See other History Articles
Title: BREAKING NEWS: CT School Shooter Killer Link To LIBOR SCANDAL
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Dec 16, 2012
Author: Atavist
Post Date: 2012-12-16 01:40:14 by Itistoolate
Keywords: None
Views: 10934
Comments: 75
The father of Newtown Connecticut school shooter Adam Lanza is Peter Lanza who is a VP and Tax Director at GE Financial. The father of Aurora Colorado movie theater shooter James Holmes is Robert Holmes, the lead scientist for the credit score company FICO. Both men were to testify before the US Sentate in the ongoing LIBOR scandal. The London Interbank Offered Rate, known as Libor, is the average interest rate at which banks can borrow from each other. 16 international banks have been implicated in this ongoing scandal, accused of rigging contracts worth trillions of dollars. HSBC has already been fined $1.9 billion and three of their low level traders arrested. BREAKING NEWS: CT School Shooter Killer Link To LIBOR SCANDAL Poster Comment:
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-25) not displayed.
.
.
.
#26. To: GreyLmist (#17)
The 15 year old girl has different cheek bone structure, different eye color (brown instead of blue) and shape, has a different nasal structure, and appears somewhat heavy, whereas 27 year old teacher Victoria Soto is slim, and is certainly not a 15 year old girl. If you can't tell a 15 year old from a 27 year old, you have a few issues GL. This is the sort of thing which really brings your credibility into question. 15 year old Kristina Shevchenko 27 year old Victoria Soto Lots of people change their natural eyecolor with contact lenses. Make all the snide insults you want but you're the one bringing your credibility into question by playing dumb about that, even though Soto's eyes don't look blue at all in the middle pic of her that you posted yourself. You have no actual proof that the first pic posted, said to be 15 year old Kristina Shevchenko, isn't of Soto at that age, with weight and features altered by aging. Nor that the photos in question aren't possibly photoshopped to appear as two different people, so as to be convincing enough to official storyliners like you. Photographic morphing technology is not futuristic sci-fi fancy. It exists in the present. Odd that of all the things I've commented on in this thread of more importance -- Connecticut being the State of issuance for Obama's fraudulent Social Security number and Militarized State Police, for examples -- you choose to argue about what I thought I had already explained plainly and reasonably: that I see enough of a resemblance that the females in question could be closely related, if not the same person or photoshop presentations. Did you understand it that time? -- because it happens to be very relevant to the info I posted at #13 above regarding rings of PsyOp/BlackOp covert-agents of foreign powers here, with corroborative examples from 3 MSM news sources (2 here and 1 abroad). That being of serious concern to me doesn't hinge on whether or not you agree or on how low your opinion of me goes. Edited for spelling and grammar. ------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
OMFG GL, give it a break. The chubby little 15 year old who survived the mall shooting in Oregon is not the same person as the slender 27 year old who got shot to death. If you can't tell the difference between the two, no wonder you see things that aren't there in the 9/11 videos. You have no actual proof that the first pic posted, said to be 15 year old Kristina Shevchenko, isn't of Soto at that age, with weight and features altered by aging Are you f'in high? YOU posted the first photo of that girl, but found one which was only of her face rather than one which included her upper torso. Are you saying the girl aged 12 years in 5 days (12/8 mall shooting vs 12/14 school shooting)? Keep smoking whatever it is you're smoking, soon you'll be accusing Lady Gaga of being the actual Victoria Soto, using Photoshop in images online of her to make herself look different. imho Thanks for your input, wud. The pics are not good comparative angles but I do see similarities of the ear, chin and slope of the nose -- enough that I can't rule out that they might be the same person. ------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
I don't think you even have a point other than to be a mudslinging noisemaker. So what if the pic I posted of the girl didn't include the entire torso? She looks chubbier there than the pic you posted, which makes her look even more similar to the slimmer Soto pics; so that doesn't really help your argument any. I most certainly never said that the girl aged 12 years in 5 days and your question as if I did is an example of why your post is just nonsensical flack. Edited for punctuation. ------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Added bracketed insert to clarify in case others didn't understand what I meant. ------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
This might be the time for you to exit stage left. Seriously, if you see a resemblance there then I guess you must think all the videos of Bin-Laden were really him instead of an actor which is apparent to most thinking people. God is always good!
I guess maybe you think that high-level hoaxings are just about bin Laden. If so, perhaps you should follow your own directions at sentence 1. ------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Because our government might lie about 911,bin laden,the weapons of mass destruction, Oswald, and on and on BUT IM SURE THEY'D NEVER LIE ABOUT THIS! Duuuuuuuuu ___FIRE
Stop telling others to take a break.. If you don't like her insight Fuck off and don't bitch about it.... I don't agree with everything everyone posts and I might even post counter arguments... But at some point you gotta realize the futility of trying to win an argument through insults. Just because you disagree with an assessment by someone else doesn't mean you gotta blast the fuck outta them. Try letting it go sometime. ___FIRE
I guess the Sandy Hook case isn't bizarre enough for GL, where the possible multiple shooters, murder weapon locked in the trunk of a drug dealer's car, and conflicting reports of whether Lanza's mother worked at the school and was shot there or didn't work at the school and was shot in her home, just isn't sexy enough for GL. No, we need to have a 15 year old girl who survived a mall shooting on 12/8/2012 actually be a 27 year old school teacher who was shot at the Sandy Hook school on 12/14/2012, having worked there for three years. So I guess the 15 year old stuffed her bra and started working at the school when she was 12, put on weight and flew out to Oregon just for the occasion last month, then flew back to Sandy Hook, losing all that weight so nobody would be the wiser, just so that she could get shot on cue. Yep, whatever it is GL is smoking must be some REALLY REALLY good shit. Why am I not surprised you agree that a chubby 15 year old girl who survived a mall shooting is the same person as the 27 year old teacher who was shot at Sandy Hook. You truly are a fucking fool. So fucking what ?!?! What kind of fucked up sick Jollys are you getting off of ripping on the ladies observations? Stop cutting everyone down just because you dislike their conclusions. Being a crass jackhole that has to make him self feel better at the attempted expense of others feelings is bullshit. ___FIRE
You know, if you two wish to start your own forum with headlines such as "Hillary Clinton is really Bill Clinton's twin brother", go right ahead, but if you post shit like that here, you can both expect people to call you on it. If neither one of you wish to be critiqued for what you write, try thinking about what you are saying before you hit the post button. Otherwise, anything you write is fair game. If what you write has merit, you'd get discussion, but when you sling outrageous comments against the wall to see if it'll stick, and no matter HOW ridiculous your rants, you stomp your feet like little babies if anyone tells you just how ridiculous your claims are, you not only have some issues, it appears you are TROLLING. blahblahblah Being a crass jackhole that has to make him self feel better at the attempted expense of others feelings is bullshit. Till your recent two posts the discussion was civil. If you wish to be a foul mouthed retard with no class at all, well, you've already shown your colors, where it is you who has just pushed this thread into that direction. Kook! sneeze Kook!
What is outragous is how much time you spend belittling when you dislike the words you read by them. Fucking shit. I don't know what to say. Stop it. Just fucking stop it. Leave her the fuck alone. Stop acting like a monster cyber bully and leave her alone! You dislike what she wrote FINE! You want to inform the world of such disagreement? Well thats peachy, But their is no reason on gods green earth for you to be so fucking vile to both a member of the opposite sex and your elder. Can I appeal to your chivalry to leaver her alone? How about your sense of christian ethic? What is it gonna take to get you top stop attacking the ideas so bitterly? What is it gonna take to get you to be at least civil? ___FIRE
On a more topic related note ___FIRE
So do you want to ask GreyLmist out or something?
I've already asked her out but sad to say some other guy beat me to her. ___FIRE
You know what titorite? When I first came onto this forum it was a place where people could come to find facts and articles which were MORE credible than main stream news. If you had it YOUR way, you and your cohort would have this place at about the same level as Weekly World News, perhaps worse. The purpose of having a comment section is to evaluate the reports and to provide additional information, which can then be discussed, and the information verified or discarded if it turns out to be false or without merit. You wish to make this a place where ANY old bullshit can be posted as if it were true, whether you read it in a comic book or on the men's room wall, or whether you just made it up for fun to see how many people you could trick into believing it. Perhaps you should get an account on YouTube and start your own video channel, make up whatever bullshit you want, pass it off as fact, then get nasty with the people who tell you what an idiot you are. I don't know what to say. Stop it. Just fucking stop it. What is it gonna take to get you to be at least civil? I'm trying to decide if this is all an act of yours, or if you're really serious. Either way you are one fucked up unit. Go fuck yourself. Ahhhhhh...
Either way you are one fucked up unit. Go fuck yourself. Well I tried to appeal to both your sense of chivalry and/ or your christian ethic. Alas.... What did I reach out too? What did I find but a hostile nasty void.... I'll go fuck myself FormerLurker Just stop being such an asshole just because you disagree. Learn to let it go. ___FIRE
The problem with those two is that no matter what, come hell or high water, in the face of compelling evidence, neither one of them will EVER, EVER, and I mean EVER admit that they might be wrong or mistaken. They will BOTH hammer away, for MONTHS if need be, no matter how ridiculous their position, no matter how wrong they are, none of that matters. Both of them only care about having the last word, where they delude themselves into thinking they have "won" if people stop posting to them, and that such silence proves they were right all along. Christine , Could you intercede upon our behalf again? I know you talked to us once... I have tried but I can not stand to see Formerlurker here derail thread after thread after thread of GreyLmists with his constant insults and slander and general disruptive attitude. I am unsure of what you could mediate but I have ran out of ideas and I can only think to appeal to you for some assistance. I don't know what kind of assistance you'd be willing to offer outside of mediation... but hell anything at this point would be welcome just to stop seeing him bash on her so much.... ___FIRE
Hey christine, now he wants to censor people from expressing their views on topics he wishes to control. Apparently he feels like he wants moderator status. If you look at this thread and see the flow of comments and what triggered them, it's clear that a ridiculous comment was made and responded to, yet argued over to the point of being absurd. So here comes self appointed 4um moderator titorite, ready to silence any rational feedback, in order to impress GL (who also is one of his "no-plane" allies, where from MY research, the "no-planes movement" IS a disinfo operation designed to divide and conquer the 9/11 Truth movement). I think I was right about titorite all along, and regret I asked you to take down that article I posted concering those observations. This is beyond immature.
___FIRE
BTW slick, this was NOT GreyLmists' thread. GL did not post the article, GL simply dirtied it up with "note the resemblence" between a 15 year old mall shooting survivor and a 27 year old deceased third-grade teacher. It is not your place to silence ANYONE here on this forum, on this thread, OR any other. Who do you think you are? Do you think you can charm people who you feel are important in order for you to personally take over and destroy this forum? It remains out of control in immaturity. I asked of you to quit picking on an lady. That is all. ___FIRE
To you, posting factual rebuttal and common sense is "picking" on someone, yet I don't see you trying to correct those who post wild bullshit, over, and over, and over, and over. Especially when that someone is yourself.
sneeze Kook! ROTFLOL!!!! Hahahaha... Thank you for your chivalrous attempts at intercession on my behalf, sir titorite. Be of good cheer. Am wearing my cyber flack-jacket and helmet to help me grin and bear the barrages by FL. :) I try to look at it like orca whale spray at Seaworld. Bring a cyber-umbrella with you to the audience-section and use it like a shield so you don't get splashed much too, is my advice. Am wondering if you would do us the favor of reducing the size of the pic you posted at #43 by adding height=X width=X at the end of the path for it? -- with X being whatever numbers would keep the thread from widening the screen display of the posts so we don't have to scroll to the right to read them. (Ex: 500 by 400 or whatever) Thanks in advance if you can make that adjustment before the editing timer closes that window of opportunity. ------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
___FIRE
GL, I was simply disagreeing with your assessment of the little 15 year old survivor and the deceased 27 year old third grade teacher. To you, rebuttals utilizing common sense are "barrages" worthy of "cyber flack-jacket and helmet". Well at least you're not as much of a drama queen as titorite, he's got you beat on that by a mile or two. It is not your place to silence ANYONE here on this forum, on this thread, OR any other. Who do you think you are? Do you think you can charm people who you feel are important in order for you to personally take over and destroy this forum? You are correct, FL, that this isn't my thread. It's Itistoolate's thread, who has been kindly tolerant of letting me use it as a workstation for various research topics of concern to me; and maybe even of some concern to others besides you. Neither is it your place to search and destroy where I'm posting by constantly making mountains of brawling posts over things as simple as a 3 word summary-comment (Noting a resemblance) and a single sentence about a video-analysis that I posted as an effort to communicate topically and supportively with you in a netiquettely polite manner. You presume as fact things that I do not -- because that's what was reported, I guess; along with mesmerizing film and pictures in the storylines that you also presume to be factual. I, however, have long been posting (even before arriving here at this forum) about PsyOp/BlackOp pseudo-event aspects and hoaxing possibilites regarding stories du jour to herd America and the world into the directions of villainous agendists. That doesn't mean my postings about it are irrational delusions. It just means that you are not cut out, so to speak, for those fields of study. In closing, it's not as big of a deal to me as it seems to be to you that you aren't ok with my views and research but knock yourself out if you want to be a public nuisance. It's not my duty to restrain your outrageous outbursts but you might give some courteous thought to restraining yourself from ransacking premises here that aren't yours. ------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Thanks much for the downsizing, titorite,. :)
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
The thing is that you seem to believe 100%, based on news reports, that there actually was a little 15 year old survivor and deceased 27 year old third grade teacher and that they are two different people and I am not so convinced of that to a reasonable degree of certainty. As far as I know at this point, the little 15 year old depicted could be a photo of Soto when Soto was 15. Of course I realize that I could be wrong about that and am not really much surprised if you and others don't agree that there's even so much as a familial resemblance between the two. The comparison was posted mostly for consideration as a continuation of the data at Post #13 and my compiled filings here and elsewhere on that subject of PsyOp/BlackOp covert-agent rings of foreign powers moving against our nation. Well at least you're not as much of a drama queen as titorite, he's got you beat on that by a mile or two. No, FL. I really don't mind common sense rebuttals. Welcome them, even, if constructive criticisms. It's a plethora of scathing remarks like, "Are you [expletive deleted] high?" and such that I object to as "barrages" of cyber-shrapnel. I don't agree with your assessment of titorite but do appreciate your kindly (for you) assessment of my exchanges with you on this matter. Hopefully, we can keep it civil henceforth now. Edited for spelling and spacing. ------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
You only need to put width=400 after the quotation mark before the last bracket. You don't need to put height. Works every time. Of course you can adjust that larger or smaller. Edit: width=800 GreyLmist is a chick? Pictures? lol jk Pictures? lol jk lol Nope, no pictures from me and not jk. Not due so much to vanity, mind you, because of being what younger generations could call an over-the-hill chick but more like a precaution against hacker-burglars, I'm sure you'll agree is the prudent thing to do onlinewise. :) ------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
I didn't know that height could be automatically adjusted by width. Thanks for the shortcut tip. ------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Comments (67 - 75) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestNoting a resemblance.
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#27. To: FormerLurker (#26)
(Edited)
The 15 year old girl has different cheek bone structure, different eye color (brown instead of blue) and shape, has a different nasal structure, and appears somewhat heavy, whereas 27 year old teacher Victoria Soto is slim, and is certainly not a 15 year old girl. If you can't tell a 15 year old from a 27 year old, you have a few issues GL. This is the sort of thing which really brings your credibility into question.
#28. To: GreyLmist (#27)
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#29. To: wudidiz (#25)
not the same people GLm
#30. To: FormerLurker (#28)
(Edited)
Are you f'in high? YOU posted the first photo of that girl, but found one which was only of her face rather than one which included her upper torso. Are you saying the girl aged 12 years in 5 days (12/8 mall shooting vs 12/14 school shooting)?
#31. To: FormerLurker, All (#27)
Me to FL: You have no actual proof that the first pic posted, said to be 15 year old Kristina Shevchenko, isn't of Soto at that age, with weight and features altered [through the years] by aging.
#32. To: GreyLmist (#17)
Noting a resemblance.
#33. To: RickyJ (#32)
This might be the time for you to exit stage left. Seriously, if you see a resemblance there then I guess you must think all the videos of Bin-Laden were really him instead of an actor which is apparent to most thinking people.
#34. To: RickyJ (#32)
This might be the time for you to exit stage left. Seriously, if you see a resemblance there then I guess you must think all the videos of Bin-Laden were really him instead of an actor which is apparent to most thinking people.
#35. To: FormerLurker (#28)
#36. To: RickyJ (#32)
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#37. To: titorite (#35)
If you don't like her insight Fuck off and don't bitch about it
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#38. To: FormerLurker (#36)
#39. To: titorite, GreyLmist (#35)
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#40. To: titorite (#38)
What kind of fucked up sick Jollys are you getting off of ripping on the ladies observations?
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#41. To: FormerLurker, titorite, GreyLmist (#39)
f what you write has merit, you'd get discussion, but when you sling outrageous comments against the wall to see if it'll stick, and no matter HOW ridiculous your rants, you stomp your feet like little babies if anyone tells you just how ridiculous your claims are, you not only have some issues, it appears you are TROLLING.
#42. To: FormerLurker (#39)
#43. To: All (#42)
(Edited)
#44. To: titorite, GreyLmist (#42)
#45. To: scrapper2 (#44)
So do you want to ask GreyLmist out or something?
#46. To: titorite (#38)
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#47. To: titorite (#42)
Fucking shit.
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#48. To: titorite (#45)
#49. To: FormerLurker (#47)
I'm trying to decide if this is all an act of yours, or if you're really serious.
#50. To: scrapper2, titorite, GreyLmist (#44)
(Edited)
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#51. To: Christine (#50)
(Edited)
#52. To: christine, titorite, *Black Ops - Psyops* (#51)
(Edited)
Christine , Could you intercede upon our behalf again? I know you talked to us once... I have tried but I can not stand to see Formerlurker here derail thread after thread after thread of GreyLmists with his constant insults and slander and general disruptive attitude.
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#53. To: all (#52)
#54. To: titorite, Itistoolate, tom007, RickyJ, Original_Intent, scrapper2, wudidiz, HOUNDDAWG, Pinguinite, James Deffenbach, Horse, All (#51)
(Edited)
[titorite cries to christine] I have tried but I can not stand to see Formerlurker here derail thread after thread after thread of GreyLmists
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#55. To: all (#54)
#56. To: titorite (#55)
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#57. To: scrapper2 (#41)
Kook!
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#58. To: titorite (#55)
#59. To: GreyLmist (#58)
#60. To: GreyLmist (#58)
Am wearing my cyber flack-jacket and helmet to help me grin and bear the barrages by FL.
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#61. To: FormerLurker, Itistoolate (#54)
BTW slick, this was NOT GreyLmists' thread. GL did not post the article, GL simply dirtied it up with "note the resemblence" between a 15 year old mall shooting survivor and a 27 year old deceased third-grade teacher.
#62. To: titorite (#59)
#63. To: FormerLurker (#60)
(Edited)
GL, I was simply disagreeing with your assessment of the little 15 year old survivor and the deceased 27 year old third grade teacher.
To you, rebuttals utilizing common sense are "barrages" worthy of "cyber flack-jacket and helmet".
#64. To: GreyLmist, titorite (#58)
(Edited)
"For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth, to know the worst, and to provide for it.” ~ Patrick Henry
#65. To: wudidiz (#64)
GreyLmist is a chick?
#66. To: wudidiz (#64)
You only need to put width=400 after the quotation mark before the last bracket. You don't need to put height.
.
.
.