over-estimated.

I would have thought the issue would have been looked into by now. Apparently it hadn't, and yes, the military along with at least one national laboratory were actively looking into nanothermite explosives since at least the 90's.

THAT is a fact, unlike your fictional "energy beam" weapon which you can't seem to find any info on, and can't describe where it'd be situated in order to destroy the WTC towers.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-12-05   16:52:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Jones' alleged samples are rubbish. He and his crew didn't even try to find traces of conventional explosives.

Uh huh. Where's your data which makes this a "fact"? And how do you know what exactly they tried to find or didn't?

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-12-05   16:53:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Hi FL

I worked 2 decades + front end....fabricating oil/nat gas process systems.
CNC underwater cut/Cryogenic nitrogen - plasma gantry,
move plate and finished vessels with 50 ton remote control cranes.
I have many years of metallurgy,ultrasound insp ticket,...nuclear weld xray
senior burner....machine operator.
We used 2" boxed column as supports under pressure vessels which went into ovens with 24 fired gas burners and heat treated/equalized the vessels welds for over 12 hours sometimes.....above the pissy useless value of burning avfuel.....neither the 2" boxed supports...nor the pressure vessel ....nor even the railcar which loaded all into a huge oven...melted,failed,...saged.
Its BS that the 64 2" core columns failed in the carbon based fire after the jet fuel was consumed.
so it requires assisted intervention....where you see fountains of molten steel and alloy flow out of the towers like a waterfall.....thats the Nano - thermate/thermite...doing its thing.
yet still...you can see the top portion of the tower pivot over centre and lean...some 30 plus floors...and become powder in milliseconds!
Thats a directed energy weapon!

This ends the BS that Moo si lums did 9-11.
Only dept's and here....its like Area 51 stuff.....have access to Directed Energy weapons.
The people who want to take down Iraq,A stan,Libya and Syria are the ones who did 9- 11
Zbigniew B and Grand chessboard/Fake war on Terror.....9-11 was the kick off for the next phase.

Parrot with speed dial  posted on  2012-12-05   17:23:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

you can see the top portion of the tower pivot over centre and lean...some 30 plus floors...and become powder in milliseconds! Thats a directed energy weapon!

There is not one directed energy weapon that I am aware of which can turn concrete to dust.

There ARE explosives however which can, and DO, accomplish that. Ever see a controlled demolition?

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-12-05   17:58:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Ever see a controlled demolition?

Conventional explosives don't cause molecular dissociation which was seen at the wtc.

wudidiz  posted on  2012-12-05   19:00:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

The good General is wrong. Those jets werre off course and had every right to be shot down.

I have to strongly disagree with everything you said there except "good General". It's a good thing, imo, that it's not your decision to order a death sentence for passengers and crews if the jets they're on go off course -- due to equipment malfunction or otherwise. That could also get some people and building-properties on the ground needlessly obliterated too when the situation might have been more humanely resolvable.

Edited for spelling and spacing.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-12-05   19:59:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Conventional explosives don't cause molecular dissociation which was seen at the wtc.

LOL!!!!!!!!!!

Do you even know what molecular dissociation IS, or are you just using a word you found at one of your psuedoscience sites?

Name me ONE, just ONE, REAL "directed energy" weapon which could cause such a thing.

Again, I don't mean something you find on science fiction shows, like Star Trek. I mean something REAL.

BTW, did you personally analyze the WTC debris and find that there were any "unassociated molecules"? If so, please describe to me the analysis, ie. what procedures and what instruments were used to make such a determination.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-12-05   20:10:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

the military along with at least one national laboratory were actively looking into nanothermite explosives since at least the 90's.

THAT is a fact

This is about the third time now that I've tried to ask you this question but so what? That's their job and they've been actively looking at Directed Energy weaponry systems for much longer than that.

unlike your fictional "energy beam" weapon which you can't seem to find any info on, and can't describe where it'd be situated in order to destroy the WTC towers.

Oh, that's rich, as the saying goes -- rich in Chutzpah. Your off-kilter, evidentiary double-standards are mighty funny, considering that merely the name "Dov Zakheim" equates to evidence of remote controlled 9/11 planes in your opinion and the Military doing its job in the field of explosives as evidence enough that thermitics brought the Towers down, as Jones sure doesn't have any credible evidence for you to bank on that agent so persistently.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-12-05   20:32:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Tell us the one about how those vehicles were demolished by conventional controlled demolition with some majikal nanothermite in the "pancake mix", FL. And what do you call that story? Reminds me somewhat of "Little Black Sambo".

Edited to reword the first two sentences and this one.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-12-05   21:01:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

This is about the third time now that I've tried to ask you this question but so what? That's their job and they've been actively looking at Directed Energy weaponry systems for much longer than that.

What it comes down to is that unlike your wishful thinking and baseless assertions concerning disintegrator beams from space, nanothermite explosives DO most likely exist.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-12-05   21:53:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Oh, that's rich

Yes, it sure is. It's VERY rich that you can't even tell us where you think that "directed energy beam" weapon was fired from in order to destroy the WTC towers, since you are INSISTING that is what happened.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-12-05   21:54:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Tell us the one about how those vehicles were demolished by conventional controlled demolition with some majikal nanothermite in the "pancake mix", FL.

Hey genius, tell us how a nuclear explosion occured in the WTC towers and nobody noticed.

As far as your ridiculous comments, DEBRIS can and DOES damage objects in its path. Being that you can't even spell magical, I can see how you might not understand such things.

Yep, new generation explosives don't exist, in your mind, yet Captain Kirk's phaser beams from space actually do.

You are one messed up unit.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-12-05   21:57:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

There is not one directed energy weapon that I am aware of which can turn concrete to dust.

After you walk us through all the stuff at Area 51 and similar secretive installations here of which you are aware and declare that's all there is cuz that's all the stashes you are aware of, I'd like to hear your report on "that's all there is cuz that's all the stashes you are aware of" after you come back from running through all of the secretive installations in foreign places like the UK, France, Russia, China, Israel...

Ever see a controlled demolition?

Just my opinion, but I don't think it's good protocol to talk down so to that Parrot with speed dial. He seems to be immensely more aware of the overall picture at the WTC than you.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-12-05   22:03:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

In your mind you already have it all figured out and everyone one else on planet earth that does not agree with every aspect of the story that you have magically worked out to the smallest detail.... well those that oppose you must be with the terrorists.

Fucking stupid.

_______________________________________________________________________________ The US government has declared civil war on itself. Its lust for war grew so great... Liberty before death. We run , we live, We fight again, till we win. We did not start this fight. We damn sure did not willingly pay our taxes to buy the bullets and drones that shall be used to kill us. We will correct the violations of this rogue nation....our rogue nation. We will fix this because nobody else can. You will work to help me help us all to fix this failure. After you're done educating yourself,Take Action!!!

titorite  posted on  2012-12-05   22:27:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

There is not one directed energy weapon that I am aware of which can turn concrete to dust.

There ARE explosives however which can, and DO, accomplish that. Ever see a controlled demolition?

Sure....I agree with you there.
Yet the reports of first responders and people near the Towers when they each fell,
they experienced an unseen force which pressed against them....similar to the force you feel when magnets repel.
Some were lifted of their feet and thrown,....this is just before the towers falling.
The various US military Microwave weapons are evidence of Directed energy.
Myself....see the evidence for controlled cutting by nano Thermate/Thermite of core columns....the steel in the building.
I would suggest the concrete of the building was loaded by some kind of phasic directed energy weapon which vibrated the concrete molecules.
any number of known forces...like sound...can shatter bonds in materials.
everything we see and touch is actually in a state of vibration,....by changing the vibration by frequency....loading that.....you can shatter atomic bonds,....the material simply flys apart.

