[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

An EMP Attack on the U.S. Power Grids and Critical National Infrastructure New York Residents Beg Trump to Come Back, Solve Out-of-Control Illegal Immigration Chicago Teachers Confess They Were told to Give Illegals Passing Grades Am I Racist? Reviewed by a BLACK MAN Ukraine and Israel Following the Same Playbook, But Uncle Sam Doesn't Want to Play "The Diddy indictment is PROTECTING the highest people in power" Ian Carroll The White House just held its first cabinet meeting in almost a year. Guess who was running it. The Democrats' War On America, Part One: What "Saving Our Democracy" Really Means New York's MTA Proposes $65.4 Billion In Upgrades With Cash It Doesn't Have More than 100 killed or missing as Sinaloa Cartel war rages in Mexico New York state reports 1st human case of EEE in nearly a decade Oktoberfest tightens security after a deadly knife attack in western Germany Wild Walrus Just Wanted to Take A Summer Vacation Across Europe [Video] 'Days of democracy are GONE' seethes Neil Oliver as 'JAIL' awaits Brits DARING to speak up Police robot dodges a bullet, teargasses a man, and pins him to the ground during a standoff in Texas Julian Assange EXPOSED Howling mad! Fury as school allows pupil suffering from 'species dysphoria' to identify as a WOLF "I Thank God": Heroic Woman Saves Arkansas Trooper From Attack By Drunk Illegal Alien Taxpayers Left In The Dust On Policy For Trans Inmates In Minnesota Progressive Policy Backfire Turns Liberals Into Gun Owners PURE EVIL: Israel booby-trapped CHILDRENS TOYS with explosives to kill Lebanese children These Are The World's Most Reliable Car Brands Swing State Renters Earn 17% Less Than Needed To Afford A Typical Apartment Fort Wayne man faces charges for keeping over 10 lbs of fentanyl in Airbnb 🚨 Secret Service Announces EMERGENCY LIVE Trump Assassination Press Conference | LIVE Right Now [Livestream in progress] More Political Perverts, Kamala's Cringe-fest On Oprah, And A Great Moment For Trump It's really amazing! Planet chocolate cake eaten by hitting it with a hammer [Slow news day] Bombshell Drops: Israel Was In On It! w/ Ben Swann Cash Jordan: NYC Starts Paying Migrants $4,000 Each... To Leave Shirtless Trump Supporter Puts CNN ‘Reporter’ in Her Place With Awesome Responses

Miscellaneous
See other Miscellaneous Articles

Title: 88 private emails? Really?
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Mar 15, 2013
Author: me
Post Date: 2013-03-15 18:15:18 by F.A. Hayek Fan
Keywords: None
Views: 1064
Comments: 67

I'm gone for a while and come back to 88 e-mails? WTF? Isn't that a bit ridiculous?

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 52.

#15. To: F.A. Hayek Fan (#0)

I'm gone for a while and come back to 88 e-mails? WTF? Isn't that a bit ridiculous?

well crap. I feel left out. or is that lucky? LOL

farmfriend  posted on  2013-03-15   20:50:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

well crap. I feel left out. or is that lucky?

Lucky, Maggie. Lucky.

Esso  posted on  2013-03-15   21:19:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Lucky, Maggie. Lucky.

LOL hey you don't miss what you don't know about. Too busy to deal with that crap anyway.

farmfriend  posted on  2013-03-15   23:36:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Comment removed [cv]

titorite  posted on  2013-03-16   0:55:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

it is certainly not too soon to make a list.

you're gonna make a list, huh?

what are you gonna do to the people on your list?

lead.and.lag  posted on  2013-03-16   17:49:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

it is certainly not too soon to make a list.

you're gonna make a list, huh?

what are you gonna do to the people on your list?

Why are you attributing that quote to me?

I did not write that.

I would not make a list.

I think List making, in this regard, is a bad idea.

Unless one thinks a DA might show leniency for having their job made easy.

titorite  posted on  2013-03-16   18:08:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

where did the quote come from?

lead.and.lag  posted on  2013-03-16   18:13:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

where did the quote come from?

Not to come off sounding like a dick, but you need to pay more attention to the stuff your quoting when you go to quote.

That stuff about list making. I did not write that.... Now you can scroll up to read wake ups words for yourself... but you always had that option. You did not need me to inform you of that nor give you permission.

Just scroll up.

titorite  posted on  2013-03-17   4:18:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Just scroll up.

cant seem to find wakeup's post about making lists

please post the url to wakeup's post about making lists

lead.and.lag  posted on  2013-03-17   4:29:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

cant seem to find wakeup's post about making lists

please post the url to wakeup's post about making lists

Oh shit, egg on my face you can't!

My bad, My apoligies, I am sorry about that.

You can not read wake up words because they are from the 88+ emails .....

Anyways, the shit I put in italics was a quote from another.

I have a mother. She was wise enough to teach me never to commit anything to paper or print that I would not have the whole world read. So yeah.

titorite  posted on  2013-03-17   4:38:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

You can not read wake up words because they are from the 88+ emails .....

Anyways, the shit I put in italics was a quote from another.

When discussing a poster, titorite, the polite thing to do is to ping them. Putting something in the quote section of a public post and attributing it to private e-mail is proof of nothing contextual or actual authorship either. To anyone not privy to an alleged copy, it amounts to hearsay and so there is always the question then that it could be an alteration or entirely fabricated. Anything attributed to someone without their permission being given publicly prior further increases those possibilities. The only things demonstrable from that are issues like breach of trust, impaired judgement -- that sort of thing.

GreyLmist  posted on  2013-03-17   8:43:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

When discussing a poster, titorite, the polite thing to do is to ping them. Putting something in the quote section of a public post and attributing it to private e-mail is proof of nothing contextual or actual authorship either. To anyone not privy to an alleged copy, it amounts to hearsay and so there is always the question then that it could be an alteration or entirely fabricated. Anything attributed to someone without their permission being given publicly prior further increases those possibilities. The only things demonstrable from that are issues like breach of trust, impaired judgement -- that sort of thing.

What I originally quoted in italics was hear say.

Done. I've no problem referring to it as such. That aside-

It is generally accepted here that if you put something in italics and up front that it is a "quote" .

And lead.and.lag has been on my ass like a douche for awhile....and I did ping wake up originally. Along with many others....

And I've no concern for the rest.

titorite  posted on  2013-03-17   9:31:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

What I originally quoted in italics was hear say.

Done. I've no problem referring to it as such.

That aside-

It is generally accepted here that if you put something in italics and up front that it is a "quote" .

I think the accepted protocol is that something italicized in a quote is verfiable in an accessible article, at a site, or in an open forum post -- like that.

I did ping wake up originally. Along with many others....

You might have thought you pinged him in this thread but you didn't. Nor would he even get a ping if spelled like that with a space in his screename. It's one word, all lowercase letters.

GreyLmist  posted on  2013-03-17   10:03:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

So I see....

Edit to add this:... I was just going over this again when I re read post 6....

I look at post 6 and think to myself WTF!?!?! I do just that and what in the heck happened?

titorite  posted on  2013-03-17   10:04:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Edit to add this:... I was just going over this again when I re read post 6....

I look at post 6 and think to myself WTF!?!?! I do just that and what in the heck happened?

My understanding is that proper use of PMs means not pinging people into private group-discussions who prefer not to be so contacted and that moving a private discussion of a topic to a public forum does not mean the session(s) become public property nor that all aspects are suitable for transference. Proper protocol as I see it [from a private to public setting] means to speak for yourself only without speaking of others as involved at all or attributing any words/opinions to someone that they have not posted publicly themselves. Respect the privacy of others and don't presume it's ok to act like a ventriloquist for context or corroboration.

Edited an apostrophe error and to insert the bracketed section.

GreyLmist  posted on  2013-03-17   21:07:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I think PMs were intended to be kind of like email, one on one mostly. The potential to abuse it with "spam" can happen, but it is easy to fix, just block people you don't want to hear from. I block no one, especially since this forum doesn't have many posters. And the more I think about it, the less I think you and titorite are disinfo agents. Disinfo agents would probably not mess with a forum this small, what would be the point? That wasn't always the case though, at one time there was a known disinfo agent on this site who came over from LP, BeAChooser, this forum was more active and had more posters at the time.

RickyJ  posted on  2013-03-17   21:27:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#53. To: RickyJ, GreyLmist (#52)

I think BAC was clearly disinfo, but at least he didn't try to advocate illegal acts in an apparent effort to entrap people, then post their words sent in confidence over a public forum.

I agree with you, I don't think GL is a shill. Wrong on certain things maybe, but I don't think she's here with an agenda to disinform.

FormerLurker  posted on  2013-03-17 21:30:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

And the more I think about it, the less I think you and titorite are disinfo agents.

Thank you. I think your human too.

titorite  posted on  2013-03-17 22:23:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]