[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

BBC Under Fire for CENSORING Gaza Medic Documentary

US is Agreement Incapable

Blow to Israeli Intelligence. taping Israelis in bathrooms

“They have 500 mRNA shots in the pipeline.”

A US federal judge has DENIED Gavin Newsom's request to stop Trump from using the National Guard in Los Angeles.

Have You Noticed That Seismic Activity Has Been Going Nuts All Over The Globe

The Vax was meant to CAUSE cancer.... listen to this - this clip from RFK Jr's site

CNN Immediately Cuts Off Panelist Who Tells the Truth About the LA Riots

Army Secretary declares war on the military industrial complex

Former Israeli PM Threatens U.S. Will Get 'A Re-Run Of 9-11' If It Doesn't Fight Israel's Wars

7 Examples Of The “Mostly Peaceful” Los Angeles Riots Becoming Even More “Peaceful”

Biden Admin and ActBlue Funded Group Behind Abolish ICE Protests in LA

Murderers, rapists, gang members: ICE busts 12 of LA's 'worst' illegal alien criminals amid riots

LA Mayor Karen Bass Threatens Feds: Withdraw From LA Or the Violence Will Escalate –

Woman points gun at police and finds out

EXCLUSIVE: Rep. Ronny Jackson Accuses Biden Doctor Kevin O’Connor Of Sexual Misconduct

WHAT YOU’RE WITNESSING IN LOS ANGELES ISN’T JUST UNREST—IT’S MORAL COLLAPSE

Anna Paulina Luna Exposes the Guy Behind the Anti-ICE Riots

Mike Huckabee Working To Keep Netanyahu in Power

Israeli Military and Israeli-Backed Gang Shoot Aid Seekers in Gaza, Killing 14

Only 68 Building Permits Issued for Pacific Palisades After Wildfires Destroyed 6800 Structures

Violent Rioters Fire Off Exploding Projectiles at Police Horses Use Fireworks and Explosives to Attack Police

ICE Just Shattered Records With One Massive Operation That Has Democrats Fuming

Nolte: Insurrectionist Democrats Plan Another Summer of Blue City-Riots

Violent riots have now been reported in over 30 American cities. Heres a full list:

Mass shooter opened fire at graduation party was an migrant who was busted in LA ICE raids:

Cash Jordan: ICE Raids Home Depot... as California Collapses

Silver Is Finally Soaring: Here's Why

New 4um Interface Coming Soon

Attack of the Dead-2025.


National News
See other National News Articles

Title: All Black People Spend Their Time Smoking Marijuana And Popping Out Babies!
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3fElcADwoJI
Published: Mar 18, 2013
Author: staff
Post Date: 2013-03-18 23:03:40 by Horse
Keywords: None
Views: 1096
Comments: 42


Poster Comment:

This is about a liberal magazine article.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 20.

#2. To: Horse (#0)

The title of this thread is the kind of stuff you'd read in a Critical Reasoning textbook where it doesn't teach you think but instead plants subliminals in the conscious mind. The seeds of disinformation. Such disinformation tactics are the kind used by CIA to sway people to a way of thinking that creates chaos. It starts with a seed. Be wary here. The First Amendment does not protect speech that incites civil violence.

purplerose  posted on  2013-03-18   23:35:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: purplerose (#2)

The First Amendment does not protect speech that incites civil violence.

Where does it say that in the First Amendment?

Turtle  posted on  2013-03-18   23:38:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Turtle (#3) (Edited)

legal-dictionary.thefreed...tive,+or+Offensive+Speech

Read section:

Inciting, Provocative, or Offensive Speech

---------------------------

The incitement of such speech falls under the Fighting Words doctrine which is not protected under the First Amendment. This comment does not pertain to Horse's thread at all but to the woman (named "Anna")from Moscow which the CNN anchorwoman was referring to. I sense that the Moscow lady responsible for the comment may be KGB.

Were I a journalist, I would have asked this "Anna" how long she has been in the U.S. and what is her occupation.

purplerose  posted on  2013-03-19   0:08:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: purplerose (#6)

So what if it is either provocative or offensive. The function of the First Amendment is to protect the right of free speech - any speech regardless of whether we personally find it offensive or provocative. Incitement to riot does not justify or excuse rioting.

Unless the speech we abhor is protected then we do not have FREE speech. The First Amendment does not protect just the speech we agree with.

Original_Intent  posted on  2013-03-19   2:52:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Original_Intent (#7)

Incitement to riot does not justify or excuse rioting.

That makes no sense at all. What triggers incitement to riot is a kind of action or speech that many refer to as "hate speech". Hate speech notice is placed in just about every police department these days. Such notices exists in L.A. police stations. Hate speech is not protected under the First Amendment when it triggers riots on the streets. The offender responsible for such speech should be held accountable for their actions. In this case, it would be "Anna" from Moscow. It is highly possible that Anna is neither a resident of Philadelphia nor is she a U.S. citizen. Or this video is just a sham.

purplerose  posted on  2013-03-19   12:44:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: purplerose (#8)

Hate speech is still speech. It is not an action nor is it a threat or attack on the well being or body of someone else. That does not mean I approve of it, but when government, the law, is allowed to determine what is, and is not, acceptable speech you are no longer free and it opens the door to much mischief. It opens the door to arbitrary determinations that speech which is truthful, but uncomfortable, is forbidden speech. A direct threat of violence etc., is another matter and while someone should not be forbidden to utter such they can be restrained and even sanctioned for making threats, but that is a special case.

Further, hate speech, like pornography, is in the eye/ear of the beholder and not all people are going to to be agreed that any given instance is in fact "hate speech". I frequently disagree with our resident racist pigs but I would not forbid their speaking even though I find it shallow, narrow minded, irrational, and even hateful.

Original_Intent  posted on  2013-03-19   13:01:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Original_Intent (#9) (Edited)

Hate speech is still speech. It is not an action nor is it a threat or attack on the well being or body of someone else.

Hate speech is a verbal attack which may lead to violence. In legal sense, this is called a foreseeable risk injury. The reason why the police put such notice up nearby the front desk where, is because Hate Speech is a foreseeable risk injury that leads to violence to which the police cannot protect you nor can they be sued for somebody else's irresponsible speech because they provided to the public Notice that Hate Speech is not tolerated. The Department of Justice also has this Notice as well. Same with FBI.

purplerose  posted on  2013-03-19   13:14:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: purplerose (#10) (Edited)

Hate speech is a verbal attack which may lead to violence. In legal sense, this is called a foreseeable injury. The reason why the police put such notice up nearby the front desk where, is because Hate Speech is a foreseeable injury that leads to violence to which the police cannot protect you nor can they be sued for somebody else's irresponsible speech because they provided to the public Notice that Hate Speech is not tolerated. The Department of Justice also has this Notice as well. Same with FBI.

It is called by another name as well - creeping totalitarianism. When government is allowed to determine what speech is acceptable and what is not then you are no longer free. You may well wish to be a carefully sheltered slave but I do not.

It is like the famous quote from the English Parliament: I disagree entirely with what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it.

Therein also lies the key point. I do not have to like or dislike something someone else utters. What is sacrosanct in a free society is their right to utter it.

Any determination as to what is acceptable or unacceptable speech is ALWAYS arbitrary.

Original_Intent  posted on  2013-03-19   13:39:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Original_Intent (#13)

I made a correction in my post #10. "In legal sense, this is called a foreseeable injury. The reason why the police put such notice up nearby the front desk where, is because Hate Speech is a foreseeable injury..."

It should read as foreseeable risk injury.

purplerose  posted on  2013-03-19   13:44:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: purplerose (#14) (Edited)

So far, you've cited as authoritative [on the topic of Hate Speech]: Unconstitutional lawsmithing, the Police, the DOJ and the FBI -- all of which assist in subverting the Constitution. Pre-emptive "laws" against speech. "Pre- emptive" War. Where does it stop? Shouldn't we have a law to pre-empt [injury to our republic by any] legislative subversions of our Constitution? I vote Yes.

Edited to include the bracketed sections and for spacing.

GreyLmist  posted on  2013-03-19   14:30:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: GreyLmist (#18)

See my post #12. In L.A. police departments, such Constructive Notice already exist in their departments. I have actually seen such notices posted in there. I do not know about smaller towns especially where it is predominantly white but in the cities, where there exists people from diverse ethnic backgrounds, the job of the police is to keep the peace by posting such notices which are advised by their City Attorneys, Police Commission, and Internal Affairs Department, so as to prevent them from being sued by a civilian's negligent comments which may trigger civil unrest.

purplerose  posted on  2013-03-19   14:40:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: purplerose, GreyLmist (#19)

So, are you then asserting that because someone said something an individual found hateful that, that individual becomes no longer responsible for their actions as an individual? That an act of violence then becomes defensible because the individual ceased being responsible for their actions?

Original_Intent  posted on  2013-03-19   14:49:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 20.

#23. To: Original_Intent (#20) (Edited)

I asserted no such thing. What the Philadelphia DOJ needs to do is find this "Anna" from Moscow ( if you watched and listened carefully to that video) who started this mindless speech and investigate her. I suspect that this Anna is not a U.S. citizen and may be trying to spark a riot. She alone should be held accountable for her words.

purplerose  posted on  2013-03-19 15:06:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 20.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]