Title: The CIA controls Evergreen Air Death Dumps Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Mar 5, 2013 Author:. Post Date:2013-03-05 02:46:43 by wudidiz Ping List:*Bilderberg and NWO Watch*Subscribe to *Bilderberg and NWO Watch* Keywords:None Views:4549 Comments:41
del smith learned the combination pretty quick... i'd gone to college in mcminnville,and evergreen was the typical one-horse helicopter outfit, struggling...
i quit college in 1964, joinged the military for flight training, and by the time i got back from the military, looking for a job flying, evergreen was the big dog in northwest helicopters, and smith already had a sleazy reputation.
the CIA connection didnt start surfacing until quite a bit later...
smith has gone fron a one-helicopter operation to 747 air tankers, torture redition flights and lord knows what else... with a little help from the "friends"
.
he's also an honored contributor to the college i went to, a nice baptist- affiliated school for aspiring minor-league neorthwest aristocrats.
the first job i had after the marine corps was flying rehabbed helicopters (kaman h43a)from marana air park... the outfit i worked for bought the helidopters for dirt and hauled them up to oregon, and fixed them up, cannibalizing maybe two or three to get one good one.
the problem i have with all this "illuminati/bankster/NWO/CFR/bilderburger" fanatics is that they dont try to explain exactly where israel fits into the picture...
is israel gonna pack its bags and disappear into the sunset when it's ordered to do so by the.... whoever?
are the neocons gonna give up their dreams of benevolent global hegemony in favor of the bankers?
are the bankers gonna let israel do its samson option?
.
all this "illuminati/etc/etc" bullshit seems to be, to me at least, mindless carping without being specific enough to figure out the mechanics of the situation.
Did you get the part about legally being a slave since 1913? Or the one about the U.S. not being a government, but a corporation? (responsible only to it's shareholders?) That bit.
Israel? Did he talk about Israel? Who created Israel? Who owns Israel? Who controls Israel?
Knowing the government of the District of Columbia was already “created into a government” and was so formed into a municipal incorporation in 1801 under the District of Columbia Acts, we wonder, [sic], how do you create, or incorporate, for the first time a municipal government that has already been in existence as a municipal corporation for over 70 years? The obvious answer is, “It’s impossible!” There is no way to pass an “Organic Act” when the “Charter Act” is already in place, because the two words (organic and charter) have the same meaning—The First Act. Even Congress cannot change history; though historians can make it appear to change by rewriting it for those unwilling to study the past from the actual records of the past. The records speak for themselves only if we study them.
A common assertion made by those who are unhappy with the declining state of freedom in America is that this can be traced to an 1871 act of Congress that established Washington DC and, at the same time, converted the United States from a constitutional republic to a corporation. [sic] They claim that this Act of 1871 abolished the original constitutional government and created a legal fiction that became financially indebted to and controlled by international bankers. [sic]
My own analysis is different. While it is true that Washington DC was created by the Act of 1871, its territory was limited to the District of Columbia and it was defined as a municipal corporation, which means it was limited to the affairs of city government. Three years later, on June 20, 1874, a new Act was passed by Congress that abolished the original city government and replaced it with a three-man commission, appointed by the President with the consent of the Senate. Its scope as a municipality did not change. A third Act of Congress, dated June 11, 1878, clarified the powers of the Commission but retained all the essential features of the previous Act, especially those that defined the nature of the District of Columbia as a municipal administrative unit. [sic]
Now, to the bigger issue. Even if it were true that Congress in 1871 converted the United States into a corporation (a claim that I do not accept), there would be two questions that must be answered: (1) what would be the practical significance and (2) what can be done about it?
WHAT CAN BE DONE?
The important question is what can be done? Even if it were true that the United States was secretly converted to a corporation in 1871, what can be done about it today? If we don’t have an answer to that question, we are wasting out time. The enemies of freedom must be happy to see us chasing phantom issues because, as long as we do, we are out of the battle. The solution to the loss of our constitutional republic is, not to endlessly debate the meaning of an obscure event in 1871, but to take action today to recapture our government from the collectivists who have subverted it and then set about to restore the republic! That is the mission of Freedom Force.
The biker-speaker in the video reads at 17:09 that the Federal Reserve system is a sovereign power structure separate and distinct from Federal United States government. Before that, he claimed at 12:12 that there is no Federal government because it was dissolved into a corporation and bankruptcy; yet he also goes on to say, too, that the United States Government is suing the State of Arizona.
Nevermind all that dizziness. Corporations -- banker or otherwise -- simply do not have the power to trump the Constitution, nor to abolish our government structure and America's sovereignty. People who see our problems as corporate might mean well but they really have no excuse, then, for not getting busy and reseating all of the gov offices with Constitutionalists that they think were vacated by the supposed incorporation hocus-pocus.
The biker-speaker in the video reads at 17:09 that the Federal Reserve system is a sovereign power structure separate and distinct from Federal United States government. Before that, he claimed at 12:12 that there is no Federal government because it was dissolved into a corporation and bankruptcy; yet he also goes on to say, too, that the United States Government is suing the State of Arizona.
Let’s take the first question: what would be the practical significance of a corporate government versus a constitutional government? In one case, the charter is a corporate charter. In the other case it is a constitution. Both are written documents and both outline the purpose, function, and limitations of the entity they create. The primary difference is that a corporation always is the creation of government, which makes government a higher source with powers assumed to be derived from the people themselves. In the case of the United States, however, this distinction is blurred, because the federal constitution was created by representatives of the colonial governments.
The author, G. Edward Griffin, confused the Constitution there with the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation were created during the Revolutionary War for Independence by representatives of the still colonial governments. The United States Constitution is a Post-Revolutionary War document.