Parrot with speed dial  posted on  2012-12-05   22:30:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Name me ONE, just ONE, REAL "directed energy" weapon which could cause such a thing.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directed-energy_weapons

If you can not click a link that has been given to you repeated times for a question you have asked over and over then your a fucking idiot not worthy of the attention people waste on you.

fucking disinformationalst tool.

_______________________________________________________________________________ The US government has declared civil war on itself. Its lust for war grew so great... Liberty before death. We run , we live, We fight again, till we win. We did not start this fight. We damn sure did not willingly pay our taxes to buy the bullets and drones that shall be used to kill us. We will correct the violations of this rogue nation....our rogue nation. We will fix this because nobody else can. You will work to help me help us all to fix this failure. After you're done educating yourself,Take Action!!!

titorite  posted on  2012-12-05   22:35:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Being that you can't even spell magical, I can see how you might not understand such things.

I spelled it that way on purpose because I don't consider it magical, as you apparently do -- also because that's the way 9/11 majikal jet fuel is spelled around here. If you don't believe me, go ask James Deffenbach. He's the classifier and expert on that subject and is where I learned of that dastardly fuelery. Do try harder to get on the same page about it.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-12-05   22:49:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I spelled it that way on purpose because I don't consider it magical, as you apparently do -- also because that's the way 9/11 majikal jet fuel is spelled around here. If you don't believe me, go ask James Deffenbach. He's the classifier and expert on that subject and is where I learned of that dastardly fuelery. Do try harder to get on the same page about it.

Yeah, I often talk about the "magickal jet fuel" that reconstituted itself over and over, burned hotter than any ever had before or since and melted steel beams which also had never happened before. I got that spelling from buck iirc. Of course I know how magical is spelled and I suspect he does too but I just think it is funny.

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.    Lord Acton

The human herd stampedes on the fields of facts and the valleys of truth to get to the desert of ignorance. Saman Mohammadi

"If a politician found he had cannibals among his constituents, he would promise them missionaries for dinner." Mencken

"..if the military is going to defend our freedoms, then we need freedoms to defend. Our freedoms must be restored before the military can defend them..."  Lawrence M. Vance

Você me trata desse jeito só porque eu sou preto. Junior (my youngest son)

James Deffenbach  posted on  2012-12-05   23:09:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

you can't even tell us where you think that "directed energy beam" weapon was fired from in order to destroy the WTC towers

As usual, no matter how many times you're told something, it's like in one ear and out the other with you. As I said to you before, I wouldn't rule out that something devastating was directed from underground in the vicinty. Additionally, if you were really interested at all in the topic, you'd find various reasonable discussions of the possibilites roundabout on the net -- a boat in the area, for one example. Not necessarily "space" stationed, as you like to demean the subject matter.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-12-05   23:22:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directed-energy_weapons

If you can not click a link that has been given to you repeated times for a question you have asked over and over then your a fucking idiot not worthy of the attention people waste on you.

fucking disinformationalst tool.

Did you even bother reading the link you posted you fucking retarded Mossad tool?

There is not ONE weapon at that link which could have brought down the towers, and if you don't know that, you're a bigger idiot than I thought you were.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-12-05   23:25:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I said to you before, I wouldn't rule out that something devastating was directed from underground in the vicinty. Additionally, if you were really interested at all in the topic, you'd find various reasonable discussions of the possibilites roundabout on the net -- a boat in the area, for one example.

Uh huh. Or perhaps those evil Muslims just prayed to Allah and he blew them down with his own breath.

That's about as plausible as what you suggest.

Again, name me ONE weapon which could bring down the WTC towers as they were brought down.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-12-05   23:27:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I spelled it that way on purpose because I don't consider it magical, as you apparently do -- also because that's the way 9/11 majikal jet fuel is spelled around here. If you don't believe me, go ask James Deffenbach.

I believe James and I were discussing this with BeAChooser well before you ever posted on any forum.

And just because you choose to add the word MAGICKAL to the word explosive doesn't mean it would have to be "magical", "majikal", or "magickal" explosives, unlike the jet fuel the government is peddling, or the non-existent super duper beam weapon that you insist brought down the towers.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-12-05   23:31:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

BTW agent titorite, are you saying BOTH nuclear weapons AND beam weapons brought down the towers now? Do you even know what a nuclear blast looks like?

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-12-05   23:39:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Yeah, I often talk about the "magickal jet fuel" that reconstituted itself over and over, burned hotter than any ever had before or since and melted steel beams which also had never happened before. I got that spelling from buck iirc. Of course I know how magical is spelled and I suspect he does too but I just think it is funny.

A hat-tip to buck and you, JD. It is funny. Sobering-like too. So, there ya go, FL. Now you should be up to speed on that issue. Since I hadn't seen it mentioned here for a while, I technically did misspell it. I guess that gives me the patent on the descriptor, majikal-nanothermite. he-he-he.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-12-05   23:41:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I believe James and I were discussing this with BeAChooser...

Yeah, and he would say, "You're a KOOK! ROTFLOL!" One of his standard replies.

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.    Lord Acton

The human herd stampedes on the fields of facts and the valleys of truth to get to the desert of ignorance. Saman Mohammadi

"If a politician found he had cannibals among his constituents, he would promise them missionaries for dinner." Mencken

"..if the military is going to defend our freedoms, then we need freedoms to defend. Our freedoms must be restored before the military can defend them..."  Lawrence M. Vance

Você me trata desse jeito só porque eu sou preto. Junior (my youngest son)

James Deffenbach  posted on  2012-12-05   23:44:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Again, name me ONE weapon which could bring down the WTC towers as they were brought down.

Dragging your feet on that weaponry-inventory project of secretive installations in the world that I spoke to you about at #55, I see. Let me know when you're ready to give us the Area 51 tour for starters.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-12-05   23:50:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

What it comes down to James is that there is a philosophical notion called Occam's Razor, which dictates that the simplist solution is usually the correct solution.

In other words, rather than jumping to nuclear weapons (which would be serious overkill besides the fact it'd be impossible to hide their use) and far- fetched energy beam weapons which nobody can quite find any info on, and have no evidence of, it's MUCH simpler to work with the assumption that either conventional or advanced explosives were used to bring down those towers.

What all this "nukes and beams" nonsense does is divert attention away from the very real fact that those towers couldn't have fallen because of the "magickal jet fuel", and instead causes those presenting evidence of how impossible it would be for the jet fuel to have been responsible for the collapses to be attacked by self proclaimed "truthers" who care more about who can come up with the wildest stories rather than who can come up with the most factual scientific evidence.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-12-05   23:52:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

So in other words, you admit that there is NO energy beam weapon known to exist that can bring down a structure.

Try to stick to facts and science rather than wild speculation and ficticious weaponry which most likely won't exist for another 100 years.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-12-05   23:54:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Yeah, and he would say, "You're a KOOK! ROTFLOL!" One of his standard replies.

Surprised our little friends here haven't started using that expression themselves.

I wonder if one of them is our old pal...

They're obviously on the same "team" at least.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-12-05   23:55:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

A hat-tip to buck and you, JD. It is funny

Uh, buckeroo was a government jet fuel story believer. You're confusing him with someone else.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-12-05   23:57:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Do you understand that an investigation of WMDs per 9/11 -- or any other investigation for that matter -- doesn't generally begin with all the answers just because you think it should and think you have all of them?

Edited for punctuation.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-12-05   23:58:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Do you understand that you don't jump into wild insane speculation that has no basis in probability nor logic, especially when there are valid, plausible, and scientific explanations based on observed phenonema and forensic evidence?

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-12-06   0:01:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Comments (75 - 142) not displayed.

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]