[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: Texas Public Schools: Still Teaching Creationism
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jan 28, 2013
Author: http://www.motherjones.com/blue-marble/2
Post Date: 2013-01-28 13:36:13 by tom007
Keywords: None
Views: 210
Comments: 21

Texas Public Schools: Still Teaching Creationism

—By Josh Harkinson | Mon Jan. 28, 2013 3:01 AM PST

85

Williac/Flickr

In Texas public schools, children learn that the Bible provides scientific proof that Earth is 6,000 years old, that the origins of racial diversity trace back to a curse placed on Noah's son, and that astronauts have discovered "a day missing in space" that corroborates biblical stories of the sun standing still.

These are some of the findings detailed in Reading, Writing & Religion II, a new report by the Texas Freedom Network that investigates how public schools in the Lone Star State promote religious fundamentalism under the guise of offering academic courses about the Bible. The report, written by Mark Chancey, a professor of religious studies at Southern Methodist University, found that more than half of the state's public-school Bible courses taught students to read the book from a specifically Christian theological perspective—a clear violation of rules governing the seperation of church and state.

Many school districts pushed specific strains of fundamentalism in the classes:

"The Bible is the written word of God," proclaims a slide shown to students in suburban Houston's Klein Independent School District (ISD). Another slide adds: "The Bible is united in content because there is no contradictions [sic] in the writing. The reason for this is because that Bible is written under God's direction and inspiration." A PowerPoint slide in Brenham ISD in Central Texas claims that "Christ's resurrection was an event that occurred in time and space—that is was, in reality, historical and not mythological." (emphasis in original) In North Texas, Prosper ISD promotes the Rapture, claiming in course materials that "the first time the Lord gathered his people back was after the Babylonian captivity. The second time the Lord will gather his people back will be at the end of the age."

Some Bible classes in Texas public school appear to double as "science" classes, circumventing limits placed on teaching creationism. Eastland ISD, a school district outside Fort Worth, shows videos produced by the Creation Evidence Museum, which claims to posess a fossil of a dinosaur footprint atop "a pristine human footprint."

Perhaps the wackiest Bible lesson was the one presented to students at Amarillo ISD titled: "Racial Origins Traced from Noah." A chart presented in the classroom claims that it's possible to identify which of Noah's three sons begat various racial and ethnic groups. Chancey explains:

According to the chart, "Western Europeans" and "Caucasians" descend from Japeth, "African races" and Canaanites from Ham, and "Jews, Semitic people, and Oriental races" from Shem. A test question shows that the chart was taken seriously: "Shem is the father of a) most Germanic races b) the Jewish people c) all African people."

In Texas, public schools have the legal right to offer these kinds of classes—up to a point. In 2007 the state legislature passed a law allowing school districts to offer "elective courses on the Bible's Hebrew Scriptures and New Testament." The Supreme Court long ago ruled that such classes pass constitutional muster, as long as they don't advocate for a specific religious view. As Chancey points out, the state of Texas obviously needs to do a much better job of educating its teachers about what that means. 85

Print Email

Losing Nemo: Great Barrier Reef At Risk From Coal

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: tom007 (#0)

Texas will stick with this until enough of their voters find their kids cannot get into really good colleges.

Shoonra  posted on  2013-01-28   16:50:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Shoonra (#1)

Texas will stick with this until enough of their voters find their kids cannot get into really good colleges.

Texas used to have good colleges, but someone decided it would be better if they indoctrinated students with marxist dogma rather than teaching them anything worthwhile.

Oh, sorry, I didn't mean to offend smug jackasses such as you.

"I am not one of those weak-spirited, sappy Americans who want to be liked by all the people around them. I don’t care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do. The important question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it." - William S Burroughs

Dakmar  posted on  2013-01-28   17:11:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: All (#2)

The leftist's "long march through the institutions" has always resembled a swarm of locust devouring a field of wheat, consuming every last seed, watched over by a scarecrow as if guarding the gates of Grenada.

"I am not one of those weak-spirited, sappy Americans who want to be liked by all the people around them. I don’t care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do. The important question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it." - William S Burroughs

Dakmar  posted on  2013-01-28   17:19:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: tom007 (#0)

In 2007 the state legislature passed a law allowing school districts to offer "elective courses on the Bible's Hebrew Scriptures and New Testament."

Bible studies are ELECTIVE courses in Texas. However, evolution is required to be taught in science courses. If a teacher decides to compare creationism to evolution in a lesson plan that's her/his choice ( as it should be).

This article is sensationalist hokum, trying to stir up the pot.

Frankly I wish media would do some in-depth stories on the pro homosexuality propaganda that is being integrated into CA schools' curriculum starting in Kindergarten ( thank you Gov. Kook Moonbeam Brown). How is this New Age social engineering pap about life style CHOICE scientific in any shape or form? And why are young children being force fed this nonsense against parents' wishes? It isn't even an elective course in CA. like Bible Studies are in Texas.

americanpowerblog.blogspo...lic-schools-to-teach.html

www.lifesitenews.com/news...ating-pro-gay-curriculum/

firstread.nbcnews.com/_ne...is-it-constitutional?lite

snip

So is creationism actually taught in Texas public schools? And is it constitutional?

Clay Robison, a spokesman for the Texas State Teachers Association, the state’s teachers’ union, says, “It is not part of the recognized official state curriculum.”

More definitively, Suzanne Marchman, a spokeswoman for the Texas Education Agency, the state’s version of the Department of Education, tells NBC, the state’s science standards for high-school biology “require students to analyze, evaluate, and critique, scientific explanations.”

And since teachers craft their own lesson plans, “It’s likely that other theories, likely creationism, are being discussed in class" -- whether it's because teachers plan lessons around it, or because students bring it up.

Marchman also explained that there is an elective course on Biblical history. “And so certainly, a teacher could include discussion of creationism in a Bible class,” she said, adding, “The curriculum doesn’t require them to teach [creationism and evolution] side-by-side, but because teachers craft their lesson plan at the local level, it’s a local decision. So the state doesn’t offer up the specifics of what’s required to be taught.”

But is it constitutional?

In fact, if it were true that the state of Texas required its public schools to teach both evolution and creationism, that would almost certainly be unconstitutional.

State officials and school officials, though, said there is no Texas law or state education standard requiring the teaching of both. Instead, again, state-education policy requires students to "analyze, evaluate, and critique" the scientific basis for evolution. Defenders of the governor said he was merely describing what often happens in classrooms, as students discuss the merits of evolution versus creationism.

In 1987, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that requiring the teaching of creationism, or forbidding the teaching of evolution, violates the separation of church and state. The court struck down a Louisiana law that banned teaching evolution unless accompanied by instruction in creationism.

scrapper2  posted on  2013-01-28   18:17:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Shoonra (#1)

Texas will stick with this until enough of their voters find their kids cannot get into really good colleges.

I guess they should go with the Jew curriculum of sodomy, coprophila, child molestation, cowardice, lying, stealing, spying and treason.

"Have Brain, Will Travel

Turtle  posted on  2013-01-28   20:49:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: tom007 (#0)

We have a bucket load of problems, and I personally don't consider this one of them. I sent my kids to private school. They in turn, are sending theirs to public. Whatever. Home schooling seems the best option frankly.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2013-01-28   20:54:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Turtle (#5)

Jew curriculum

You forgot to include the semester on "How to traverse life with a giant hook nose."

Jethro Tull  posted on  2013-01-28   20:58:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Jethro Tull (#6)

I sent my kids to private school. They in turn, are sending theirs to public. Whatever.

My sister did private with my nephew. He had such a classical education - real history, real science, real math, real English literature and he learned how to properly express himself orally as well as in writing. But the tuition cost an arm and a leg. Catholic schools are a bit cheaper but there are long wait lists.

Maybe your children are sending their kids to public schools because it's cheaper and less of a hassle to get in.

scrapper2  posted on  2013-01-28   21:01:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: scrapper2 (#8)

My oldest daughter & her hubby quit the NJ corporate rat race and followed us here in the middle of PA. We spent a bundle for her HS, complete with a semester of study in Europe. She benefited greatly and earned a degree in biology along with an MBA. The options here for her son are more limited and the public school is one of the best in the state so it appears to be the right move. Time will tell as he is only in the 2nd grade.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2013-01-28   21:29:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Jethro Tull (#9)

With public schools, parent ( maybe even grandparents?)volunteers are welcome in elementary. If your daughter or son-in-law have flex time jobs, they should definitely try to volunteer 1 shift a week or every 2 weeks, so they can see what's going on at the school and also so they can project a positive helpful cooperative image to teachers. This might pay dividends to your grandson in the classroom.

One thing my sister learned (the hard way) when she tried out a local public school for my nephew is that boys ( at least in CA) are treated as 2nd class citizens in the class room. Girls get asked all the questions even if their hands are not up. Girls get all the praise even if their work is just ok. Boys if they fidget even innocently are spoken to in not very friendly tones. That's why my nephew ended up going to private school. Your daughter needs to keep a close eye on any signs of favoritism shown by the teacher to girls. Kids see thru that attitude pretty quickly and then they give up showing interest in academics because they don't want to be ignored by the teacher.

scrapper2  posted on  2013-01-28   21:52:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: scrapper2 (#10)

Thanks for these interesting comments scrap. It never occurred to me that gender favoritism was a possibility. I guess I'm not adjusting very well to the propaganda tossed at kids today. I can tell you this, if my wife had her way, Kevin would be in the local Catholic school. He's staying put partially because he's a huge kid - 5'0", 100 pounds and loves basketball and football. Around these parts, that's gold.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2013-01-28   22:46:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Jethro Tull (#11)

It never occurred to me that gender favoritism was a possibility.

It's become a very serious issue. Your daughter and son-in-law need stay on top of what is happening in the classroom with your grandson. That's why keeping a profile through volunteering can give them a way into the school to project a helpful image and also to snoop.

www.cbsnews.com/8301-18560_162-527678.html

"The Gender Gap: Boys Lagging"

snip

Thirty years after the passage of equal opportunity laws, girls are graduating from high school and college and going into professions and businesses in record numbers.

Now, it's the boys who could use a little help in school, where they're falling behind their female counterparts.

And if you think it's just boys from the inner cities, think again. It's happening in all segments of society, in all 50 states. That's why more and more educators are calling for a new national effort to put boys on an equal footing with their sisters. Lesley Stahl reports.

...“Girls outperform boys in elementary school, middle school, high school, and college, and graduate school,” says Dr. Michael Thompson, a school psychologist who writes about the academic problems of boys in his book, "Raising Cain." He says that after decades of special attention, girls are soaring, while boys are stagnating.

...While there are statistically more boy geniuses than girl geniuses, far more boys than girls are found at the very bottom of the academic ranks. School districts from Massachusetts to Minnesota to California report that boys are withdrawing from the life of schools, and girls are taking over.

“Girls are being told, 'Go for it, you can do it. Go for it, you can do it.' They are getting an immense amount of support,” he says. “Boys hear that the way to shine is athletically. And boys get a lot of mixed messages about what it means to be masculine and what it means to be a student. Does being a good student make you a real man? I don't think so… It is not cool.”

Boys are falling further behind girls in reading and writing, and still, there's no public outcry the way there was for girls, and we wanted to find out why.

“All the rhetoric in the gender equity movement is about how schools shortchange girls. There was almost nothing about how we could reach out to boys,” says Christina Hoff Sommers, a former college professor, now at the American Enterprise Institute. She blames the lack of attention to boys' problems on feminists.

“In order to advance girls, they exaggerated how vulnerable girls were, and they understated the needs of boys. They depicted boys as ... the privileged beneficiaries of a patriarchal society that oppresses women, demeans them and trains young men to be sexist, misogynists,” she says.

Sommers targets groups like the AAUW, the American Association of University Women, and feminist scholars. She says they published a blitz of studies and popular books depicting girls in crisis at precisely the moment when statistics showed girls were catching up to boys or moving past them in most academic areas. Sommers says the efforts on behalf of girls turned into what she calls a war against boys.

Sommers calls the AAUW and other similar organizations the "gender bias industry.” Woods disagrees: “Most people understand that gender equity is about making sure that both boys and girls have equal access to educational opportunities.”

Sommers also accuses women teachers of favoring girls over boys. She says they reward classroom behavior that girls find easier, like sitting still, and punish boys for being, well, boys.

“If boys are obstreperous and high-spirited and competitive, which most of them are, this is seen as behavior which is not tolerated. They see that as an expression of a toxic masculinity,” she says.

theboysinitiative.wordpre...ost-underserved-students/

theboysinitiative.wordpre...e-red-boys-and-education/

scrapper2  posted on  2013-01-28   23:17:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: scrapper2, Jethro Tull, 4 (#12)

WildestColts.com make the best horses.

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2013-01-29   6:54:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Dakmar (#2)

indoctrinated students with marxist dogma

funny you say that, because when I was a kid my dad would say that colleges try to turn kids into commies.

"Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28

Artisan  posted on  2013-01-29   10:42:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: scrapper2 (#4)

You can bet that schwarzenegger passed at least some of those pro-homo laws, i remember. he also heavily pushed the first 5, trying to get the kids indoctrinated as young as possible.

"Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28

Artisan  posted on  2013-01-29   10:46:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Artisan (#15)

You can bet that schwarzenegger passed at least some of those pro-homo laws,

No, I read that Schwarzenegger rejected the stuff. Then the kook Dem Party politicians waited until Brown got elected and he signed the worst of the lot. Maybe you are confusing the Governator with Greyout Davis. I read that Davis started the ball rolling passing a few pro homosexual thingies while he was King.

scrapper2  posted on  2013-01-29   11:49:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: scrapper2 (#16)

No. arnold is indeed a perv homo-ist & signed homo laws. i dont have it @ my disposal but will get you a link when i have time. i opposed him from the start ("the only 1 man" according to NBC news) & followed the devil very closely.

"Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28

Artisan  posted on  2013-01-29   12:08:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Artisan (#17)

www.breakingchristiannews.../display_art.html?ID=3083

In September, 2006, Governor Schwarzenegger of California vetoed all three bills that would have pushed pro-homosexual agenda in schools, according to a report by Karen England, Executive Director of Capitol Resource Institute. The measures vetoed by the governor were AB 606 and AB 1056, while SB 1437 was vetoed by Schwarzenegger earlier in September.

Fyi, "SB 1437, would have prohibited teachers, school districts, textbooks and instructional materials from presenting anything that "reflects adversely upon persons" because of their "sexual orientation." The bill also would have prohibited instructional materials containing "sectarian or denominational doctrine or propaganda" regarding homosexuality."

"AB 1056 would establish a "tolerance education pilot program," providing 10 schools $25,000 apiece to implement a tolerance program for students. According to the bill, the programs must address discrimination based on "sexual orientation" as well as "actual or perceived gender."

"AB 606 would require the California Department of Education to adopt an anti-discrimination and anti- harassment policy based on "actual or perceived gender identity" and "sexual orientation." School districts that don't implement the policy would lose state funding."

Also, he vetoed same sex marriage bills 2x, once in 2005 and again in 2007. ( AB 43? sponsored by Assemblyman Mark Leno).)

scrapper2  posted on  2013-01-29   12:52:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: scrapper2 (#18)

he may have vetoed the laws in your story, but he did indeed sign pro homo laws into effect. Maybe you dont live in CA, but i remember it and will find them for you later. If you think hes somehow conservative or anti homo, that is 1000% wrong.

"Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28

Artisan  posted on  2013-01-29   13:01:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: scrapper2 (#18)

ok, i just took half a second & found it. google SCHWARZENEGGER SIGNS PRO HOMO LAW & the first 10,000 results will yield the proper results. As i explained it caused quite a stir here at the time.

"Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28

Artisan  posted on  2013-01-29   13:05:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Artisan (#20)

I looked at some of the articles and there were 2 laws he signed which are not in the same league as what Brown approved with SB 48.

Also I never claimed that Schwartzenegger was a conservative. I said he vetoed the stuff that Brown later signed into a mandated ( required) law for schools - SB 48.

And I have lived in CA all my life, just so you know.

www.massresistance.o rg/do...b/CA_bill_SB48/index.html

snip

California Bill SB48: Would require public schools & textbooks to portray homosexuality and transgenderism in positive light!

Now moving through CA Legislature. The homosexual movement's next step for schools

POSTED: April 6, 2011 Is this the future of American schools? It very well could be. (It's certainly the direction that Obama's "Safe Schools Czar" Kevin Jennings is taking us.)

A bill is moving forward in the California Legislature that would require all public schools - and all textbooks - to actively portray homosexuality and transgenderism / cross-dressing in a positive light. It would also require all of the state's history textbooks to include figures and events in gay history in a positive light.

If passed and signed into law, it would be the most radical law of its kind in the country. Nevertheless, Bill SB48 appears to have widespread support in both houses, being propelled by the powerful homosexual lobby. Last year a similar law was passed but vetoed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. The new governor, Jerry Brown, has indicated he would sign it if it passes this year.

www.califo rniafamilycounc...lbillsovervocalobjections

Arnold Schwarzenegger signed SB 54 and SB 572, both authored by Senator Mark Leno, into law. SB 54 requires California to grant all the privileges and rights of marriage to same-sex marriages performed outside of California prior to the passage of Proposition 8 last year. SB 572 requires the governor to declare every May 22 Harvey Milk Day in California.

scrapper2  posted on  2013-01-29   14:28:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]