#21. To: Itistoolate, titorite, GreyLmist, FormerLurker, RickyJ, randge, Lod, TommyTheMadArtist, AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt, christine, all (#0)
The picture with Obama was taken before the one with Robbie Parker. The Parker one is obviously photoshopped. Only 2 pairs of legs for 3 girls and the one with Obama isn't photoshopped - they took Emily from the Obama picture and pasted it into the Parker picture. This is damning evidence.
.... they took Emily from the Obama picture and pasted it into the Parker picture. ....
Either way, the girl (in the Utah photo) looking directly into the camera, with her hair parted on the right, is not exactly the same image as the girl (in the Obama photo), looking at something below the camera, with her hair parted down the middle.
The Utah photo, with green foliage, was obviously taken at least a few months before the December shooting, and the possibility that one of the younger girls had grown into Emilie's hand-me-downs by the time of the massacre would be entirely credible to any parent. Funny how NOBODY WHO KNEW EMILIE is supporting this conspiracy theory.
I think it's astonishing (and disgusting) how a massacre that took the life of one Jewish boy is being used as into an opportunity for Jew-baiting.
and the possibility that one of the younger girls had grown into Emilie's hand-me-downs by the time of the massacre would be entirely credible to any parent.
Not to this parent of little girls. How much do you think they grow in a couple of months? What evidence do you have that the photos are indeed MONTHS apart? NOne. There is no noticeable growth from one picture to the next. Also, the family photo is a CHRISTMAS PHOTO--so when do you think it was taken? In a matter of WEEKS at most from the date of the massacre.
There is very little difference where the hair is parted from one image to the other. After a bath, the part falls where it falls each day with little girls anyway. Parents know this.
The Utah photo, with green foliage, was obviously taken at least a few months before the December
No, the frickin pine trees actually remain green year round. As with MOST FAMILY PHOTOS IT IS A FRICKIN BACKGROUND, not the natural outdoors anyway. Do you think the natural outdoors also had convenient family seating too? lol