See other Resistance Articles
Title: The Official Story Of The Sandy Hook School Shooting Is Riddled With Holes
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.sandyhookhoax.com/
Published: Dec 31, 2012
Author: .
Post Date: 2012-12-31 11:41:43 by wudidiz
Ping List: *Black Ops - Psyops* Subscribe to *Black Ops - Psyops*
Keywords: None
Views: 17187
Comments: 188
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 115.
#2. To: wudidiz, Itistoolate, noone222 (#0)
This story gets stranger by the day.
Family photo of slain teacher Vicki Soto.
Saw a video on the occult issues that commented on the "oto" part of her last name possibly indicating the O.T.O. initials for Ordo Templi Orientis/Order of the Temple of the East.
Hmmm. Did you know that the name Smith ends with "ith", which could mean "In Thy Hell", and that the first two letters, "Sm", could mean "Sadistic Murderer"?
GreyLmist and Parrot, I do tend to agree with FL's tongue-in-cheek observation. Please note that FL and I rarely agree on anything. While referencing the Occult with friends after knocking back several brewskies might evoke considerable interest in that setting, introducing the Occult to sober people as support for a theory that there's more than meets the eye regarding 9-11, Sandy Hook massacre, etc will tend to throw dust and damage the credibility of your original supposition. Just saying....
scrapper2: GreyLmist and Parrot, I do tend to agree with FL's tongue-in-cheek observation. Please note that FL and I rarely agree on anything. While referencing the Occult with friends after knocking back several brewskies might evoke considerable interest in that setting, introducing the Occult to sober people as support for a theory that there's more than meets the eye regarding 9-11, Sandy Hook massacre, etc will tend to throw dust and damage the credibility of your original supposition. Just saying.... scrapper, if you entered this thread at the point of my one sentence reply at Post #24 on what FL had presented and innocuously dubbed as a family-photo of Vicki Soto, I can understand why you mistakenly got the impression, which you apparently did, that I had "drunkenly" introduced the occult angle here and with no basis. What you've described as FL's "tongue-in-cheek observation" (as if a credible rebuttal to my making overmuch, seemingly, about nothing) is actually a backhanded-strawman swipe from FL -- for no apparent reason that I can fathom other than to cause confusion and conflict over what was, until then, simply a conversationally supportive remark (from my video observations) on the occult angle that FL had enlarged upon here after Newtown's Masonic-org medical care complex was noted at Post #1. Beginning at Post #2, FL presented a 7.5 minute video of Newtown as a major hub of Satanism and then presented the horned hand-gestured Soto family-photo at Post #3, which I made a short comment on 21 posts later. In the meantime, FL had said at Post #6 (as if unaware of the redundant circularity of their opinion) that they were still not convinced the Sandy Hook parents are actors but COULD be Satanists, when their own 7.5 minute video at Post #2 had described Satanists precisely as a network of actors pretending in society that they aren't such. Rather than kick up dust argumentatively by asking FL if they had even watched their own video, I tried to simply show a corroborative example of other investigative research along the very same lines that FL had themself injected into the discussion -- not me or And now, here we are in a mixed up mess at the bottom of FL's slippery slope as if they had nothing at all to do with any of that -- just us other "woo-hoos" or whatever -- and you claiming agreement with FL's sarcastic swing. Please try to not be misused so again for their confrontational manuevers, scrapper. Just sayin' and good luck on that. Edited paragraph 1 + formatting, punctuation and spelling.
What it comes down to GL is that if you see the devil everywhere to the point you see something sinister about a person's name just because it ends with the letters "oto", not only are you grasping at straws, but you are jumping to absurdities which are so far from being meaningful observations as to deserve a "sarcastic swipe" across the head.
It is you who imagines something sinister almost everywhere, to the point of arguing like a control freak "puppetmaster" bent on recklessly smashing input contributions that you deem unapproved -- and for no logical reason, imo, other than to smite in spite. It is you who are grasping at absurdity straws and jumping strangely to transmute accusingly even a benevolent, corroborative comment made conversationally (on a topic you yourself had inserted here) into something warranting enmity and a targeted strike from you. Evidently (and typically again of you), even my short, one sentence comment wasn't really comprehensively read by you but you've misread much into it, as usual. FYI: I'm not the analyst who interpreted the "oto" letters as a possible Satanic signal in the name of a possibly fictitious character or Crisis Actor. I merely relayed, as a gesture of support, an abbreviated summary on their video-assessment of it to you in response to the horned hand-gesture signal-issues that you had presented as a meaningfully relevant observation in this discussion. I'm not clear on why you've arbitrarily drawn the line of meaningful occult observation at your input only but go ahead and stomp and swipe like an agitated ogre over it, if you insist on manifesting so. I'll just laugh at your shows of force.
