See other History Articles
Title: THE STORY OF THE BUCK ACT
Source:
usa-the-republic.com
URL Source: http://usa-the-republic.com/emergency%20powers/buck%20act.html
Published: Nov 22, 2005
Author: Richard McDonald
Post Date: 2005-11-22 20:15:45 by A K A Stone
Keywords: STORY, BUCK
Views: 57
Comments: 2
In order for you to understand the full import of what is happening, I must explain certain laws to you. When passing new statutes, the Federal government always does everything according to the principles of law. In order for the Federal Government to tax a Citizen of one of the several states, they had to create some sort of contractual nexus. This contractual nexus is the "Social Security Number". In 1935, the federal government instituted Social Security. The Social Security Board then created 10 Social Security "Districts". The combination of these "Districts" resulted in a "Federal area" which covered all the several states like a clear plastic overlay. In 1939, the federal government instituted the "Public Salary Tax Act of 1939". This Act is a municipal law of the District of Columbia for taxing all federal and state government employees and those who live and work in any "Federal area". Now, the government knows that it cannot tax state Citizens who live and work outside the territorial jurisdiction of Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 (1:8:17) or Article 4, Section 3, Clause 2 (4:3:2) in the U.S. Constitution. So, in 1940, Congress passed the "Buck Act", (4 U.S.C.S. Sections 105-113). In Section 110(e), the Act authorized any department of the federal government to create a "Federal area" for imposition of the "Public Salary Tax Act" of 1939. This tax is imposed at 4 U.S.C.S. Sec. 111. The rest of the taxing law is found in the Internal Revenue Code. The Social Security Board had already created a "Federal area" overlay. "4 U.S.C.S. Sec. 110(d). The term "State" includes any Territory or possession of the United States." "4 U.S.C.S. Sec. 110(e). The term "Federal area" means any lands or premises held or acquired by or for the use of the United States or any department, establishment, or agency of the United States; and any Federal area, or any part thereof, which is located within the exterior boundaries of any State, shall be deemed to be a Federal area located within such State." There is no reasonable doubt that the "federal State" is imposing an excise tax under the provisions of 4 U.S.C.S. Section 105, which states in pertinent part: "Sec. 105. State, and so forth, taxation affecting Federal areas; sales or use tax. "(a) No person shall be relieved from liability for payment of, collection of, or accounting for any sales or use tax levied by any State, or by any duly constituted taxing authority therein, having jurisdiction to levy such tax, on the ground that the sale or use, with respect to which such tax is levied, occurred in whole or in part within a Federal area; and such State or taxing authority shall have full jurisdiction and power to levy and collect any such tax in any Federal area within such State to the same extent and with the same effect as though such area was not a Federal area." Irrespective of what the tax is called, if its purpose is to produce revenue, it is an "income tax" or a "receipts tax" under the Buck Act [4 U.S.C.A. Secs. 105-110]. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Calvert, 464 SW 2d. 170 (1971), affd (Tex) 478 SW 2d. 926, cert. den. 409 U.S. 967, 34 L.Ed. 2d. 234, 93 S.Ct. 293. Thus, the obvious question arises: What is a "Federal area"? A "Federal area" is any area designated by any agency, department, or establishment of the federal government. This includes the Social Security areas designated by the Social Security Administration, any public housing area that has federal funding, a home that has a federal bank loan, a road that has federal funding, and almost everything that the federal government touches through any type of aid. Springfield v. Kenny, 104 N.E. 2d 65 (1951 App.). This "Federal area" attaches to anyone who has a Social Security Number or any personal contact with the federal or state governments. Through this mechanism, the federal government usurped the Sovereignty of the People, as well as the Sovereignty of the several states, by creating "Federal areas" within the boundaries of the states under the [purported] authority of Article 4, Section 3, Clause 2 (4:3:2) in the federal Constitution, which states: "2. The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States, and nothing in this Constitution shall be so construed as to prejudice any claims of the United States, or of any particular State." Therefore, all U.S. citizens [i.e. citizens of the District of Columbia] residing in one of the states of the Union, are classified as "property", as franchisees of the federal government, and as an "individual entity". See Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Fox, 298 U.S. 193, 80 L.Ed. 1143, 56 S.Ct. 773. Under the "Buck Act", (4 U.S.C.S. Secs. 105-113), the federal government has created "Federal areas" within the boundaries of all the several states. These areas are similar to any territory that the federal government acquires through purchase, conquest or treaty, thereby imposing federal territorial law upon all people in these "Federal areas". Federal territorial law is evidenced by the Executive Branch's yellow-fringed U.S. flag flying in schools, offices and all courtrooms. You must live on land in one of the states in the Union of states, not in any "Federal State" or "Federal area", nor can you be involved in any activity that would make you subject to "federal laws". You cannot have a valid Social Security Number, a "resident" driver's license, or a motor vehicle registered in your name. You cannot have a "federal" bank account, a Federal Register Account Number relating to Individual persons [SSN], (see Executive Order Number 9397, November 1943), or any other known "contract implied in fact" that would place you within any "Federal area" and thus within the territorial jurisdiction of the municipal laws of Congress. Remember, all Acts of Congress are territorial in nature and only apply within the territorial jurisdiction of Congress. (See American Banana Co. v. United Fruit Co., 213 U.S. 347, 356-357 (1909); U.S. v. Spelar, 338 U.S. 217, 222, 94 L.Ed. 3, 70 S.Ct. 10 (1949); New York Central R.R. Co. v. Chisholm, 268 U.S. 29, 31-32, 69 L.Ed. 828, 45 S.Ct. 402 (1925).) There has been created a fictional "Federal State within a state". See Howard v. Sinking Fund of Louisville, 344 U.S. 624, 73 S.Ct. 465, 476, 97 L.Ed. 617 (1953); Schwartz v. O'Hara TP. School Dist., 100 A. 2d. 621, 625, 375 Pa. 440. (Compare also 31 C.F.R. Parts 51.2 and 52.2, which also identify a fictional State within a state.) This fictional "State" is identified by the use of two-letter abbreviations like "CA", "AZ" and "TX", as distinguished from the authorized abbreviations like "Calif.", "Ariz." and "Tex.", etc. This fictional State also uses ZIP Codes which are within the municipal, exclusive legislative jurisdiction of Congress. This entire scheme was accomplished by passage of the "Buck Act", (4 U.S.C.S. Secs. 105-113), to implement the application of the "Public Salary Tax Act" of 1939 to workers within the private sector. This subjects all private sector workers (who have a Social Security number) to all state and federal laws "within this State", a "fictional Federal area" overlaying the land in California and in all other states in the Union. In California, this is established by California Form 590, Revenue and Taxation. All you have to do is to state that you live in California. This establishes that you do not live in a "Federal area" and that you are exempt from the Public Salary Tax Act of 1939 and also from the California Income Tax for residents who live "in this State". The following definition is used throughout the several states in the application of their municipal laws which require some form of contract for proper application. This definition is also included in all the codes of California, Nevada, Arizona, Utah and New York: "In this State" or "in the State" means within the exterior limits of the State ... and includes all territories within such limits owned or ceded to the United States of America." This definition concurs with the "Buck Act" (supra) which states: "110(d) The term "State" includes any Territory or possession of the United States." "110(e) The term "Federal area" means any lands or premises held or acquired by or for the use of the United States or any department, establishment, or agency of the United States; and any Federal area, or any part thereof, which is located within the exterior boundaries of any State, shall be deemed to be a Federal area located within such State." Do some research. I have given you all the proper directions in which to look for the jurisdictional nexus that places you within the purview of the federal government.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: All (#0)
bump for understanding how we got where we are.
