[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

10 Supplements That Fight Inflammation

CNN Security Analyst Defends Agents Who Removed Senator Padilla From Kristi Noem Presser

Florida sheriff warns rioters: 'We will kill you graveyard dead'

DEMOCRATS' NIGHTMARE: Viral Video Shows Why They LOST The Election!

Israeli strikes on Iran. Five Waves. Might last 2 weeks?

Images Emerge Of Tehran Destruction After Major Israeli 'Preemptive Attack'

This Is What Happens Next After Israel Bombs Iran’s Nuclear Facilities…

Smartmatic accused of deleting evidence in 27 Billion Fox News Defamation Case Court Docs

White House Fears Iranian Response To An Attack Could Overwhelm Israel's Air Defenses

The Money and Power Behind the Riots: This is No Grass-Roots Movement

D.C. Judge Sides With Trump In Lawsuit Over Control Of Corrupt Foreign Aid Agency

Israel Iran Double Standard

Soros Funneled $8.3M into Leftist Group Trying to Turn Lone Star State Blue

California Democrats Under Fire for Buying Bricks During Protests

ICE Launches Campaign to Crack Down on Marriage Fraud Could Ilhan Omar Finally Face Justice?

Joe Rogan's podcast predicted violent LA riots two years ago leaving viewers stunned

Anti-migrant rioters shouting 'f*** off foreigners!'

Amazing things happen when you actually cut government spending.

25 Vaccine Death Stories To Share In Social Media

The White House just posted this:

US Anticipating Potential Israeli Attack on Iran

Grok Is Using a Far-Left Fact Check website to Smear and Censor Conservative Outlets on X

Over 300 UK Foreign Office staff told to consider resigning if they disagree with government's Gaza policy

Jimmy Dore: Here’s How Israel’s Massacres At Aid Sites Work!

Iran successfully tests missile with 2-ton warhead

Liberal Teachers Union Presidents Rally Behind LA Rioters

Ilhan Omars Daughter Applauds Anti-ICE Riots, Urges Death to Colonial Empire: U.S. and Israel One Oppressor

California Leaders Want United Nations Blue Helmets to Expel Federal Forces from the State

Tulsi Gabbard Warns of “Nuclear Holocaust” in Chilling 3-Minute Plea

LBMA Silver Short Position Now 2nd Largest In History


National News
See other National News Articles

Title: All Black People Spend Their Time Smoking Marijuana And Popping Out Babies!
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3fElcADwoJI
Published: Mar 18, 2013
Author: staff
Post Date: 2013-03-18 23:03:40 by Horse
Keywords: None
Views: 1188
Comments: 42


Poster Comment:

This is about a liberal magazine article.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 37.

#2. To: Horse (#0)

The title of this thread is the kind of stuff you'd read in a Critical Reasoning textbook where it doesn't teach you think but instead plants subliminals in the conscious mind. The seeds of disinformation. Such disinformation tactics are the kind used by CIA to sway people to a way of thinking that creates chaos. It starts with a seed. Be wary here. The First Amendment does not protect speech that incites civil violence.

purplerose  posted on  2013-03-18   23:35:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: purplerose (#2)

The First Amendment does not protect speech that incites civil violence.

Where does it say that in the First Amendment?

Turtle  posted on  2013-03-18   23:38:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Turtle (#3) (Edited)

legal-dictionary.thefreed...tive,+or+Offensive+Speech

Read section:

Inciting, Provocative, or Offensive Speech

---------------------------

The incitement of such speech falls under the Fighting Words doctrine which is not protected under the First Amendment. This comment does not pertain to Horse's thread at all but to the woman (named "Anna")from Moscow which the CNN anchorwoman was referring to. I sense that the Moscow lady responsible for the comment may be KGB.

Were I a journalist, I would have asked this "Anna" how long she has been in the U.S. and what is her occupation.

purplerose  posted on  2013-03-19   0:08:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: purplerose (#6)

So what if it is either provocative or offensive. The function of the First Amendment is to protect the right of free speech - any speech regardless of whether we personally find it offensive or provocative. Incitement to riot does not justify or excuse rioting.

Unless the speech we abhor is protected then we do not have FREE speech. The First Amendment does not protect just the speech we agree with.

Original_Intent  posted on  2013-03-19   2:52:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Original_Intent (#7)

Incitement to riot does not justify or excuse rioting.

That makes no sense at all. What triggers incitement to riot is a kind of action or speech that many refer to as "hate speech". Hate speech notice is placed in just about every police department these days. Such notices exists in L.A. police stations. Hate speech is not protected under the First Amendment when it triggers riots on the streets. The offender responsible for such speech should be held accountable for their actions. In this case, it would be "Anna" from Moscow. It is highly possible that Anna is neither a resident of Philadelphia nor is she a U.S. citizen. Or this video is just a sham.

purplerose  posted on  2013-03-19   12:44:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: purplerose (#8)

Hate speech is still speech. It is not an action nor is it a threat or attack on the well being or body of someone else. That does not mean I approve of it, but when government, the law, is allowed to determine what is, and is not, acceptable speech you are no longer free and it opens the door to much mischief. It opens the door to arbitrary determinations that speech which is truthful, but uncomfortable, is forbidden speech. A direct threat of violence etc., is another matter and while someone should not be forbidden to utter such they can be restrained and even sanctioned for making threats, but that is a special case.

Further, hate speech, like pornography, is in the eye/ear of the beholder and not all people are going to to be agreed that any given instance is in fact "hate speech". I frequently disagree with our resident racist pigs but I would not forbid their speaking even though I find it shallow, narrow minded, irrational, and even hateful.

Original_Intent  posted on  2013-03-19   13:01:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Original_Intent (#9) (Edited)

Hate speech is still speech. It is not an action nor is it a threat or attack on the well being or body of someone else.

Hate speech is a verbal attack which may lead to violence. In legal sense, this is called a foreseeable risk injury. The reason why the police put such notice up nearby the front desk where, is because Hate Speech is a foreseeable risk injury that leads to violence to which the police cannot protect you nor can they be sued for somebody else's irresponsible speech because they provided to the public Notice that Hate Speech is not tolerated. The Department of Justice also has this Notice as well. Same with FBI.

purplerose  posted on  2013-03-19   13:14:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: purplerose (#10)

Hate speech is a verbal attack which may lead to violence. In legal sense, this is called a foreseeable risk injury. The reason why the police put such notice up nearby the front desk where, is because Hate Speech is a foreseeable risk injury that leads to violence to which the police cannot protect you nor can they be sued for somebody else's irresponsible speech because they provided to the public Notice that Hate Speech is not tolerated.

Should I, as a Gentile, be able to claim that anybody who uses the word "anti- semite" in an attempt to stop discussion of the Holoco$t is guilty of inflammatory hate speech?? Gentiles might get their feelings hurt and then be forced to lash out in violence to speak truth to power. See how that works??

 photo 311ald.jpg

Isn't this hate speech??

 photo dallas004.jpg

Nobody was arrested when this was waved in Good White People's faces, so if it makes me mad and I kill a few thousand mexicon invaders then I'm not responsible for my actions because hate-speech incited me to kill. Am I getting it right???

Or is "hate-speech" only a club to beat down whitey, with NO repercussions for non-whites who get slimy ACLU lawyers to back up their hate-speech??

X-15  posted on  2013-03-19   16:14:11 ET  (2 images) Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: X-15 (#25)

You made an excellent point, X-15. Yes, anti-semitism is also absolutely hate speech just as the term "honkies" is hate speech directed towards whites. The original Civil Rights Act of 1866 applied to both whites and blacks. It is a shame that this is never brought up.

purplerose  posted on  2013-03-19   23:52:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: purplerose, X-15 (#31)

X-15 at #25: Should I, as a Gentile, be able to claim that anybody who uses the word "anti- semite" in an attempt to stop discussion of the Holoco$t is guilty of inflammatory hate speech??

purplerose at #31: You made an excellent point, X-15. Yes, anti-semitism is also absolutely hate speech

Not "anti-semitism", purplerose. Is it inflammatory Hate Speech for a Gentile to be called an "anti-semite" by someone who wants to stop debate of the Holocaust?

GreyLmist  posted on  2013-03-20   4:56:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 37.

        There are no replies to Comment # 37.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 37.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]