Just as in your little circle of pals, you are guilty of projecting your own faults onto others, specifically, those who disagree with you and/or call you on your far fetched schemes. To see something sinister in a common name is beyond rational. I doubt you would make those claims to people in real life as they may well view you as certifiably insane. Oh boo hoo hoo, I told you that you were off the deep end because you tried to claim Victoria Soto was satanic JUST BECAUSE the three letters of her name ends with "oto". That I tried to inject a bit of humor rubs you the wrong way, and now I'm all sorts of bad things. Now I should get ready for your fellow gang of misfits to come tell me I'm an asshole, a jerk, and all sorts of other things because I popped your little balloon. You folks are all very quick to pounce on others over perceived wrongs, but cry like little drama queens when someone tries to speak to you as if you were actually adults.
That post was made yesterday, almost 24 hours ago, in response to your whirlwind wardances in-process then over a short, conversational sentence about somebody else's interpretation of the 3 "oto" letters, as well as a 3 word file-summary comment posted by me, "Noting a resemblance". Since then, I thought we had reached an amicable understanding and had hoped, if I replied to your post here on the issues of the boy, Bear, and his family that you would have the presence of mind to remember that prior conflict was over with -- or so I thought but, apparently, I was wrong about you having that much rationality and composure. Oh, well. I think that's your problem, not mine. Edited sentence 1 + for grammar and punctuation.
I just read your comment today, must have missed it yesterday. I don't spend all my time on forums, I have more pressing matters to attend to.
Ok, then. I apologize for the curt reply but would like to suggest a quick check of the posting-date stamp logs before dashing off an unnecessarily overheated message. While I'm here again, am using this time to list some video examples for the record that I've noticed of children and adults outside that day in shirts and no coat/jacket/sweater/sweatshirt -- a number of them even in short sleeve, summery shirts. View at the YouTube sites: At least 27 dead, including 18 children, in Connecticut school shooting - YouTube Connecticut Shooting: Parents React Dec 14th, 2012 Connecticut Shooting Sandy Hook Elementary Teachers' Reactions to Gunshots - ABC News - YouTube US school shooting: Children tell of terror Connecticut Shooting Sandy Hook Elementary Teachers' Reactions to Gunshots - ABC News - YouTube Sandy Hook Massacre Exposed? (With Evidence) 1/2 Edited for video notations, time-stamp markers and sequence order. Also to add this child in no coat pic example not seen in those videos:
Grey, your #62 is a terrific breakdown of the many examples of the
inconsistencies related to Sandy Hook. Take a close look at the picture you
end your post with. It's clearly staged. When one is running from an active
gunman, they run. Now, look at the feet of the female in the blue top. If she's
running she takes the smallest steps I've ever seen, the same applies for all of
them. Also, the cop involved wouldn't be holding hands and running in a line
along with the civilians. I'd think his training would be to place those folks
in front of him (he has a bullet proof vest on for crying out loud) and shield
them as they ran. This pic is a major FAIL.
This is supposed to be a picture of a December night in Connecticut. A body is being moved. I notice that nobody is cold in the winter night air... hell even the dudes coffee doesn't stream... he must have soda water in that cup...
This is supposed to be a picture of a December night in Connecticut. A body is being moved. I notice that nobody is cold in the winter night air... hell even the dudes coffee doesn't stream... he must have soda water in that cup... Good points. The temperature was below freezing there from 7 p.m. on Dec 14 until 10 a.m. on Dec 15 and the nydailynews.com article linked below shows the pic you posted, with the article time stamped Saturday, December 15, 2012, 9:47 AM. Published: Friday, December 14, 2012, 10:51 AM Updated: Saturday, December 15, 2012, 9:47 AM Newtown CT (Fairfield County) Hourly Weather Data For December 14 2012 -- scroll down to about 1/3 of the page for that day's report; Observed at: Danbury Municipal Airport, CT. That weather report is also referenced above at Post #68 in this thread via the link to Post #54 of 4um Title: Sandy Hook Hoax "Medical Examiner" Wayne Carver. This is an excerpted summary by me copied from that thread-posting for the weather conditions on that day: This is a link for the Newtown weather conditions on December 15, 2012. From midnight until the hour of 10 a.m., the temperature there was in the 20s; 26 degrees at midnight, falling steadily to 22 degrees by 5 a.m. where it stayed until 10 a.m. Newtown CT (Fairfield County) Hourly Weather Data For December 15 2012 -- scroll down to about 1/3 of the page for that day's report; Observed at: Danbury Municipal Airport, CT. Edited to shorten sentence 2.
It comes down to this. If you believe that an entire town that has been incorporated since 1711 doesn't really exist, and that the people there don't really exist, just because a few people aren't bundled up with heavy winter jackets in a New England town on a mild day in December where the temperatures at the time were in the 40's, well, believe what you wish to believe. We've been over the weather before GL, and you KNOW that the temperatures were in the 40's at the time those pictures were taken. MOST people have light jackets or sweatshirts on (including some of those kids you claim have "thin shirts" on, where in reality they're wearing an outer shirt over a long sleeve undershirt). One or two people have t-shirts on. I see that often enough when the temps are in that range, and not just in New England. I don't know what pleasure you derive from these gyrations, and I really don't care. But you are apparently obsessed with convincing people this had to have happened in a Hollywood studio, it just couldn't have happened otherwise. And JT, I'm highly surprised you're apparently following the "it was all done in the studio" road, where you actually live or lived in NYC, knowing how the people react to temperatures in that range. Not just that, but don't you think people in that town would say, "hey, that isn't what happened, we don't know those people, that isn't really Newtown", etc.? And IF "they" HAD decided to do this all in a "studio", going through the trouble of gathering all these people into various scenes, don't you think they'd think about what sort of clothes they "should" have been wearing? Seeing this trend of cognitive dissonance amongst those who I thought would know better, hell, I think there's absolutely no hope left for any of us. We have been defeated.
In my opinion, all of this "lookie here, people are wearing this sort of shirt, so it MUST have been done in a studio and none of it is real", is a misdirection ploy designed to accomplish several things; A) Draw attention away from truly serious question such as "where was the rifle found, and was it really the same rifle that shot those people", and "how did Lanza get to the school if it wasn't his car that was found outside the school, but that of a drug dealer". Also, how did the murder weapon (as initially reported) end up in that car if the owner wasn't involved. Oh yeah, what about the person arrested in the woods behind the school, what's the story with that? B) Focus attention on a straw man argument which can easily be knocked down, not only diverting attention away from questions such as those described in A above, but also causing the general public to view any "conspiracy theorists (ie. those who question the official story) as being bat shit crazy. Now go ahead and launch your grenades and fire bombs, if you feel the need.
A) Draw attention away from truly serious question such as "where was the rifle found, and was it really the same rifle that shot those people", and "how did Lanza get to the school if it wasn't his car that was found outside the school, but that of a drug dealer". Also, how did the murder weapon (as initially reported) end up in that car if the owner wasn't involved. Oh yeah, what about the person arrested in the woods behind the school, what's the story with that? The title of this thread is about holes in the official story -- not the only valid questions are yours above except when you want to point out that Newtown is a Satanist hub. Edited for clarity.
GL, do you not think these things out before you proclaim them as viable scenarios? Do you truly believe it possible that the Sandy Hook shooting was all an elaborate hoax televised from a studio location out in the Hollywood hills or something? If not, could you tell us what you are really saying?
If not, could you tell us what you are really saying? I've already explained to you before -- at least once and maybe twice -- that I've never said it was all filmed in a studio so I don't think I need to repeat that for us. I will say that the weather here was in the 40s yesterday afternoon and it was not warm, imo.
So what ARE you trying to accomplish with all these weather reports and pictures of students in sweatshirts, with a few in t-shirts? You ARE trying to say that this was filmed or televised from somewhere other than Newtown, aren't you? Do you think the town of Newtown CT doesn't really exist? Because if it did, don't you think people there would notice if none of this really happened? Incidently, don't you think if there were a school shooting and parents rushed to see if their kid was ok or not, they might not have been thinking about whether or not their child had their jacket on?
At what point do you think parents or someone might have reasonably given a thought to whether or not the children had their jackets on? At the time of the alleged shooting the temperature there was very near freezing until 11 a.m. You and Ricky seem to have a problem with a pictorial record of this. That says more about both of you than it does me.