================= "When passing new statutes, the Federal government always does everything according to the principles of law. In order for the Federal Government to tax a Citizen of one of the several states, they had to create some sort of contractual nexus. This contractual nexus is the "Social Security Number". In 1935, the federal government instituted Social Security. The Social Security Board then created 10 Social Security "Districts". The combination of these "Districts" resulted in a "Federal area" which covered all the several states like a clear plastic overlay. In 1939, the federal government instituted the "Public Salary Tax Act of 1939". This Act is a municipal law of the District of Columbia for taxing all federal and state government employees and those who live and work in any "Federal area". Now, the government knows that it cannot tax state Citizens who live and work outside the territorial jurisdiction of Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 (1:8:17) or Article 4, Section 3, Clause 2 (4:3:2) in the U.S. Constitution. So, in 1940, Congress passed the "Buck Act", (4 U.S.C.S. Sections 105-113). In Section 110(e), the Act authorized any department of the federal government to create a "Federal area" for imposition of the "Public Salary Tax Act" of 1939. This tax is imposed at 4 U.S.C.S. Sec. 111. The rest of the taxing law is found in the Internal Revenue Code. The Social Security Board had already created a "Federal area" overlay. "4 U.S.C.S. Sec. 110(d). The term "State" includes any Territory or possession of the United States." "4 U.S.C.S. Sec. 110(e). The term "Federal area" means any lands or premises held or acquired by or for the use of the United States or any department, establishment, or agency of the United States; and any Federal area, or any part thereof, which is located within the exterior boundaries of any State, shall be deemed to be a Federal area located within such State." ...." ".... What is a "Federal area"? A "Federal area" is any area designated by any agency, department, or establishment of the federal government. This includes the Social Security areas designated by the Social Security Administration, any public housing area that has federal funding, a home that has a federal bank loan, a road that has federal funding, and almost everything that the federal government touches through any type of aid. Springfield v. Kenny, 104 N.E. 2d 65 (1951 App.). This "Federal area" attaches to anyone who has a Social Security Number or any personal contact with the federal or state governments. Through this mechanism, the federal government usurped the Sovereignty of the People, as well as the Sovereignty of the several states, by creating "Federal areas" within the boundaries of the states under the [purported] authority of Article 4, Section 3, Clause 2 (4:3:2) in the federal Constitution, which states: "2. The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property [ATKHWDI note: i.e., in true Babylonian Talmudic form, since the UCC we live under is Babylonian (Micah 4:10), "other property" can include "US citizens"] belonging to the United States, and nothing in this Constitution shall be so construed as to prejudice any claims of the United States, or of any particular State." Therefore, all U.S. citizens [i.e. citizens of the District of Columbia] residing in one of the states of the Union, are classified as "property", as franchisees of the federal government, and as an "individual entity". See Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Fox, 298 U.S. 193, 80 L.Ed. 1143, 56 S.Ct. 773. Under the "Buck Act", (4 U.S.C.S. Secs. 105-113), the federal government has created "Federal areas" within the boundaries of all the several states. These areas are similar to any territory that the federal government acquires through purchase, conquest or treaty, thereby imposing federal territorial law upon all people in these "Federal areas". Federal territorial law is evidenced by the Executive Branch's yellow-fringed U.S. flag flying in schools, offices and all courtrooms. You must live on land in one of the states in the Union of states, not in any "Federal State" or "Federal area", nor can you be involved in any activity that would make you subject to "federal laws". You cannot have a valid Social Security Number, a "resident" driver's license, or a motor vehicle registered in your name. You cannot have a "federal" bank account, a Federal Register Account Number relating to Individual persons [SSN], (see Executive Order Number 9397, November 1943), or any other known "contract implied in fact" that would place you within any "Federal area" and thus within the territorial jurisdiction of the municipal laws of Congress. Remember, all Acts of Congress are territorial in nature and only apply within the territorial jurisdiction