[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Resistance See other Resistance Articles Title: Rev Kevin Annett: Historic Federal Lawsuit against Vatican, UK Queen, Big Pharma... Poster Comment: HELP ME OUT please, my friends. I was chatting with my highly intelligent son this evening, when I found that he wasn't familiar with the system wide abuse and murder of indigenous peoples of Canada by the descendants of the discoverers and founders who brought civilization to the "waiting-to-be-baptised-heathens" (My, aren't we the witty one? HD) of the fur bearing and indigenous slave producing territories to our North. You know to whom I refer, the good people of Hudson's Bay Company packing illustrated mail order catalogs and loads of fire water after Leif, who neglected to bring trinkets or honey mead for trade was sent packing with his fellow Viking rapists-explorers-rapists. (I said "rapists" twice? "I like rape." "Okay, sign here.") Anyway, there are two things I'm offering for your interest and input so that I might better solidify and clarify my moral footing on this painful, heart wrenching issue. Rev Kevin Annett is one of the most courageous persons that's ever earned my respect. His meek exterior belies his virtual stature as a hairy chested brute, the likes of which we should all be fortunate enough to meet and join, should the opportunity and motivation ever simultaneously manifest. Here's the first major cognitive dissonance in my progressively crumbling brain: Shortly after he went public with the charges, he was defrocked by his United Church Of Canada. And he's been struggling as a lay dissident since 1996 with no support from "men of conscience in Christ" to bring the case to trial in that time. So tell me, (Danny and any others) assuming that this good man was initially motivated by a strong belief in the words of Our Lord, how can he now believe in the teachings IF the entire structure of his church is eat slap up with soulless demons? To my thinking the moral equivalency OF and proportionality TO his adversaries' crimes over the years and their unconscionable acts while opposing him should warrant a surprise hosing with lamb's blood, or some other projectile material with greater sectional density. I mean, how could they cry foul if Rev. Kevin Annett really caught them with their skivvies down at some church retreat as they discuss the pretty little native girls who were sterilized? ____________________________ "I mean fellas, I didn't want that sexy little fox to drop any little red-headed pups!" "YOU GOT THAT RIGHT, RED!" "Remember the sexy little Branch Davidian whore who quoted Koresh before that congressional committee?? He told her that (she)...'has the kind of pussy that he loves, the kind that hangs on to (his) di--' --'Excuse me for interrupting, Reverend Paterson, but Prime Minister Stephen Harper is on the phone, and he wants to know if he should mention that you're "the first openly gay moderator of our church since it was formed in 1925, and the first in the world to lead a major Christian denomination", his words, Reverend, in your welcome aboard luncheon next Tuesday?" (Whooping and assorted animal mating sounds) "By the way, Red, is she here? I brought my stun gun!" ____________________________________ And the other issue for me is, if I was in the thick of this fight and the case was won, what would I do if Rev. Annett was re-frocked or made Pope, Buddha, or given the keys and convinced to reside in The Forbidden City while his every need was met by The Palace eunuchs and concubines? In other words, could he cleanse away countless crimes against humanity from the inside? (JFK tried that with the parallel CIA govt) And could Rev. Annett ever retake the pulpit without Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip making restitution and returning the kidnapped native peoples they enslaved as servants for the royal household? (Earth to puppy, Earth to puppy, those meds are for emergencies like choking on a bone (ruh roh) so, get out of the drug locker, DAWG....") South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Committee "...effected its mandate through 3 committees: the Amnesty Committee, Reparation and Rehabilitation (R&R) Committee and Human Rights Violations (HRV) Committee"(wiki) none of which would have invited victims to openly testify in detail about being corn holed by the monarchy, or (G_D help us all) exploring under the Queen's Victoria Secrets teddy. (Hey, when she was sweet sixteen, but now?) If it appears that public pressure will force a disposition then this court case in Canada can only end in tragedy. (Move over Karen Silkwood, whereever you are, sweetheart....) Otherwise, it may idle on the docket until all of the principals and victims are dead. But, I'm going to ask you to look past the humor (which borders the badlands of poor taste) and address the issue anyway. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
|
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||