From Past Weather Conditions for KDXR Tabular Listing: December 14, 2012 - 0:00 through December 15, 2012 - 00:00 EST I really don't care if you think the University of Utah is "in on it". Go find some other official source, ie. National Weather Service data, if you don't like Utah or universities in general. Thing is, most official sources require a subscription and are fee based, at least in terms of historical data. So most if not all of the official data available for free is only available from universities. But again, it's all irrelevant if you consider the fact that the entire town would need to be lying if nothing really happened there at Sandy Hook and if all of those kids and families were actors who staged the entire event at some warmer location, while forgetting that they needed warm clothing if it was supposed to be occuring in a New England town on a winter day. There are MANY real contradictions and aspects of the event which raise serious questions, but the fact a few kids weren't bundled up in winter coats isn't one of them. You are free to believe whatever you want, but if you wish to be taken seriously, perhaps you should spend more time on the serious issues rather than highly improbable scenarios which defy logic and reason.
Before I answer your latest round of stuff, I'm going to test my handy-dandy "Video and Photographic Record + Analyses and Newtown Weather Reports" portable-template that I made in case those references get moved off the page with lots of postings in this subject. That way, I can access the info as needed with a one-click link of this Post # and so can anyone else who wants to check it or transfer it. Ping to notify those whose valuable input is included therein: 4um Title: The Official Story Of The Sandy Hook School Shooting Is Riddled With Holes [video and pictorial record + analyses and weather report postings re: the alleged shooting at Sandy Hook Elem.] Video and pictorial record postings: Video and pictorial analyses + weather reports: Weather reports are referenced as observed at Danbury Municipal Airport, an official weather station nearby. Contact that official weather station and friendlyforecast.com if further verification of that data is needed. Edited for punctuation + paragraph 1.
Perhaps you should take your own advice. The data I posted IS the official data from the National Weather Service, provided by the University of Utah free of charge. Friendlyforecast.com is NOT an official source of National Weather Service data. But like I said, you're squabbling over a non sequitur (ie., the temperature being different by a few degrees at 10 AM doesn't PROVE that all the police, town folks, and news media fabricated this event and filmed it off in some warmer location). Do you seriously think all of this could have been done without anyone in the town coming forward and stating that none of it happened, it was all done somewhere else?
We don't have to go to Utah, home State of the Parker family, for an acceptable report of the weather in Connecticut that day. Danbury Municipal Airport is an official weather station near Newtown. Bridgeport/Igor|Sikorsky Memorial is also an official CT weather station nearby but when I posted that as a source from friendlyforecast.com (thinking at the time that you had objected to NOAA's reference of Danbury Municipal Airport, rather than the timeframe issues), you objected that Bridgeport was too near the coast. You said at Post #25 of Sandy Hook Hoax "Medical Examiner" Wayne Carver: If you enter NEWTOWN CT and December 15 2012, it'll give you the weather for NEWTOWN CT on that day, and confirms that the temperature was 44 degrees with no wind for the time frame of the press conference. Newtown CT (Fairfield County) Hourly Weather Data For December 15 2012 If you've ever been to New England and driven to the coast, you'd know that the weather conditions along the coast are always different than what they are a mere 5 - 10 miles or so inland. It's cooler in the summer and warmer in the winter, and there is almost always a breeze, even if there is no wind at all further inland. When you posted umpteen weather reports from Hartford, which is farther away, as well as sources like timeanddate.com and the terrorist-sounding Weather Underground, that was ok by you. And you posted the friendlyforcast.com link above yourself for Newtown instead of Bridgeport. Now you want to insist that your Utah/BYU site is the best go-to source for Newtown, CT weather reporting but I disagree. Nor do I think I have to squabble with you about it or provide a different source when people can make up their own minds on the issue. However, I did find this demo-graph from weathersource.com titled "Official Weather: Newtown, Connecticut" for station: Danbury Muni Arpt on 12/14/2012 that shows a maximum temperature of 44.0, an average temperature of 31.5 and a minimum temperature of 19.0 rather than hourly reporting stats. On a sidenote, besides the Parker family of Newtown being connected to the Utah region you've directed us to, so is Ryan T. Murphy who is a "native of Newtown, Connecticut" (listed under the Notable people header at that link) and "attended Brigham Young University". "While a student at BYU Murphy served as an assistant to then BYU professor Mack Wilberg" and "has since March 2009 been the associate music director of the Mormon Tabernacle Choir, working with music director Mack Wilberg." On another sidenote (since the alleged Sandy Hook shooting is being used to attack the 2nd Amendment like the Leftist version of the PNAC Neocon's "New Pearl Harbor" invocation soon before 9/11), I was watching a documentary recently about former CIA Director William Colby, iirc, that mentioned the Mormon Tabernacle Choir was being broadcast as Pearl Habor was bombed in December of 1941. It was interesting enough under the aforementioned circumstances, I thought, to make note of it here. Various edits for grammar, punctuation, clarity, readability + additional link and info in next to last paragraph.
Here we are with a looming assault weapons ban, high capacity magazine ban, and outright civil war, triggered by a staged event, and you're here posting thousands of posts about weather reports, trying to convince everyone that nothing at all happened at Sandy Hook, everyone involved were all "actors" filming in a far away location. You're doing a stand up job of diverting people away from the HARD FACTS which if they were honestly looked at and called into question by the media, they'd blow this thing wide open. So, as far as I can tell, YOU and a few of your "pals" here ARE involved with the event in that you are steering people away from REAL questions and ACTUAL facts, causing them to waste their efforts on straw men and red herrings. And oh yes, you have an obsession with trying to discredit my character and honesty, since I've been posting REAL facts and calling into question ACTUAL contradictions with both THIS story AND 9/11.
Ricky J: I feel sorry for people that fall for her lame stuff. She isn't even very good at it. You know, you guys might be on to something. Deflection and over loading with minutiae, not to mention looney theories, which would immediately serve to discredit legitimate concerns about the convenient events that occurred within 6 months of each other @ Aurora and Sandy Hook... Makes one wonder if there's some method to all of this extraneous load of ... Maybe it's not only Shooonra ( so obvious) in 4um's midst - another actively misdirecting discussions to deem this a "kook" site.
Deflection and over loading with minutiae, not to mention looney theories, which would immediately serve to discredit legitimate concerns about the convenient events that occurred within 6 months of each other @ Aurora and Sandy Hook... Makes one wonder if there's some method to all of this extraneous load of ... Maybe it's not only Shooonra ( so obvious) in 4um's midst - another actively misdirecting discussions to deem this a "kook" site. What looney theories? Do you even know what you're talking about?
Do you believe that the Sandy Hook shootings didn't actually occur and that the cops never went to the school, kids never fled the school, and that it was all filmed somewhere other than Newtown CT?
#116. To: FormerLurker (#115)
That is kinda what I believe... I... but what I really wanna know if any of the children that attended the school remember any of the alleged dead.
I believe the parents of the supposed victims are lying actors. I haven't seen any evidence of dead children. Have you?
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#3. To: All (#2)
#24. To: FormerLurker (#3)
Family photo of slain teacher Vicki Soto.
#31. To: GreyLmist (#24)
Saw a video on the occult issues that commented on the "oto" part of her last name possibly indicating the O.T.O. initials for Ordo Templi Orientis/Order of the Temple of the East.
#32. To: GreyLmist, FormerLurker, Parrot on Speed Dial (#31)
Hmmm. Did you know that the name Smith ends with "ith", which could mean "In Thy Hell", and that the first two letters, "Sm", could mean "Sadistic Murderer"?
#40. To: scrapper2, FormerLurker, Parrot on Speed Dial, wudidiz (#32)
(Edited)
FormerLurker: Hmmm. Did you know that the name Smith ends with "ith", which could mean "In Thy Hell", and that the first two letters, "Sm", could mean "Sadistic Murderer"?
Parrot on Speed Dial Parrot with speed dial either; who had offered their insight-confirmations on the occult issue to me and wudidiz and not to dispute FL or go off-topic of what FL had turned attentions to in this subject multiple times.
#42. To: GreyLmist (#40)
#52. To: FormerLurker (#42)
What it comes down to GL is that if you see the devil everywhere to the point you see something sinister about a person's name just because it ends with the letters "oto", not only are you grasping at straws, but you are jumping to absurdities which are so far from being meaningful observations as to deserve a "sarcastic swipe" across the head.
#58. To: GreyLmist, scrapper2 (#52)
(Edited)
It is you who imagines something sinister almost everywhere, to the point of arguing like a control freak "puppetmaster" bent on recklessly smashing input contributions that you deem unapproved
#60. To: FormerLurker (#58)
(Edited)
#61. To: GreyLmist (#60)
#62. To: FormerLurker (#61)
(Edited)
I just read your comment today, must have missed it yesterday. I don't spend all my time on forums, I have more pressing matters to attend to.
At 0:21 children walking in a line with no coat
Girl in no coat and adult female in short sleeve summer shirt at 1:24
Girl in short sleeves at 1:31 and man at 2:06 in white shirt
At 0:44 girl in white shirt
At 2:20 woman in short sleeve summer shirt
At 2:08 female in white shirt
At 2:23 and 2:26 children in short sleeve shirts
At 0:22 boy in green shirt with scarf but no coat; 0:36 girl in white shirt
At 1:10-1:20 several with no coat, including a baby boy in green shirt
Baby in green shirt with no coat at 1:21; also seen in the previous video and the one below
Man in background wearing short sleeve summer shirt at 1:52
At 12:17 shirt sleeves, including baby boy in green shirt 
#65. To: GreyLmist, 4um, *The Pending Gun Grab* (#62)
#66. To: Jethro Tull (#65)
(Edited)
#70. To: titorite (#66)
(Edited)
[Link for posted New York Daily News pic captioned: A victim killed at Sandy Hook Elementary School being transported aftere shooting rampage.]
UPDATED: 26 dead, including 20 kids, in Newtown, Conn., elementary school shooting: Gunman Adam Lanza, 20, kills teacher mom in her Newtown home, drives her car to her school and opened fire before killing self
From midnight until the hour of 11 a.m., temperatures decreased for 8 hours far below the freezing point (from 23 to 21 degrees), then went to very near freezing (34 degrees) for 2 hours until 11 a.m. when it registered at 40 degrees but went no higher in the afternoon than 46 degrees for the 3 hours of 3 p.m. through 5 p.m. -- dropping rapidly from there during the hour of 5 p.m. (approx. sunset) to very near the freezing point again at 6 p.m. (33 degrees) and steadily dropping below freezing therafter to 26 degrees through [Edit to add: the hour of] 11 p.m.; with the winds and humidity impacting the windchill factor, which would make it seem colder than the logged temperatures.
#72. To: GreyLmist, Jethro Tull, All (#70)
#73. To: All (#72)
#75. To: FormerLurker (#73)
(Edited)
a misdirection ploy designed to accomplish several things;
#76. To: GreyLmist (#75)
#78. To: FormerLurker (#76)
Do you truly believe it possible that the Sandy Hook shooting was all an elaborate hoax televised from a studio location out in the Hollywood hills or something?
#80. To: GreyLmist (#78)
I will say that the weather here was in the 40s yesterday afternoon and it was not warm, imo.
#82. To: FormerLurker, RickyJ (#80)
don't you think if there were a school shooting and parents rushed to see if their kid was ok or not, they might not have been thinking about whether or not their child had their jacket on?
#86. To: GreyLmist (#82)
Time(EST) Temperature Dew Wet Bulb Relative Wind Wind Quality Pressure Sea level Altimeter 1500 m Weather Visibility Point Temperature Humidity Speed Direction check pressure Pressure conditions ° F ° F ° F % mph in in in in miles 23:53 26.1 23.0 25.1 88 0 29.74 30.24 30.23 25.23 clear 9.00 22:53 26.1 23.0 25.1 88 0 29.72 30.22 30.21 25.21 clear 9.00 21:53 28.9 24.1 27.3 82 0 29.72 30.22 30.21 25.21 clear 10.00 20:53 27.0 23.0 25.6 85 3 WSW 29.73 30.23 30.22 25.22 clear 10.00 19:53 28.9 24.1 27.3 82 0 29.72 30.22 30.21 25.21 clear 10.00 18:53 30.0 24.1 27.9 78 0 29.70 30.20 30.19 25.19 clear 10.00 17:53 33.1 24.1 29.8 69 0 29.68 30.18 30.17 25.18 clear 10.00 16:53 37.9 23.0 32.4 54 0 29.66 30.16 30.15 25.16 clear 10.00 15:53 46.0 19.9 36.3 35 5 WNW 29.65 30.15 30.14 25.15 clear 10.00 14:53 48.0 21.0 37.6 34 6 W 29.64 30.14 30.13 25.14 clear 10.00 13:53 46.0 23.0 37.0 40 10 W 29.64 30.14 30.13 25.14 clear 10.00 12:53 45.0 24.1 36.8 43 12 WSW 29.66 30.16 30.15 25.16 clear 10.00 11:53 42.1 25.0 35.4 50 9 WSW 29.68 30.18 30.17 25.18 clear 10.00 10:53 39.9 25.0 34.2 55 10 WSW 29.72 30.22 30.21 25.21 clear 10.00 9:53 37.9 24.1 32.8 57 