4um: Cabal Having Difficulty Telling a Consistent Sandy Hook Story

Published on Dec 17, 2012

At this point, the story was that the 4 handguns were found inside the school. During this juncture, they are still going with the part about how the Bushmaster was left in the trunk of the car the shooter drove there. The AR-15 Bushmaster being found in the trunk of the shooter’s car was the story for the first entire day and most of the day after if not 2 days after (I will have to confirm that, but I think it was 2 days after), before they decided to do something about the fact that their story wasn’t adding up. Especially when the medical examiner came out and said that all the victims suffered rifle wounds. This report of the 4 handguns and rifle being in the trunk of the car is confirmed by SEVERAL Connecticut State and Federal officials. Sounds like the right hand doesn’t know what the left it doing. This is what’s called not being able to get your story straight, and usually indicates deception being used.

Gun Inconsistencies in Sandy Hook School Mass Shooting
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ju_NllT1iDo

LeakSourceNews

Published on Dec 15, 2012

12/15/2012

Original reports were that 3 guns were found at the scene of the Sandy Hook elementary school mass shotting in Newtown, Connecticut.

2 HANDGUNS & 1 ASSAULT RIFLE

Latest reports are that 4 handguns were found inside the school.

Video shows authorities retrieving the assault rifle from the trunk of Lanza’s car outside the school.

But at a press conference today the Medical Examiner said, “All the wounds I know of at this point were cause by the long weapon.” A reporter then clairifed, “So the rifle was the primary weapon?” The Medical Examiner replying, “Yes.”

So the assault rifle found outside the school in the trunk of Lanza’s car was used to kill every single person?

And the 4 handguns found inside the school weren’t used at all?

UPDATE: Was the Sandy Hook Massacre A False Flag Operation? Early Eyewitness Reports From Newton, CT Suggest So

by SGT,

We will continue to follow this story closely because there are just too many unanswered questions, and the “official” version of what happened on Friday at Sandy Hook Elementary continues to shift and change.

There are several easily answered questions the local police and first responders MUST address immediately to help clear things up: 1. What is the name of the man dressed in camouflage pants and a dark jacket who police pulled out of the woods in handcuffs? 2. Where is the man from? 3. What was that man doing near the school and why did he run into the woods? 4. Has the man been cleared of any involvement in this massacre?

This is another equally important fact which has been mostly ignored by the mockingbird media: Here’s the RAW audio exchange between police as the shooting was happening – This is the first responder police radio recording first posted by the Houston Chronicle, then by the NY Post.

At 44 seconds, the police relay a teacher’s report that she saw “two shadows running past the gym”. [Now keep in mind that according to the 'official' story the "lone" shooter has killed himself.] At 55 seconds, the police officer reports a van coming toward him with two occupants, he then says at 1 minute 30 seconds he has them “proned out” (lying on the ground face down). At approximately 2 minutes, they report the New Jersey plates of the van, and the rental car company registration. These two men are in addition to the ONE man dressed in camo pants who the police arrested in the woods near the school. That makes THREE men in addition to the “lone gunman” Adam Lanza. QUESTIONS: WHAT HAPPENED TO THESE MEN? WHO ARE THEY?

John Carter

Also, another major problem with the ‘official’ story is this: According to medical examiner Dr. H. Wayne Carver, “All the victims of the Connecticut elementary school shooting were killed up close by multiple rifle shots.” But how is this possible when ALL early reports claimed that Adam Lanza was found dead in a classroom with two firearms, a Glock and Sig Sauer – another gun, a 223 Bushmaster, was found nearby in a car ?

Conveniently, on Sunday a quick Google search revealed only the new, revisionist version of the rifle’s location: Reports like this one from the Huffington Post now claim that “the rifle was found next to Adam Lanza’s body” — AND that “three other guns have also been recovered, but it was not clear where they were found, an official told AP. They were a Henry repeating rifle, an Enfield rifle and a shotgun”.

QUESTION: Why was it initially reported that the .223 rifle was found in a car? Why has that version of events now changed? As for the ‘additional weapons” now being reported, how could Adam Lanza carry that many weapons? WHERE were those weapons found? Who are those additional weapons registered to?

Why are we staying on top of this tragic story? Two reasons: One, because the establishment wants to use this tragedy to strip American citizens of their Second Amendment right to bear arms which is our last defense against a tyrannical, out-of-control government. And second, because we know from past experience that the ‘official’ version of tragic events like this one falls into place after day one. Early reports which do not support the ‘official’ narrative are cleansed from the media. We saw this with theOklahoma City Federal building bombing, on 9/11, with the Underwear Bomber, and the Aurora, Co Theater shooting, to name just a few.

There are far too many unanswered questions, and far too few adequate answers regarding what actually happened on Friday at Sandy Hook Elementary. sgtreport.com/2012/12/so-many-questions-too-few-answers-was-the-sandy-hook-massacre-an-organzied-false-flag-operation/#more-127150

Christine, can you please inform this individual to stop harrassing me here on the forum?

Cry baby you can grow up , stop throwing tantrums for attention, and use the ignore button.

You have brought nothing new to the table that has not already been brought up in many other threads here.

I'm not the one smearing you across the forum by inserting out of context quotes from you in my tag line.

No you are the one that keeps pinging christine like a little cry baby when we all damn well know she shares the true stance on freedom of speech.

You can put me on ignore anytime you like.... I do not think I will ever put you back on ignore again.

You've chosen to stalk me on this forum by incorporating an out of context quote from me in your tag line.

It's gone beyond a simple disagreement or a heated argument. You've become a forum disruptor, carrying animosity against me in every single post you make on every single thread here on the forum.

You act like a 2 year old throwing a tantrum at a department store, yet you tell ME that I'M the one being a crybaby?

Perhaps an expose on you would be in order for the forum to read in all it's glory.

Lurker, I am not the one pinging Christine begging for someone else to do something for me Gawd could you act like any bigger of a pussy?

Use the fucking ignore button or fuck right off with your whiny lies and petulant bullshit.

Grow up and stop acting like a spoiled little bitch who had his ass spanked in front of everyone. Remove your tagline, and apologize for being such an immature little punk.