See other 9/11 Articles
Title: POWERFUL: Belgian MP Exposes War on Terror Lie and 9/11 False Flag
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.thedailysheeple.com/powe ... -lie-and-911-false-flag_012013
Published: Jan 26, 2013
Author: .
Post Date: 2013-01-26 20:48:45 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 584
Comments: 34
On January the 17th, 32-year-old Belgium MP Laurent Louis, considered one of the most controversial and demonized national political figures, delivered the most powerful truth ever told in a political arena. First, he explained why he voted against the Belgian support to war in Mali, that it was based on lies and rooted in neo-colonialism. Then he expressed his disgust and wrath against the criminal foreign policies of the Western elite and its submission to foreign financial and interests groups, before scolding his colleagues who voted for interventionist war with “fuck you’s”. Finally, he says that the war on terror is a lie and that 9/11 was a false flag to justify aggressive military action in the Muslim world. Click on the “Captions” icon to get the English subtitles. You won’t be disappointed.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 24.
#1. To: christine, Four (#0)
This is a great 'tube. America is polarized and becoming radicalized. Should a leader bubble up from the political swamp, a man like this, he'd become an instant threat to the RDs. He is capable of blending nationalism with populism, something that is a very strong brew.
I'm reading a book titled "Hitler, Beyond Evil and Tyranny" by RHS Stolfi. This author takes a more logical look at what brought Hitler to power with less focus on whether or not he was an evil man. The author also points towards Hitler's motivations being other than simply power mongering. Hitler did for Germany prior to the all out war what could be done in America absent the greedy bankers, politicians, and corporate thugs. I think Hitler was one bad motherfucker that was willing to take on the world to free his people. I also think it is a shame he wasn't victorious. The times in Germany then remind me of world conditions today. Widespread poverty, austerity, and governments pushing everyone around. Germany was being persecuted through the Versailles Treaty by the same Western Powers that are fucking everyone else today only Germany has now joined them. The political swamp does exist where a "nationalist" leader is likely to bubble up. Thanks for the video, JT.
Along the lines of the book you're reading, you might find these four tubes interesting. IMO Buchanan nails the real origins of WWII and the "Greatest Generation" sheeple who marched into hell for a political lie.
I think Buchannan makes more sense than 99% of the pundits. I watched the vids on youtube and again think he makes perfect sense. Hitler saw the Jew / Communism as the enemy both within and without Germany. Many of the same grievances are being complained of in America today. He viewed Communism as Judeo-communism. I think Hitler was one of those people that are able to make a firm decision based upon reality and then make every effort to complete the necessary task despite what the world might think. If the world today existed without a Jew in it ... would anyone even notice ? Better stated, would the world notice an improvement ?
Mike Rivero has an audio (I think I posted here) talking about real history. I wasn't aware of this before, but he said that Hitler was trying to get rid of the jewish central bankers in Germany and that's the reason he was demonized. I bet you knew that?
I hadn't heard the audio of which you speak, but I've always questioned the mainstream storyline because he was too popular, did too much for the general populace, and appeared to me to be a "real patriot." I figured that he may have used the Central Bankers because of the huge amount of military arms he developed, the autobahn, the scientific research that brought about the V-1 and V-2 rockets. It's also documented that he was getting laundered funds through Prescott Bush and Brown Harriman. However, I don't know that he was getting those funds directly. Then, considering all of the other lies I've been taught it's impossible for me to believe that I was told the truth about Hitler. I'd like to hear the audio you mentioned.
We know this about Hitler, 1) he was a nationalist when both England and America were, or becoming, internationalist in nature. 2) He despised communism and Stalin, while both Churchill and FDR were his ally. 3) FDR referred to him as Uncle Joe, 4) The defeat of Germany was used as the basis of the creation of Israel and the political elevation of the UN. There's enough here for me to say we might have been slipped a biased dose of history regarding him.
TIME MAN OF THE YEAR 1938 Even before I became interested to know the truth about him I felt like much needed to be better explained. His ability to take Germany from the destitution, poverty and hyper-inflation following WWI AND DURING AN INTERNATIONAL DEPRESSION to nearly conquering Europe is of itself fascinating and caused my increased curiosity. He was a verifiable war hero (Silver Cross 1st Class and 2nd Class) that actually wanted to be an artist. His job as a runner / messenger on the front lines was extremely dangerous. He felt like Germany had been sold out by its leadership at the end of WWI and that the reparations required by the Versailles Treaty would keep Germany in a state of enslavement forever. It seems that many biographers put a negative spin on his accomplishments in keeping with the PC mandates of publishers. Hindsight is 20/20 in most instances but not with regard to Hitler. I had never known that he made peace offers continuously and never wanted to war against the western powers of Britain and America. He actually thought they might side with him, but he underestimated the international banker's influence upon political figures.
Thanks - more study needed here.
#25. To: Lod (#24)
Even this article has to admit the accomplishments while trying to discredit Hitler at every opportunity. He not only did these things while garnering the approval of 90 some percent (probably 95) ... and I wouldn't have believed it except that they were ALL IN THE STREETS APPLAUDING HITLER EVERYWHERE and he was riding in a convertible without protection. And to think, as the article admits, Hitler built the most formidable military OF ANY COUNTRY in Europe and possibly the world, during an international DEPRESSION. No, I think Hitler deserves another look, epecially when we see the Kenyan doing the same thing. He's intent upon destroying America / the Constitutional republic against the wishes of the very people that pay taxes and are forced to support the Obama teat suckers (and bankers) that only vote themselves another raise every election. Enough is fucking enuff ... the D.C. plague needs to be completely eliminated. I'm sure the cost will be high ... but we're guilty of resting comfortably on our laurels for far too long.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#2. To: Jethro Tull (#1)
(Edited)
America is polarized and becoming radicalized. Should a leader bubble up from the political swamp, a man like this, he'd become an instant threat to the RDs. He is capable of blending nationalism with populism, something that is a very strong brew.
#4. To: noone222, Lod, 4 (#2)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5BRoEmrCf8
#5. To: Jethro Tull (#4)
#17. To: noone222 (#5)
#19. To: christine (#17)
Hitler was trying to get rid of the jewish central bankers in Germany and that's the reason he was demonized. I bet you knew that?
#20. To: noone222, 4um (#19)
Then, considering all of the other lies I've been taught it's impossible for me to believe that I was told the truth about Hitler.
#22. To: Jethro Tull (#20)
There's enough here for me to say we might have been slipped a biased dose of history regarding him.
#23. To: noone222 (#22)
I had never known that he made peace offers continuously and never wanted to war against the western powers of Britain and America. He actually thought they might side with him, but he underestimated the international banker's influence upon political figures.
#24. To: All (#23)
more on Hitler -
Replies to Comment # 24.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 24.