8 WSW 29.74 30.24 30.23 25.23 clear 9.00 8:53 34.0 25.0 30.7 69 7 WSW 29.75 30.25 30.24 25.24 clear 8.00 7:53 21.9 18.0 20.8 84 0 29.75 30.26 30.24 25.24 fog 5.00 6:53 21.0 19.0 20.4 92 0 29.75 30.26 30.25 25.24 clear 7.00 5:53 21.0 18.0 20.1 88 0 29.75 30.27 30.25 25.24 clear 8.00 4:53 21.9 19.0 21.1 88 0 29.76 30.27 30.26 25.25 clear 8.00 3:53 21.9 19.0 21.1 88 0 29.77 30.28 30.27 25.26 clear 7.00 2:53 23.0 19.9 22.1 88 0 29.79 30.30 30.29 25.28 clear 8.00 1:53 23.0 19.9 22.1 88 0 29.80 30.31 30.30 25.29 clear 7.00 0:53 24.1 21.0 23.1 88 0 29.80 30.31 30.30 25.29 clear 7.00 23:53 23.0 21.0 22.4 92 0 29.82 30.33 30.32 25.30 clear 8.00 
University of Utah MesoWestCopyright © 2002- 2012 University of Utah. All Rights Reserved.
For Questions or Comments about this page or MesoWest contact atmos- mesowest@lists.utah.edu
#87. To: FormerLurker, titorite, Jethro Tull (#86)
(Edited)
Post #62; videos and pic posted by GreyLmist
Post #66; pic posted by titorite
Post #67; pics and video posted by GreyLmistLink for Pic #13 at Post #67
Description Edit here to include an additional notation, after the semi-colon, for Pic #13 at Post #67: Man in a purple shirt, woman in a white and blue shirt; + child in background wearing a short sleeve shirt (maybe another shirt with long sleeves) and no coatPost #63; analysis by titorite of pic at the bottom of Post #62
Post #65; analysis by Jethro Tull of pic at the bottom of Post #62
Post #66; analysis by titorite of the pic he posted there
Post #68; Newtown weather report for Dec 14 and summary of those conditions for the day linked by GreyLmist
Post #70; Newtown weather reports for Dec 14 and Dec 15 linked by GreyLmist (with a summary printout of the Dec 14 conditions reported and also a summary of reported conditions from midnight through 10 a.m. on Dec 15) re: analysis of the pic posted by titorite at Post #66
#88. To: GreyLmist (#87)
Weather reports are referenced as observed at Danbury Municipal Airport, an official weather station nearby. Contact that official weather station and friendlyforecast.com if further verification of that data is needed
#96. To: FormerLurker (#88)
(Edited)
The data I posted IS the official data from the National Weather Service, provided by the University of Utah free of charge. Friendlyforecast.com is NOT an official source of National Weather Service data.
why are you trying to misdirect people here with the weather for a location on the coast, whereas the weather for the town of interest can easily be found via the exact same website?
#104. To: GreyLmist (#96)
Various edits for grammar, punctuation, clarity, readability + additional link and info in next to last paragraph.
#107. To: FormerLurker, Ricky J (#104)
FL: Here we are with a looming assault weapons ban, high capacity magazine ban, and outright civil war, triggered by a staged event, and you're here posting thousands of posts about weather reports, trying to convince everyone that nothing at all happened at Sandy Hook, everyone involved were all "actors" filming in a far away location.
#112. To: scrapper2, christine, GreyLmist, titorite, FormerLurker, RickyJ (#107)
You know, you guys might be on to something.
#115. To: wudidiz (#112)
What looney theories?
Replies to Comment # 115. Do you believe that the Sandy Hook shootings didn't actually occur and that the cops never went to the school, kids never fled the school, and that it was all filmed somewhere other than Newtown CT?
#121. To: FormerLurker, *Black Ops - Psyops* (#115)
Do you believe that the Sandy Hook shootings didn't actually occur and that the cops never went to the school, kids never fled the school, and that it was all filmed somewhere other than Newtown CT?
End Trace Mode for Comment # 115.
