See other Editorial Articles
Title: Republican and Democrat Voters Dutifully Wait for their Masters to Order them to Turn in their "Assault" Weapons while Independents and Third Party Voters Wave Their Middle Finger
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Dec 23, 2012
Author: F.A. Hayek Fan
Post Date: 2012-12-23 13:12:04 by F.A. Hayek Fan
Keywords: None
Views: 2105
Comments: 34
It's funny to read the Republicrat slaves on FR, LP, and LF talk shit about not turning in their weapons. These are the same slavish scum who bitch, moan, and whine for two, four, and six years about their party and then dutifully march into the voting booth and vote for them. They are filthy cowards who will march down to the police station and not only turn in their weapons but turn in their neighbors as well.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: F.A. Hayek Fan (#0)
I bet those doing the most talking are those who would cower in fright if push came to shove, assume the position, and give up their weapons like good little serfs. Their Hebrew and neocon masters have neutralized them long ago. They’re all New Yorkers now!
The head serf over there started a thread, about this thread. Some of those who would have gladly turned over their guns to Masshole Mitt the gun grabber, may be less likely to give them to Uncle "Shotgun" Joe. Got a link?
Hayek. Are you afraid to come here and discuss this? Or is it more comfortable under the skirt of christine? Thank you.
While Dr. XXXXX's comment about how it would be unlikely for someone to kill as many people with a broken beer bottle is no doubt true, it is also true that there are other ways for people intent on doing so to commit acts of mass murder. In the first incident recorded of mass murder of school children there were 45 people killed, 37 of them were children. And interestingly enough the killer didn't use a gun, he used explosives. His name was Andrew Kehoe also known as the Bath School Murderer. The date was May 18, 1927. Anyone who wants to know more about it can read it online here: murderpedia.org/male.K/k/kehoe-andrew.htm. Another point that someone needs to make is that many cities in this country are, for all intents and purposes, "gun free zones" but that hasn't stopped anyone from using guns to kill other people. The city of Chicago has very strict gun laws and yet something like 440 school-aged children were killed there in 2011, comparable to TWENTY Sandy Hook shootings. Yet you don't hear much about that on the "news." There are many ways that people kill others and I have yet to hear of even one instance where a gun killed even one person of its own volition. For all those who think it would be a splendid idea to disarm everyone, or everyone except the government (including the military) and the cops, do you think it would be preferable if someone lit a Molotov cocktail and threw it through the windows of a school? And for those who think that "citizens" shouldn't be armed and should instead rely on the police the unfortunate fact is that if someone is intent on killing you, you might not have time to wait for the police to get there. Except for the very rare cases where they happen upon a crime in progress all the police can do is write an incident report after the fact and then investigate it. We don't need yet more laws which violate the second amendment in the name of gun control. We need criminal control and nut control. Throw in a huge dose of Prescription Drug Control there.
“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken Yeah, some of those drugs are bad news, that's for sure.
If Netandyahoo told him to he'd sell his children for sexual favors at his local synagogue or Republican gathering. He'd then high five everyone as they were finishing and call his kids antisemitic traitors for crying. Calling Ron Paul an isolationist is like calling your neighbor a hermit because he doesn't come over and break your window - unknown I WITHDRAW MY CONSENT! I'm worried they will try to enforce a ban of these weapons, not whether I would turn in what I own. I suspect too the shootings could of been orchestrated in some way by those wanting a ban to take place and be complied with peacefully, with no or little resistance. Afraid? LOL! The reason he left this site and began his own was because he was tired of me and others spanking his anti-American ass on a daily basis. There is nothing to be afraid of. Besides that, there's no telling what his America-last ass would do with the personal information of a person who puts America first. I read left-wing Republican forums like FR, LP, and LF in order to laugh at them, make fun of them, and let others know what sort of filthy degenerates they are, not to lower myself by speaking with them. Calling Ron Paul an isolationist is like calling your neighbor a hermit because he doesn't come over and break your window - unknown I WITHDRAW MY CONSENT! Let them try. The minute the jackboots begin knocking down doors and demanding guns is the minute they begin dying. While the Republican and Democrat faithful will answer the door and immediately assume the buns up kneeling position, they are a minority of the population. If even 1% of gun owners fight back, the Republicans and Democrats will be thrown from power. Their police and military will be useless against millions of angry and armed Americans. Calling Ron Paul an isolationist is like calling your neighbor a hermit because he doesn't come over and break your window - unknown I WITHDRAW MY CONSENT! Hey, Mike - Way too funny tag. “The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken Thanks, I always thought Barry and Mitt shoulda made a bet to drive the other one from coast to coast with the loser in a doggy cargo carrier on the roof to dice up the stakes of the election. It would of been funny to see either man dealing with the humiliation and disconfort. ;-) You may be correct. I live by the assumption that the Democrats and Republicans are behind pretty much everything negative that happens in this country and most of the world. Especially when they are the only ones that benefit. They and their followers are evil incarnate. A ban will only be complied with peacefully if it is not retroactive. Calling Ron Paul an isolationist is like calling your neighbor a hermit because he doesn't come over and break your window - unknown I WITHDRAW MY CONSENT! Better they were both chained to the bumper C2C.
“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken hey, Mike. it's been awhile. how are you doing?
that's one of Stone's ploys to get y'all posting over there.
I guess I don't understand, unless for amusement purposes only, why anyone would even go to those other sites. Am I missing something?
Keep your friends close and your enemies closer. Republicans and Democrats are the enemy of those who believe in small government and liberty. It is important to keep an eye on them IMHO. Calling Ron Paul an isolationist is like calling your neighbor a hermit because he doesn't come over and break your window - unknown I WITHDRAW MY CONSENT! It's a big government Republican and Israel-first site. I have no desire to either post there or be associated with the scum that do. Calling Ron Paul an isolationist is like calling your neighbor a hermit because he doesn't come over and break your window - unknown I WITHDRAW MY CONSENT! The hunters at 24hourcampfire and Texas Hunting Forum have been fired up about a potential "ban" of some sort: they're NOT going to comply and they're fully aware of the real purpose behind the 2nd Amendment.
It's funny to read the Republicrat slaves on FR, LP, and LF talk shit about not turning in their weapons.
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#2. To: F.A. Hayek Fan (#0)
#3. To: F.A. Hayek Fan (#0)
LF talk shit
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
#4. To: hondo68 (#3)
"It is the habit of unhappiness to rewrite our lives and from a different beginning come to a different ending. We cling to the past and what it could have been; what we wanted, or thought we wanted, before we were taught by a broken heart that our own good intentions have little effect on the way things are."
D. W. Buffa, Breach of Trust
#5. To: James Deffenbach, F.A. Hayek Fan (#4)
libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=33849
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
#6. To: hondo68 (#5)
"It is the habit of unhappiness to rewrite our lives and from a different beginning come to a different ending. We cling to the past and what it could have been; what we wanted, or thought we wanted, before we were taught by a broken heart that our own good intentions have little effect on the way things are."
D. W. Buffa, Breach of Trust
#7. To: F.A. Hayek Fan (#0)
The following is a letter I wrote just now to one of our little local papers in response to one of their regular columnists.
"It is the habit of unhappiness to rewrite our lives and from a different beginning come to a different ending. We cling to the past and what it could have been; what we wanted, or thought we wanted, before we were taught by a broken heart that our own good intentions have little effect on the way things are."
D. W. Buffa, Breach of Trust
#8. To: James Deffenbach (#7)
#9. To: Lod (#8)
"It is the habit of unhappiness to rewrite our lives and from a different beginning come to a different ending. We cling to the past and what it could have been; what we wanted, or thought we wanted, before we were taught by a broken heart that our own good intentions have little effect on the way things are."
D. W. Buffa, Breach of Trust
#10. To: hondo68 (#3)
Some of those who would have gladly turned over their guns to Masshole Mitt the gun grabber, may be less likely to give them to Uncle "Shotgun" Joe.
Any perceived compliance with unconstitutional “laws” or orders put forth by government employees is NOT recognition of their authority; it is simply the result of carefully calculated submission to an entity exhibiting superior firepower.
#11. To: F.A. Hayek Fan (#0)
#12. To: hondo68 (#5)
Hayek. Are you afraid to come here and discuss this? Or is it more comfortable under the skirt of christine?
Any perceived compliance with unconstitutional “laws” or orders put forth by government employees is NOT recognition of their authority; it is simply the result of carefully calculated submission to an entity exhibiting superior firepower.
#13. To: Ferret (#11)
I'm worried they will try to enforce a ban of these weapons, not whether I would turn in what I own.
Any perceived compliance with unconstitutional “laws” or orders put forth by government employees is NOT recognition of their authority; it is simply the result of carefully calculated submission to an entity exhibiting superior firepower.
#14. To: Ferret (#11)
#15. To: Lod (#14)
(Edited)
#16. To: Ferret (#11)
I suspect too the shootings could of been orchestrated in some way by those wanting a ban to take place and be complied with peacefully, with no or little resistance.
Any perceived compliance with unconstitutional “laws” or orders put forth by government employees is NOT recognition of their authority; it is simply the result of carefully calculated submission to an entity exhibiting superior firepower.
#17. To: Ferret (#15)
#18. To: Ferret (#11)
#19. To: F.A. Hayek Fan, hondo68 (#12)
Hayek. Are you afraid to come here and discuss this? Or is it more comfortable under the skirt of christine?
#20. To: christine (#19)
#21. To: puddin (#20)
I guess I don't understand, unless for amusement purposes only, why anyone would even go to those other sites.
Any perceived compliance with unconstitutional “laws” or orders put forth by government employees is NOT recognition of their authority; it is simply the result of carefully calculated submission to an entity exhibiting superior firepower.
#22. To: christine (#19)
that's one of Stone's ploys to get y'all posting over there.
Any perceived compliance with unconstitutional “laws” or orders put forth by government employees is NOT recognition of their authority; it is simply the result of carefully calculated submission to an entity exhibiting superior firepower.
#23. To: F.A. Hayek Fan (#0)
-Alex Kurtagic
#24. To: X-15 (#23)
Well if they are Republicans or Democrats don't you believe it. The hunters at 24hourcampfire and Texas Hunting Forum have been fired up about a potential "ban" of some sort: they're NOT going to comply and they're fully aware of the real purpose behind the 2nd Amendment.
Calling Ron Paul an isolationist is like calling your neighbor a hermit because he doesn't come over and break your window - unknown
I WITHDRAW MY CONSENT!
Any perceived compliance with unconstitutional “laws” or orders put forth by government employees is NOT recognition of their authority; it is simply the result of carefully calculated submission to an entity exhibiting superior firepower.
#25. To: X-15 (#23)
Thanks - I'll check'em out. The hunters at 24hourcampfire and Texas Hunting Forum have been fired up about a potential "ban" of some sort: they're NOT going to comply and they're fully aware of the real purpose behind the 2nd Amendment.
#26. To: F.A. Hayek Fan (#0)
Why do Australians pour motor oil on their lawns? Australia estimates they had at best 19% compliance with their mandatory buy-back scheme. California estimates about 10% compliance with their Assault Weapons Ban and Registration scheme. In Australia when they passed the Big Ban, there was a run on PVC pipe to the point where it was unavailable for months. If these numbers are common, look out. There won't be any compliance but there will be an uptick in people purchasing metal milling machines.
To lubricate their guns.
A people unwilling to use force, once diplomatic efforts have been exhausted, in order to preserve or obtain their liberty deserves the tyrants that rule over them.
#27. To: mirage (#26)
hi mirage! are you saying that gov of australia banned pvc pipe?
#28. To: christine (#27)
Nope, but Aussies bought so much of it after their Gun Ban went into effect that there was a nationwide shortage down there. With less than 20% compliance with their gun ban ... the pipe was to seal up their guns so they could be buried. The problem is, when you come to the conclusion its time to bury your guns, its actually time to dig them up and start using them. are you saying that gov of australia banned pvc pipe?
A people unwilling to use force, once diplomatic efforts have been exhausted, in order to preserve or obtain their liberty deserves the tyrants that rule over them.
#29. To: FormerLurker (#1)
That's exactly what William Pierce predicted in his futuristic novel, The Turner Diaries. Of course it'll be possible to see where the guns are buried by just following the endless stream of headlights of vehicles heading out to remote areas and national forests. And a flyby in a U2 will record all of the holes being dug without the gun owners ever knowing they are being photographed. Guns buried in PVC tubes 100 miles away may as well be surrendered. They'll be inaccessible when needed, and some who are manacled to the floors of rail cars may wish they had made a stand once they know what's in store for them and their families. The name Karen Wetmore is unknown to most people. Given a choice between her ordeal or dying with your boots on, which would you choose? I bet those doing the most talking are those who would cower in fright if push came to shove, assume the position, and give up their weapons like good little serfs.
#30. To: HOUNDDAWG (#29) (Edited)
Minor correction Dawggie. Edit: Guns buried in PVC tubes Guns buried in PVC tubes 100
miles feet away may as well be surrendered. 100 miles feet away may as well be surrendered.
Mike Flaherty: Yeah, it's been there a long time. I wish I knew which corner.
My Man Godfrey (1936)
On a long enough timeline the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
#31. To: Esso (#30)
Minor correction Dawggie. Edit: Guns buried in PVC tubes Right. Guns buried in PVC tubes 100
miles feet away may as well be surrendered. 100 miles feet away may as well be surrendered.
#32. To: christine (#18)
Doing well, thank you. I haven't been online much lately. But I'm still posting and alive and kicking.
#33. To: Ferret (#32)
hey, I've missed you.
The advantage of exercising every day is so when you die, they'll say, 'Well, he looks good doesn't he?'
#34. To: FormerLurker (#1)
Some of us are learning new skills instead This guy did some amazing work.... I bet those doing the most talking are those who would cower in fright if push came to shove, assume the position, and give up their weapons like good little serfs.
A people unwilling to use force, once diplomatic efforts have been exhausted, in order to preserve or obtain their liberty deserves the tyrants that rule over them.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest