Title: Gun Confiscation - Paul Revere's Ride Source:
YouTube URL Source:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AnkFBVbQvSE Published:Oct 23, 2012 Author:therealTrippleB Post Date:2013-01-14 15:50:19 by GreyLmist Keywords:Gun Confiscation, Sons of Liberty, Paul Revere, Militia Views:211 Comments:10
[5.75 mins.] The history of the birth of our nation, and the corresponding fight for liberty is more relevant than you may have considered.
This is a short visualization of Paul Revere's famous ride. It was shot at Old Sturbridge Village in Sturbridge, MA with an almost entirely volunteer cast and crew.
CAN’T BE REPEALED (GUN CONTROL FORBIDDEN) The Trump Card Enacted by the Congress Further Asserting the Second Amendment as Untouchable The Dick Act of 1902 also known as the Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654, of June 28, 1902 invalidates all so-called gun-control laws. It also divides the militia into three distinct and separate entities.
Paul Revere rode to warn the colonists of the approaching British troops, who were under orders to sieze the colonists arms and powder stores at Lexington and Concord. ;)
"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke
Paul Revere rode to warn the colonists of the approaching British troops, who were under orders to sieze the colonists arms and powder stores at Lexington and Concord. ;)
Yes, and the 1st video speaks of it regarding the understanding that the Sons of Liberty had as to the importance of an early warning system network. Here are some examples of such currently:
Michael Hampton’s brilliant Porcupine 411 service has gotten a big story in today’s Concord Monitor! If you don’t subscribe to Porc 411 and you consider yourself a liberty activist, you’re missing out. Don’t forget that if you can’t subscribe to porc 411′s regular emails or podcast, you can also get the latest messages in text form via Twitter!
Here’s the story (which mentions Keene activism!) from the Concord Monitor’s Annmarie Timmins: [Excerpted]
Michael Hampton’s brilliant Porcupine 411 service has gotten a big story in today’s Concord Monitor! If you don’t subscribe to Porc 411 and you consider yourself a liberty activist, you’re missing out. Don’t forget that if you can’t subscribe to porc 411′s regular emails or podcast, you can also get the latest messages in text form via Twitter!
Here’s the story (which mentions Keene activism!) from the Concord Monitor’s Annmarie Timmins:
Seconds after someone leaves a voice mail at 413-0411, an audio clip of it is sent to the phones or e-mail addresses of the network’s 345 subscribers. The clip is also instantly posted on nh.porcupine411.com. More recently, volunteers have even started sending the gist of the messages out over Twitter.
“It’s really gone beyond my expectations,” said creator Michael Hampton of Manchester. “There are some who call in frequently and some who never call in. I know some (subscribers) who have the number on speed dial just in case.”
Hampton was lured to New Hampshire from Wisconsin a few years ago by the Free State Project, a recruitment effort to bring 20,000 liberty activists to New Hampshire. In 2006, he began Porcupine 411 as a way to connect like-minded souls from across the state.
The name, Porcupine 411, or Porc 411 for short, is a nod to the Free State Project, which uses the porcupine as its mascot.
It is free to subscribe. Hampton, who has experience with phone networks, created the platform and collects just $15 a month for the phone line service. (Two other Porcupine 411 subscribers pick up the tab.)
Ian Freeman of Keene has been a subscriber since the beginning. He likes to know when the police “are going after some peaceful person,” he said. Callers often give hour-by-hour accounts of arrests and police interactions.
Ridley advocates documenting police enforcement of what he calls victimless crimes.
Porcupine 411 is one way to document that interaction, he said, because anyone questioned by the police need only dial the phone number and let the voice mail record the conversation. The network has served Ridley well in other ways, too.
He called the number once looking for a jump start for his car. Fifteen minutes later, someone arrived to help.
Published on Dec 30, 2012 by NotGunNuts [5.75 mins. Set to start at 1:51.]
Comment at the site: The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms, Shall NOT be INFRINGED
Should have noted for clarity at the time of posting that the video above is a good introductory guide, imo, for discussions of that subject and explains that the 2nd Amendment is not to be diminished by interpretations of it. This is an informative link posted in the Description section, along with more info there:
Wanted to post that article here and noticed that the Dick Act of 1902 video [Published on Dec 30, 2012 by NotGunNuts; 5.75 mins. Set here to start at 1:51] is no longer available and shows the message: This video has been removed by the user. So, here are two more sources for it below that start at the beginning. Recommend making copies if concerned about the subject and possible censorship of it:
I've gor an older model 23 channel mobile unit that a tech converted over to 40 channels. He peaked it and tuned it and it can talk quite a ways with my K40 antenna. ;)
"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke
I've gor an older model 23 channel mobile unit that a tech converted over to 40 channels. He peaked it and tuned it and it can talk quite a ways with my K40 antenna. ;)
Glad to hear that. ;)
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
CAN’T BE REPEALED (GUN CONTROL FORBIDDEN) The Trump Card Enacted by the Congress Further Asserting the Second Amendment as Untouchable The Dick Act of 1902 also known as the Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654, of June 28, 1902 invalidates all so-called gun-control laws. It also divides the militia into three distinct and separate entities.
Posted that link and excerpt as an introduction to the 2nd Amendment video-commentary about it by NotGunNuts. More on that topic here in rebuttal and discussion:
The Dick Act of 1902 is a federal law that invalidated all gun-control laws in the U.S. it is also known as the Efficiency of Militia Bill as it divides the militia into distinct and separate entities.
The act authorized, for the first time, the creation of a separate section responsible for National Guard affairs. It made the National Guard as the primary organized reserve force.
The Honorable William Gordon Congressional Record, House, Page 640 - 1917
"Be it enacted that the militia shall consist of every able-bodied male citizen, respective of States, Territories, and the District of Columbia and every able-bodied male of foreign birth who has declared his intention to become a citizen, who is more than 18 and less than 45 years of age, shall be divided into three classes;
============
LAW OF THE LAND
The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for a law which violates the Constitution to be valid. This is succinctly stated as follows:
"All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void. " Marbury vs Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803)
"Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them quot; Miranda vs Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491.
"An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no right; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed." Norton vs Shelby County118 US 425 p.442
"The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and the name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it.
No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it." 16th American Jurisprudence 2d, Section 177 late 2nd, Section 256
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC