[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Joe Rogan on Tucker Carlson and Ukraine Aid

Joe Rogan on 62 year-old soldier with one arm, one eye

Jordan Peterson On China's Social Credit Controls

Senator Kennedy Exposes Bad Jusge

Jewish Land Grab

Trump Taps Dr. Marty Makary, Fierce Opponent of COVID Vaccine Mandates, as New FDA Commissioner

Recovering J6 Prisoner James Grant, Tells-All About Bidens J6 Torture Chamber, Needs Immediate Help After Release

AOC: Keeping Men Out Of Womens Bathrooms Is Endangering Women

What Donald Trump Has Said About JFK's Assassination

Horse steals content from Sara Fischer and Sophia Cai and pretends he is the author

Horse steals content from Jonas E. Alexis and claims it as his own.

Trump expected to shake up White House briefing room

Ukrainians have stolen up to half of US aid ex-Polish deputy minister

Gaza doctor raped, tortured to death in Israeli custody, new report reveals

German Lutheran Church Bans AfD Members From Committees, Calls Party 'Anti-Human'

Berlin Teachers Sound Alarm Over Educational Crisis Caused By Multiculturalism

Trump Hosts Secret Global Peace Summit at Mar-a-Lago!

Heat Is Radiating From A Huge Mass Under The Moon

Elon Musk Delivers a Telling Response When Donald Trump Jr. Suggests

FBI recovers funds for victims of scammed banker

Mark Felton: Can Russia Attack Britain?

Notre Dame Apologizes After Telling Hockey Fans Not To Wear Green, Shamrocks, 'Fighting Irish'

Dear Horse, which one of your posts has the Deep State so spun up that's causing 4um to run slow?

Bomb Cyclone Pacific Northwest

Death Certificates Reveal FBI 'Revised' Murder Stats Still Bogus

A $110B bubble on $500M earnings. History warns: Bubbles always burst.

Joy Behar says people like their show because they tell the truth, unlike "dragon believer" Joe Rogan.

Male Passenger Disappointed After Another Flight Ends Without A Stewardess Frantically Asking If Anyone Can Land The Plane

Could the Rapid Growth of AI Boost Gold Demand?

LOOK AT MY ASS!


Religion
See other Religion Articles

Title: Too clever to have children? Oh thank god. Let’s take the selfish c*** DNA out of the gene pool once and for all!
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Mar 6, 2013
Author: Judgy Bitch
Post Date: 2013-03-06 11:02:30 by wudidiz
Ping List: *Humor-Weird News*     Subscribe to *Humor-Weird News*
Keywords: None
Views: 635
Comments: 31

Too clever to have children? Oh thank god. Let’s take the selfish cunt DNA out of the gene pool once and for all! 22 Nov

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2236467/The-women- think-theyre-clever-babies-Theyre-educated-dynamic-careers–believe-motherhood- beneath-them.html

A group of ladies is very busy applauding themselves this morning in the Daily Mail for being too clever to have children.  They’ve sunk all the energy and passion and intelligence they possess into building careers and have absolutely no time for motherhood, which apparently sucks anyways.  You would think they might have a little time to hit the gym, but no, that’s not a priority either, by the looks of it.

The article describes motherhood as boring, a slog, virtual house arrest, intellectually unstimulating and a life of being controlled by someone else.  Goodness!  Well, who would want that?  These ladies interpret their impressions of motherhood not as a character flaw in themselves (I have no maternal instinct- tee hee – says one woman gleefully) but a natural result of their impressive and astonishing intelligence.  They’ve been educated out of reproduction, because you know, only dumb twats who didn’t finish high school could possibly find motherhood fulfilling.

Unsurprisingly, few of these women are able to maintain relationships with adult partners, either.  What?! Men don’t find ball-crushing career ladies appealing?  Who knew?  Of course that’s not down to the ladies being self-absorbed materialists either.  Men are sexist!  Afraid of strong women (because no mother can be strong).  Men are icky and shoes are better!  Babies are even ickier and it is a well known that fact that a closet stuffed with designer clothes and an empty although very posh flat will bring oodles of happiness, particularly later in life.  When all the other 60 year old ladies are enjoying their grandchildren, these super smart women will be… well, who knows, but I’ll bet it will be so much fun!

Marisa Peer offers a bit of a caveat to these brainy go-getters.  “One of the hardest things I have to deal with is women in their 50s who regret not having a baby,’ she says. ‘One of my clients, who had a huge hedge-fund career in the City, woke up one day and realised she hadn’t got anyone to leave this to, that when she died she had no one and it was all a bit pointless.”

Reproduction is and ought to be a conscious choice for every man and woman in a modern society.  Choosing to have a baby is choosing to accept responsibility and obligations that extend far beyond what you personally want right now at this very moment.  Having and nurturing a child is an investment in the future, yours and your child’s.  A child teaches patience, tolerance, love, compassion and kindness.  Life with a child brings the untold wonders of seeing everything again with new eyes.  The world is no longer a place when you and you alone exist.  It is suddenly filled with millions of other people, and having a child will teach you that almost all of us want the same things:  food, warmth, security, safety and world where our children are recognized and valued for who they are and not how many shoes they can stuff in a closet.

For most people, having children is a way of continuing their own unique line of genetic material. Your face, your quirks, your strengths, your weaknesses, your talents and your gifts will combine with your husband’s and together you will create a new person that contains the best of both of you. The ladies in the Daily Mail have no interest in contributing to the human gene pool, and I say THANK GOD! We don’t need more selfish, stupid, superficial women. We have plenty of those already. Let their genes die out and let’s all have a round of applause for women who not only have a maternal instinct, but who are clever enough to pass it along to the next generation.

Ladies who are too clever for babies should not any. Such a shame their own mothers didn’t feel the same way, no?

Lots of love,

JB

(3 images)

Subscribe to *Humor-Weird News*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 27.

#3. To: wudidiz (#0) (Edited)

Reproduction is and ought to be a conscious choice for every man and woman in a modern society. Choosing to have a baby is choosing to accept responsibility and obligations that extend far beyond what you personally want right now at this very moment. Having and nurturing a child is an investment in the future, yours and your child’s. A child teaches patience, tolerance, love, compassion and kindness. Life with a child brings the untold wonders of seeing everything again with new eyes. The world is no longer a place when you and you alone exist. It is suddenly filled with millions of other people, and having a child will teach you that almost all of us want the same things: food, warmth, security, safety and world where our children are recognized and valued for who they are and not how many shoes they can stuff in a closet.

This author is clueless where it comes to raising a family these days. It takes more than love to bring a child in this world. It cost money. Therefore, women in their 20's are delaying childbearing until they have fulfilled their career ambitions. I applaud them for this. In fact, I'm finding out that many women are not even starting to have children until their later 40's. That is when they have a home and a successful husband who also desires to be a parent.

Anybody can start a family but to be a parent is another. Many who start families are not thinking about their children's future at all. Like starting a saving account when they are born so that by the time that child reaches 18, they can go to college so that they have a better future. That is what I would be doing with mine. I would want the very best for them. I guess by society's standards that would classify me as selfish rather than making my social contribution as a "responsible" citizen. However, I don't live by society's standards. I live by my own.

purplerose  posted on  2013-03-06   14:07:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: purplerose (#3)

A woman's fertility starts to go down at 25. Beyond that, good luck having a kid. Other bad things go up beyond that year - autism and Down Syndrome, for example. Women who delay child-bearing are selfish and irresponsible.

Turtle  posted on  2013-03-06   18:03:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Turtle (#6)

Other bad things go up beyond that year - autism and Down Syndrome, for example. Women who delay child-bearing are selfish and irresponsible.

Autism and downs syndrome are caused by the vaccines pumped into our veins. Prior to vaccines, autism and downs syndrome did not exists. Vaccines are known to destroy the DNA and white blood cells which trigger many diseases.

Women who delay child bearing are not selfish and irresponsible because they want to assure that they are able to financially care for the children they would bring in. The ones who bring in children and cannot afford them are the ones who are selfish and irresponsible. I'm talking about the ones who live off the government tit. They don't care about the future of their children. And funny thing about those people who do have children and refer to their kids as a burden should never have had those kids in the first place. Children are not a burden but a blessing. And when you can afford to have them, you make a big difference in society in that you take financial responsibility for their well-being rather than making society pay for them. This means teaching your kid about the birds and bees when they start asking those embarrassing questions. When you lie to those kids, they'll find out the truth on the streets. This shows responsibility on your part rather than relying on a school to teach your kid about the birds and bees where instead of teaching them the facts, the school passes out contraceptives.

purplerose  posted on  2013-03-06   22:44:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: purplerose (#8)

Autism and downs syndrome are caused by the vaccines pumped into our veins.

No, the older a woman is when she has a child, the higher the risk of autism and Down syndrome. To deny that your rationalization hamster has to be madly spinning its wheels. Years ago there was little autism and Down syndrome because women didn't try to have children when they were 35. They had them from 18 to 25. My mother had me at 18 and my sister her first child at 23.

Turtle  posted on  2013-03-06   23:07:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Turtle, purplerose (#9)

I had my kids mid 20s. I knew if I didn't have them before 30, given family history, I would not be able to have them.

farmfriend  posted on  2013-03-07   10:14:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: farmfriend, purplerose (#16)

I had my kids mid 20s. I knew if I didn't have them before 30, given family history, I would not be able to have them.

Women are being lied to. College, screw around with a "career," get married at 30, have kids...

"But it didn't happen the way it was supposed to! Now I'm 50 with no husband, children and home! just a shitty career! And it's men's fault! Now I'm a spinster!"

I've seen this several times, and sometimes I'm the subject of that hate.

Turtle  posted on  2013-03-07   13:35:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: Turtle (#24)

and sometimes I'm the subject of that hate.

LOL I can understand that.

sorry, couldn't resist.

farmfriend  posted on  2013-03-07   19:44:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 27.

#28. To: farmfriend, Turtle (#27)

and sometimes I'm the subject of that hate.

Did you know Turtle was the original saxaphone player for The Coasters until the 1956 court order forced them to segregate?

Dakmar  posted on  2013-03-07 20:01:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 27.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]