Title: BREAKING NEWS: CT School Shooter Killer Link To LIBOR SCANDAL Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Dec 16, 2012 Author:Atavist Post Date:2012-12-16 01:40:14 by Itistoolate Keywords:None Views:10889 Comments:75
The father of Newtown Connecticut school shooter Adam Lanza is Peter Lanza who is a VP and Tax Director at GE Financial. The father of Aurora Colorado movie theater shooter James Holmes is Robert Holmes, the lead scientist for the credit score company FICO. Both men were to testify before the US Sentate in the ongoing LIBOR scandal. The London Interbank Offered Rate, known as Libor, is the average interest rate at which banks can borrow from each other. 16 international banks have been implicated in this ongoing scandal, accused of rigging contracts worth trillions of dollars. HSBC has already been fined $1.9 billion and three of their low level traders arrested.
BREAKING NEWS: CT School Shooter Killer Link To LIBOR SCANDAL
Was researching the Clackamas/Portland, Oregon Mall shooting and I think this video shows (at the 0:33 seconds mark) the same sort of Century Cinemas sign there as the Colorado shooting:
Noting here that the last names of the two victims reported to have been killed in the recent Clackamas mall shooting are:
Forsyth: sounds like foresight.
Yuille: sounds like Yule/Winter Solstice/Yuletide/Feast of the Nativity of Jesus Christ/Christmas.
NBC report on Clackamas - Yuille's stepson interviewed. Similar to many examples re: Sandy Hook Elementary school in Connecticut, he does not appear traumatized or bereaved. Describes her at 1:19 as "too nice":
Noting here that the last name of this alleged father of a 3rd grade student-survivor at Sandy Hook Elementary school in Connecticut sounds like Judas:
Stephen Delgiudice interview -- obeyed the speed limit during drive to the school; cursing heard on the loudspeaker
The 15 year old girl has different cheek bone structure, different eye color (brown instead of blue) and shape, has a different nasal structure, and appears somewhat heavy, whereas 27 year old teacher Victoria Soto is slim, and is certainly not a 15 year old girl. If you can't tell a 15 year old from a 27 year old, you have a few issues GL. This is the sort of thing which really brings your credibility into question.
The 15 year old girl has different cheek bone structure, different eye color (brown instead of blue) and shape, has a different nasal structure, and appears somewhat heavy, whereas 27 year old teacher Victoria Soto is slim, and is certainly not a 15 year old girl. If you can't tell a 15 year old from a 27 year old, you have a few issues GL. This is the sort of thing which really brings your credibility into question.
Lots of people change their natural eyecolor with contact lenses. Make all the snide insults you want but you're the one bringing your credibility into question by playing dumb about that, even though Soto's eyes don't look blue at all in the middle pic of her that you posted yourself. You have no actual proof that the first pic posted, said to be 15 year old Kristina Shevchenko, isn't of Soto at that age, with weight and features altered by aging. Nor that the photos in question aren't possibly photoshopped to appear as two different people, so as to be convincing enough to official storyliners like you. Photographic morphing technology is not futuristic sci-fi fancy. It exists in the present. Odd that of all the things I've commented on in this thread of more importance -- Connecticut being the State of issuance for Obama's fraudulent Social Security number and Militarized State Police, for examples -- you choose to argue about what I thought I had already explained plainly and reasonably: that I see enough of a resemblance that the females in question could be closely related, if not the same person or photoshop presentations. Did you understand it that time? -- because it happens to be very relevant to the info I posted at #13 above regarding rings of PsyOp/BlackOp covert-agents of foreign powers here, with corroborative examples from 3 MSM news sources (2 here and 1 abroad). That being of serious concern to me doesn't hinge on whether or not you agree or on how low your opinion of me goes.
OMFG GL, give it a break. The chubby little 15 year old who survived the mall shooting in Oregon is not the same person as the slender 27 year old who got shot to death.
If you can't tell the difference between the two, no wonder you see things that aren't there in the 9/11 videos.
You have no actual proof that the first pic posted, said to be 15 year old Kristina Shevchenko, isn't of Soto at that age, with weight and features altered by aging
Are you f'in high? YOU posted the first photo of that girl, but found one which was only of her face rather than one which included her upper torso. Are you saying the girl aged 12 years in 5 days (12/8 mall shooting vs 12/14 school shooting)?
Keep smoking whatever it is you're smoking, soon you'll be accusing Lady Gaga of being the actual Victoria Soto, using Photoshop in images online of her to make herself look different.
Stop telling others to take a break.. If you don't like her insight Fuck off and don't bitch about it.... I don't agree with everything everyone posts and I might even post counter arguments...
But at some point you gotta realize the futility of trying to win an argument through insults.
Just because you disagree with an assessment by someone else doesn't mean you gotta blast the fuck outta them. Try letting it go sometime.
You know, if you two wish to start your own forum with headlines such as "Hillary Clinton is really Bill Clinton's twin brother", go right ahead, but if you post shit like that here, you can both expect people to call you on it.
If neither one of you wish to be critiqued for what you write, try thinking about what you are saying before you hit the post button. Otherwise, anything you write is fair game.
If what you write has merit, you'd get discussion, but when you sling outrageous comments against the wall to see if it'll stick, and no matter HOW ridiculous your rants, you stomp your feet like little babies if anyone tells you just how ridiculous your claims are, you not only have some issues, it appears you are TROLLING.
f what you write has merit, you'd get discussion, but when you sling outrageous comments against the wall to see if it'll stick, and no matter HOW ridiculous your rants, you stomp your feet like little babies if anyone tells you just how ridiculous your claims are, you not only have some issues, it appears you are TROLLING.