[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Attack of the Dead-2025.

Canada strips Jewish National Fund of charitable status

Minnesota State Rep. Vang just admitted that she is an ILLEGAL ALIEN.

1100% increase in neurological events since the roll-out of Covid mRNA

16 Things That Everyone Needs To Know About Violent Far-Left Revolution In Los Angeles

Undercover video in Arizona alleges ongoing consumer fraud by Fairlife

Dozens arrested after San Francisco protest turns violent Sunday

Looking for the toughest badasses in the city (Los Angeles)

Democrat Civil War Explodes: DNC Chair Threatens to Quit Over David Hogg

Invaders waving Mexican flags, pour onto the 101 Freeway in Los Angeles

Australian Fake News Journo Hit By Rubber Bullet In L.A. Riot

22-year-old dies after being unable to afford asthma inhaler

North Korean Bulsae-4 Long-Range ATGM Spotted Again In Russian Operation Zone

Alexander Dugin: A real Maidan has begun in Los Angeles

State Department Weighing $500 Million Grant to Controversial Gaza Aid Group: Report

LA Mayor Karen Bass ordered LAPD to stand down, blocked aid to federal officers during riots.

Russia Has a Titanium Submarine That Can ‘Deep Dive’ 19,700 Feet

Shocking scene as DC preps for Tr*mp's military birthday parade.

Earth is being Pulled Apart by Crazy Space Weather! Volcanoes go NUTS as Plasma RUNS OUT

Gavin, feel free to use this as a campaign ad in 2028.

US To Formalize Military Presence in Syria in Deal With al-Qaeda-Linked Govt

GOP Rep Introduces Resolution Labeling Free Palestine Slogan as Anti-Semitism

Two-thirds of troops who left the military in 2023 were at risk for mental health conditions

UK and France abandon plans to recognise Palestinian state at conference

Kamala Backs LA Protests After Rioters Attack Federal Officers

Netanyahu's ultra-Orthodox partners move ahead with Knesset dissolution plan

Former Prime Minister of Ukraine: Zelensky will leave the country

Man protesting Paramount ICE raid added to FBI's Most Wanted

JUAN O SAVIN- The Plan to Capture America

US Manufacturing By State: Who Gains Most From 'Made In America'?


9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: Alex Jones Compars Judy Wood 911 Analysis to "Space Beams"
Source: you tube
URL Source: http://youtu.be/3p5VibTaUeQ
Published: Dec 1, 2012
Author: Santilli Covering AJ/Bermas Idiocy
Post Date: 2012-12-01 09:57:34 by abraxas
Keywords: None
Views: 6799
Comments: 142

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 70.

#7. To: abraxas (#0)

Alex Jones Compars Judy Wood 911 Analysis to "Space Beams"

The title says it all. I wonder if AJ would be surprised to know that NORAD controlled the planes that hit the Twin Towers? Just asking. ROTFLOL!

BTP Holdings  posted on  2012-12-01   15:03:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: BTP Holdings (#7)

The title says it all. I wonder if AJ would be surprised to know that NORAD controlled the planes that hit the Twin Towers? Just asking. ROTFLOL!

The answer is AJ knows that the planes were remote controlled. Judy Woods says there were no planes. It was just a figment of our imaginations, a product of lasers.

ratcat  posted on  2012-12-02   0:19:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: ratcat (#16)

The answer is AJ knows that the planes were remote controlled. Judy Woods says there were no planes. It was just a figment of our imaginations, a product of lasers.

I am not sure what AJ knows or doesn't know, but Judy Woods is not a reliable source of info for really anything, yet certain people keep pushing her 9/11 stories. The 9/11 truth movement is trying to be made into a laughing stock by these jokers to make sure the general population does not investigate the events of 9/11 and realize they have been lied to by the media and government for years.

If widespread knowledge of the truth of 9/11 came out then Israel would be history just like Alan Saborsky said they would be. It is the state of Israel, Mossad and CIA agents, as well as those in the government and military that cooperated with this false flag event that are using every means available to discredit the 9/11 truth movement with wackos like Judy Wood.

RickyJ  posted on  2012-12-04   19:26:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: RickyJ (#35)

Low opinions of Judy Wood are irrelevant to the facts that planes don't explain the devastation at the WTC, nor does thermitics. The same devastation can be seen in newsclips. The question of exotic weaponry didn't originate with her anyway. That's traceable to Christopher Bollyn, all the way back to February 2002 -- long before she arrived in the 9/11 research community whether you like it or not. What you think of her or the WMD aspect of 9/11 investigations changes nothing of the issues that can't be chalked up to conventional controlled demolitions.

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-12-04   19:51:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: GreyLmist, RickyJ (#37)

What you think of her or the WMD aspect of 9/11 investigations changes nothing of the issues that can't be chalked up to conventional controlled demolitions.

There is not ONE thing which can't be "chaulked up" to conventional EXPLOSIVES, let alone that which could be "chaulked up" to explosives based on nano-thermite.

Nano-thermite would be the way to go if they didn't want evidence of conventional explosives found in the debris. Now they can have people post on forums saying that no traces of explosives have been found.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-12-05   1:34:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: FormerLurker (#39)

There is not ONE thing which can't be "chaulked up" to conventional EXPLOSIVES, let alone that which could be "chaulked up" to explosives based on nano-thermite.

Nano-thermite would be the way to go if they didn't want evidence of conventional explosives found in the debris.

I disagree with both of those statements. For someone who claimed in this post not to have looked into nano-thermite in any depth until less than two weeks ago, you seem to have like a religious fervor for the stuff. The magnitude of powers you've attributed to it are way over-estimated.

Now they can have people post on forums saying that no traces of explosives have been found.

Jones' alleged samples are rubbish. He and his crew didn't even try to find traces of conventional explosives. Those are plain facts and have nothing to do with your misdirected imagineerings about people like me. It's ok to realize that he's been misleading people -- kind of like "Mr. Thermite Sandman". Just shake it off and leave his deceptive snare.

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-12-05   4:00:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: GreyLmist (#40)

I disagree with both of those statements. For someone who claimed in this post not to have looked into nano-thermite in any depth until less than two weeks ago, you seem to have like a religious fervor for the stuff. The magnitude of powers you've attributed to it are way over-estimated.

I would have thought the issue would have been looked into by now. Apparently it hadn't, and yes, the military along with at least one national laboratory were actively looking into nanothermite explosives since at least the 90's.

THAT is a fact, unlike your fictional "energy beam" weapon which you can't seem to find any info on, and can't describe where it'd be situated in order to destroy the WTC towers.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-12-05   16:52:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: FormerLurker (#43)

the military along with at least one national laboratory were actively looking into nanothermite explosives since at least the 90's.

THAT is a fact

This is about the third time now that I've tried to ask you this question but so what? That's their job and they've been actively looking at Directed Energy weaponry systems for much longer than that.

unlike your fictional "energy beam" weapon which you can't seem to find any info on, and can't describe where it'd be situated in order to destroy the WTC towers.

Oh, that's rich, as the saying goes -- rich in Chutzpah. Your off-kilter, evidentiary double-standards are mighty funny, considering that merely the name "Dov Zakheim" equates to evidence of remote controlled 9/11 planes in your opinion and the Military doing its job in the field of explosives as evidence enough that thermitics brought the Towers down, as Jones sure doesn't have any credible evidence for you to bank on that agent so persistently.

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-12-05   20:32:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#53. To: GreyLmist (#50)

Oh, that's rich

Yes, it sure is. It's VERY rich that you can't even tell us where you think that "directed energy beam" weapon was fired from in order to destroy the WTC towers, since you are INSISTING that is what happened.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-12-05   21:54:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#61. To: FormerLurker (#53)

you can't even tell us where you think that "directed energy beam" weapon was fired from in order to destroy the WTC towers

As usual, no matter how many times you're told something, it's like in one ear and out the other with you. As I said to you before, I wouldn't rule out that something devastating was directed from underground in the vicinty. Additionally, if you were really interested at all in the topic, you'd find various reasonable discussions of the possibilites roundabout on the net -- a boat in the area, for one example. Not necessarily "space" stationed, as you like to demean the subject matter.

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-12-05   23:22:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#63. To: GreyLmist (#61)

I said to you before, I wouldn't rule out that something devastating was directed from underground in the vicinty. Additionally, if you were really interested at all in the topic, you'd find various reasonable discussions of the possibilites roundabout on the net -- a boat in the area, for one example.

Uh huh. Or perhaps those evil Muslims just prayed to Allah and he blew them down with his own breath.

That's about as plausible as what you suggest.

Again, name me ONE weapon which could bring down the WTC towers as they were brought down.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-12-05   23:27:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#68. To: FormerLurker (#63)

Again, name me ONE weapon which could bring down the WTC towers as they were brought down.

Dragging your feet on that weaponry-inventory project of secretive installations in the world that I spoke to you about at #55, I see. Let me know when you're ready to give us the Area 51 tour for starters.

GreyLmist  posted on  2012-12-05   23:50:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#70. To: GreyLmist (#68)

So in other words, you admit that there is NO energy beam weapon known to exist that can bring down a structure.

Try to stick to facts and science rather than wild speculation and ficticious weaponry which most likely won't exist for another 100 years.

FormerLurker  posted on  2012-12-05   23:54:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 70.

        There are no replies to Comment # 70.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 70.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]