of Congress. (See American Banana Co. v. United Fruit Co., 213 U.S. 347, 356-357 (1909); U.S. v. Spelar, 338 U.S. 217, 222, 94 L.Ed. 3, 70 S.Ct. 10 (1949); New York Central R.R. Co. v. Chisholm, 268 U.S. 29, 31-32, 69 L.Ed. 828, 45 S.Ct. 402 (1925).) There has been created a fictional "Federal State within a state". See Howard v. Sinking Fund of Louisville, 344 U.S. 624, 73 S.Ct. 465, 476, 97 L.Ed. 617 (1953); Schwartz v. O'Hara TP. School Dist., 100 A. 2d. 621, 625, 375 Pa. 440. (Compare also 31 C.F.R. Parts 51.2 and 52.2, which also identify a fictional State within a state.) This fictional "State" is identified by the use of two-letter abbreviations like "CA", "AZ" and "TX", as distinguished from the authorized abbreviations like "Calif.", "Ariz." and "Tex.", etc. This fictional State also uses ZIP Codes which are within the municipal, exclusive legislative jurisdiction of Congress. This entire scheme was accomplished by passage of the "Buck Act", (4 U.S.C.S. Secs. 105-113), to implement the application of the "Public Salary Tax Act" of 1939 to workers within the private sector. This subjects all private sector workers (who have a Social Security number) to all state and federal laws "within this State", a "fictional Federal area" overlaying the land in California and in all other states in the Union. In California, this is established by California Form 590, Revenue and Taxation. All you have to do is to state that you live in California. This establishes that you do not live in a "Federal area" and that you are exempt from the Public Salary Tax Act of 1939 and also from the California Income Tax for residents who live "in this State". The following definition is used throughout the several states in the application of their municipal laws which require some form of contract for proper application. This definition is also included in all the codes of California, Nevada, Arizona, Utah and New York: "In this State" or "in the State" means within the exterior limits of the State ... and includes all territories within such limits owned or ceded to the United States of America." This definition concurs with the "Buck Act" (supra) which states: "110(d) The term "State" includes any Territory or possession of the United States." "110(e) The term "Federal area" means any lands or premises held or acquired by or for the use of the United States or any department, establishment, or agency of the United States; and any Federal area, or any part thereof, which is located within the exterior boundaries of any State, shall be deemed to be a Federal area located within such State." ....." THE STORY OF THE BUCK ACT http://www.freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=15354&Disp=All&#C1 See: The New World Order Map [Completed in 1941] for the 10 "Districts" on the US "Regional" Map and the corresponding FEMA Districts. I suspect they are all one and the same: http://www.freedom4um.com/cgi-bi...um=72307&Disp=12&Trace=on / Full thread: http://www.freedom4um.com/cgi-bi...ArtNum=72307&Disp=All&#C1 The other point I want to make is what I said some time back about the "illegal" wire-tapping surveillance of US citizens. As one can see from the above Buck Act, anyone residing within the so-called Federal Areas, is the "property" of the "State" [i.e., CorpUSA/Federal Government] to do with what they want. [See the 14th Amendment at http://usa-the-republic.com . See also Children as Human Capital at http://sweetliberty.org .....we are all classified as "Human Resources/Human CAPITAL"]. Anyone residing outside the Federal Areas, i.e., claiming to live in one of the original, i.e., organic Constitutional, i.e., pre-1861 Constitution, States, is living "outside the United States" and subject to surveillance by these Pharisees in suits. That is most likely why they can claim that Bush's wiretapping was not illegal, immoral and unlawful, yes, but not illegal. And let's not forget, CorpUSA declared ALL US citizens Enemies of the "State" in 1933. Conversely, by so doing, Jew CorpUSA publicly declared itself the enemy of Americans, the majority of whom are Christians. I'll say it again. Christian American has been enslaved by the Judeo/Masonic/Jesuit/British-Monarchy/City of London Banksters for 400 years: Gen. 15:13-14/Gal. 3:16-29. This is our "Egypt", which we will be spiritually delivered from. As more than 60 million Americans have discovered the whole fraud, they have stopped paying income tax, which has made Americans the ever-increasing target of CorpUSA et al. The purpose of the inside job known as 911, as we all know, was to enslave America forever within a police state. These antiChrist people pulling the strings fulfill the prophecy that was made of them toward Christian America, God's Mt. Zion [Psalm 2:6]. Isaiah 10:24 "King James Bible Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD of hosts, O my people that dwellest in Zion, be not afraid of the Assyrian: he shall smite thee with a rod, and shall lift up his staff against thee, after the manner of Egypt......." http://bible.cc/isaiah/10-24.htm As in the days of Moses, when Moses delivered the message from God: Let my people go, Pharaoh answered no, and afflicted the people all the more, until Moses began promising a scourge on Egypt [ http://kingjbible.com/exodus/8.htm ]. It would behoove us to understand who we are, where we are, get right with God, and pray He would bring down a scourge on these people to bring them into line: 24 Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD of hosts, O my people that dwellest in Zion, be not afraid of the Assyrian: he shall smite thee with a rod, and shall lift up his staff against thee, after the manner of Egypt. 25 For yet a very little while, and the indignation shall cease, and mine anger in their destruction. 26 And the LORD of hosts shall stir up a scourge for him according to the slaughter of Midian at the rock of Oreb: and as his rod was upon the sea, so shall he lift it up after the manner of Egypt. 27 And it shall come to pass in that day, that his burden shall be taken away from off thy shoulder, and his yoke from off thy neck, and the yoke shall be destroyed because of the anointing. Here's to DELIVERANCE! =================================================== Matthew 23:4 "....American Standard Version Yea, they bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay them on men's shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with their finger......." "...Luke 11:46 But He said, "Woe to you lawyers as well! For you weigh men down with burdens hard to bear, while you yourselves will not even touch the burdens with one of your fingers....." "....Matthew Henry's Concise Commentary 23:1-12 The scribes and Pharisees explained the law of Moses, and enforced obedience to it. They are charged with hypocrisy in religion. We can only judge according to outward appearance; but God searches the heart. They made phylacteries. These were scrolls of paper or parchment, wherein were written four paragraphs of the law, to be worn on their foreheads and left arms, Ex 13:2-10; 13:11-16; De 6:4-9; 11:13-21. They made these phylacteries broad, that they might be thought more zealous for the law than others. God appointed the Jews to make fringes upon their garments, Nu 15:38, to remind them of their being a peculiar people; but the Pharisees made them larger than common, as if they were thereby more religious than others. Pride was the darling, reigning sin of the Pharisees, the sin that most easily beset them, and which our Lord Jesus takes all occasions to speak against. [ For him that is taught in the word to give respect to him that teaches, is commendable; but for him that teaches, to demand it, to be puffed up with it, is sinful. How much is all this against the spirit of Christianity! The consistent disciple of Christ is pained by being put into chief places. But who that looks around on the visible church, would think this was the spirit required? It is plain that some measure of this antichristian spirit prevails in every religious society, and in every one of our hearts......." ================= The Final Battle. The Gospel/Christian America [Micah 4:1-2,Psalm 2:6]/Kingdom of God[Matthew 13:31-32]/ vs. the Talmud/CorpUSA/Kingdom of Satan[tares,leaven Matthew 13:33 - that's interesting 333 is half of 666]. Gospel wins. Exodus 19:4/Isaiah 9:6-7/John 14:3/Ezekiel 17:1-10/John 15:1-2/Matthew 15:13. http://www.cephas-library.com/nw...ts_will_replace_ours.html If Kosovo can declare independence, what's to stop us? President Wilson signed the Federal Reserve Act on December 23, 1913. History proved that on that day, the Constitution ceased to be the governing covenant of the American people, and our liberties were handed over to a small group of international bankers. - Secrets of the Federal Reserve by Eustace Mullins
#2. To: A K A Stone, all (#0)
(Edited)
I'm way behind in my reading, have no idea what's going on in the world [except I just heard about the burning of the US embassy in Serbia in retaliation for Jew Corp USA putting their stamp of approval on the Muslim territory declaring independence from Serbia; obviously the PTB are still stirring up trouble in the world, especially for Christians, a la Rev. 20:9], I ran across something, and just checked to see if the Buck Act had ever been posted here. It was, and while I am still studying it and pondering it [I heard about it years ago, but never studied it], I wanted to draw attention to, add a few comments to, or connect a few dots for some of you to ponder as well. [Then it's back to cleaning up my computer ].......
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest