The title says it all. I wonder if AJ would be surprised to know that NORAD controlled the planes that hit the Twin Towers? Just asking. ROTFLOL!
The answer is AJ knows that the planes were remote controlled. Judy Woods says there were no planes. It was just a figment of our imaginations, a product of lasers.
The answer is AJ knows that the planes were remote controlled. Judy Woods says there were no planes. It was just a figment of our imaginations, a product of lasers.
I am not sure what AJ knows or doesn't know, but Judy Woods is not a reliable source of info for really anything, yet certain people keep pushing her 9/11 stories. The 9/11 truth movement is trying to be made into a laughing stock by these jokers to make sure the general population does not investigate the events of 9/11 and realize they have been lied to by the media and government for years.
If widespread knowledge of the truth of 9/11 came out then Israel would be history just like Alan Saborsky said they would be. It is the state of Israel, Mossad and CIA agents, as well as those in the government and military that cooperated with this false flag event that are using every means available to discredit the 9/11 truth movement with wackos like Judy Wood.
Low opinions of Judy Wood are irrelevant to the facts that planes don't explain the devastation at the WTC, nor does thermitics. The same devastation can be seen in newsclips. The question of exotic weaponry didn't originate with her anyway. That's traceable to Christopher Bollyn, all the way back to February 2002 -- long before she arrived in the 9/11 research community whether you like it or not. What you think of her or the WMD aspect of 9/11 investigations changes nothing of the issues that can't be chalked up to conventional controlled demolitions.
What you think of her or the WMD aspect of 9/11 investigations changes nothing of the issues that can't be chalked up to conventional controlled demolitions.
There is not ONE thing which can't be "chaulked up" to conventional EXPLOSIVES, let alone that which could be "chaulked up" to explosives based on nano-thermite.
Nano-thermite would be the way to go if they didn't want evidence of conventional explosives found in the debris. Now they can have people post on forums saying that no traces of explosives have been found.
There is not ONE thing which can't be "chaulked up" to conventional EXPLOSIVES, let alone that which could be "chaulked up" to explosives based on nano-thermite.
Nano-thermite would be the way to go if they didn't want evidence of conventional explosives found in the debris.
I disagree with both of those statements. For someone who claimed in this post not to have looked into nano-thermite in any depth until less than two weeks ago, you seem to have like a religious fervor for the stuff. The magnitude of powers you've attributed to it are way over-estimated.
Now they can have people post on forums saying that no traces of explosives have been found.
Jones' alleged samples are rubbish. He and his crew didn't even try to find traces of conventional explosives. Those are plain facts and have nothing to do with your misdirected imagineerings about people like me. It's ok to realize that he's been misleading people -- kind of like "Mr. Thermite Sandman". Just shake it off and leave his deceptive snare.
I worked 2 decades + front end....fabricating oil/nat gas process systems. CNC underwater cut/Cryogenic nitrogen - plasma gantry, move plate and finished vessels with 50 ton remote control cranes. I have many years of metallurgy,ultrasound insp ticket,...nuclear weld xray senior burner....machine operator. We used 2" boxed column as supports under pressure vessels which went into ovens with 24 fired gas burners and heat treated/equalized the vessels welds for over 12 hours sometimes.....above the pissy useless value of burning avfuel.....neither the 2" boxed supports...nor the pressure vessel ....nor even the railcar which loaded all into a huge oven...melted,failed,...saged. Its BS that the 64 2" core columns failed in the carbon based fire after the jet fuel was consumed. so it requires assisted intervention....where you see fountains of molten steel and alloy flow out of the towers like a waterfall.....thats the Nano - thermate/thermite...doing its thing. yet still...you can see the top portion of the tower pivot over centre and lean...some 30 plus floors...and become powder in milliseconds! Thats a directed energy weapon!
This ends the BS that Moo si lums did 9-11. Only dept's and here....its like Area 51 stuff.....have access to Directed Energy weapons. The people who want to take down Iraq,A stan,Libya and Syria are the ones who did 9- 11 Zbigniew B and Grand chessboard/Fake war on Terror.....9-11 was the kick off for the next phase.
you can see the top portion of the tower pivot over centre and lean...some 30 plus floors...and become powder in milliseconds! Thats a directed energy weapon!
There is not one directed energy weapon that I am aware of which can turn concrete to dust.
There ARE explosives however which can, and DO, accomplish that. Ever see a controlled demolition?
Conventional explosives don't cause molecular dissociation which was seen at the wtc.
LOL!!!!!!!!!!
Do you even know what molecular dissociation IS, or are you just using a word you found at one of your psuedoscience sites?
Name me ONE, just ONE, REAL "directed energy" weapon which could cause such a thing.
Again, I don't mean something you find on science fiction shows, like Star Trek. I mean something REAL.
BTW, did you personally analyze the WTC debris and find that there were any "unassociated molecules"? If so, please describe to me the analysis, ie. what procedures and what instruments were used to make such a determination.
Tell us the one about how those vehicles were demolished by conventional controlled demolition with some majikal nanothermite in the "pancake mix", FL. And what do you call that story? Reminds me somewhat of "Little Black Sambo".
Edited to reword the first two sentences and this one.
Tell us the one about how those vehicles were demolished by conventional controlled demolition with some majikal nanothermite in the "pancake mix", FL.
Hey genius, tell us how a nuclear explosion occured in the WTC towers and nobody noticed.
As far as your ridiculous comments, DEBRIS can and DOES damage objects in its path. Being that you can't even spell magical, I can see how you might not understand such things.
Yep, new generation explosives don't exist, in your mind, yet Captain Kirk's phaser beams from space actually do.
Being that you can't even spell magical, I can see how you might not understand such things.
I spelled it that way on purpose because I don't consider it magical, as you apparently do -- also because that's the way 9/11 majikal jet fuel is spelled around here. If you don't believe me, go ask James Deffenbach. He's the classifier and expert on that subject and is where I learned of that dastardly fuelery. Do try harder to get on the same page about it.
I spelled it that way on purpose because I don't consider it magical, as you apparently do -- also because that's the way 9/11 majikal jet fuel is spelled around here. If you don't believe me, go ask James Deffenbach. He's the classifier and expert on that subject and is where I learned of that dastardly fuelery. Do try harder to get on the same page about it.
Yeah, I often talk about the "magickal jet fuel" that reconstituted itself over and over, burned hotter than any ever had before or since and melted steel beams which also had never happened before. I got that spelling from buck iirc. Of course I know how magical is spelled and I suspect he does too but I just think it is funny.
Yeah, I often talk about the "magickal jet fuel" that reconstituted itself over and over, burned hotter than any ever had before or since and melted steel beams which also had never happened before. I got that spelling from buck iirc. Of course I know how magical is spelled and I suspect he does too but I just think it is funny.
A hat-tip to buck and you, JD. It is funny. Sobering-like too. So, there ya go, FL. Now you should be up to speed on that issue. Since I hadn't seen it mentioned here for a while, I technically did misspell it. I guess that gives me the patent on the descriptor, majikal-nanothermite. he-he-he.